Posts
Old habits die hard, even for jihadis. Not content with killing Christians and destroying churches throughout Africa, the Middle East and southern Asia, they decided to rekindle a Richard Reid style of attack. The latest attempt by the terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to murder residents of the Free World occurred on Christmas, undoubtedly, not a coincidence. Al-Kaida relishes timing their strikes on days of significance. Even the Islamic hijackings and slaughter of thousands of civilians on the eleventh of September in 2001 a carried historical link. On that same day in 1683, Christian forces crushed the jihadist invaders outside Vienna. From that point through centuries, civilized nations gradually pushed back or suppressed the Islamic plague. Unfortunately for the world, those forces did not eradicate the Mohamadan scourge.
This most recent incidence of jihad demonstrates the power and primacy of unassuming individuals over impotent or dhimmified bureaucrats. One Dutch man accomplished what scores, if not hundreds or thousands, of federal governmental employees failed to do: halt a jihadi intent on murdering residents of the Free World. He did not need “cultural sensitivity” brainwashing sessions by the Council on American-Islamic Relations or any other fifth-columnist organization. Neither did his bravery require consultation with moral relativist lawyers nor with irrelevant international treaties ignored by Islamists. This one man from the Netherlands has continued the spirit of resistance to Islam exemplified by the passengers on United Flight 93 on the eleventh of September in 2001.
One must ask why this savage was even allowed on this flight? A broader question needs to be addressed: Why are any Mohamadans permitted anywhere near aircraft anymore? How many times do jihadis have use civilian airplanes as an implement of war before governmental authorities in the Free World admit that such naïve lackadaisicalness leads to deaths of free people? Until someone with authority decides to bar these monsters from infiltrating situations which facilitate acts of jihad, non-combatants will continue to suffer and die at the hands of vermin like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
In the end, despite the suicidal naïveté of and constant acquiescence to Islamists’ demands by federal authorities, the jihadi failed in his mission to earn eternity in a free whorehouse. Fortunately, no civilized people died in his jihad. Sadly, the passengers did not fully impose justice on the savage. This lascivious Mohamadan was willing to cause deaths of dozens of people in addition to his own just to satisfy his libido. Everyone should notice that his morbid desire to slaughter for sexual gratification ended up sabotaging his own future pursuits. What delicious irony that his own act of jihad torched his own little minaret, hopefully beyond any further usage.
COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT, DECEMBER 2009
Monday, December 28, 2009
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Jihadist Murders at Fort Hood
Some actions are so easily anticipated and foreseeable. When they occur, these incidents only surprise those ignorant of the causes or those willfully blind to reality. Such incidents include rabid dogs biting people, flies buzzing around freshly deposited feces and snakes sliding along the ground before striking their victims. Also in the category of expected occurrences, one finds the inevitability of Mohamadans murdering civilized people when the opportunity presents itself.
Today’s latest episode of a jihadi slaying American armed forces personnel has underscored the need for a ban on Mohamadans in the American armed forces. This continues a long string of fifth columnists within the various branches of U.S. Department of Defense who used their training to murder Americans. I provide a recap of just some of the jihads’ plots to attack and undermine for those who forgot or have buried their hands in the sands of useful idiocy:
-On June 1 of this year, Abdulhakim Mujahid fatally shot Private William Long and wounded Quinton Ezeagwula in Little Rock, Arkansas.
-On the twenty-third of March 2003, Sgt. Asan Akbar rolled live grenades into the tents of fellow soldiers then fired an automatic weapon at them at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait. This jihadi killed two officers and injured fourteen other soldiers.
-Jeffrey Leon Battle, one of the Portland Six tied to al-Kaida, joined the Army Reserves in order to learn how to kill American soldiers. On the fourth of October 2002 Jeffrey Leon Battle was arrested. According to the Justice Department, he planned to wage war against Americans in Afghanistan. On the second of December 2003, Battle pleaded guilty and received a sentence of 18 years in prison.
-In May of 2002, the federal agents arrested Semi Osman, a Mohamadan cleric and a mechanic in the Naval Reserves, as part of an investigation of a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Osman had access to fuel trucks like those employed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia 1996 that killed 19 U.S. airmen. In January 2003, he pleaded guilty to a weapons charge.
-Ali Mohamed, a secret member of Islamic Jihad, enlisted in the U.S. Army and reached the rank of sergeant. He taught a class on Islamic perceptions of America to special forces at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. He also taught at the JFK Special Operations Warfare School where he stole classified military documents. After leaving the Army in 1989, he joined al-Kaida. He spent the 1990s traveling around the world helping plot jihadist operations. The FBI finally arrested him in 1998. He pleaded guilty to conspiring with Osama Bin Laden to attack Western targets.
-John Allen Muhammad was mechanic, truck driver and specialist metalworker in the Louisiana National Guard and later in the U.S. Army. He earned commendations for marksmenship which used to shoo t and kill ten civilians and wounded three other in the autumn of 2002 in the metropolitan area of Washington, DC.
A person need only read any of the numerous violently totalitarian scriptures serving as the foundation of Islam. These Islamic plots to murder Americans, civilians and armed forces personnel, and undermine national security further highlight the danger of allowing Mohamadans into the organizations sworn to protect the United States. How many more treacherous savages have to infiltrate American armed forces then slaughter the true defenders of freedom before the U.S. government bars these hostile barbarians from its military?
COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Today’s latest episode of a jihadi slaying American armed forces personnel has underscored the need for a ban on Mohamadans in the American armed forces. This continues a long string of fifth columnists within the various branches of U.S. Department of Defense who used their training to murder Americans. I provide a recap of just some of the jihads’ plots to attack and undermine for those who forgot or have buried their hands in the sands of useful idiocy:
-On June 1 of this year, Abdulhakim Mujahid fatally shot Private William Long and wounded Quinton Ezeagwula in Little Rock, Arkansas.
-On the twenty-third of March 2003, Sgt. Asan Akbar rolled live grenades into the tents of fellow soldiers then fired an automatic weapon at them at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait. This jihadi killed two officers and injured fourteen other soldiers.
-Jeffrey Leon Battle, one of the Portland Six tied to al-Kaida, joined the Army Reserves in order to learn how to kill American soldiers. On the fourth of October 2002 Jeffrey Leon Battle was arrested. According to the Justice Department, he planned to wage war against Americans in Afghanistan. On the second of December 2003, Battle pleaded guilty and received a sentence of 18 years in prison.
-In May of 2002, the federal agents arrested Semi Osman, a Mohamadan cleric and a mechanic in the Naval Reserves, as part of an investigation of a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Osman had access to fuel trucks like those employed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia 1996 that killed 19 U.S. airmen. In January 2003, he pleaded guilty to a weapons charge.
-Ali Mohamed, a secret member of Islamic Jihad, enlisted in the U.S. Army and reached the rank of sergeant. He taught a class on Islamic perceptions of America to special forces at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. He also taught at the JFK Special Operations Warfare School where he stole classified military documents. After leaving the Army in 1989, he joined al-Kaida. He spent the 1990s traveling around the world helping plot jihadist operations. The FBI finally arrested him in 1998. He pleaded guilty to conspiring with Osama Bin Laden to attack Western targets.
-John Allen Muhammad was mechanic, truck driver and specialist metalworker in the Louisiana National Guard and later in the U.S. Army. He earned commendations for marksmenship which used to shoo t and kill ten civilians and wounded three other in the autumn of 2002 in the metropolitan area of Washington, DC.
A person need only read any of the numerous violently totalitarian scriptures serving as the foundation of Islam. These Islamic plots to murder Americans, civilians and armed forces personnel, and undermine national security further highlight the danger of allowing Mohamadans into the organizations sworn to protect the United States. How many more treacherous savages have to infiltrate American armed forces then slaughter the true defenders of freedom before the U.S. government bars these hostile barbarians from its military?
COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Mohamadan Posing as a Concerned Jew
For the amusement of my associates, below is a message on Facebook which I received from a purported Jew who objected to my logo on Facebook. I have not altered anything which he or I wrote.
Daniel Sidon, October 4 at 6:26am: "you are against what? religion? why you making this to your profile photo? I am Jew and I respect Islam, because there is lot of similarities, that bad and stupid people which are figting for hamas etc. they will fight also without islam! they aren't following islam and jihad. jihad is strictly self-defensive! be so kind and put there something whats telling to others how you are nice, or ugly, but not how you're same stupid! thanks"
Charles Kastriot, October 6 at 12:02am "I am not against religion. I oppose Islam and all other forms of totalitarianism. My profile photo represents my opposition to the cancer that threatens democracy and freedom across the world.
If you are truly Jewish, which I highly doubt, try reading the Koran before you defend Islam. It is full of anti-Jewish rhetoric. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) merely co-opted some superficial elements of Judaism to lure Arabian Jews into his self-aggrandizing cult. After all but a few refused, he waged jihad on them, killing or enslaving all of the Jewish tribes of Arabia.
Hamas and other Islamists are simply following the example of Mo (MHBHF) as he dictated in the Koran. Just as Mo (MHBHF) ordered assassinations of critics, robbed anyone not in his cult, had sex with a multitude of women and pre-pubescent girls and committed numerous other crimes, Hamas and others such savages imitate his loathsome pattern.
If you think that by serving Mohamadans as their useful idiot, that they will not eventually slit your throat too? Stop being a craven dhimmi!"
Daniel Sidon, October 6 at 8:43am
"maybe YOU can try to read Koran."
I tried to reply to this anemic statement but this coward blocked me! Now, I am completely convinced that this invertabrate is actually a Mohamadan.
Daniel Sidon, October 4 at 6:26am: "you are against what? religion? why you making this to your profile photo? I am Jew and I respect Islam, because there is lot of similarities, that bad and stupid people which are figting for hamas etc. they will fight also without islam! they aren't following islam and jihad. jihad is strictly self-defensive! be so kind and put there something whats telling to others how you are nice, or ugly, but not how you're same stupid! thanks"
Charles Kastriot, October 6 at 12:02am "I am not against religion. I oppose Islam and all other forms of totalitarianism. My profile photo represents my opposition to the cancer that threatens democracy and freedom across the world.
If you are truly Jewish, which I highly doubt, try reading the Koran before you defend Islam. It is full of anti-Jewish rhetoric. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) merely co-opted some superficial elements of Judaism to lure Arabian Jews into his self-aggrandizing cult. After all but a few refused, he waged jihad on them, killing or enslaving all of the Jewish tribes of Arabia.
Hamas and other Islamists are simply following the example of Mo (MHBHF) as he dictated in the Koran. Just as Mo (MHBHF) ordered assassinations of critics, robbed anyone not in his cult, had sex with a multitude of women and pre-pubescent girls and committed numerous other crimes, Hamas and others such savages imitate his loathsome pattern.
If you think that by serving Mohamadans as their useful idiot, that they will not eventually slit your throat too? Stop being a craven dhimmi!"
Daniel Sidon, October 6 at 8:43am
"maybe YOU can try to read Koran."
