Saturday, February 28, 2009

Feeding the Crocodile

President Obama’s decision to aid Arabs in the Gaza Strip has raised a huge cause for concern. Robert Wood, Acting Spokesman of Public Affairs for the United States Department of State, stated on February 10, 2009 that the federal government has already provided nearly sixty million dollars worth of aid to occupants of the territory. ( This aid will bolster members of Hamas and those who support that jihadist group. A clear thinking person must ask why would Obama help those who are overwhelmingly adherents to an ideology hostile to the U.S.A.

Obama, like other socialists around the world, displays knee jerk reactions when he views the ongoing tension between the Israelis and Arabs. He lapses into the template of sympathizing with “the blameless, impoverished people of color” who are in a continual state of conflict with the “technologically advanced, inherently evil white people”. Of course, the presence of tens of thousands of black Israelis who were airlifted out of Ethiopia in 1984 is never factored into the estimation. Additionally, the fact that Arabs are also Caucasian is conveniently ignored, lest the politically correct lenses shatter under the weight of reality. The hand-wringers in the Obama administration and Obamaniacs everywhere turn a “visually-impaired” eye toward the repeated violent provocations by the Arabs to launch attacks on Israelis. These incitements include missile launchings to strike targets with no military value in Israel. One should not forget about the Arab practice of sneaking brain-washed recruits with fantasies of an afterlife in an eternal whorehouse into Israeli to blow themselves up in order to murder as many Israeli civilians as possible in the process. The useful idiots supporting the Gazans have displayed a Herculean effort in propping up their flimsy and false archetype regarding who act as the true villains in this conflict.

Does Obama hope that aiding the Arabs in Gaza will win over some Islamists into loving the United States or, at least, hating the U.S.A. less? How many of these that he seeks to help were among the throngs of Mohamadans dancing and chanting in the streets upon hearing about the jihadist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the thousands of Americans who had been killed? Does he think that the same people who direct so much vitriol towards the U.S.A. for toppling totalitarian regimes in Iraq and Afghanistan will suddenly experience a 180 degree turn in their disposition toward Americans? If he possesses as much knowledge about Islam as he has claimed, he should realize that true adherents to Islam will never love or even respect Americans until the United States submits to Islam. The most practical goal for the U.S.A. remains making Islamists fear Americans. They must be convinced that any future jihadist attacks would result in a crushing response too harsh for the Islamists to justify the initial strikes.

Is Obama betraying some secret affinity or some sympathy for Mohamadans? The Gazans are overwhelmingly adherents of Islam. This resulted from the forcible removal of Jews from the area when the Israelis vacated the territory. Additionally, a concerted jihad waged on the Christian Arab minority has driven the Christians out of the Gaza Strip. Therefore, only Mohamadans stand to benefit from Obama’s magnanimity. The years of indoctrination in an Islamic school in Indonesia during his youth have undoubtedly colored his view of Islam in a dangerously favorable light.

As Winston Churchill wisely declared, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.” Apparently, Obama is nourishing the ravenous crocodile known as Hamas in the hopes that the beast will not attack him or his country. Meanwhile, his benevolence strengthens this predator. Eventually, this creature will strike Americans. When this reptile does lash out again, he will be capable of assaults since Obama’s misplaced altruism sustained the beast instead of letting him deteriorate then starve to death.


Thursday, February 19, 2009

Bridges to Truth about Islamic Marriage

Muzzammil Hassan unwittingly undermined the disinformation spewed forth by Bridges TV, his television station. His actions demonstrated the truth of the repressive and violent basis of Islamic marriages. Hassan's brutal treatment of his wife stands as just another tragic example in a historical legacy of Islam's misogyny, both verbal and physical. Whether the tales involve women resisting Islamic marriages or attempting to escape from them, sadly the fate of a woman is all too often the same: viciously violent death, usually at the hands of their husband or of her blood relatives.

These unions result from fathers arranging marriages for their daughters to the highest bidder or to whomever the father wants influence in future considerations. Marriage exists as a formal declaration of dominion of a man over a woman. It merely announces that a woman has submitted to the control of her husband and what compensation her father gained for relinquishing his authority over her. No thought is given to the "decadent, infidel notions" of "mutual respect", "consent", "romantic love" or "reciprocated affinity".

Why would Mohamadans hold any of those ideals with any esteem? After all, their namesake and role-model certainly did not. His early marriages to wealthy widows resulted from the need to indulge in his gold-digging urges. His later marriage to Aisha, a nine year girl, fed his pedophiliac desires. He collected numerous wives with casual avarice, only concerned with how his possession of them would satisfy his whims. A co-equal and monogamous relationship with a woman would have been viewed as an anathama to Mohamed ibn Abdullah just as representative democracy, use of underarm deodorant and daily bathing are to Islamists.


