Tuesday, November 30, 2010

My Conflict with the Thought Police

Last week, the Thought Police at Facebook disabled my account. Today, I opened the reply to my appeal to Facebook. It follows:

“Hi Charles,

After reviewing your situation, we have determined that you violated our Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Please note that content which contains hate speech or promotes violence is not allowed on the site.

As such, we will not be able to reactivate your account for any reason. Unfortunately, we cannot provide additional information as to why your account was disabled. This decision is final and cannot be appealed.

Thanks for your understanding,

User Operations

I replied in this message:


In response to your charges, I will reply to the first one. I admit that I despise Islam. That is due to my opposition to the sexual molestation of pre-pubescent girls, to a man having multiple wives and beating them and exploiting them as mere sexual outlets and to misogyny in general. All of the Mohamadan perpetrators of these hateful acts find support for their crimes in the Koran and other Islamic texts. Does Facebook consider these above criticism? Do you, Daphne, as a woman, not want to condemn such cruelties instead of silencing someone who exposes these outrages?

As for your second accusation, I have never promoted violence in any post on Facebook. I advocated the execution of those who murder. In accordance with the criminal justice system of my country, the United States of America, such a statement does not violate any law against promoting violence. If you or your website consider the administration of capital punishment as ‘violence’, then you must ban all Islamic groups and Mohamadan accounts in order to remain consistent to your principles. Islamic scriptures and those who adhere to them demand executions of people without even a trial by jury in front of an impartial judge, an attorney to represent the interest of the accused or the possibility of appeal. The calls for killing people include supposed crimes such as a woman who was raped facing execution for adultery or for a Mohamadan who renounces Islam.

This banishment from Facebook obviously stems from the concerted effort by Islamists to deny me the right to express my views. The group behind revolutionmuslim.com has targeted me along with other detractors of Islam and its creator. In June of this year, this website encouraged its readers to file complaints on Facebook against us in order to squelch any criticism to Islam. Does Facebook support the freedom of thought and expression or does it want to implement the totalitarian demands of Islamists?

Wishing you imminent enlightenment,

Charles Kastriot”

This is the reply I received:

“Hi Charles,

Unfortunately, your account has been permanently disabled for violating Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. We will not be able to reactivate it for any reason, nor will we provide further information about your violation or the systems we have in place. This decision is final and cannot be appealed.


User Operations

The most disappointing aspect of this decision is the loss of contact with my friends. I have gained valuable insight and reassuring encouragement from many associates. I have connected with more than one thousand, six hundred civilized people who realize the imminent threat of Islam to freedom, human rights and representative government.

Friday, October 15, 2010

drivel from Mohamadan sheep named Ahle Tauheed

Ahle Tauheed sent this message to me through Facebook on the fourth of October 2010 at 10:04 am:
"burn all u want u son of still u cnt erase the glorys quran u kafiir may allah curse u die a dogs death ameen"

My reply on the fifth of October at 12:48am follows:
"I have no intention of erasing the absurd collection of moronic rantings called the Koran. I enjoy using pages from Korans as toilet paper far too much. Enjoy spending eternity being sodomized by a pig and being roasted in Hell. The child-molesting and murderous thief who fabricated your laughable totalitarian ideology is already receiving such punishment for his lifetime of evil.

"Your ignorance of grammar, punctuation and spelling reveal your general cerebral atrophy. Years of Islamic brainwashing have token a tragic toll on your mind. I know as much, if not more, about Islam than you do. The difference lies in the fact that I criticize the sexual perversion, misogyny, violence and totalitarianism inherent to Islam while you embrace those evils."

On the ninth of October at 12:19pm, the savage sent this message:
"ist learn islam moron u dnt even know anthing abt islam what u will defeat it , dum blind and deaf, the world will hear ur moranic calls oh man u will regret th day will come u can sit like a enuch and make websitse and facebook accounts tht all u can u enuch u dnt even who whos ur father ur linage is like tht like pigs ur people beget and unlawful piglets like u are born no wonder u end up doing this enuck like thinks ,u willsuffer 100%"

On October 15 at 12:26am, I replied:
"Your ignorance of grammar, punctuation and spelling reveal your general cerebral atrophy. Years of Islamic brainwashing have token a tragic toll on your mind. I know as much, if not more, about Islam than you do. The difference lies in the fact that I criticize the sexual perversion, misogyny, violence and totalitarianism inherent to Islam while you embrace those evils."

Friday, September 24, 2010

Who Is Obfuscating Sharia?

The residents of the Free World have arrived at a pivotal crossroads in the continuum of human history. However, not all members of this collective realize critical importance of their current location or even that history was ever plodding along with them included. Sadly, far too many do not realize that they find themselves at a juncture eerily similar to that of their parents and grandparents in the twentieth century.

I suspect that a majority of people living in North America and in Europe sense the menace festering within their respective countries. Certainly, only a tiny minority, just some Mohamadans and other dimwits in fact, deny the acts of war perpetrated by Mohamad Atta and his fellow hijackers in September of 2001, Nidal Malik Hassan at Fort Hood in 2009, or the jihadis’ bombings in Madrid in March of 2004 or in London in July of 2005. The recurring threats of Osama bin Laden, Anwar al-Awlaki, Anjem Choudary and other Islamist blowhards frequently remind anyone willing to pay attention of Islam’s malevolence. Even non-violent acts such as Feisal Abdul Rauf’s effort to build a monument to terrorism at Ground Zero grab the attention of conscientious people. However, efforts to propagate and impose Islam and its legal code, Sharia, occur in deceivingly forms hidden under condescension and dishonesty.

A recent example of the insidious efforts to camouflage the malignancy of Islam appeared on the Huffington Post website. On the third of September, 2010, Sumbul Ali-Karamali concocted a piece of Islamist disinformation entitled “Who’s Afraid of Sharia?” This authoress demonstrated takkiya, the Islamic practice of lying to infidels in order to benefit Mohamadans and their ideology, in undiluted toxicity. Besides denying the desire to spread their brand of totalitarianism which its inventor, Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in Hell forever), ordered his legions to do, she also attempted to obscure its malignancy. As Mohamad (MHBHF) declared in Koran 3:28, those following his ideology are permitted to pretend to befriend non-Mohamadans in order to avoid awakening Americans to their true intentions of eventual subjugation. The authoress certainly has adopted this advice.

This authoress claimed, “No one is advocating Sharia in the USA”. Omar M. Ahmad, founder of the Council on American Islamic Relations, said, "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant." He also declared, "The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America”. Is that not a sufficiently blunt statement of intent to impose Sharia from the creator of one of the foremost Islamist organization in the United States?

The takkiya continued with the statement “(T)hese six principles (of Sharia) sound a lot like those espoused in my very own Constitution of the United States. Except that these were developed over a thousand years ago.” I am compelled to shine the light of truth on these principles to expose their antithesis to the United States’ Constitution and another other document based on human rights, on the rule of law and on government based on consent of the governed.
6 principals allegedly espoused by Sharia follow below:

1.The right to the protection of life: Is she referring to the killing endorsed and practiced by Islam’s inventor? In March 624, Mo (MHBHF) recruited one of his goons to assassinate Asma bint Marwan, a poetess critical of Mohamad (MHBHF). The Mohamadan crept into her house, removed the child sleeping at her breast, drew his sword, and plunged it into her, killing her in her sleep. In April 624, Abu Afak, an elder of Medina had written a derogatory poem about Muhammad. Mo (MHBHF) asked his gang, "Who will deal with this rascal for me?" That night, one member, Salim bin Umayr, went and killed him. In September 624, Kab bin al-Ashraf, a member of the Jewish al-Nadr tribe in Medina wrote a widely circulated poem hostile to the Mohamadans. His writing recounted Mo’s (MHBHF) thugs slaughtering inhabitants of Mecca. Mohamad (MHBHF) asked, "Who would rid me of Kab?" Five Mohamadans volunteered. They informed him, "O apostle of God [Mohamad], we shall have to tell lies." He answered, "Say what you like, for you are free in the matter." Takkiya was thus born out of the lips of Islam fabricator. These examples are but a few of those who perished at the hands of Mohamad’s henchmen acting under his orders.