I tried to reply to this anemic statement but this coward blocked me! Now, I am completely convinced that this invertabrate is actually a Mohamadan.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Sympathy for a Devil
This author has been accused of promoting hatred of Mohamadans. I have been criticized for automatically concluding that Islamists are guilty of committing acts of war and terrorism against the Free World. "Never mind that the overwhelming number of bombings across the world, both of the suicidal and homicidal varieties, occur in furtherance of the jihad," say Islamists and their useful idiots. So do they have a point that the goons holding a Koran in one hand while torching churches and the Christians inside them or while vandalizing Jewish-owned business or cemeteries did not constitute a concerted effort by Islamists to attack infidels? In an attempt at cultural sensitivity, conflict resolution and reconciliation with Mohamadans, I will serve as the defense attorney in the court of public opinion for Najibullah Zazi, the Mohamadan in the United States recently arrested for involvement with a terrorist plot targeting New York. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/national/main5321252.shtml?tag=stack)
Has anyone considered the possibility all of his secretive dealings were an effort to surprise New Yorkers? On the eighth anniversary of the jihadist attacks on the World Trade Center, maybe he was planning a citywide gift distribution. After consulting a list of traditional gifts for anniversaries, Zazi could have been secretly arranging the placement of improvised explosive devices in pottery or bronze receptacles through the city. The residents could have been greeted with lovely gunpowder-fueled displays spelling out "I heart NY" in shrapnel. Perhaps he preferred the modern suggestion of lace or linen so we can deduce what he had in mind: new burkas for every woman in the city! So, FBI, are you happy now that you ruined the surprise for everyone? What a bunch of spoilsports!
Did the FBI consider the possibility that Zazi's reference to an actual, planned wedding was, in fact, legitimate but just not recognized under the American legal system? News out of Sudan showed that Islamists do not discriminate against people with an alternative sexual orientation(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm)Moral relativists certainly should demand that the FBI display a higher level of tolerance for this cultural aspect of Islam, in addition to other cherished Islamic practices like female genital mutilation, wife-beating and murder of rape victims. Once again, Americans have demonstrated their bigotry toward sexual minorities!
Undoubtedly, people in the United States will label Zazi as an "extremist" or a "radical" adherent of Islam. A more unfounded accusation could not be hurled at him. Zazi has faithfully devoted himself to following the tenets and commandments of the Koran. He has not strayed into un-Islamic activities like befriending infidels, repairing vandalized churches or synagogues, protesting against terrorism, composing music or creating works of art like sculptures or portraits. Therefore, those who have besmirched his allegiance to Allah should acknowledge Zazi's commitment to true Islam!
Is it too much to ask for Americans to view the situation from Zazi's point of view? We should consider his unease about seeing his relatives for the upcoming the celebration of Eid al-Fitr. He would have had to face yet another plethora of irritating comments from his parents such as "Your older brother Mohamad killed three infidels and one apostate during Ramadan. That's more than you killed all year! Even your younger brother Mohamad martyred himself last month. Why can't you stop being such a slacker and act like your brothers?" Due to his shirking of his responsibilities to Allah and Mohamad, Zazi's parents will not give him that brand new explosive vest on which he has had eye for months now. Instead, he will have to settle for a box cutter as the gift from his parents. That kind of torture would not be permitted by the United Nations yet we expect that this young man to suffer like this? Have you no heart, Americans?
I would like to offer a compromise. We should allow him to behead a few members of Code Pink or the John Adams Project to placate his demanding parents. The members of those groups would just blame the slayings on George Bush, Israel's existence, global warming or any other culprit except for Islam. So what would be the problem?
In conclusion, I wish to all my devoted Mohamadan readers, HAVE AN EXPLOSIVE EID AL-FITR!
COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009
Has anyone considered the possibility all of his secretive dealings were an effort to surprise New Yorkers? On the eighth anniversary of the jihadist attacks on the World Trade Center, maybe he was planning a citywide gift distribution. After consulting a list of traditional gifts for anniversaries, Zazi could have been secretly arranging the placement of improvised explosive devices in pottery or bronze receptacles through the city. The residents could have been greeted with lovely gunpowder-fueled displays spelling out "I heart NY" in shrapnel. Perhaps he preferred the modern suggestion of lace or linen so we can deduce what he had in mind: new burkas for every woman in the city! So, FBI, are you happy now that you ruined the surprise for everyone? What a bunch of spoilsports!
Did the FBI consider the possibility that Zazi's reference to an actual, planned wedding was, in fact, legitimate but just not recognized under the American legal system? News out of Sudan showed that Islamists do not discriminate against people with an alternative sexual orientation(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm)Moral relativists certainly should demand that the FBI display a higher level of tolerance for this cultural aspect of Islam, in addition to other cherished Islamic practices like female genital mutilation, wife-beating and murder of rape victims. Once again, Americans have demonstrated their bigotry toward sexual minorities!
Undoubtedly, people in the United States will label Zazi as an "extremist" or a "radical" adherent of Islam. A more unfounded accusation could not be hurled at him. Zazi has faithfully devoted himself to following the tenets and commandments of the Koran. He has not strayed into un-Islamic activities like befriending infidels, repairing vandalized churches or synagogues, protesting against terrorism, composing music or creating works of art like sculptures or portraits. Therefore, those who have besmirched his allegiance to Allah should acknowledge Zazi's commitment to true Islam!
Is it too much to ask for Americans to view the situation from Zazi's point of view? We should consider his unease about seeing his relatives for the upcoming the celebration of Eid al-Fitr. He would have had to face yet another plethora of irritating comments from his parents such as "Your older brother Mohamad killed three infidels and one apostate during Ramadan. That's more than you killed all year! Even your younger brother Mohamad martyred himself last month. Why can't you stop being such a slacker and act like your brothers?" Due to his shirking of his responsibilities to Allah and Mohamad, Zazi's parents will not give him that brand new explosive vest on which he has had eye for months now. Instead, he will have to settle for a box cutter as the gift from his parents. That kind of torture would not be permitted by the United Nations yet we expect that this young man to suffer like this? Have you no heart, Americans?
I would like to offer a compromise. We should allow him to behead a few members of Code Pink or the John Adams Project to placate his demanding parents. The members of those groups would just blame the slayings on George Bush, Israel's existence, global warming or any other culprit except for Islam. So what would be the problem?
In conclusion, I wish to all my devoted Mohamadan readers, HAVE AN EXPLOSIVE EID AL-FITR!
COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009
Friday, August 28, 2009
Persecution of Patriots
Hidden by the ongoing debate and protests over the proposed socialization of the American health care system in addition to the recent death of the man responsible for Mary Jo Kopechne's death, the Obama administration has started its torment of the defenders of American security. The Obama regime has been returning political favors to those that supported his campaign. Among these are the self-loathing Americans who want the United States to accept defeat and retreat on all of fronts in the Islamic war against the Free World. Therefore, the Obamaniacs have demanded that their messiah's henchmen unsheathe their daggers then plunge them into the exposed backs of patriots combating jihadis.
American service personnel have already been forced to concede to Islamists' demands regarding the treatment of the jihadis. American tax dollars were spent to provide a Koran, prayer rug and prayer beads to every captured jihadi. This funding of religious instruction exists in addition to the highly expensive provision of halal meals to cater to the savages' tastes. All of this undeserved treatment of these criminals flies in the face of the Geneva Convention. None of these goons were wearing a distinguishable military uniform while engaged in such activities as firing on American and allied forces, planting explosives and other acts of war.
There is no precedent for this appeasement of Islamists' demands for undeserved treatment. German prisoners during the Second World War never received free copies of Mein Kempf during their captivity. During that same war, the few Japanese soldiers captured by American were not issued any means to commit ritualistic suicide as their ideology mandated. Additionally, captured communist forces during the wars in Korea and Vietnam never were issued copies of The Communist Manifesto or any other Marxist literature supplied by the country that they sought to defeat. One must ask why do adherents to Islam deserve complementary implements of their ideology when adherents to other strains of totalitarianism were denied similar luxuries. Not only were Axis and Communist forces never pampered in captivity, those who engaged in military operations while not in uniform were frequently executed. Anyone involved in acts of sabotage or other hostility while not in uniform are considered as spies; those have no protections under the Geneva Convention. Instead of bowing down to Allah five times per day, these jihadis should reserve some gratitude for Uncle Sam for his naive and short-sighted magnanimity.
So what practices have drawn the ire of the useful idiots more concerned about pleasing Islamists than preventing further acts of jihad against the United States? Some of these prisoners were strip-searched, had ink smeared on their faces, were held in solitary confinement, were deprived of shoes, had cigar smoke blown in their faces or saw an interrogator squat over, stand on or kick a Koran. Can anyone hand-wringing over these incidents name just one person who has ever died or suffered disabling injuries from any of these actions?
Mohamad al-Kahtani, the would-be twentieth hijacker of the plot on the eleventh of September in 2001, faced annoyances such as sleep deprivation, exposure to cold and insults to female members of his family. Many of the members of the American armed forces have endured the same treatment during their training. When will any member of the ACLU or any other jihadi-coddling group lift a finger to halt to rough treatment meted out to American service personnel?
In a pursuit of justice, someone should conduct of poll of survivors of jihadist violence. The question would ask, “Would you rather undergo the same treatment suffered by the prisoners at GITMO or would prefer the fate of the passengers of the hijacked planes and by the occupants of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?” Maybe such an undertaking would open the eyes of the “Hate America First” crowd to see the folly of their myopic and self-destructive agenda.
COPYRIGHT CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009
American service personnel have already been forced to concede to Islamists' demands regarding the treatment of the jihadis. American tax dollars were spent to provide a Koran, prayer rug and prayer beads to every captured jihadi. This funding of religious instruction exists in addition to the highly expensive provision of halal meals to cater to the savages' tastes. All of this undeserved treatment of these criminals flies in the face of the Geneva Convention. None of these goons were wearing a distinguishable military uniform while engaged in such activities as firing on American and allied forces, planting explosives and other acts of war.
There is no precedent for this appeasement of Islamists' demands for undeserved treatment. German prisoners during the Second World War never received free copies of Mein Kempf during their captivity. During that same war, the few Japanese soldiers captured by American were not issued any means to commit ritualistic suicide as their ideology mandated. Additionally, captured communist forces during the wars in Korea and Vietnam never were issued copies of The Communist Manifesto or any other Marxist literature supplied by the country that they sought to defeat. One must ask why do adherents to Islam deserve complementary implements of their ideology when adherents to other strains of totalitarianism were denied similar luxuries. Not only were Axis and Communist forces never pampered in captivity, those who engaged in military operations while not in uniform were frequently executed. Anyone involved in acts of sabotage or other hostility while not in uniform are considered as spies; those have no protections under the Geneva Convention. Instead of bowing down to Allah five times per day, these jihadis should reserve some gratitude for Uncle Sam for his naive and short-sighted magnanimity.
So what practices have drawn the ire of the useful idiots more concerned about pleasing Islamists than preventing further acts of jihad against the United States? Some of these prisoners were strip-searched, had ink smeared on their faces, were held in solitary confinement, were deprived of shoes, had cigar smoke blown in their faces or saw an interrogator squat over, stand on or kick a Koran. Can anyone hand-wringing over these incidents name just one person who has ever died or suffered disabling injuries from any of these actions?
Mohamad al-Kahtani, the would-be twentieth hijacker of the plot on the eleventh of September in 2001, faced annoyances such as sleep deprivation, exposure to cold and insults to female members of his family. Many of the members of the American armed forces have endured the same treatment during their training. When will any member of the ACLU or any other jihadi-coddling group lift a finger to halt to rough treatment meted out to American service personnel?
In a pursuit of justice, someone should conduct of poll of survivors of jihadist violence. The question would ask, “Would you rather undergo the same treatment suffered by the prisoners at GITMO or would prefer the fate of the passengers of the hijacked planes and by the occupants of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?” Maybe such an undertaking would open the eyes of the “Hate America First” crowd to see the folly of their myopic and self-destructive agenda.
COPYRIGHT CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Second Part of Conversation with Mohamadan idiot named Mohammad Irfaan
Here are second batch of rantings from the Mohamadan sheep calling himself "Mohammad Irfaan" along with my responses. I have not altered anything that he or I said. The lunacies in addition to the misspellings and errors of capitalization and punctuation are all his own.
Mohammad Irfaan
August 11 at 6:42am
"Hey Charlie.. what your producing is complete rubbish.
"these verses don't not even exist in the Qur'an.. total fabircation!
"Islam says one should not burden one's wife with work that is toilsome and hard upon her (wife).