Wednesday, February 11, 2009

French Collaboration, 21st Century Style

A small but significant percentage of the French population actively collaborated with the Nazi authorities following France's capitulation to Germany in 1940. These traitors included police officers who hunted down Jews and others who openly opposed to the fascist regime and sent them to the death camps. Sadly, this shamefully practice of acquiescing to totalitarians has experienced a renaissance in France.

As reported by the television network, France 2, ( on its 8 PM news broadcast on February 11, the French government requested that the Catholic University of Paris set up training for "Imams of the Republic". This program includes four hundred hours of classes including law, history and religion. The justification for this certification was stated as the government's need for representatives considered as "legitimate" by the "faithful", meaning Mohamedans in France. These representatives supposedly will become dedicated to French values of liberty, equality, fraternity and secularism. Apparently, non-Mohamedan officers lack the acumen to halt the practice of torching cars and of vandalizing businesses whenever the Mohamedans feel slighted by some cartoons or one of the own is injured or killed while committing criminal acts. Most egregious of all is the traitorous complicity of this Catholic university with the same savages who would eliminate it under a revived caliphate. Obviously, kowtowing to Islamists trumps any commitment to avoid church-state interactions.

The report features a graduate of the program, Mohamed Ali Bouharb, the first leader of "Moslem harmony" within the police department. He claimed that the text of the Koran has different contexts in different societies. He made such a statement either out of utter ignorance or deliberate dishonesty since the Koran clearly states that Islam must reign over the entire world with uniformity and opposes factionalism or dissension. Islamists vehemently object to the translation of the Koran from its seventh century Arabian Peninsular dialect into any other languages; how could anyone honestly believe that Islam can be molded into varying forms to fit into different societies?

The commitment to a Frenchified, secular role for this officer and other government-trained Islamic clerics seems absurd, at best. He claims commitment to secularism while proudly showing off the crescent moon on his uniform hat. Displayed very prominently in his office at his workplace, one can see a prayer rug laid on the floor and a Koran on his desk. Hypocritically, the French government baned the wearing of Islamic head-rags in public schools since they were labelled as "distracting". In contrast, this governmental employee is permitted to openly flaunt his Islamic affiliation and received taxpayer-funded training related to Islam. Granted that the head-rags stand out as an obvious sign of the repressive nature of Islam yet the adolescent girls wearing them were unlikely to carry firearms and certainly lacked the power to arrest anyone. This officer would have both the weapons and the cover of legal authority in his arsenal to threaten someone critical of Islam.

Where is Charles Martel when France desperately needs him again? Hopefully, his spirit of resistance will imbue someone with the courage to resist this and all other forms of Sharia-creep. Otherwise, France will continue to slide into the abyss of Islamification.


Friday, February 6, 2009

Lowering of Defenses

President Obama's catering to Islamists and their useful idiots among the hand-wringing and spineless Hate America crowd has already born bitter fruit. ( In 2000, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri led a covert operation to destroy an American warship, the USS Cole. Despite this clear act of war, he will not face charges in a military tribunal. Unfortunately, this savage, along with the hundreds of other jihadis in American custody will be treated as mere common criminals instead of what they truly are. They operate as members of a hostile army with the exception of no distinguishable uniform. The most consideration these jihads deserve is a trial by military tribunal. They refuse to conform to the protocols of the Geneva Convention. Therefore, they have no right to claim any protections afforded to legitimate POWs. What this savage and the others of his ilk should receive is simple: a bungee-jump with the tether wrapped around their necks.


Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Bigger Fish to Fry?

In the wake of the Israeli Defense Force's squandered opportunity to obliterate HAMAS, we can only hope that the halt is due to another more dangerous threat. Instead of resolving the situation of regularly launched missiles into Israeli civilian areas from the Gaza Strip, there may exist the likelihood of fewer yet more dangerous missiles from Iran. A homeowner should cease squashing flies infesting his/her home when scorpions are on the verge of invading.
This week, the Iranian regime has launched a satellite, proving it does possess the technology to launch other, more menacing items too. This action has made the security situation clear: the Free World must act now before Iranian missiles start raining down on Israel and other civilized countries. How long before Iranian missiles will be fitted with biological or chemical weapons? Will the world soon find out the true purpose of Iran's allegedly "peaceful" use nuclear technology to attach nuclear warheads to these missiles?(,0,4385361.story )
The nominal leader of Iran, Mahmoud Akhmadinewhackjob, has betrayed his regime's true intentions in past statements. His blatant anti-Israeli rhetoric, including questioning the historical veracity of the Nazis' genocidal activities aimed at Jews, demonstrates his commitment to the ongoing jihad against Jews. He spouts Islamic rhetoric, straight from the most virulent verses of the Koran. As reprehensibly evil as Mohamad ibn Abdullah, the fabricator of Islam, was, he never possessed the power to destroy tens of thousands of people in a matter of minutes. For that reason, the time to act, not negotiate with savages or deny reality, has arrived.