2.The right to the protection of family: Does she mean wife-beating and honor killing any female members who are raped? Koran Chapter 4:34 authorizes wife-beating. Mohamadan women are regularly brutalized for refusing to follow Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) commandment (Koran 24:31) to cover themselves completely. Sharia relies on testimony of only male witnesses without permitting other evidence such DNA samples taken from the victim.

3.The right to the protection of education: Exceptions to this alleged right include questioning Islam and renouncing it after discovering the numerous absurdities and cruelties enshrined within the Koran and Hadiths. Examples are Mo’s (MHBHF) laughable tale about the sun setting in a muddy spring as stated in Koran 18:86 and its place of rising in 18:90. Also, Mo (MHBHF) stated that the Earth is flat in Koran verses 79:30, 21:31 20:53 and 27:61. Koran 9:11-12 states that apostates will be treated ruthlessly for leaving Islam.

4. The right to the protection of religion: Sharia imposes draconian limitations on Jews & Christians. The Islamic legal code forbids them from building new churches or synagogues or repairing such existing structures. Sharia bars those groups from openly expressing, either verbally or physically, any manifestation of their faith such as praying in public, wearing a cross or a Star of David or reading from the Bible. As Koran 9:29 mandated, Mohamadans forcibly collect protection money from conquered Jews and Christians for more than millennium. After Mohamadans had bled those groups white, the Islamic authorities seized Jewish and Christian children as slaves. Under Sharia, Mohamadans grant Jews and Christians only as much freedom of religion as parasites allow their hosts the freedom to live.

5. The right to the protection of property: Women are considered property, on par with real estate. Mohamad (MHBHF) clearly stated in Koran 2:223 that women are to be exploited for the sexual gratification of their husbands just as fields exist for the use of their owners.

As far as property belonging to non-Mohamadans, those owners have no rights under Sharia. After Islamic hordes subjugated various lands, soon after the jihadis finished with raping and robbing the inhabitants, they desecrated or destroyed churches, synagogues, temples and other similar edifices. The Islamic conquerors converted these structures into mosks or other Islamic buildings or built Islamic structures on those sites. The Hagia Sophia in Constantinople plus the Church of Saint Nicholas and the Cathedral of Saint Helen in Damascus stand out as a few examples of Mohamadans’ co-opting of non-Islamic landmarks.

6. The right to the protection of human dignity: verses belittling Jews, Christians and others. Go to Defeat the Third Jihad to read the 527 verses (http://dttj.blogspot.com/2010/08/intolerance-toward-non-muslims-in-quran.html) critical of and hostile toward non-Mohamadans.

This Islamist continued with these declarations, “(T)he whole body of Islamic texts, which includes the (Koran), the sayings of the Prophet, and the books of interpretive literature written by medieval Muslim scholars. The first two are considered divine.” So rantings of Mo (MHBHF) are considered divine? Mo (MHBHF) received supposed revelations that always conveniently permitted him to do whatever he wanted, whether taking his daughter-in-law for his own wife after seeing her undressing, giving him permission to have an unlimited number of wives while other men were limited to four, and increasing his share of booty stolen from people who rejected his claim to prophethood and dictatorship. Where are the accounts of eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen or heard Allah's alleged “revelations” to Mo (MHBHF)? No one else heard Mo's (MHBHF) so-called “revelations”. He claimed to be alone whenever he claimed that Allah gave him a message. That is a suspiciously convenient cover for such a huckster like Mo (MHBHF).

“No religion gets to be 1400 years old and the second largest in the world unless it's flexible and adaptable,” Ali-Karamali lied. Koran 2:2 clearly states that whatever Mo (MHBHF) said is recorded in the Koran is absolutely true and not to be doubted. Therefore, anyone remaining true to the rantings of Mo (MHBHF) must maintain that the Koran is inerrant and immutable. This authoress dishonestly declares that Islam has allows for change of its doctrines and has morphed over time. Any deviance from the littoral words of the Koran has rarely occurred and was quickly and brutally crushed by Islamists.

“(A)dultery was made such a fantastically difficult crime to prove that the punishment was impossible to apply. Historically, stoning was very rarely implemented in the Islamic world,” she denied history. As decreed by Mo (MHBHF), four witnesses needed (Koran 24:4 and 24:13 plus Hadith Bukhari 5:59:462), otherwise a raped woman accusing her victimizer incriminates herself as to having committed adultery. Koran 2:282 establishes that a woman's testimony is worth only half that of a man's in court so any “he said, she said” disputes always give a man more credibility despite any evidence to the contrary.

The dishonesty continues with her unsubstantiated claim that “(t)he vast majority of Muslims today do not believe in stoning people for adultery.” Says who? Has this authoress conducted a comprehensive survey of Mohamadans’ views of Koran-based executions of those accused of adultery? If so, then she must publish them. Otherwise, she is merely spouting baseless propaganda of Islam’s apologists.

“As for other scary stories attributed to (Sharia), like honor killings, veiling of women, and female genital cutting, these are cultural practices and not Islamic,” denies this authoress. Mohamadan women are regularly brutalized for refusing to follow Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) commandment in Koran 24:31 to cover themselves completely. According to the Hadith of Umm Atiyyah, Mohamad (MHBHF) stated that the cutting of female genitals is acceptable. In Koran 24:2, Mo (MHBHF) mandated flogging for those accused of fornication. The Hadith of Sahi Muslim No. 4206 outlines Mohamad (MHBHF) ordering the execution by stoning of a woman who admitted to adultery. Under Sharia, women receive only half a share of inheritance (Koran 4:11) and their testimony is worth only half of that from a man (Koran 2:282). Hadith of Sahih Bukhari,Volume 3, Book 48, Number 826 derides women’s intelligence, thus supporting the misogynistic elements of Islamic laws.

Ali-Karamali denies reality in her statement, “(Sharia) is a set of religious principles and is not the law of the land anywhere in the world.” Saudi Arabia, Iran and Sudan govern with Sharia as the sole legal code within their borders. The unfortunate citizens of those countries must adhere to the dictates of Mo (MHBHF) or else face the punishments ordered by the inventor of Islam.

She blatantly lied, “the Prophet himself never tried to implement an ‘Islamic state,’ " Mo (MHBHF) was the dictator of Medina and later the rest of the Arabian Peninsula. His pronouncements were the law which he fabricated and abrogated whenever the whim struck him. His unquestionable orders were codified into what we now call Sharia.

The authoress ignored historical evidence in claiming “(t)raditionally, in the Islamic world, the institutions that governed were always separate from the institutions that developed religion.” Mo’s succeeding caliphates were all absolute overlords in all matters, religious and political. Whatever fiat that they decreed, was an order which no one could challenge without risking his or her life.

She persisted with the takkiya such as “every Islamic empire was a multi-religious, multicultural empire, in which religious minorities were governed by their own laws.” Jews & Christians had odious restrictions and mandates hoisted on them for refusing to convert to Islam. I refer her to my response to the fourth tenet of Sharia. Jews and Christians could not proselytize to Mohamadans. Mohamadans were forbidden to renounce Islam without facing execution.

“In fact, Islam contains plenty of concepts consistent with modern democracy,” Ali-Karamali laughably wrote without providing a shred of evidence to support this absurd claim. Representative democracy is the complete antithesis of Islam. No one was allowed to vote to overturn any of Mo’s (MHBHF) dictates or remove him from his self-appointed position of “prophet”. The same autocratic standards applied under the absolute dictators who followed Mo (MHBHF) as “caliphs”. Under a modern democracy, a government derives its power from the consent of the citizens through elections. Under Islam, governance is based on the whimsical rantings of one megalomaniac which are not open to alteration or abolition.