"Says also says that A Muslim woman also has obligations. All the laws and regulations pertaining to prayer, fasting, charity, pilgrimage, doing good deeds, etc., apply to women, albeit with minor differences having mainly to do with female physiology.
"Before marriage, a woman has the right to choose her husband. Islamic law is very strict regarding the necessity of having the woman's consent for marriage. The groom gives a marriage dowry to the bride for her own personal use. She keeps her own family name, rather than taking her husband's. As a wife, a woman has the right to be supported by her husband even if she is already rich. She also has the right to seek divorce and custody of young children. She does not return the dowry, except in a few unusual situations
"Finally I end with the World of Al-Mighty Allah....
"'And among His signs is this: that He created mates for you from yourselves that you may find rest and peace of mind in them, and He ordained between you love and mercy. Certainly, herein indeed are signs for people who reflect.' [Noble Quran 30:21]"
Charles Kastriot
August 11 at 10:02am
"You are partially right about the quotes I provided to you. They are complete rubbish but so is the entire Koran and all other the drivel which Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) fabricated and spewed.
"In contrast, you did not give any Koranic verses which substantiate the supposed rights of women under Islamic tyranny. You are a pathetic debater and delusional sheep.
"How can you dare to say what I quoted does not exist in the Koran? I provided the entire verse and gave you the chapter and verse numbers so you can look them up for yourself. You obviously never read the Koran. You are just regurgitating Islamic propaganda that has been drilled into your skull. You are a brainwashed robot."
Mohammad Irfaan
August 12 at 3:49am
"Hey Charlie Kid you little child...
"your bullshit is a load of crap. I am a Muslim fully read the Qur'an understood!
"The bullshit verse your saying does not exist in the Qur'an.. so better luck next time. Islam uplifts the women and gives it a higher status unlike you fools, Islam teaches us to eat, clothe, bathe ourselves, clean ourselves and many more.. what does your religion offer you?
"finally kid i would like to end with the Words of Al-Mighty Allah The Master of the Universe...
"'And If an evil worship comes to you from shaitan (Satan) then seek refuge with Allah. Verily He is All-Hearer, All-Knower. '
(Al Quran, 7:200)"
Mohammad Irfaan
August 12 at 3:50am
"Regards to debating, its pointless debating with you, because to debate the opponents needs to have some or little knowledge, unfortunately your Null!"
Charles Kastriot
August 12 at 12:34pm
"If the verse of Koran 4:34 does not say what I quoted, what does it say? You have proved that you are a liar by claiming to have read the Koran yet denying the existence of the misogynistic verse which I spelled out for you to read.
"My religion offers me the freedom to use my God-given powers of observation and reasoning, unlike your totalitarian ideology of blindly accepting the ludicrous dictates of a criminal.
"By calling me a 'kid', you only insult yourself because this 'kid' has outdebated you and revealed your ignorance of your own religion."
Mohammad Irfaan
August 13 at 3:22am
"ha ha I laugh in your face... your talking total rubbish.
"You can't prove anything from what you believe and try to use the Qur'an to go against Islam.. but you've lost once again.
"We Muslims believe in Moses and Jesus as one of the greatest Prophets of Al-Mighty Allah, we also believe Jesus was taken up alive and will be coming back to earth on the second comming, this also says in the real testiment the old Bible.. the One eyed monster the Jaal will come and Jesus will fight and destroy it.
"There are many simiarlities between Islam, Christianity and Jewdaism, but we must all unite and believe in what is in all faiths which is Believing in One God (Al-Mighty Allah).
"Qur'an Is the solution for Mankind!"
Charles Kastriot
August 14 at 12:25am
"You are a laughably ignorant buffoon. You cannot handle someone like me who has actually read that worthless bilge called the Koran. I quoted the Koran to prove the oppression and violence that Mohamad (May he burn in hell forever) endorsed. You childishly rant and scream baseless insults because you have failed to substantiate your absurd claims. Just because you deny the misogyny and violence inherent in Islam does not erase those evils from the heart of Mo's (MHBHF) fabricated ideology. Try reading Koran 4:34 and other verses espousing misogyny and violence before making any more stupid denials of Islam's misogyny and violence.
"I believe in one God, just not the phony lunar deity that Mo (MHBHF) claimed gave him the privilege to steal other men's wives, have sex with children, rob, murder and commit numerous other crimes."
Mohammad Irfaan
August 14 at 3:32am
"HEY LITTLE ONE you Kid, You get amuzed so easily lol.
"I do not need to prove or provide evidence my holy book the Al-Qur'an is the word of Al-Mighty Allah. what your quoting and asking me to look up is pure Bull shit, there is no such thing in the Qur'an in that particular verse. I understand the Qur'an AllahmidAllah, where you understanding finishes, mine starts!
"Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him (InshAllah) taught us many good deeds including treating others as human, loving kids, respecting elders, protecting the women, providing them with all the help and having no burden on the women.
"there is none worthy of worship expect Al-Mighty Allah and Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him (InshAllah) is the final messenger and servant of Al-Mighty Allah.
"ISLAM = THE SOLUTION FOR HUMANITY..
"you believe or you don't believe, my job was to convey the message of Peace, the message of submission to Al-Mighty Allah, the message of Good!
"You ponder over it or ignore thats totally upto you mate!
"ps. you knowledge on Islam is apaulling, i'm ashmed of You!
Charles Kastriot
Today at 5:54pm
"My knowledge of Islam is no less than yours. You will not even acknowledge the existence of obvious violent and misogynistic verses in Mohamad's (May He Burn in Hell Forever) contrived rantings even after I supplied the quotes to you, including chapter and verse numbers. Therefore, I can conclude that you must be one of the following:
1. illiterate
2. a lunatic who clings to his delusions despite overwhelming evidence disproving the existence of his fantasies
3. a liar determined to deny the truth of the misogynistic and violent contents found throughout the Koran
"You cannot provide any evidence of any supposed divine origin of the Koran other than Mohamad (May He Burn in Hell Forever) said so. Anyone can claim "divine origin" for his or her words, even a seventh century, child-molesting, murderous, thieving Arabian megalomaniac.
"You are more pathetic than a sheep. In the defense of a sheep, he lacks the cerebral capacity to reason and discern wisdom and decency from self-serving perversion and anti-social behavior. You have voluntarily forfeited any human capacity for advanced thought. You have accepted Mohamad's (May He Burn in Hell Forever) drivel as perfect simply because he claimed divine origin for it without even questioning his lunacy. George Orwell certainly had someone just like you when he wrote 1984."
Mohammad Irfaan
August 11 at 6:42am
"Hey Charlie.. what your producing is complete rubbish.
"these verses don't not even exist in the Qur'an.. total fabircation!
"Islam says one should not burden one's wife with work that is toilsome and hard upon her (wife).
"Says also says that A Muslim woman also has obligations. All the laws and regulations pertaining to prayer, fasting, charity, pilgrimage, doing good deeds, etc., apply to women, albeit with minor differences having mainly to do with female physiology.
"Before marriage, a woman has the right to choose her husband. Islamic law is very strict regarding the necessity of having the woman's consent for marriage. The groom gives a marriage dowry to the bride for her own personal use. She keeps her own family name, rather than taking her husband's. As a wife, a woman has the right to be supported by her husband even if she is already rich. She also has the right to seek divorce and custody of young children. She does not return the dowry, except in a few unusual situations
"Finally I end with the World of Al-Mighty Allah....
"'And among His signs is this: that He created mates for you from yourselves that you may find rest and peace of mind in them, and He ordained between you love and mercy. Certainly, herein indeed are signs for people who reflect.' [Noble Quran 30:21]"
Charles Kastriot
August 11 at 10:02am
"You are partially right about the quotes I provided to you. They are complete rubbish but so is the entire Koran and all other the drivel which Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) fabricated and spewed.
"In contrast, you did not give any Koranic verses which substantiate the supposed rights of women under Islamic tyranny. You are a pathetic debater and delusional sheep.
"How can you dare to say what I quoted does not exist in the Koran? I provided the entire verse and gave you the chapter and verse numbers so you can look them up for yourself. You obviously never read the Koran. You are just regurgitating Islamic propaganda that has been drilled into your skull. You are a brainwashed robot."
Mohammad Irfaan
August 12 at 3:49am
"Hey Charlie Kid you little child...
"your bullshit is a load of crap. I am a Muslim fully read the Qur'an understood!
"The bullshit verse your saying does not exist in the Qur'an.. so better luck next time. Islam uplifts the women and gives it a higher status unlike you fools, Islam teaches us to eat, clothe, bathe ourselves, clean ourselves and many more.. what does your religion offer you?
"finally kid i would like to end with the Words of Al-Mighty Allah The Master of the Universe...
"'And If an evil worship comes to you from shaitan (Satan) then seek refuge with Allah. Verily He is All-Hearer, All-Knower. '
(Al Quran, 7:200)"
Mohammad Irfaan
August 12 at 3:50am
"Regards to debating, its pointless debating with you, because to debate the opponents needs to have some or little knowledge, unfortunately your Null!"
Charles Kastriot
August 12 at 12:34pm
"If the verse of Koran 4:34 does not say what I quoted, what does it say? You have proved that you are a liar by claiming to have read the Koran yet denying the existence of the misogynistic verse which I spelled out for you to read.
"My religion offers me the freedom to use my God-given powers of observation and reasoning, unlike your totalitarian ideology of blindly accepting the ludicrous dictates of a criminal.
"By calling me a 'kid', you only insult yourself because this 'kid' has outdebated you and revealed your ignorance of your own religion."
Mohammad Irfaan
August 13 at 3:22am
"ha ha I laugh in your face... your talking total rubbish.
"You can't prove anything from what you believe and try to use the Qur'an to go against Islam.. but you've lost once again.
"We Muslims believe in Moses and Jesus as one of the greatest Prophets of Al-Mighty Allah, we also believe Jesus was taken up alive and will be coming back to earth on the second comming, this also says in the real testiment the old Bible.. the One eyed monster the Jaal will come and Jesus will fight and destroy it.
"There are many simiarlities between Islam, Christianity and Jewdaism, but we must all unite and believe in what is in all faiths which is Believing in One God (Al-Mighty Allah).
"Qur'an Is the solution for Mankind!"
Charles Kastriot
August 14 at 12:25am
"You are a laughably ignorant buffoon. You cannot handle someone like me who has actually read that worthless bilge called the Koran. I quoted the Koran to prove the oppression and violence that Mohamad (May he burn in hell forever) endorsed. You childishly rant and scream baseless insults because you have failed to substantiate your absurd claims. Just because you deny the misogyny and violence inherent in Islam does not erase those evils from the heart of Mo's (MHBHF) fabricated ideology. Try reading Koran 4:34 and other verses espousing misogyny and violence before making any more stupid denials of Islam's misogyny and violence.
"I believe in one God, just not the phony lunar deity that Mo (MHBHF) claimed gave him the privilege to steal other men's wives, have sex with children, rob, murder and commit numerous other crimes."
Mohammad Irfaan
August 14 at 3:32am
"HEY LITTLE ONE you Kid, You get amuzed so easily lol.
"I do not need to prove or provide evidence my holy book the Al-Qur'an is the word of Al-Mighty Allah. what your quoting and asking me to look up is pure Bull shit, there is no such thing in the Qur'an in that particular verse. I understand the Qur'an AllahmidAllah, where you understanding finishes, mine starts!
"Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him (InshAllah) taught us many good deeds including treating others as human, loving kids, respecting elders, protecting the women, providing them with all the help and having no burden on the women.
"there is none worthy of worship expect Al-Mighty Allah and Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him (InshAllah) is the final messenger and servant of Al-Mighty Allah.
"ISLAM = THE SOLUTION FOR HUMANITY..
"you believe or you don't believe, my job was to convey the message of Peace, the message of submission to Al-Mighty Allah, the message of Good!
"You ponder over it or ignore thats totally upto you mate!
"ps. you knowledge on Islam is apaulling, i'm ashmed of You!
Charles Kastriot
Today at 5:54pm
"My knowledge of Islam is no less than yours. You will not even acknowledge the existence of obvious violent and misogynistic verses in Mohamad's (May He Burn in Hell Forever) contrived rantings even after I supplied the quotes to you, including chapter and verse numbers. Therefore, I can conclude that you must be one of the following:
1. illiterate
2. a lunatic who clings to his delusions despite overwhelming evidence disproving the existence of his fantasies
3. a liar determined to deny the truth of the misogynistic and violent contents found throughout the Koran
"You cannot provide any evidence of any supposed divine origin of the Koran other than Mohamad (May He Burn in Hell Forever) said so. Anyone can claim "divine origin" for his or her words, even a seventh century, child-molesting, murderous, thieving Arabian megalomaniac.
"You are more pathetic than a sheep. In the defense of a sheep, he lacks the cerebral capacity to reason and discern wisdom and decency from self-serving perversion and anti-social behavior. You have voluntarily forfeited any human capacity for advanced thought. You have accepted Mohamad's (May He Burn in Hell Forever) drivel as perfect simply because he claimed divine origin for it without even questioning his lunacy. George Orwell certainly had someone just like you when he wrote 1984."
Monday, August 10, 2009
Conversation with Mohamadan Idiot Named Mohammad Irfaan
For the amusement of the readers, I present my dialogue from Facebook with a Mohamadan moron calling himself Mohammad Irfaan. I have not changed any of his statements nor any of mine. The errors in capitalization, grammar and punctuation, faulty logic and denial of reality presented below are all his own.
Mohammad Irfaan
July 10 at 7:00am
"Bismillah-Hir-Rahman-Nir-Rahim - In the Name of Allah The Most Kind the Most Mercificul.
"I would like to invite you to the Faith of Islam - The Solution for Humanity!"
Charles Kastriot
July 10 at 10:36am
"In the name of the dignity, liberty and equality of every human being, I invite you to renounce Islam- The Scourge of Humanity!"
Mohammad Irfaan
July 13 at 1:10am
"Islam is Dignity, liberty and Equality!!!"
Charles Kastriot
July 15 at 9:29pm
"Mohamad (MHBHF) declared that women are inherently inferior in Koran, Chapter Four. He also mandated subserviant status for non-Mohamadans in Koran, Chapter Nine. Therefore, equality of all humans is not possible under Islam.
"Liberty for Mohamadans to renounce Islam under Sharia or question Islamic doctrines does not exist. Apostacy is punished by execution. The freedom to create laws on the consensus of the governed is the antithesis of Islam. Islam is the whole world conforming to the whims and opinions of Mo (MHBHF). Thus, liberity is not possible under Islam.
"The only dignity accorded to anyone under Islam is to the clerics who emulate Mo(MHBHF) and the goons that enforce the tyrannical reign of Islamic regimes. Women have no such luxury;they have to hope that none of their hair peeks through their oppressive outfits or that no one rapes them. Otherwise they face floggings or stonings. These exist in addition to the dehumanizing Islamic practices of polygyny, female genital mutilation and wife-beating. There is no dignity under Islam for women and girls."
Mohammad Irfaan
July 16 at 2:41am
"Hey Charles, it seems you your not bright enough nor literate enough to understand the Qur'an. Al-Mighty Allah Tala has put a balance between men and women. If so, for the sake of the argument, why don't say FIFA have men playing women in football, why don't you see boxing matches being fought between men and women - wherez equality in that!
"the Qur'an has an absolute balance between men and women, some areas where men have more share, and some where women have a higher share, it completly addes to equality between both sexes.
"You guys (western) actually downgrade your women, you sell your mothers, daughters, wife's and sisters to people, advertise them almost naked, Islam respects them, covers them and gives total protection, thats why 2/3 of people accpeting Islam in America are women - WHY?"
Charles Kastriot
July 19 at 8:33am
"It seems you are so blinded by your brainwashing that you cannot see the inferor status of women under Islam. If they are equal under Islam, why cannot a women have multiple husbands but a man can have multiple wives? Why does a woman only receive half of a share of inheritance while a man receives a whole share? Why is the testimony of one man equal the testimony of two women? Name one specific area in which have more privilege than a man under Islam.
"You refuse to see how Islam degrades women. How is respectful of women to force them to wear black, suffocating clothing, especially in desert climates? Why are you Mohamadans so threatened by seeing such benign images such as a woman's face, hair or ankle? The answer lies in the fact that Mohamadans only view women and girls as their inferior servants (family members) or potential sexual objects (all other women in the world).
"There is no protection for sexually exploited women under Islam. If a woman is raped, she must provide four witness of the rape to exonerate herself. If not, she faces execution. If four men witness a rape and do nothing to stop it, they are either accomplices or too cowardly to testify against the rapist(s) anyway.
"Under Western laws, it is illegal to sell any human being. Under Islam women and girls are regularly sold by their families, often pre-teen girls are sold to men in their thirties and forties. Pedophilia is a crime in the Free World; in the Islamic bloc, it is accepted as another way to emulate Mohamad (MHBHF). Under Islam, enslavement of non-Mohamadans is condoned; in the civilized world, enslavement of anyone was outlawed two centuries ago.
"As for your argument about segregation of women and men in soccer and boxing, that is done for competitive balance. The same reason exists for the various weight classifications dividing men in boxing. Officials want a fight to be determined based on skill, not sheer size. That is why a hundred kilogram man does not fight a seventy kilogram man. Also, twelve year old boys do not compete in the same leagues as twenty-five year old men. It is a matter of physical maturity and length of time spent in training. At least women are free to compete openly in soccer, boxing and other sports in the Free World. That is not the case in the Islamic bloc.
"Obviously your Islamic indoctrination of relying on the Koran and Hadiths for all of life's questions has destroyed any mental capacity for you to determine answers on your own. A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Only you can liberate your brain from the cancer called Islam.
"Who says two-thirds of people converting to Islam are women? Name your source. This sounds like typical Islamic phony propaganda. While you search for an objective source for that, find out how many women renounce Islam once they arrive in the Free World. Their numbers continue to grow without much publicity."
Mohammad Irfaan
July 20 at 3:33am
"I'm Impressed by your words but not Influenced at all!
"Regards to the women being degraded etc by Islam - trust me your under a huge illusion. The Question of Hijab: Suppression Or Liberation?
"'Why do Muslim women have to cover their heads?' This question is one which is asked by Muslim and non-Muslim alike. For many women it is the truest test of being a Muslim so your no the only one.
"The answer to the question is very simple - Muslim women observe HIJAB (covering the head and the body) because Allah has told them to do so.
"'O Prophet, tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their outer garments around them (when they go out or are among men). That is better in order that they may be known (to be Muslims) and not annoyed...' [Noble Quran 33:59]"
"PLEASE CONTINUE TO READ...
"Other secondary reasons include the requirement for modesty in both men and women. Both will then be evaluated for intelligence and skills instead of looks and sexuality. An Iranian school girl is quoted as saying, 'We want to stop men from treating us like sex objects, as they have always done. We want them to ignore our appearance and to be attentive to our personalities and mind. We want them to take us seriously and treat us as equals and not just chase us around for our bodies and physical looks.' A Muslim woman who covers her head is making a statement about her identity. Anyone who sees her will know that she is a Muslim and has a good moral character. Many Muslim women who cover are filled with dignity and self esteem; they are pleased to be identified as a Muslim woman. As a chaste, modest, pure woman, she does not want her sexuality to enter into interactions with men in the smallest degree. A woman who covers herself is concealing her sexuality but allowing her femininity to be brought out.
"Islam has no fixed standard as to the style of dress or type of clothing that Muslims must wear. However, some requirements must be met. The first of these requirements is the parts of the body which must be covered. Islam has two sources for guidance and rulings: first, the Quran, the revealed word of Allah and secondly, the Hadith or the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) who was chosen by Allah to be the role model for mankind.
"Often forgotten is the fact that modern Western dress is a new invention. Looking at the clothing of women as recently as seventy years ago, we see clothing similar to Hijab. These active and hard-working women of the West were not inhibited by their clothing which consisted of long, full dresses and various types of head covering. Muslim women who wear Hijab do not find it impractical or interfering with their activities in all levels and walks of life. Hijab is not merely a covering dress but more importantly, it is behavior, manners, speech and appearance in public. Dress is only one facet of the total being. The basic requirement of the Muslim woman's dress apply to the Muslim man's clothing with the difference being mainly in degree. Modesty requires that the area between the navel and the knee be covered in front of all people except the wife. The clothing of men should not be like the dress of women, nor should it be tight or provocative. A Muslim should dress to show his identity as a Muslim. Men are not allowed to wear gold or silk. However, both are allowed for women.
"For both men and women, clothing requirements are not meant to be a restriction but rather a way in which society will function in a proper, Islamic manner."
Mohammad Irfaan
July 20 at 3:47am
"At a time when the rest of the world, from Greece and Rome to India and China, considered women as no better than children or even slaves, with no rights whatsoever, Islam acknowledged women's equality with men in a great many respects. The Quran states:
"'And among His signs is this: that He created mates for you from yourselves that you may find rest and peace of mind in them, and He ordained between you love and mercy. Certainly, herein indeed are signs for people who reflect.' [Noble Quran 30:21]
"Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said:
"'The most perfect in faith amongst believers is he who is best in manners and kindest to his wife.' [Abu Dawud]
"With regard to education, both women and men have the same rights and obligations. This is clear in Prophet Muhammad's saying:
"'Seeking knowledge is mandatory for every believer.' [Ibn Majah]
"A woman is to be treated as God has endowed her, with rights, such as to be treated as an individual, with the right to own and dispose of her own property and earnings, enter into contracts, even after marriage. She has the right to be educated and to work outside the home if she so chooses. She has the right to inherit from her father, mother, and husband.
"Before marriage, a woman has the right to choose her husband. Islamic law is very strict regarding the necessity of having the woman's consent for marriage. The groom gives a marriage dowry to the bride for her own personal use. She keeps her own family name, rather than taking her husband's. As a wife, a woman has the right to be supported by her husband even if she is already rich. She also has the right to seek divorce and custody of young children. She does not return the dowry, except in a few unusual situations.
"Despite the fact that in many places and times Muslim communities have not always adhered to all or even many of the foregoing in practice, the ideal has been there for 1,400 years, while virtually all other major civilizations did not begin to address these issues or change their negative attitudes until the 19th and 20th centuries, and there are still many contemporary civilizations which have yet to do so.
"Finally...
"The issue of women in Islam, is topic of great misunderstanding and distortion due partly to a lack of understanding, but also partly due to misbehavior of some Muslims which has been taken to represent the teachings of Islam!"
Charles Kastriot
July 21 at 9:04am
"If you know Islam as well as you claim, you know that hadiths are disputed by various sects and schools of Islam. Some hadiths are labeled sound by some groups but others call the same hadiths false. All of sects and schools consider the Koran is the ultimate source of Islamic doctrine. In the fourth chapter of the Koran appropriately titled 'Women', Mohamad (May he burn in hell forever) clearly states that women are inherently inferior to men and that a man is permitted to beat his multiple wives. Any Mohamadan man who takes multiple wives and beats them is not misunderstanding or distorting Islam. On the contrary, he is emulating Mo (MHBHF) who the Koran states is the paragon and example of ideal human behavior.