“The (Koran) contains many verses advocating religious tolerance,” spewed this Islamist in hopes of deceiving those ignorant of the entire Koran. Those few verses of apparent tolerance occurred when Mo (MHBHF) and his cult were a weak minority in Mecca. After seizing power in Medina and amassing a massive army, he abrogated those verses and replaced them anti-Jewish, Christophobic and otherwise violently hostile rantings. Among the last orders from Mo (MHBHF) include this verse, "Fight against such as those to whom the Scriptures were given (Jews and Christians).until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued." (Koran 9:29)

Despite clear contradictions located in the Koran, the authoress spewed “(i)t is established in Islam that you don't need to be Muslim to go to heaven.” I quote the Koran: "The only true faith in God's sight is Islam." (3:19) "It is He who has sent forth His apostle with guidance and the true Faith [(Islam) to make it triumphant over all religions, however much the idolaters (non-Mohamadans) may dislike it." (9:31). Koran 4:47 commands Jews and Christians to believe Mo’s (MHBHF) ideology or they will be destroyed.

She deceptively offered, “The only verses about fighting in the (Koran) refer specifically to the polytheistic Arab tribes who were trying to kill the Prophet in the (seven)th century.” I refer her to my response to the first tenet of Sharia. In those three examples, Mo (MHBHF) ordered murders of poets simply for composing verses critical of Mohamad (MHBHF), not for threatening his life. Mo (MHBHF) urged murder of his enemies in Koranic verses 2:244, 2:191, 2:216, 4:76, 4:89, 5:33, 9:5, 9:73, 9:111 and 9:123

This Islamist spewed more lies, “the (Koran) repeatedly commands particular respect of Jews and Christians. It is established in Islam that you don't need to be Muslim to go to heaven.” A blatant lie since 9:29 specifically calls for fighting and subjugating Jews and Christians. The next verse erroneously accuses Jews of claiming that Ezra is the son of God. Due to this supposed sin of Jews and Christians declaring that God has a son, Mo (MHBHF) pronounced in 3:151 that Allah will terrorize them. Koran (5:59-60) says the “People of the Bible” are descended from apes and pigs. The Hadith of Ishaq:250 supports this claim. Koran 59:14 reads "The Jews are devoid of sense. There is a grievous punishment awaiting them. Satan tells them not to believe so they will end up in Hell." Hadith Bukhari (59:727) indicates "Allah's curse be on the Jews and the Christians" was among Mo’s (MHBHF) final words before his death. Ishaq 240 quotes Mo (MHBHF) "The Jews are a nation of liars” and “The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people" Koran 3:118, 5:51, 80 and 3:28 plus Hadiths Ishaq:364, and Hadith of Ishaq:262 forbids befriending Jews and Christians and threaten damnation for Mohamadans who do so. Hadith of Tabari VIII:130 details "The Messenger said during his final illness, 'Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.' Umar investigated the matter, then sent to the Jews, saying: 'Allah has given permission for you to be expelled; for I have received word that the Prophet said that two religions cannot coexist in Arabia." Koran 98:1 "Surely the unbelievers and idolaters from the People of the Book will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures." She must expect that no Jew or Christian would ever try to verify her patently false utterances.

“Repeating a lie over and over again doesn't make it true; but it certainly results in people believing the lie,” the authoress concluded. Finally, something uttered by this authoress which contains any truth. She is following example of her fellow Islamists who engage of repeated spewing of disinformation to shroud the truly violent, misogynistic and oppressive cornerstones of Islam. Like their fellow advocate of a species of totalitarianism, Joseph Goebbels stated, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.


Thursday, September 9, 2010

Condensed Retort to Ground Zero Monstrosity

I wish to respond to the Islamists, their useful idiots and the ignorant sheeple who indignantly whine about the opposition to the proposed monstrosity at Ground Zero. All of these bleat about the freedoms enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Ironically, these same liberties will disappear if the Islamists ever seize control of the United States' government. Until the Islamists achieve their goal of undermining and destroying the American republic, they will continue, with the aid of other statists and other mushy-headed types, to squeal about imagined injustices against Mohamadans.

The opposition to the planned monument to the jihadis' mass murder at Ground Zero is not denying Islamists' freedom of religion. They are free to pray to their meteorite in Mecca, spout the hateful and violent verses of the criminal who fabricated their totalitarian ideology and otherwise continue to wallow in their pitiful lunacy. However, the civilized people in the United States do not have to permit the construction of structures that will bolster the Islamic infection. This insult to the memory of all the murdered civilians will serve as yet another malignant tumor which will further metastasize the cancer called Islam.

As Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson wisely stated, "The Bill of Rights is not a suicide pact."


Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Messages from a Mohamadan in Spain

Last week, I received a message from a particularly idiotic Mohamadan who is a member of the occupation of Spain. I am posting his drivel and my replies. I have not altered anything which he or I wrote other to translate them into English:

Bilal Borras Navarro September 2 at 1:14pm
"no hay nada más atrevido que la ignorancia. Ni todos los marroquis son musulmanes ni todos los españoles son católicos"
"there is nothing more daring than ignorance. Not all Moroccans are Muslims and not all are Catholic Spanish"

My reply on September 2 at 1:32pm
"What is the point of your message? I never said anything about all Moroccans being Mohamadans or all Spanish being Catholic. There is nothing more suicidally asinine than a resident of the Free World apologizing for Islam."

From Bilal Borras Navarro on September 3 at 9:51am
yo no hago apología del Islam, y soy musulman, y español como el que más. ERES RACISTA, entonces?
"I make no apology for Islam, and I am Muslim, and Spanish as they come. YOU ARE RACIST, then?"

From me on September 4 at 9:04am:
"Provide one example of my alleged racism! You Mohamadans falsely accuse anyone who criticizes your totalitarian ideology of racism. Since you are obviously not smart enough to figure this out on your own, I will spell it out for you. ISLAM IS NOT A RACE!

"You are a disgrace to the memory of the millions of Spaniards who suffered for centuries under Islamic tyranny and oppression!"

From Bilal Borras Navarro on September 5 at 6:00am:
"es verdad,era mejor la Santa Inquisicion, si pensabas de otra forma ibas a la hoguera, asi conquistamos las Americas y los Ingleses el resto del mundo. IMPONIENDO NUESTRA VERDAD, LA VERDADERA. TODOS IRAN AL CIELO POR SUS BUENAS ACCIONES. VERDAAAAAD????
Gracias a la cultura de otras naciones las matematicas, la agricultura, la astrofisica, la astronomia, y otras ciencias que ahora consideramos nuestras seguirian en el olvido y seguiriamos pensando que la Tierra es plana, es lo que pensaba el Cristianismo, les debes tanto que os da miedo admitirlo"

"is true, the Holy Inquisition was better, if you thought otherwise were going to the bonfire, so we conquer the Americas and the English the rest of the world. Impose our TRUE, TRUE. ALL go to heaven for good deeds. VERDAAAAAD?? Thanks to the culture of other nations in math, agriculture, astrophysics, astronomy and other sciences that we now consider our would follow into oblivion and continue to feel that the earth is flat, it's what I thought Christianity , we must therefore admit that I'm afraid"

My response on September 7 at 11:42pm:
"So you prefer the centuries of Islamic relegation of others to third class status, forced to pay protection money, called jizya, to their Mohamadan oppressors or face death or enslavement? So you agree with Sharia-based injunctions against non-Mohamadans reciting their scriptures aloud, ringing bells, wearing identifiable symbols of their differing religions and any other manifestations of pride and fealty to other faiths? Do you support Islamic mandates to destroy churches, temples and other non-Islamic structures or else, forcibly seize them then convert into mosks, madrassas or other Islamic buildings? The violent and oppressive elements of the Spanish Inquisition have no basis for support within Christian scriptures, canonical or apocryphal. In contrast, the Koran and Hadiths openly mandate the murder, robbery, rape and enslavement of those who disagree with Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) totalitarian lunacy.

"In referencing the Spanish and English colonization, you conveniently ignore the Islamic conquest and subjugation of huge swaths of territory in Europe, Africa and Asia. Mohamadans killed or enslaved millions of Christians and others for more than a millennium. All these atrocities occurred with the blessing of the criminal who fabricated your ideology.