"As for oppressive clothing required for women, why must women suffer in suffocating outfits? Men can control their thoughts and actions in regards to women. Even if a women completely hides herself in the outfits identical to a tent, a man can still view her as a sexual object. No amount of hiding herself under layer upon layer of clothing by a woman can make men stop viewing her as a carnal outlet for their sexual gratification. The problem of objectivication of women and girls lies in the minds of sexually compulsive men like Mo (MHBHF).
"On what basis do you claim that a DEITY ordered that women must wear suffocating outfits? It was Mo (MHBHF) that uttered those words recorded in the Koran. He alone claimed to receive those commandments. None of his contemporaries heard any divine voices telling them to how to think or act. There is zero independent corroboration of any divine origin of any of Mo(MHBHF)'s fabrications.
"Can you not see that Mo (MHBHF) was a charlatan who eventually deluded enough people to rise to the level of a dictator? He conveniently received exemptions to rules to which everyone else had to comply. He could have an unlimited number of wives; other men had a four wife limit. Mo (MHBHF) was entitled to twenty percent of the booty from his lackeys robbing other tribes; everyone else settled for smaller shares, even though they actually risked their lives to commit the crimes and Mo (MHBHF) just gave orders. After seeing the wife of his adopted son undresing and he started lusting for her, he just so happened to receive a self-serving alleged "revelation" so he could seize another man's wife for Mo(MHBHF)'s own exploitation.
"(MHBHF) was nothing more than sexually-obsessed, megalomaniacal, evilly manipulative child molester. He exploited the gullibility, greed and superstitious beliefs of ignorant people around him then built up a totalitarian regime with himself wielding the sole position of power. He stands in a long line of similar despots throughout history such as Adolf Hitler, Genghis Khan, Joseph Stalin, Napoleon Bonaparte and other self-appointed so-called "prophets" espousing new ideologies who morphed into absolute tyrants.
Mohammad Irfaan
July 23 at 3:40am
"Hey Charles - seriously I do not know where you get your false sources from.. regards to man beating his wife is totally against Islam - Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad (Peace and Blessing Be Upon him InshAllah) always learned us to love and care for the wives.
"Regarding the cover up of Muslim Women, every Muslim women whom covers does it so by its own personal DESIRE.. its not that if you don't cover you will get killed or beated to death - But Islam order a women to cover up, shez allowed to show her face, hands and ankles - So i don't see where she suffocates!
"A wife (women) can earn as much as she wants and spend it where ever she prefers, according to Islam the women does not need to share money or her finance with her husband, but the Husband has been given the duty to provide full financial support to his wife - Therefore here the women is given huge respect, as the man takes the financial burden!
"Regarding Muhammad Peace and Blessing Be Upon Him InshAllah...
"Almost everyone on the earth today is discussing Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him. People want to know, 'Who was he exactly?' 'What did he teach?' 'Why was he loved so much by some and hated so much by others?' 'Did he live up to his claims?' 'Was he a holy man?' 'Was he a prophet of God?' 'What is the truth about this man - Muhammad?'
"How can we discover the truth and be totally honest in our judgment?
"We will begin with the very simple historical evidences, facts as narrated by thousands of people, many of whom knew him personally. The following is based on books, manuscripts, texts and actual eyewitness accounts, too numerous list herein, yet all have been preserved in original form throughout the centuries by both Muslims and non-Muslims.
"Muhammad ibn (son of) Abdullah ibn (son of) Abdul Mutalib, was born in the year 570 C.E. (Christian Era) in Makkah, Felix Arabia (today: Saudi Arabia) and he died in 633 C.E. in Yathrib (today: Madinah, Saudi Arabia).
"A. His names: When he was born, his grandfather, Abdul Mutalib, gave him the name Muhammad. And it means 'praised one' or 'praising one.' He was later called 'As-Saddiq' (the Truthful) by all of those who knew of his truthful and honest nature. He always said only the truth. He was also called 'Al-Amin' (the Trustworthy) due to his integrity and always upholding any trust given to him. When the tribes were battling against each other, both sides would entrust him with their possessions during the fighting, even if it might be against some of his own tribesmen, because they knew he would always uphold any trust given to him. All of his names indicated the very nature of a man who was praised for his honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. He was also well known for advocating the reconciliation of kinship and relationships. He ordered his followers to always honor the 'ties of the wombs' (siblings and other close relatives).
"Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, taught that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was the immaculate conception and miracle birth of Mary, and that she was the best creation of Almighty God. He insisted even to the Jews of Madinah, that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was the Messiah, the Christ, the one predicted to come in their Torah (Old Testament). He also taught that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, did many miracles by the permission of Almighty God, curing the lepers, restoring sight to the blind and even bringing a dead man back to life, and he was not dead, rather Almighty God had raised him up. He also predicted Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, is going to return again in the Last Days to lead the true believers in a victory over the evil and unrighteous people, and he will destroy the Anti-Christ.
"PLUS...
"Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, forbade any killing, even when his followers were being killed, until the orders for retaliation came from Allah. Even then the limits were clearly spelled out and only those engaged in active combat against the Muslims or Islam were to be fought in combat. And even then, only according to very strict rules from Allah.
Charles Kastriot
August 6 at 11:18pm
"My sources are the Koran and Hadiths. Koran Chapter 4:34 authorizes wife-beating. Mohamadan women are regularly brutalized for refusing to follow Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) commandment (Koran 24:31) to cover themselves completely. Mo (MHBHF) urged murder of his enemies in Koran (2:244, 2:191, 2:216, 4:76, 4:89, 5:33, 9:5, 9:73, 9:111 and 9:123, in addition to numerous others). So where do you obtain your phony Islamic propaganda?
"Mohamadan men hold total authority over their wives according to Koran 4:34. Therefore, a man can prevent his wives from holding jobs thus being totally dependent on his support. This is a common tactic to keep Mohamadan women dependent on their husband despite his infidelity (polygyny) and his Koran-authorized beatings.
"Where are the accounts of eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen or heard Allah's alleged 'revelations' to Mo (MHBHF)? NO ONE ELSE heard Mo's so-called 'revelations'. He claimed to be alone whenever Allah allegedly gave him a message. That is a suspiciously convenient cover for such a huckster like Mo (MHBHF). He fabricated supposedly divine messages whenever he wanted something like larger portions of stolen goods, taking someone else's wife and such criminal behavior."
Mohammad Irfaan
Today at 4:26am
"Hey seems you invented your own false book where you quoting from.
Islam is against beating of the wife, the Holy Book of Al-Mighty Allah the Al-Qur'an is against the beating of the wife.
"A women if she wishes can work and in Islam there is not stopping. Islam has put the financial burden on the Husband, its the Husband's duty to provide food and shelter for the women, if the women earns money too she is not oblighed to support the Husband, if she wishes fair enough else it is not compulsory to give her money to the Husband. Islam AllhamdiAllah has given huge respect to women, we Muslims cover our women and its something that Muslim women prefer, unlike the western society, they love to display their mothers, daughters and wives nude on tv.
"Islam is pure and a solution for Mankind!"
Charles Kastriot
August 10, 2009 at 10:47am
"I did not invent a false book for those quotes. I typed quotes from Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) false book. Since you obviously never read his loathsome fabrication or are simply lying about its contents, I will spell out the entire Koranic verse 4:34.
"'Men stand superior to women in that God hath preferred some of them over others, and in that they expend of their wealth: and the virtuous women, devoted, careful (in their husbands') absence, as God has cared for them. But those whose perverseness ye fear, admonish them and remove them into bed-chambers and beat them; but if they submit to you, then do not seek a way against them; verily, God is high and great.'
"Since I provided Koranic evidence proving Islamic sanctioning of wife-beating, I dare you to provide any Koranic verse giving women the right to work even if her husband objects to that.
"Where have you seen women nude on television? I can tell you that in my country, the United States, NO ONE, female or male, is allowed to appear nude on over-the-air broadcast or basic cable television.
"Yes, you Mohamadans cover your women, just like civilized people cover furniture. That is logical since you savages consider women as objects to be collected like multiple possessions (Koran 4:3) then exploited sexually (Koran 2:223).
"Islam is pure evil and the bane of humanity!"
Mohammad Irfaan
July 10 at 7:00am
"Bismillah-Hir-Rahman-Nir-Rahim - In the Name of Allah The Most Kind the Most Mercificul.
"I would like to invite you to the Faith of Islam - The Solution for Humanity!"
Charles Kastriot
July 10 at 10:36am
"In the name of the dignity, liberty and equality of every human being, I invite you to renounce Islam- The Scourge of Humanity!"
Mohammad Irfaan
July 13 at 1:10am
"Islam is Dignity, liberty and Equality!!!"
Charles Kastriot
July 15 at 9:29pm
"Mohamad (MHBHF) declared that women are inherently inferior in Koran, Chapter Four. He also mandated subserviant status for non-Mohamadans in Koran, Chapter Nine. Therefore, equality of all humans is not possible under Islam.
"Liberty for Mohamadans to renounce Islam under Sharia or question Islamic doctrines does not exist. Apostacy is punished by execution. The freedom to create laws on the consensus of the governed is the antithesis of Islam. Islam is the whole world conforming to the whims and opinions of Mo (MHBHF). Thus, liberity is not possible under Islam.
"The only dignity accorded to anyone under Islam is to the clerics who emulate Mo(MHBHF) and the goons that enforce the tyrannical reign of Islamic regimes. Women have no such luxury;they have to hope that none of their hair peeks through their oppressive outfits or that no one rapes them. Otherwise they face floggings or stonings. These exist in addition to the dehumanizing Islamic practices of polygyny, female genital mutilation and wife-beating. There is no dignity under Islam for women and girls."
Mohammad Irfaan
July 16 at 2:41am
"Hey Charles, it seems you your not bright enough nor literate enough to understand the Qur'an. Al-Mighty Allah Tala has put a balance between men and women. If so, for the sake of the argument, why don't say FIFA have men playing women in football, why don't you see boxing matches being fought between men and women - wherez equality in that!
"the Qur'an has an absolute balance between men and women, some areas where men have more share, and some where women have a higher share, it completly addes to equality between both sexes.
"You guys (western) actually downgrade your women, you sell your mothers, daughters, wife's and sisters to people, advertise them almost naked, Islam respects them, covers them and gives total protection, thats why 2/3 of people accpeting Islam in America are women - WHY?"
Charles Kastriot
July 19 at 8:33am
"It seems you are so blinded by your brainwashing that you cannot see the inferor status of women under Islam. If they are equal under Islam, why cannot a women have multiple husbands but a man can have multiple wives? Why does a woman only receive half of a share of inheritance while a man receives a whole share? Why is the testimony of one man equal the testimony of two women? Name one specific area in which have more privilege than a man under Islam.
"You refuse to see how Islam degrades women. How is respectful of women to force them to wear black, suffocating clothing, especially in desert climates? Why are you Mohamadans so threatened by seeing such benign images such as a woman's face, hair or ankle? The answer lies in the fact that Mohamadans only view women and girls as their inferior servants (family members) or potential sexual objects (all other women in the world).
"There is no protection for sexually exploited women under Islam. If a woman is raped, she must provide four witness of the rape to exonerate herself. If not, she faces execution. If four men witness a rape and do nothing to stop it, they are either accomplices or too cowardly to testify against the rapist(s) anyway.
"Under Western laws, it is illegal to sell any human being. Under Islam women and girls are regularly sold by their families, often pre-teen girls are sold to men in their thirties and forties. Pedophilia is a crime in the Free World; in the Islamic bloc, it is accepted as another way to emulate Mohamad (MHBHF). Under Islam, enslavement of non-Mohamadans is condoned; in the civilized world, enslavement of anyone was outlawed two centuries ago.
"As for your argument about segregation of women and men in soccer and boxing, that is done for competitive balance. The same reason exists for the various weight classifications dividing men in boxing. Officials want a fight to be determined based on skill, not sheer size. That is why a hundred kilogram man does not fight a seventy kilogram man. Also, twelve year old boys do not compete in the same leagues as twenty-five year old men. It is a matter of physical maturity and length of time spent in training. At least women are free to compete openly in soccer, boxing and other sports in the Free World. That is not the case in the Islamic bloc.
"Obviously your Islamic indoctrination of relying on the Koran and Hadiths for all of life's questions has destroyed any mental capacity for you to determine answers on your own. A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Only you can liberate your brain from the cancer called Islam.
"Who says two-thirds of people converting to Islam are women? Name your source. This sounds like typical Islamic phony propaganda. While you search for an objective source for that, find out how many women renounce Islam once they arrive in the Free World. Their numbers continue to grow without much publicity."
Mohammad Irfaan
July 20 at 3:33am
"I'm Impressed by your words but not Influenced at all!
"Regards to the women being degraded etc by Islam - trust me your under a huge illusion. The Question of Hijab: Suppression Or Liberation?
"'Why do Muslim women have to cover their heads?' This question is one which is asked by Muslim and non-Muslim alike. For many women it is the truest test of being a Muslim so your no the only one.
"The answer to the question is very simple - Muslim women observe HIJAB (covering the head and the body) because Allah has told them to do so.
"'O Prophet, tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their outer garments around them (when they go out or are among men). That is better in order that they may be known (to be Muslims) and not annoyed...' [Noble Quran 33:59]"
"PLEASE CONTINUE TO READ...
"Other secondary reasons include the requirement for modesty in both men and women. Both will then be evaluated for intelligence and skills instead of looks and sexuality. An Iranian school girl is quoted as saying, 'We want to stop men from treating us like sex objects, as they have always done. We want them to ignore our appearance and to be attentive to our personalities and mind. We want them to take us seriously and treat us as equals and not just chase us around for our bodies and physical looks.' A Muslim woman who covers her head is making a statement about her identity. Anyone who sees her will know that she is a Muslim and has a good moral character. Many Muslim women who cover are filled with dignity and self esteem; they are pleased to be identified as a Muslim woman. As a chaste, modest, pure woman, she does not want her sexuality to enter into interactions with men in the smallest degree. A woman who covers herself is concealing her sexuality but allowing her femininity to be brought out.
"Islam has no fixed standard as to the style of dress or type of clothing that Muslims must wear. However, some requirements must be met. The first of these requirements is the parts of the body which must be covered. Islam has two sources for guidance and rulings: first, the Quran, the revealed word of Allah and secondly, the Hadith or the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) who was chosen by Allah to be the role model for mankind.
"Often forgotten is the fact that modern Western dress is a new invention. Looking at the clothing of women as recently as seventy years ago, we see clothing similar to Hijab. These active and hard-working women of the West were not inhibited by their clothing which consisted of long, full dresses and various types of head covering. Muslim women who wear Hijab do not find it impractical or interfering with their activities in all levels and walks of life. Hijab is not merely a covering dress but more importantly, it is behavior, manners, speech and appearance in public. Dress is only one facet of the total being. The basic requirement of the Muslim woman's dress apply to the Muslim man's clothing with the difference being mainly in degree. Modesty requires that the area between the navel and the knee be covered in front of all people except the wife. The clothing of men should not be like the dress of women, nor should it be tight or provocative. A Muslim should dress to show his identity as a Muslim. Men are not allowed to wear gold or silk. However, both are allowed for women.
"For both men and women, clothing requirements are not meant to be a restriction but rather a way in which society will function in a proper, Islamic manner."
Mohammad Irfaan
July 20 at 3:47am
"At a time when the rest of the world, from Greece and Rome to India and China, considered women as no better than children or even slaves, with no rights whatsoever, Islam acknowledged women's equality with men in a great many respects. The Quran states:
"'And among His signs is this: that He created mates for you from yourselves that you may find rest and peace of mind in them, and He ordained between you love and mercy. Certainly, herein indeed are signs for people who reflect.' [Noble Quran 30:21]
"Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said:
"'The most perfect in faith amongst believers is he who is best in manners and kindest to his wife.' [Abu Dawud]
"With regard to education, both women and men have the same rights and obligations. This is clear in Prophet Muhammad's saying:
"'Seeking knowledge is mandatory for every believer.' [Ibn Majah]
"A woman is to be treated as God has endowed her, with rights, such as to be treated as an individual, with the right to own and dispose of her own property and earnings, enter into contracts, even after marriage. She has the right to be educated and to work outside the home if she so chooses. She has the right to inherit from her father, mother, and husband.
"Before marriage, a woman has the right to choose her husband. Islamic law is very strict regarding the necessity of having the woman's consent for marriage. The groom gives a marriage dowry to the bride for her own personal use. She keeps her own family name, rather than taking her husband's. As a wife, a woman has the right to be supported by her husband even if she is already rich. She also has the right to seek divorce and custody of young children. She does not return the dowry, except in a few unusual situations.
"Despite the fact that in many places and times Muslim communities have not always adhered to all or even many of the foregoing in practice, the ideal has been there for 1,400 years, while virtually all other major civilizations did not begin to address these issues or change their negative attitudes until the 19th and 20th centuries, and there are still many contemporary civilizations which have yet to do so.
"Finally...
"The issue of women in Islam, is topic of great misunderstanding and distortion due partly to a lack of understanding, but also partly due to misbehavior of some Muslims which has been taken to represent the teachings of Islam!"
Charles Kastriot
July 21 at 9:04am
"If you know Islam as well as you claim, you know that hadiths are disputed by various sects and schools of Islam. Some hadiths are labeled sound by some groups but others call the same hadiths false. All of sects and schools consider the Koran is the ultimate source of Islamic doctrine. In the fourth chapter of the Koran appropriately titled 'Women', Mohamad (May he burn in hell forever) clearly states that women are inherently inferior to men and that a man is permitted to beat his multiple wives. Any Mohamadan man who takes multiple wives and beats them is not misunderstanding or distorting Islam. On the contrary, he is emulating Mo (MHBHF) who the Koran states is the paragon and example of ideal human behavior.
"As for oppressive clothing required for women, why must women suffer in suffocating outfits? Men can control their thoughts and actions in regards to women. Even if a women completely hides herself in the outfits identical to a tent, a man can still view her as a sexual object. No amount of hiding herself under layer upon layer of clothing by a woman can make men stop viewing her as a carnal outlet for their sexual gratification. The problem of objectivication of women and girls lies in the minds of sexually compulsive men like Mo (MHBHF).
"On what basis do you claim that a DEITY ordered that women must wear suffocating outfits? It was Mo (MHBHF) that uttered those words recorded in the Koran. He alone claimed to receive those commandments. None of his contemporaries heard any divine voices telling them to how to think or act. There is zero independent corroboration of any divine origin of any of Mo(MHBHF)'s fabrications.
"Can you not see that Mo (MHBHF) was a charlatan who eventually deluded enough people to rise to the level of a dictator? He conveniently received exemptions to rules to which everyone else had to comply. He could have an unlimited number of wives; other men had a four wife limit. Mo (MHBHF) was entitled to twenty percent of the booty from his lackeys robbing other tribes; everyone else settled for smaller shares, even though they actually risked their lives to commit the crimes and Mo (MHBHF) just gave orders. After seeing the wife of his adopted son undresing and he started lusting for her, he just so happened to receive a self-serving alleged "revelation" so he could seize another man's wife for Mo(MHBHF)'s own exploitation.
"(MHBHF) was nothing more than sexually-obsessed, megalomaniacal, evilly manipulative child molester. He exploited the gullibility, greed and superstitious beliefs of ignorant people around him then built up a totalitarian regime with himself wielding the sole position of power. He stands in a long line of similar despots throughout history such as Adolf Hitler, Genghis Khan, Joseph Stalin, Napoleon Bonaparte and other self-appointed so-called "prophets" espousing new ideologies who morphed into absolute tyrants.
Mohammad Irfaan
July 23 at 3:40am
"Hey Charles - seriously I do not know where you get your false sources from.. regards to man beating his wife is totally against Islam - Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad (Peace and Blessing Be Upon him InshAllah) always learned us to love and care for the wives.
"Regarding the cover up of Muslim Women, every Muslim women whom covers does it so by its own personal DESIRE.. its not that if you don't cover you will get killed or beated to death - But Islam order a women to cover up, shez allowed to show her face, hands and ankles - So i don't see where she suffocates!
"A wife (women) can earn as much as she wants and spend it where ever she prefers, according to Islam the women does not need to share money or her finance with her husband, but the Husband has been given the duty to provide full financial support to his wife - Therefore here the women is given huge respect, as the man takes the financial burden!
"Regarding Muhammad Peace and Blessing Be Upon Him InshAllah...
"Almost everyone on the earth today is discussing Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him. People want to know, 'Who was he exactly?' 'What did he teach?' 'Why was he loved so much by some and hated so much by others?' 'Did he live up to his claims?' 'Was he a holy man?' 'Was he a prophet of God?' 'What is the truth about this man - Muhammad?'
"How can we discover the truth and be totally honest in our judgment?
"We will begin with the very simple historical evidences, facts as narrated by thousands of people, many of whom knew him personally. The following is based on books, manuscripts, texts and actual eyewitness accounts, too numerous list herein, yet all have been preserved in original form throughout the centuries by both Muslims and non-Muslims.
"Muhammad ibn (son of) Abdullah ibn (son of) Abdul Mutalib, was born in the year 570 C.E. (Christian Era) in Makkah, Felix Arabia (today: Saudi Arabia) and he died in 633 C.E. in Yathrib (today: Madinah, Saudi Arabia).
"A. His names: When he was born, his grandfather, Abdul Mutalib, gave him the name Muhammad. And it means 'praised one' or 'praising one.' He was later called 'As-Saddiq' (the Truthful) by all of those who knew of his truthful and honest nature. He always said only the truth. He was also called 'Al-Amin' (the Trustworthy) due to his integrity and always upholding any trust given to him. When the tribes were battling against each other, both sides would entrust him with their possessions during the fighting, even if it might be against some of his own tribesmen, because they knew he would always uphold any trust given to him. All of his names indicated the very nature of a man who was praised for his honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. He was also well known for advocating the reconciliation of kinship and relationships. He ordered his followers to always honor the 'ties of the wombs' (siblings and other close relatives).
"Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, taught that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was the immaculate conception and miracle birth of Mary, and that she was the best creation of Almighty God. He insisted even to the Jews of Madinah, that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was the Messiah, the Christ, the one predicted to come in their Torah (Old Testament). He also taught that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, did many miracles by the permission of Almighty God, curing the lepers, restoring sight to the blind and even bringing a dead man back to life, and he was not dead, rather Almighty God had raised him up. He also predicted Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, is going to return again in the Last Days to lead the true believers in a victory over the evil and unrighteous people, and he will destroy the Anti-Christ.
"PLUS...
"Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, forbade any killing, even when his followers were being killed, until the orders for retaliation came from Allah. Even then the limits were clearly spelled out and only those engaged in active combat against the Muslims or Islam were to be fought in combat. And even then, only according to very strict rules from Allah.
Charles Kastriot
August 6 at 11:18pm
"My sources are the Koran and Hadiths. Koran Chapter 4:34 authorizes wife-beating. Mohamadan women are regularly brutalized for refusing to follow Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) commandment (Koran 24:31) to cover themselves completely. Mo (MHBHF) urged murder of his enemies in Koran (2:244, 2:191, 2:216, 4:76, 4:89, 5:33, 9:5, 9:73, 9:111 and 9:123, in addition to numerous others). So where do you obtain your phony Islamic propaganda?
"Mohamadan men hold total authority over their wives according to Koran 4:34. Therefore, a man can prevent his wives from holding jobs thus being totally dependent on his support. This is a common tactic to keep Mohamadan women dependent on their husband despite his infidelity (polygyny) and his Koran-authorized beatings.