"As your spouting of that Islamic fallacy about Christianity supporting the idea of a 'flat Earth', name any verse in the Bible which states that error.

"In contrast, Mohamad (MHBHF) clearly exposed his erroneous belief that the Earth is flat. In Koran 18:86, he describes someone traveling to the place where the sun sets. In 18:90, he mentions someone traveling to where the Sun rises. Koran 36:37-38 and the Hadith by Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 421 confirms Mo's (MHBHF) absurd error on what happens to the sun when it "sets". Only an ignorant savage would think that a person find such a place considering that the setting of the Sun is merely the Earth rotating away from the Sun, not a place at the end of a flat surface where the Sun disappears.

"In three different Koranic verses (verses 20:55, 2:20 and 71:18-19), Mo (MHBHF) claimed that Allah spread out the Earth like a carpet. That is not possible considering that the Earth is a sphere which has no flat surface. In four different passages of the Koran (31:9, 16:15, 78:6-7, 21:32 Mo (MHBHF) stated that mountains are needed to keep the Earth pinned down so it will not roll up like a scroll would. In Koran verses 20:53, 43:10, 78:6 and 79:30, Mo (MHBHF) said that Allah spread out the Earth like a bed, an obvious flat surface.

"I see that you have already proceeded to the next page of the script of Islamic disinformation. I challenged you to name any proof of my supposed racism. Of course, you cannot since I never made any statements regarding race. You then jumped to the Islamic fallacy of the supposed infallibility of the Koran and its creator, Mohamad ibn Abdullah (MHBHF). I am sure that you will turn to the last page of the Mohamadan playbook for your next message to me: baseless insults and threats of violence toward me and my family.

"So what attracts you to Islam? Do you like beating women and treating them like mere property to use for your own sexual gratification? Do you enjoy having sex with a pre-pubescent girl just like Mo (MHBHF) did? Are you looking forward to killing some non-Mohamadans so you can spend eternity in an orgy?"

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Obama's Next Vacation Destination

I am expecting to read a news report to this effect any day in the near future.

White House spokesman Jayson Blair announced today the intended destination for President Obama’s next vacation. “The President will depart from Washington and fly to Saudi Arabia with Americans of Middle Eastern origin. He intends to spend a few days in Mecca conducting meetings between his traveling companions and Islamic clergy and Saudi governmental officials.” Blair continued, “The reason for their journey to Mecca is to perform the hajj, the required pilgrimage for all adherents to Islam once in their lives.”

In response to a reporter’s questioning of why President Obama would engage in an obviously Islamic ritual, Blair replied, “The President wants to demonstrate his heartfelt adherence to Christianity while also showing the whole world his commitment to religious diversity.”

The reporter persisted, “How is the President demonstrating his Christian beliefs by performing an Islamic ritual?”

Blair declined to comment then called on another reporter.

The second reporter inquired, “Considering that Saudi Arabia bars all non-Mooslums from entering Mecca and even imprisons anyone espousing non-Islamic beliefs or possessing texts and implements used by other religions within the Saudi kingdom, how is the President’s action connected to religious diversity?”

Blair waved to members of White House security and whispered to them out of range of the microphone. The security members forcibly escorted both reporters out of the White House. Blair informed the remainder of the media, “There will be no further questions taken.”


Monday, August 23, 2010

Cultural Sensitivity for That Sacred Day in September

The people of the Free World will be commemorating the deaths of nearly three thousand civilians at the hands of jihadis next month. What can Mohamadans do to ensure that they do not unwittingly offend their civilized counterparts during the sacred month of September? In response to the demands of Mohamadans and of their useful idiots for deference to Islamic mandates regarding Ramabomb, I submit this list of equitable responses from them.

-Remove your burkas, nikabs, and all other misogynistic clothing that Islamists demand that every woman wear. We object to women being forced to hide under oppressive outfits because some men erroneously think that they cannot control their libidos.

-Leave your absurd superstitions like fear of sitting toilets and dogs plus your phobia of pork and alcohol in the Islamic bloc when you enter the Free World. We do not like to be told what we are allowed to eat or drink based on others’ delusions.

-Cease quoting from the Koran or any other Islamic texts that encouraged those terrorists to commit mass murder and condones their actions. We know that your supposedly sacred scriptures are full of hateful oppression directed toward us. We resent the threats which your ilk spews in reciting these totalitarian texts.

-Dispense with any absurd and baseless conspiracies that anyone other than nineteen Arab Mohamadans committed these crimes. At least have the decency to admit that your cult wants to kill us.

-Stop the plan to build a monument near Ground Zero to the Islamic terrorists who carried out the hijackings. Such a construction will provoke a formidable backlash against those who wish to gloat over our losses.

I wish a peaceful eleventh of September to all civilized people. Likewise, to all Mohamadans, I hope for your complete failure in all your attempts at violence during the remainder of Ramabomb.


Saturday, August 7, 2010

Tough Times for Gaza Residents

I wonder if it is possible to ever find an honest assessment such as this hypothetical report about the Philistines...

Tough Times for Gaza Residents
By Mohamad al-Dhimmi for the Al-Jihad Network

Months of restrictions by Israel on the inflow of goods into Gaza Strip has caused shortages of essential items in high demand among the residents. Tensions have been rising among the local population as they scramble to improvise so as to avoid disruption of their lives. Residents gladly spoke to this reporter in order to vent their frustrations and demand that the rest of the world break the blockade.

One of them, Ahmad Waeef-Beetah, lamented the loss of his prized cane.

"It broke last week as I was hitting my second wife. Since then I have had to use one of my shoes to keep her in accordance with the will of Allah. Can you imagine having to beat your wives with an old sandal? Because of the inhuman blockade, I have to remove my shoes, give them to a wife to clean, beat her with it then hand it back to her for another cleaning. It's barbaric what the Jews are forcing me to resort to," Waeef-Beetah moaned.

He continued, "Yesterday, I was so exhausted after discipling wife number one and number two, I didn't have any strength to deal with my other two wives." At this point, tears began welling up in his eyes as his voice began to escalate, "I had to order number three and number four to beat each other. At first, I felt so ashamed that I couldn't perform my duties proscribed by Allah."
Regaining his composure, a smile crept across his face after he wiped his cheeks, "As I sat in my home watching them smack each other, I felt the presence of Allah comforting me. My shame disappeared as I continued to see them striking one another. Soon, the sight of the blood and their shrieking had made my minaret fully vertical. Praise be to Allah!"

A health-care provider, Aiduh Kuttah, also bitterly complained about the dearth of medical supplies available to her. "The Jews have hurt my livelihood with their blockade. It has been harder to find the right type of tools I use to perform cliterectomies. Parents keep contacting me to cut their daughter's private parts as the Prophet proscribed but all my small razor blades are very dull now. I have tried larger objects which I never heard of before. I found something called a 'steak knife' that infidels use. I have heard the infidels use of these items when they sit, men and women together, in the same room, women's faces shamelessly uncovered, eating at the same time. What an abomination! May Allah forgive me for resorting to using the wicked implements of the infidels for a holy practice."

A youth counselor, Anas T. Kaboom complained about shortages affecting his group's activities for the neighborhood children.

"I have struggled to find enough properly fitting vests for the children. Many of the vests are too small to be correctly loaded. Others lack enough pockets and the pockets are too small to hold enough nails, ball bearings or any other type of small objects. Sometimes, the pockets rip open when we try to pack in a lot of shards of glass or screws," he lamented.
He paused to stop himself from sobbing then resumed, "The children are becoming impatient waiting to martyr themselves. They cry every day when I have to tell them that we don't have enough explosives for everybody. So scuffles break out when they stand in line to gather supplies to make their vests to go to Paradise. I bet the wicked Jews are laughing evilly when they see these wonderful boys and girls being deprived of the chance to go to their eternal reward. I curse Israel for this injustice!" He spat on the ground after completing his statement.

Locals are placing hope in rumors of a flotilla of more cargo ships setting sail from Europe and Turkey. Additionally, huge groups of the faithful engage in mass prayer sessions five times per day in between shopping at the newly opened mega-mall which opened in Gaza in July.


Monday, June 14, 2010

Unexpected Inspiration

Just as I was starting to believe that none of my articles were being read or even noticed, I recently received two messages through Facebook. Two Mohamadans reminded me why I compose and publish the truth about the evils of Islam and why it must be destroyed. Mohamadans have sent me two types of correspondence. One, usually from females, consists of gushing praise for Islam and Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) along with claims that I do not understand Islam. The other type, usually from males, includes vulgar insults and threats of violence, usually of a sexual nature. This month, I have received an example of each.

The first example arrived from a savage calling himself "Bakor". On the tenth of June, at 3:18pm, I received this bilge from this foul-mouthed barbarian. It appears exactly in the same form in which I received it.

"hi this message is actually something else intended
FUCK YOU BITCH MUTHA fucka!!!!! if you dare say a thing about islam again i will pound the fuck out of u!!!!!!! and make u suck my dick like a pretty boy that u r! and PS ur pic doesnt represent islam just PAKISTAN and they are worth more then u bitch"

Later that day, I replied,
"My picture represents Islam since it has been used by Mohamadans for centuries in reference to the fictitious lunar deity called Allah. Pakistan is not the only Islamic wasteland which features the crescent moon. Malaysia, Algeria, Turkey and several other hellholes also display it on their flags as does the Red Crescent Organization. Obviously, you need to do some research, you ignorant savage.

I will continue to speak the truth about Islam, Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) and the morons like you who adhere to his insane rantings. I dare you to try to stop me. If you attack me, I would enjoy reducing you to a whimpering and bloody stain on the ground!

Unlike you, I have zero interest in homosexual activity so take your offer of fellatio to the other perverts who flock to your mosk. You should stick to what is your expertise: raping little boys and being sodomized by pigs. Burn in Hell alongside the criminal who fabricated your ideology!"

The following day I found this message in my inbox on my Facebook page from Yasmin Adam on June 11 at 8:39am:
"ur profile pic is very provoking
and i'm really sad that there's ppl like u in the world coz terrorists come out from ppl like u who hate a religions and act like fanatics ewww i'm disgusted seriously u such a racist"

Here is my reply on June 12 at 12:24am:
"Terrorists do not come from people who support democracy, advocate for equal rights for women and extol capitalism like myself."

"I dare you to provide any evidence of my supposed racism. Name just one shred of proof that have criticized or discriminated against anyone because of his/her race!

"I am really sad that naive and dishonest people like exist to apologize for true terrorists who propagate Islam."

This is how she answered on June 12 at 11:51am:
"ur profile picture show that u support racism
i'm not going to tell u "O islam is a great religion blah blah blah" coz i don't care what u think of islam or muslims
but it just piss me off that When u attack black people,they call it Racism. When u attack Jewish people,they call it Anti-semetism. When you attack women, they call it Sexism. When you attack homosexuality,they call it Intolerance. When u attack ur country,they call it Treason.But when u attack islam u want to call it democracy??"

So I started dismantling her warped vision of the world, distorted by Islamic disinformation on June 12 at 12:15pm:
"Islam is an ideology, not a race. Therefore opposition to Islam has no connection to racism. Mohamadans consist of various races.

"Yes, criticism of Islam is an expression of democratic freedom. Under democracy, a government derives its power by consent of the citizens and the will of the majority to choose its leaders. One of the most important God-given rights is the freedom of speech.

"Under Islam, a government derives its power by adherence to the rantings of a seventh century Arabian criminal and brutally crushing anyone who does not hold those views. Anyone differing with the lunacy spouted by Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) is oppressed, threatened or killed in an Islamic regime.

"Islam consists of totalitarianism, misogyny, terrorism, pedophilia, violence and other despicable traits. So why do you defend an ideology that promotes dictatorship, wife-beating, polygyny, sex with pre-pubescent girls plus murder, rape and robbery of non-believers?"

She tried soft-peddle Islam at this point on June 12 at 4:23pm:
"o-k-a-y may i knew from where u learned that?
i'm a muslim girl who live in a muslim country and let me tell u how we live
i have two sisters they r both married to the guy they love and by their choice
and about polygyny it's a choice if the wife didn't agree then she can get divorce
and about the governmet thing all the governmnets everywhere is assholes they lie and manipulate with their people
and don't u dare insult muhmad (peace be upon him) coz u know nothing about him, u r just a guy who is blind with hate and it really kills me to hear what u just said about my religion


At this point, I decided to inundate her with quotes taken straight from Islamic texts to expose her to what her ideology truly supports on June 13 at 11:55pm"
"I learned about the various evils spouted by Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) by reading a Koran and other Islamic texts. Simply by pointing to verses from the Koran and other sources, I will enlighten you about your ideology.

"Have you ever even read any of Mo's (MHBHF) rantings? I do not mean mindlessly reciting or memorizing verses in an archaic dialect of Arabic which very few Mohamadans understand. I refer to reading the Koran or other Islamic texts in a language in which you can read and comprehend.

"The difference between a democratic government and an Islamic one is that under democracy, any laws can be changed by the citizens. Under an Islamic regime, no one is allowed to institute a law that contradicts whatever Mo (MHBHF) ordered or forbid. Islamist justify their terrorism, misogyny, totalitarianism, pedophilia, violence and other despicable crimes by pointing to the words and deeds of Mo (MHBHF).

"Regarding divorce women have no freedom to dump a husband for his polygyny since Mo (MHBHF) restricted their freedom to divorce (Hadith Bukhari vol.7 no.121,122 p.93 and vol.7 chapter 93 vol.7 no.130 p.99) In fact, Mo authorized polygyny. So you accept the practice of allowing Mohamadan men to have simultaneous sexual relationships with multiple wives and slaves while a Mohamadan woman must remain monogamous to this man (Koran 4:3)? Do you like being viewed as a piece of property which Mo (MHBHF) did in Koran 2:223 or as an animal as he did in Hadith Tabari Vol 9, Number 1754 ? Do enjoy the idea that your testimony must be corroborated by another woman to be considered equal to the testimony of just one man (Koran 2:282 and Hadith Bukhari 6:301)?Are you happy with receiving only half of an inheritance of a male relative (Koran 4:11)? So you consider yourself as inferior to men as Mo (MHBHF) proclaimed in Koran 2:228 and 4:34?

"I will continue to insult Mo (MHBHF) and all the weak-minded sheep who blindly adhere to his evil rantings. I will never stop until everyone in the world has been liberated from his totalitarianism. Which is more deplorable, for you to feel "killed" from reading the truth about Islam and its fabricator (MHBHF) or for you and other Mohamadans to kill those who disagree with your ideology?


Yasmin's pathetic whimper came like this on June 14 at 5:49am:
"well,it still hurt when u say this bad words but i trust my ppl so much and i LOVE my religion and i won't give up on my ppl and again i don't care what u think and islam will propagate around the wold isn't it amazing how there's ppl like u who hate islam and say bad things about it but there's ppl still convert !
anyways thank u for the good talk u just made me believe more in my religion ^_^ i'll pray for u"

She sent to me a link to YouTube.com for a recording entitled "Fuck You" by Lily Allen.

In conclusion, I concluded this exchange like this earlier today:
"I am not amazed that barbarous men and feeble-minded women convert to Islam. This ideology is well suited for their mental and moral deficiencies. The same sort of moronic savages have always embraced other forms of totalitarianism too.

"Many Mohamadans have renounced Islam. Those with enough strength of character and wisdom realize the absurd insanity of Mo's (MHBHF) rantings. Of course, they are not as highly visible as sheep who are seduced by Islam. Also, the ex-Mohamadans live in fear of murder by jihadis determined to enforce Mo's (MHBHF) commandment to kill anyone who abandons Islam.

"I am not surprised that you cannot refute any of the statements which I made exposing the numerous evils of your ideology. You may choose to continue your blissful ignorance instead of confronting the appalling crimes advocated and celebrated by your fellow Mohamadans. However, you only perpetuate the self-destructive insanity.