"Where are the accounts of eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen or heard Allah's alleged 'revelations' to Mo (MHBHF)? NO ONE ELSE heard Mo's so-called 'revelations'. He claimed to be alone whenever Allah allegedly gave him a message. That is a suspiciously convenient cover for such a huckster like Mo (MHBHF). He fabricated supposedly divine messages whenever he wanted something like larger portions of stolen goods, taking someone else's wife and such criminal behavior."
Mohammad Irfaan
Today at 4:26am
"Hey seems you invented your own false book where you quoting from.
Islam is against beating of the wife, the Holy Book of Al-Mighty Allah the Al-Qur'an is against the beating of the wife.
"A women if she wishes can work and in Islam there is not stopping. Islam has put the financial burden on the Husband, its the Husband's duty to provide food and shelter for the women, if the women earns money too she is not oblighed to support the Husband, if she wishes fair enough else it is not compulsory to give her money to the Husband. Islam AllhamdiAllah has given huge respect to women, we Muslims cover our women and its something that Muslim women prefer, unlike the western society, they love to display their mothers, daughters and wives nude on tv.
"Islam is pure and a solution for Mankind!"
Charles Kastriot
August 10, 2009 at 10:47am
"I did not invent a false book for those quotes. I typed quotes from Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) false book. Since you obviously never read his loathsome fabrication or are simply lying about its contents, I will spell out the entire Koranic verse 4:34.
"'Men stand superior to women in that God hath preferred some of them over others, and in that they expend of their wealth: and the virtuous women, devoted, careful (in their husbands') absence, as God has cared for them. But those whose perverseness ye fear, admonish them and remove them into bed-chambers and beat them; but if they submit to you, then do not seek a way against them; verily, God is high and great.'
"Since I provided Koranic evidence proving Islamic sanctioning of wife-beating, I dare you to provide any Koranic verse giving women the right to work even if her husband objects to that.
"Where have you seen women nude on television? I can tell you that in my country, the United States, NO ONE, female or male, is allowed to appear nude on over-the-air broadcast or basic cable television.
"Yes, you Mohamadans cover your women, just like civilized people cover furniture. That is logical since you savages consider women as objects to be collected like multiple possessions (Koran 4:3) then exploited sexually (Koran 2:223).
"Islam is pure evil and the bane of humanity!"
Friday, August 7, 2009
conversation with a Mohamadan sheep named Fatima Shirazi
In response to a friend request on Facebook by someone unknown to me calling herself "Fatima Shirazi", the following exchanges took place. I have not altered any of what she or I said in the original messages.
Charles Kastriot
June 29 at 11:51pm
"Have we met previously? I am wondering why you sent me a friend request."
Fatima Shirazi
July 7 at 8:26pm
"lol no...
we havent
just curious to add you"
Charles Kastriot
July 8 at 12:45pm
"What is your opinion of Islam?"
Fatima Shirazi
July 9 at 5:59pm
"but in what aspect do you mean?
it is a broad question
whats your view?"
Charles Kastriot
July 9 at 8:27pm
"I will specify my question. What is your opinion of polygyny, of Sharia and its implementation, of suicidal attacks, of apostasy from Islam and of other religions?"
Fatima Shirazi
July 9 at 9:47pm
"lol wow so basically what do I think of radical islam?
I do not support polygamy it was in the quran back in the day for different reasons, sharia is only practiced in saudi and other gulf nations. I dont suport suicide attacks not does islam, despite wat people say.
apostasy-if a person wants to be a different religion so be it...to each their own.
i have no issue with other religions but if i were to ever convert i could never be a polytheistic one..
ex-hindu, buddhism...etc
but that doesnt mean i have a personal vendetta against them
and you?"
Charles Kastriot
July 11 at 3:12pm
"Polygyny is not radical in terms of Islam. Mohamad (MHBHF) clearly stated in Koran 4:3 that a man can marry up to four women. If someone claimed that polygyny was forbidden in Islam or that a woman could legally have multiple husbands at the same times, those would be radical. Polygyny is a conventional Islamic component
"Koran 3:151, 4:74, 4:76, 4:89-91 and numerous others promote violence versus non-believers and promise eternal rewards for those who die fighting. Once again, there is nothing radical about advocating Islamic violence against non-believers according to the foundation of Islam, the Koran.
"Koran 2:2 clearly states that whatever Mo (MHBHF) said and is recorded in the Koran is absolutely true and not to be doubted."
Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:22pm
"in regards to a man being able to marry four women, those who still practice it despite the history of why it happened during the time of the prophet pbuh, are in my opinion uneducated. it also states in which chapter im not sure, that the reason it was written was so no one disputed him, and later it states that you are only able to marry up to four women if you can support all of them and be equal, since that is not humanly possible it is not to happen. the reason why people still do it is for debts, or they are uneducated and/or they are trying to keep a bloodline in the family. there are many reasons why it happens. i dont understand are we arguing?
i find what you asked me radical.
"i pray, i dont eat pork, i fast during ramadan, but yet i go out, i date non muslims, i am aware of who i am, i added you because you were on the i hate islam group. it is easy to pick apart any religion for its beliefs. there are many beliefs in islam i dont agree with, but the same goes for christianity, buddhism, catholicism, judaism, etc. i find flaws in all religions despite you being able to quote chapters, i am devout but not to the point where i dont have my own mind.
The quran is a guideline, i find religion a guideline and any person who has any kind of faith, agnostic, atheistic or etc...will go to heaven on hell depending on what a person hold inside not what they show to the world as their religion. those who have faith and those who dont...i dont understand the hatred for religions people dont fully understand.
"you have to understand why these things were implemented before you debate them.
as a sidenote, i was int he i hate islam group, because i did not believe it when a friend of mine told me. this friend of mine is christian and a friend of theirs joined the group.
"i am not saying its okay to pick and choose what you believe about a religion, but i am saying that i understand the flaws of islam, and if you were to sit down with me or someone like minded they would be able to explain this to you."
Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:23pm
"its very easy to pick faults with a religion, but why focus on that when we have our own lives to live?"
Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:27pm
"Inside the Koran
A film by Antony Thomas"
Charles Kastriot
July 15 at 9:12pm
"While other religious have their shortcomings, Islam is not merely a religion. It is a totalitarian ideology. Its dedicated adherents pursue Mo(MHBHF)'s exhortations to subjugate the whole world to force all of of humanity to submit to Islamic dominance. That is why I actively oppose Islam and its advocates."
Fatima Shirazi
July 23 at 8:09pm
"Well while I disagree with you fully. I feel this is a no win argument. You have your views and I have mine. But I hope you dont feel like that about Islam forever. Maybe you will meet a great person who is muslim or maybe you will see where your faults lie in your view of islam."
Charles Kastriot
July 25 at 2:46pm
"You truly think by meeting 'a great person who is muslim' that will eliminate all of the evil contained within his/her and your ideology? Would meeting a 'great person who is Jewish' cause you to renounce Islam and accept Judaism? What if that 'great person' were an athiest, a Christian, a Buddhist, a Marxist or a pagan? Falling for Islamic disinformation uttered by a smooth-talking Mohamadan cannot change the inherently totalitarian nature of Islam.
"I hope you will read the Koran and other Islamic texts with an open mind and inquisitive spirit instead of the unquestioned and unchallengeable acceptance that Islamists demand. I simply view Islam as it really exists and what it advocates."
Fatima has not replied to my last message.
Charles Kastriot
June 29 at 11:51pm
"Have we met previously? I am wondering why you sent me a friend request."
Fatima Shirazi
July 7 at 8:26pm
"lol no...
we havent
just curious to add you"
Charles Kastriot
July 8 at 12:45pm
"What is your opinion of Islam?"
Fatima Shirazi
July 9 at 5:59pm
"but in what aspect do you mean?
it is a broad question
whats your view?"
Charles Kastriot
July 9 at 8:27pm
"I will specify my question. What is your opinion of polygyny, of Sharia and its implementation, of suicidal attacks, of apostasy from Islam and of other religions?"
Fatima Shirazi
July 9 at 9:47pm
"lol wow so basically what do I think of radical islam?
I do not support polygamy it was in the quran back in the day for different reasons, sharia is only practiced in saudi and other gulf nations. I dont suport suicide attacks not does islam, despite wat people say.
apostasy-if a person wants to be a different religion so be it...to each their own.
i have no issue with other religions but if i were to ever convert i could never be a polytheistic one..
ex-hindu, buddhism...etc
but that doesnt mean i have a personal vendetta against them
and you?"
Charles Kastriot
July 11 at 3:12pm
"Polygyny is not radical in terms of Islam. Mohamad (MHBHF) clearly stated in Koran 4:3 that a man can marry up to four women. If someone claimed that polygyny was forbidden in Islam or that a woman could legally have multiple husbands at the same times, those would be radical. Polygyny is a conventional Islamic component
"Koran 3:151, 4:74, 4:76, 4:89-91 and numerous others promote violence versus non-believers and promise eternal rewards for those who die fighting. Once again, there is nothing radical about advocating Islamic violence against non-believers according to the foundation of Islam, the Koran.
"Koran 2:2 clearly states that whatever Mo (MHBHF) said and is recorded in the Koran is absolutely true and not to be doubted."
Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:22pm
"in regards to a man being able to marry four women, those who still practice it despite the history of why it happened during the time of the prophet pbuh, are in my opinion uneducated. it also states in which chapter im not sure, that the reason it was written was so no one disputed him, and later it states that you are only able to marry up to four women if you can support all of them and be equal, since that is not humanly possible it is not to happen. the reason why people still do it is for debts, or they are uneducated and/or they are trying to keep a bloodline in the family. there are many reasons why it happens. i dont understand are we arguing?
i find what you asked me radical.
"i pray, i dont eat pork, i fast during ramadan, but yet i go out, i date non muslims, i am aware of who i am, i added you because you were on the i hate islam group. it is easy to pick apart any religion for its beliefs. there are many beliefs in islam i dont agree with, but the same goes for christianity, buddhism, catholicism, judaism, etc. i find flaws in all religions despite you being able to quote chapters, i am devout but not to the point where i dont have my own mind.
The quran is a guideline, i find religion a guideline and any person who has any kind of faith, agnostic, atheistic or etc...will go to heaven on hell depending on what a person hold inside not what they show to the world as their religion. those who have faith and those who dont...i dont understand the hatred for religions people dont fully understand.
"you have to understand why these things were implemented before you debate them.
as a sidenote, i was int he i hate islam group, because i did not believe it when a friend of mine told me. this friend of mine is christian and a friend of theirs joined the group.
"i am not saying its okay to pick and choose what you believe about a religion, but i am saying that i understand the flaws of islam, and if you were to sit down with me or someone like minded they would be able to explain this to you."
Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:23pm
"its very easy to pick faults with a religion, but why focus on that when we have our own lives to live?"
Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:27pm
"Inside the Koran
A film by Antony Thomas"
Charles Kastriot
July 15 at 9:12pm
"While other religious have their shortcomings, Islam is not merely a religion. It is a totalitarian ideology. Its dedicated adherents pursue Mo(MHBHF)'s exhortations to subjugate the whole world to force all of of humanity to submit to Islamic dominance. That is why I actively oppose Islam and its advocates."
Fatima Shirazi
July 23 at 8:09pm
"Well while I disagree with you fully. I feel this is a no win argument. You have your views and I have mine. But I hope you dont feel like that about Islam forever. Maybe you will meet a great person who is muslim or maybe you will see where your faults lie in your view of islam."
Charles Kastriot
July 25 at 2:46pm
"You truly think by meeting 'a great person who is muslim' that will eliminate all of the evil contained within his/her and your ideology? Would meeting a 'great person who is Jewish' cause you to renounce Islam and accept Judaism? What if that 'great person' were an athiest, a Christian, a Buddhist, a Marxist or a pagan? Falling for Islamic disinformation uttered by a smooth-talking Mohamadan cannot change the inherently totalitarian nature of Islam.