"By the way, your feebly vulgar link made me laugh. This pathetic attempt at a response shows how meager is your level of cerebral functioning after years of Islamic brainwashing."

In closing, I would like to thank both Bakor and Yasmin. You two numskulls have encouraged me to further pursue the obliteration of Islam.

Saturday, June 5, 2010

Return to Their Place of Origin

Helen Thomas' comments regarding Jews supposedly occupying Arab lands provided some provocative suggestions. This White House reporter demands that one group of people should return to their place of origin. In order to remain honestly consistent, why is she not demanding the expulsion of recent infiltrators into the United States of America, Canada and Europe?

Thomas' comments included the desire for Jews to return to Poland and Germany. One can rightfully ask where should the Sephardim go? What would be the fate of Jews who left, often expelled involuntarily and under threat of violence, from Yemen, Iran, Morocco and other Islamic nations? Also, what about the Jews living in the territory surrounding Jerusalem for centuries despite the Islamic conquest and subsequent oppression?

So where are Thomas' calls for the removal of outsiders who have been encroaching into the country of her residence? Mohamadans have been infiltrating the United States of American for decades. They have been granted citizenship despite violating standards mandated by Congress as essential for gaining citizenship. The Immigration and Naturalization Act of bars anyone espousing a totalitarian ideology in Section 313 under Title III of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. Considering that Islamic governance is based on enforcing the whimsical utterances of seventh century dictator and his successors instead of consent of the citizens and will of the majority, Islam clearly demonstrates its totalitarian foundation. Additionally, anyone engaging in polygamy or intending to do so cannot legally naturalize under Section 212(10)(A) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. However, Islam explicitly permits polygamy while considering a man with several simultaneous marriages as the role model for human behavior. Therefore, one can logically assume that anyone adhering to Islam does so in opposition to representative democracy and its ideals.

While discussing the topic of people returning to their place of origin, Helen Thomas should follow her own demands. She has one of two options. First of them is for Helen Thomas to leave the United States to go back to Lebanon, the place of her parents' birth. Otherwise, she must return to her other homeland where she was better suited in her role of hostess of "Tales from the Crypt".


Saturday, May 15, 2010

Out of Sight, Not out of Mind

A recent press release has faded too quickly from the national consciousness. Like fireworks, some news stories burst into public view then fade immediately upon the explosion of another event. In contrast to the awesome beauty of fireworks displays, this announcement deserves a glaring spotlight to expose one of the most awfully ugly aspects of Islam. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/health/policy/07cuts.html?partner=rss&emc=rss)

The American Academy of Pediatrics decided to change its previous opposition to any medically unnecessary procedure performed on the genitals of a girl. Its members indicated that the federal law barring such procedures should be modified to allow some form of restricted cutting of female genitals. Their argument supposes that families will take their girls outside of the United States in order to lacerate them if not allowed to undergo genital mutilation in the USA. Does the AAP consider the words of Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) in the Hadith of Umm ‘Atiyyah condoning cutting female genitalia as superseding proven gynecological evidence of the harm of female genital mutilation? Such compromise at the expense of girls’ physical and mental health reeks of acquiescence to Sharia-creep.

The line of reasoning of the proposed change in policy stands out as tragically laughable. A counter analogy that I would offer is the advice to leave the doors and windows open in one’s house for the benefit of burglars. Following the rationale of the AAP, burglars are just going to break into houses anyway. Why not make it easier for them? With this type of submission to their demands, the results would end less destructively. Sure, the appliances, jewelry and other valuables will be stolen but at least the burglars will not be prosecuted and homeowner will not incur the cost of replacing damaged doors or windows.

Any form of female genital mutilation is a totally unnecessary procedure. It not only robs the victims of sexual pleasure it also interfere with proper functioning of female excretory system. This criminal act involves intentionally damaging or amputating a healthy organ and surrounding vital tissue. One has to wonder if Islamists would endorse castration for a lustful man who refuses to control his sexual impulses. Given that Islam’s inventor felt no need to rein in his libido, why would those following his ideology have such concerns?

This inhumane butchery follows in the vein of misogyny rampant throughout Islam. The Mohamadan mentality rooted in Sharia holds a woman responsible for all perceived problems related to sexuality. If she is raped, she must prove herself innocent with the testimony of four male witnesses. The burden falls on women to wear suffocating and dehumanizing outfits in order to hide themselves from the gazes of men. Instead of teaching boys to respect women as equal members of humanity, Islamists consider women as inherently inferior. Boys are indoctrinated into viewing females as either subordinate family members or as inferior objects created for their sexual gratification. Of course, all of this negativity directed toward the feminine half of humanity originated in the mind of and out of the libido of Islam’s fabricator (May he burn in Hell forever).

This tradition of savagery occurs solely for the benefit of Mohamadans who believe that its victims will not commit fornication or adultery. Apparently these Neanderthals never considered other, non-sadistic alternatives. A few come to my mind. First of all, the marriage of pre-pubescent or teenage girls to men twice their age or older would certainly motivate a girl to rebel by seeking affection of someone else. If women are allowed to choose their own husbands, they are much less likely to try to seek extramarital relationships with men. Women’s fidelity is easier to secure if their husband respond in kind. Why should a woman feel compelled to remain monogamously loyal to her husband while he is allowed to engage in de facto debauchery under the guise of polygyny and unrestricted sexual activity with his female slaves or servants called "concubines"?

As long as men view the Koran and Islamic texts as the guide to proper treatment of women, atrocities like FGM will continue. If Mohamadan men want to dabble in some radical measures to maintain the loyalty of their wives, perhaps they might consider thinking of a wife as equal partner in a relationship, not merely as an inherently inferior outlet for their sexual urges. If Mohamadan men want to engage in some further extremism, they could include some flowers and breaks from domestic drudgery from time to time. I am sure that women would appreciate that "outside of the Koran" type of thinking.

Islamists and their useful idiots relish attempts of conflation of female genital mutilation and circumcision. No scientist would make an analogy between circumcision and FGM unless he is hopelessly blinded by devotion to every word in Islamic texts. Circumcision involves the cutting of a section of superficial skin. This procedure does not obstruct normal functioning of the incised area. For the women and uncircumcised men in my readership, I relate circumcision to the removal of an earlobe. Obviously, the ear’s appearance would be altered. Nevertheless, the functioning of the ear would not be damaged or destroyed. Normal hearing would continue despite such a superfluous procedure. The hygienic benefits resulting from circumcision have been discussed for decades and will probably be up for debate in the foreseeable future. However, clitorectomies or any cutting of female genitals provides no benefit to the victim, only pain and degradation.

A clear-thinking person must certainly wonder about the silence of feminists on this issue. The mere discussion of anything short of totally unrestricted abortion at any point of a pregnancy fully funded by taxpayers elicits shrieks of ”misogyny” from the National Organization for Women and its cohorts. Where are demonstrations in the streets demanding harsher penalties for those mutilating the genitals of girls? Why are no feminists protesting outside the offices of the Council on American-Islamic Relations and those of other Islamists clamoring for those groups to condemn publicly all forms of female genital mutilation? Does the feminists’ fear of jihadist reprisal override their often bellowed concern for women’s health and choice? Apparently, feminist allegiance to political correctness precludes any criticism that Mohamadans would label as "Islamophobic".

The AAP’s acquiescence to Islamic barbarity must never be tolerated. Georganne Chapin, executive director of an advocacy group called Intact America, rightfully illuminated the situation. She stated, “There are countries in the world that allow wife beating, slavery and child abuse, but we don’t allow people to practice those customs in this country. We don’t let people have slavery a little bit because they’re going to do it anyway, or beat their wives a little bit because they’re going to do it anyway.” It behooves us to take heed of her words to spare any more girls this cruel indignity and severely punish those who inflict such torture.


Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Lesson Learned Yet?

A series of questions weighs heavily on my mind so I would like to pose them to anyone reading this article. How many more Mohamadans have to plot to kill Americans? Do they need to string together a chain of successful mass murders? Have the recent failed bombing attempts by jihadis lulled the American people into a false sense of security? How much more infrastructure must they destroy? What is necessary for both the majority of Americans and their elected leaders to remove their muzzles and admit who is the enemy and what is their objective?

The attention of the country is focused on the most recent act of jihad. We must take advantage of this spotlight to further illuminate the rancidly totalitarian core of Islam. Politicians in Washington would have a greater inclination to counteract the jihad when their constituents are clamoring for steps to halt and roll back Islamization. The notoriously ephemeral attention span of the general American public must be channeled toward anti-Islamic counteroffensive before the media steers their minds away from the imminent Islamic threat.

We must support those in political positions who are willing to enact measures curtailing Islamists' power and influence. Senator Joseph Lieberman has proposed stripping citizenship from turncoat American citizens who join terrorist organizations (http://congress.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/05/05/lieberman-seeks-to-strip-citizenship-of-americans-overseas-with-ties-to-terror-orgs). Representative Sue Myrick has composed a list of countermeasures against Islamists called the "Wake Up America Agenda" (http://www.house.gov/list/press/nc09_myrick/wakeupamerica41808.html). Such initiatives need the support of everyone opposed to Islamization of the United States. The responsibility falls on the American electorate to demand that its representatives take action.

Islamists reveal their inherently totalitarian ideology, both blatantly and subtly. Anyone willing to read Islamic texts cannot escape the unmistakeably clear nature of Islam. Consequently, Mohamadans express notions and support measures which enforce Islamic supremacy. Islam rejects the concept of a government based on the consent of the governed. Islamic rule depends on the whimsical pronouncements of a seventh century Arabian dictator. Equality of citizens under an objective legal code does not exist under Sharia. In a truly Islamic regime, women are inherently relegated to an inferior caste with non-Mohamadans relegated even lower. An absolute monarchy such as Saudi Arabia or a single party dictatorship like the one in Iran are the only options for a country adhering to Islamic governance.

Additionally, we must demand a cessation of the entry of Mohamadans into the United States for the purpose of immigration and naturalization. Their totalitarian ideology dictates that its adherents must subdue non-believers and subjugate the whole world. Section 313 in Chapter 2 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act expressly forbids citizenship for anyone espousing any totalitarian ideology. As previously detailed, Islam clearly falls within the definition of totalitarianism. Therefore, those Americans cherishing their representative democracy must demand the exclusion and expulsion of those who will undermine and destroy the republic.


Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Comedy Central’s Capitulation

Last week, a prominent media organization in the United States succumbed to the inundation of Sharia-creep. Comedy Central joined the growing list of dhimmified American companies by caving into threats from jihadis who objected to any negative references to Islam or its fabricator. Not out of respect for all religions did this cable television outlet stifle images of Islam's creator. The hypocritical wimps in the upper echelon of network management censored Trey Parker and Matt Stone’s opus due to politically correct gutlessness.

Trey Parker and Matt Stone had featured Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) in an episode which originally was broadcast in July of 2001. Since Islamists had not yet launched the official start of the jihad in the United States, this depiction passed through Comedy Central’s self-imposed censorship. The license to impose Sharia granted to Mohamadans following the terrorist attacks of the eleventh of September 2001 trumped Parker and Stone’s inclusion of an image of Mohamad (MHBHF) in an April 2006 episode. In their recent attempt, they flirted with including an image of Mohamad (MHBHF) in the first half of the two part episode. However, Comedy Central obscured the image of the fabricator of Islam in both broadcasts, including bleeping his name in the latter.

The creators of South Park have not shied away from disparaging other religions. An episode that originally aired on the nineteenth of November in 2003 detailed the origin of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. It featured a musical recounting of Joseph Smith’s acquisition of the Book of Mormon laced with a choral voice-over of "Dumb, dumb, dumb" ; anyone who questioned Smith’s pronouncement was serenaded with a voice-over of "Smart, smart, smart". On the sixteenth of November in 2005, Comedy Central ran of an episode mocking Scientologists’ beliefs regarding the story of the origin of life on Earth in addition to labeling the Church of Scientology’s leadership as solely interesting in financially exploiting its members. A Christmas-related show broadcast in 2002 portrayed Christ as an automatic rifle-wielding avenger who shot and stabbed Iraqis who had kidnapped and tortured Santa Claus. Multiple episodes have blatantly attacked the Catholic Church including showing the College of Cardinals openly admitting to sexual activity with children. Consequently, any claims by Comedy Central about the desire to avoid insulting others’ religious beliefs stand out as disingenuously false.

Americans must question whether or not their media outlets will continue to silence any negative remarks toward or squelch any unflattering depictions of any Islamic-related issues. A dozen jihadis boasting of a supposed Mohamadan revolution cowed a popular and successful cable outlet. The thinly veiled threat of one traitorous American named Zachary Adam Chesser made an entire network cower in fear then acquiesce to the demands of these savages. No longer does public opinion need to be measured in the millions or even in tens of thousands to induce a change in subject matter. The totalitarian ultimatums of a mere handful of Mohamadans suffices to crush the freedom of speech of all Americans. Considering Comedy Central’s continuous kowtowing to jihadis’ threats and burning desire to placate Mohamadans, one should expect the executives of the network to act proactively to forestall any further alleged blasphemy. Therefore, it is a matter of time until the executives behead Parker and Stone in accordance with Sharia, just to be on the safe side.


Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Did the Earth Move for You?

Hojjat ol-eslam Kazem Sediki, an Islamic prayer leader in Iran, has blamed women’s lack of hiding themselves under oppressively suffocating outfits for an increased number of earthquakes. Conveniently, he overlooked the fact that numerous bare-breasted women on many beaches throughout France have not resulted in calamitous earthquakes in the French Riviera. The resorts along Mexico’s eastern shores and in the Caribbean Sea have not been swallowed by gaping fissures in the ground due to the presence of bikini-clad women. Along the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean and of the Gulf of Mexico of the United States, scantily-clad women have never induced such seismic retribution for decades now. So why exactly are Iranian women the cause of terrestrial rumblings?

This cleric’s remarks are typical of Islamists’ knee-jerk misogyny. The exposure of women’s hair, ankles, arms or faces supposedly causes calamities. Such absurdity makes perfect sense only to buffoons who have been mind-numbed through years of Islamic indoctrination. Who has time to study geology to understand the true causes of earthquakes? These savages certainly do not since they have been pre-occupied with robotically reciting the Koran. Why study an objective science when they can parrot verses which very few of them even understand due to ignorance of the seventh century dialect of the Arabian Peninsula in which Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) fabricated the Koranic verses? Anyone with at least a minimal level of scientific education guffawed uproariously upon hearing Sediki’s statements.

Apparently, this numbskull never considered the possibility that his country has experienced earthquakes as punishment for its Islamic regime’s three decades of repression. Certainly a just deity would avenge the frequent stonings of women who report being raped but cannot clear the ridiculous hurdle of proof required by Sharia that four male witnesses observed the crime. Additionally, a wrathful god
would surely punish those who flog women because a few strands of hair peeked through the tents mandated as “appropriate garments” by Islamists like Sediki. Divine retribution is due to the ruling clerics for their continued repression of democracy and secularism advocates.

Such admonishments seem even more hypocritical considering the practice of “temporary marriages” sanctioned by the Islamic regime. Iranian men pay women to sign contracts of marriage which stipulate when their marriage will end and how much the women will receive as compensation. These matrimonial farces often last for just a few days, frequently for a mere hour or two. This institution is de facto prostitution promoted for unmarried young males, especially among those studying to become Islamic clerics in the city of Kom. These arrangements including written documents between the johns and the whores only give a phony veneer of legitimacy in the eyes of the Islamists but not to any clear-thinking person.

Sediki’s ranting has further illuminated the dangerous insanity of the Islamic regime. With such ignorant leaders in charge of this totalitarian regime, how can anyone in the Free World not shudder at the thought of these barbarians safely handling radioactive materials for use in a nuclear power program? Of course, anyone subscribing to the Iranian disinformation about wanting a nuclear power program for peaceful civilian use certainly lacks the wisdom to see through the Iranians’ lies anyway.


Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Jihad Jane and the Victims of the Danish Cartoon

Once again, the nefarious schemes of the barbarians within the gates of the Free World have been exposed. The latest revelation of Colleen LaRose, a Western-born and raised Caucasian American woman participating in jihad against the United States should finally shatter the endlessly spouted deception from Islamists and their useful idiots. One must wonder if the wall of political correctness protecting the public perception of Islam will crumble due to this latest blow of truth.

Any measures taken against Mohamadans and any responses to the Islamic threat automatically receive the label "racist". Arab jihadis such as Nidal Malik Hassan is and the nineteen hijackers of the eleventh of September were also Caucasian. The majority of Americans are Caucasian just as the Arab jihadis are.

What is the basis for Islamists' screeches of "racism" every time a Mohamadan is frisked at an airport boarding area or Islamic organization is investigated by the media or law enforcement? Actually, the only basis is knowledge of the obsession of the vast majority of Americans with avoiding the mere accusation of racism against themselves. The Islamists' ubiquitous hurling of the "r-word" against the obstacles in their path to Islamization has served as a permanent "get out of trouble free" card. Their cynical ignoring of facts which undercut the potency of their favorite tactic demonstrates one of their principles: the ends (Islamization) justifies the means (takkiya).

Jihad Jane continues a growing line of American jihadis such as John Allen Mohammed, John Walker Lindh, Adam Gadahn, and Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad. This blond, blue-eyed woman could have served as a model for Nazi propaganda. Instead she chose to adhere to Islam, another form of totalitarianism but no less brutally hostile to representative democracy and the freedoms which it entails and she exploits. Unfortunately, the altruism of a Pennsylvania police officer prevented this most recent traitor from committing suicide in 2005.

Jihad Jane expressed her desperation to do something to ease the suffering of Mohamadans. What exactly is this supposed suffering and what was her plan to help end it? Colleen LaRose and her fellow Mohamadans object to a cartoon drawn by Lars Vilks. Their solution to art which they dislike is to kill of the artist. Mohamadans are practicing the solution to opposition instituted by their namesake whenever he learned of any poetry mocking his supposed prophetic status. Whenever Islamists and their useful idiots spout Islamic propaganda about the alleged compatibility of Islam within a representative democracy, clear-thinking people must keep this plot in mind. This conspiracy to murder belies how freedoms of speech and of expression are obliterated when Islamic principles are imposed. Just as any aspersion on Adolf Hitler in Nazi-dominated territory or objections to Karl Marx in communist regimes inevitably led to death sentences, the adherents of Islam will violently extinguish any source of criticism of the creator of their ideology.

Lost among the details of this manifestation of Islam in action has been the public defamation of an entire group of beings. Lars Vilks' drawing in question portrayed the head of the inventor of Islam on the body of a dog. The canine community did nothing to deserve this slander of guilt by association. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) frequently revealed his cynophobia in various Islamic texts. Mohamadans express hostility toward dogs; one could logically assume that the antipathy is mutual. Considering that no dog has admitted to having sexual relations with a nine year old girl nor robbed anyone opposed to their absolute dictatorship nor ordered the assassination of political opponents, this writer maintains that dogs, not Mohamadans, deserve the apology from Lars Vilks for his cartoon.


Tuesday, March 2, 2010

More Bleeting from a Mohamadan Sheep

One of the Mohamadan sheeple who has contacted me to spew Islamic disinformation resented my postings of her inanity. The following is her most recent messages with my responses. I have not altered anything that she or I initially wrote.

Fatima Shirazi March 1 at 10:17pm
"I was looking for a article I wrote on the internet, and I found your website..and you posted our entire conversation. Seriously? Its not okay to call muslims Mohamadan Sheeps. wow.....I did not want even to finish our conversation the first time around because I realized you have no thorough understanding of what Islam really represents, you just pick random schools of thought and lump Islam into one category. Open your eyes, there are more then one school of thought for Islam and there are more deep rooted meanings and reasons then you could ever understand. Enjoy your Islam hating."

Charles Kastriot March 1 at 11:08pm
"Only two 'schools' of Islam exist: yours, which obfuscates the plethora of evils (totalitarianism, misogyny, pedophilia, thievery and so forth) and the other school which openly admits and embraces these evils. There is nothing deeper to Islam than the libido and whims of its fabricator, Mohamad (May he burn Hell forever). Enjoy being beaten for not hiding yourself under a drape in your posted photograph. Hopefully, your batterer will beat some wisdom and enlightenment into your brain."

Fatima Shirazi March 1 at 11:50pm
"Be careful every time you turn your ignition key.

May Allah bless you and forgive you."

Charles Kastriot March 2 at 1:07am
"What a typical Mohamadan response. Of course, savages such as yourself would never dare to try to harm me face-to-face. Your ilk prefer cowardly attacks like car bombings which you referenced in addition to hijacking planes then crashing them into buildings. May you burn in Hell forever alongside the criminal who created your totalitarian ideology."

Unfortunately for the Free World, this barbarian resides within the realm of civilization. We should be concerned about what type of terrorism with which this Fifth Columnist is involved. Hopefully, civilized people will keep a watchful eye on this enemy and remove her from their soil.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Punched into Recognition

So Ahmedinejad much ballyhooed "punch to West" has occurred. Does anyone in the Free World feel punch-drunk or even slightly dazed? Instead of describing the announcement as a punch, it would be more accurate to call it the latest slap to the collective face of the civilized people of the world. Ahmedinejad has repeatedly struck the cheeks of a slumbering Uncle Sam who is determined to continue his dream of willful ignorance.

Uncle Sam keeps brushing away attempts at reveille by his only true friend in Ahmadinejad's otherwise overtly hostile neighborhood. Despite Israel's meager population and limited resources and territory, it is willing to face down the Iranian blowhard. Realistic Israelis can see the imminent atomic assault on their country. The primary factor impeding the Israels' proactive elimination of Iran's capacity for nuclear attacks lie in hope that other civilized nations will find a way to halt the threat of attacks originating from Iran. Up to this date, no member of the Free World has demonstrated any determination to stop the jihadis in Iran from gaining means to propagate Islam through nuclear weapons. Nuclear-armed jihadis will afford the free people of the world the same options they have always proposed: convert to Islam, accept inferior status including paying protection money or die at the hands of the savages.

Perhaps, the popular uprisings in Iran have convinced leaders of the civilized nations that the Islamic regime and its nuclear weapons program are teetering on collapse. The line of reasoning follows: "Why bother to provoke the Iranian regime when, by ignoring it, its oppressed citizens will soon topple it? A bellicose response to Ahmadinejad would just give him a rallying cry against the infidels."
One could be tempted to support those rallying in the streets of Iran simply because they seem to view the Islamic regime as a common enemy. Granted, the unrest may distract the regime from reaching its goal of nuclear capability. This view could prove true but no definite list of the objectives of the protesters has been clearly demonstrated.

Anyone outside Iran must wonder about the goals of the demonstrators. Are they pushing for a complete upheaval of Iranian society, including purging of Islam and other Arabian elements of their society? Do they want to abolish the theocracy in favor of a secular government? Do they demand a Persian version of a fascist state like the one formerly in Irak, led by an autocrat who played on ethnic and sectarian strife to wield absolute power? Do they merely seek more economic opportunities and openness with the West? Will they settle for less odious treatment of women, non-Shi'ites and non-Persians while continuing to chafe under the yoke of Islamic totalitarianism? Before embracing the angry crowds surging in the streets of Iran, the residents of the Free World must delve deeper into words and actions of the individuals within the movement.

Will Uncle Sam eventually rouse himself from this self-destructive slumber? One might be reminded of another allegorical character, Rip Van Winkle, who awoke from his decades-long nap. Unfortunately for him, Rip hardly recognized his surroundings after being unconscious for such an extended period of time. The world had changed noticeably and in ways which Rip did not like. For hope of the Free World, Uncle Sam must snap out of this suicidally somnolent state before his world has declined in a Dark Age of Islamic hegemony.