"I hope you will read the Koran and other Islamic texts with an open mind and inquisitive spirit instead of the unquestioned and unchallengeable acceptance that Islamists demand. I simply view Islam as it really exists and what it advocates."
Fatima has not replied to my last message.
conversation with Mohamadan idiot named Ali Siddiqui
A few months ago, a Mohamadan punk calling himself "Ali Siddiqi" hijacked an anti-Islamic group on Facebook. I had been a member of the group until this savage co-opted it to spew Islamic disinformation. So I quit the group. The following exchanges are his challenges and my responses. All of his rampant misspellings, ignorance of grammatical and capitalization rules and numerous vulgar comments have not been altered by me!
Ali Siddiqui
June 25 at 1:00am
"so you came back huh?
you cant put up a debate so wh should i keep you on the group? "
Charles Kastriot
June 25 at 6:34pm
"I have never been gone. I can debate you into the ground. Your ignorance of anything outside of the ideology created by Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in hell forever) is as glaring as the midday sun. I no interest in belonging to the group you hijacked."
Ali Siddiqui
June 25 at 6:59pm
"lol the one you mean you left? lol what a dumbass. you ran away from the debate we had because the holy spirit knew it couldnt guide you.
my ignorance? buddy you gave me what most anti-islamics give. the same stuff over and over and stupid christians like you haven't realised muslims have refuted all lies you christian sites have thrown at us."
Charles Kastriot
June 25 at 8:01pm
"I had more important activities at the time than spell out all the evils of Islam to an myopic savage like yourself. I can easily debate you and make you look like a fool. You refuse to accept any logic or information that contradicts the Koran and whatever else Mo (MHBHF) fabricated. You are a simpleton whose philosophy is "If Mohamad did or said it, it must be right." I do not need to lie about Mohamadans or Islam. Simply quoting the Koran incriminates Mo (MHBHF) and the ideology he created.
I will repeat what I said to you about the Holy Spirit. I could not care less about defending Christian mysticism. That is not my ideology. I am a Deist."
Ali Siddiqui
June 26 at 4:53pm
"you ran away from the women debate we had. and your saying you can make me look like a fool? i dont see where logic contradicts the quran."
Charles Kastriot
June 26 at 11:26pm
"Try explaining away Koran 76:13 in which Mo (MHBHF) claimed those who would kill & die for his benefit would spend eternity without experiencing the cold of the moon. The temperature on the moon reaches 138 degrees Celsius. Does that sound "cold" to you?
"As for women, Islamic misogyny is summed up in one verse. In 4:34, Mo (MHBHF) not only claimed that men are inherently superior to women but also that men are allowed to beat women. That is naked hatred of women and totally inexcusable."
Ali Siddiqui
June 27 at 1:47pm
"'As for women, Islamic misogyny is summed up in one verse. In 4:34, Mo (MHBHF) not only claimed that men are inherently superior to women but also that men are allowed to beat women. That is naked hatred of women and totally inexcusable.'
"buddy i've taken care of this. remember when you ran away?
do you reall think you can judge the gender equity by this one verse?
and no he ddn say women are inferior to men. men have more responsibilities than women. they have the same rights, diff roles.
"and yeah again theres 3 chances before a wife gets a lgith beating with a miswak. see those women in downtown? yeah islam doesn't alow that. if a wife is going towards prostitution, the husband has to talk to her. if she does it again the husband sleep elsewhere in the house. and if she still does it, then the husband can take that miswak (toothbrush) and tap her. its to cause emotional pain. now i dont know if you got a sex change, but women are emotional. alot more than men."
Charles Kastriot
June 27 at 2:48pm
"Koran 4:34 clearly states that men are SUPERIOR to women. Under Islamic law, women do not have the same rights as men. Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time. Women are not allowed to beat their husbands. Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance. Women are not allowed to exit their homes without hiding their heads and covering their entire bodies in oppressive outfits. These are just a few examples of women's inferiority under Islam.
"The Koran says NOTHING about giving women three chances before being beaten.It does not limit the size of an object that a man can use to hit a woman. Try reading the Koran instead of parroting Islamic disinformation.
"You want more proof of Islamic misogyny? Read Koran 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) stated that women as the same as real estate, an inanimate possession, that be entered whenever the male owners wish. Women are just property in the Mohamadan mindset. That is dehumanizingly evil.
"So you think because women are supposedly a lot more emotional than men that justifies beating and belittling women? Only cowardly savages like you think that way."
Ali Siddiqui
June 27 at 6:59pm
"'Koran 4:34 clearly states that men are SUPERIOR to women. Under Islamic law, women do not have the same rights as men. Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time. Women are not allowed to beat their husbands. Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance. Women are not allowed to exit their homes without hiding their heads and covering their entire bodies in oppressive outfits. These are just a few examples of women's inferiority under Islam.'
"lol. obviously i shouldnt debate with a scholor who's spent years analysing islam like you. i only copy and paste what i fon on the internet to support my claims.
it says they HAVE MORE RESPONSIBILITIES:
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996016420
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996015878
"'Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time.'
"so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands? no. islam says men can have more than 1 wife ONLY if he can provide and care for them with the same equality. if you read further you can see how God says he prefers men marry only one.
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996015724
"watching a video this question came up by a non-muslim women. the woman was pretty angry at this for some reason. she said with a temper 'why cant women in islam have more than one husband? the scholor asked if that woman has a husband, she said 'yes and when he comes home from work he's all grumpy and i get him a beer and cook for him'.
so the scholor asked 'then why do you want 4'?
'Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance'
"again if you weren a dried up pussy you'd remember i took care of this.
women get less inheritance because the law of Naqfa- the man has to support his wife, kids and sisters with the money FIRST before he can spend on what he wants. meanwhile since the wife doesnt have to provde any income, she gets less and she can spend it on whatever. same goes for when she has a job. she could be a millioanre and doesnt have to give a single penny towards the family needs. again thats the man's job. he could make 10 000 a year and the family has to be provided for first. again christianity, judaism and hinduism give ZERO inheritance to females.
"'The Koran says NOTHING about giving women three chances before being beaten.It does not limit the size of an object that a man can use to hit a woman. Try reading the Koran instead of parroting Islamic disinformation.'
"LOL another dried up puss remark. go read the actual verse mr scholor.
i've memorized the quran in 3 languages (arabic of course, english, and my own language urdu plus i can translate into french since i've been taking french immersion since kindergarden).
yes everysingle scholor says it has to be with a miswak or a cloth-http://www.islamonline.net/english/In_Depth/IslamWifeBeating/index.shtml
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996016760
http://whyislam.org/FamilyandGender/IslamandDomesticViolence/tabid/288/Default.aspx
"'You want more proof of Islamic misogyny? Read Koran 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) stated that women as the same as real estate, an inanimate possession, that be entered whenever the male owners wish. Women are just property in the Mohamadan mindset. That is dehumanizingly evil.'
"hmm mr scholor please read the hadiths behind this. before islam anal sex was practiced AGAINST women's will. muhammed pbuh said you can put your penis from any angle AS LONG AS its gets to the vagina. thats what it means by "wish". any way but anal sex is not allowed.
"'So you think because women are supposedly a lot more emotional than men that justifies beating and belittling women? Only cowardly savages like you think that way.'
"only a gay ass drug thinks the way you do. funny how you mix words and interpretations together. re-read what i said on what the wife has to do to get the non-painful beating. no where in the quran does it say men can beat their wives whenever. muslims dont hurt ot insult or beat anyone like how you do to your wife."
Charles Kastriot
June 27 at 10:43pm
"Well, you are cowardly punk. You resort to name-calling because you cannot defend the violent misogyny that Mo (MHBHF) put in the Koran.
"You still have not justified men being allowed to have multiple wives. You betray your own misogyny by your question "so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands?" You obviously only view a wife as sexual outlet and domestic servant, not as an equal member in a partnership.
"You keep referring to a supposed lack of inheritance for women in Judaism, Hinduism and Christianity. As I pointed out to you previously which you refuse to accept, none of those are the legal codes in any country, not even Israel or India. Christianity is not a political ideology as Islam is so your point is a non-sequitor. There is no Christian equivalent to Sharia. Israel, India and Christian countries are representative democracies in which laws are based on the will of the citizens through elected officials. Islamic regimes are based on the whims and example of the dictatorship of Mo (MHBHF).
"Your cited Islamic experts can obfuscate and fabricate whatever they wish about Koran 4:34. That will not change the fact that NO limitation on what a man is permitted to use to beat his wives or how many times he must warn her is listed in the Koran.
"Further proof of your objectification of women is your evasion of addressing the point of 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) equated women with A PIECE OF LAND, a mere possession, not a fellow human being. Under that verse, women have no right to their own bodies. They have no right to decline sex. A man owns her and uses her for his own gratification, regardless of what she wants.
"You still have not explained the illogical promise Mo (MHBHF) made to his followers about being spared the "cold of the moon" in paradise. You claim not to have found any illogic in the Koran. That is just one of many.
"Your statements have revealed yourself as an ignorant anus. You deny the widespread cases of Mohamadan men beating their wives, often fatally, feeling justified by Koran 4:34. Are you that delusional or just a committed liar?"
Ali Siddiqui
June 28 at 12:01pm
"'Well, you are cowardly punk. You resort to name-calling because you cannot defend the violent misogyny that Mo (MHBHF) put in the Koran.
'You still have not justified men being allowed to have multiple wives. You betray your own misogyny by your question "so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands?" You obviously only view a wife as sexual outlet and domestic servant, not as an equal member in a partnership.'
"your stupidity allows me to call you a fag. you call yourself a scholr yet fail to give any point in your scholory claims.
and mr scholor i took care of polygamy. i gave you links that go directly to scholors, female ones too. islam doesnt allow women to be sexual objects like your cult faith.
i'm saying thats what having more husbands would be like. how can she satisfy all of her husbands? again you've read the entire quran and you still fail to understand.
"'You keep referring to a supposed lack of inheritance for women in Judaism, Hinduism and Christianity. As I pointed out to you previously which you refuse to accept, none of those are the legal codes in any country, not even Israel or India. Christianity is not a political ideology as Islam is so your point is a non-sequitor. There is no Christian equivalent to Sharia. Israel, India and Christian countries are representative democracies in which laws are based on the will of the citizens through elected officials. Islamic regimes are based on the whims and example of the dictatorship of Mo (MHBHF).'
"again mr scholor when you ran away from the debte several months ago, i told you i'm talking about faith not countries. any faith can be put as political. christianity use to in the medevil era. and islam is not the same as christianity. it gives people rightd even non-muslims. dont bother mr scholor taking verses from the quran. most of it talks about war in which we cant start in islam. again the Us has christian values in their government systems.
"'Your cited Islamic experts can obfuscate and fabricate whatever they wish about Koran 4:34. That will not change the fact that NO limitation on what a man is permitted to use to beat his wives or how many times he must warn her is listed in the Koran'
"fabricate? its all in the islamic scriptures. you can whine all you want fag, it wont change a thing. again mr scholor if you didnt ignore my previous posts you'd see how i took care of this. see your wife in downtown? yeah islam doesnt allow that. it doesnt allow women to be whore's like her. when women start to move towards this,the husband has the right to stop her. and again the beating is a tap. it cant hurt. i think your wife needs a fist in her stomach but i cant since islam doesnt allow pain to women.
"'Further proof of your objectification of women is your evasion of addressing the point of 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) equated women with A PIECE OF LAND, a mere possession, not a fellow human being. Under that verse, women have no right to their own bodies. They have no right to decline sex. A man owns her and uses her for his own gratification, regardless of what she wants'
"dont be ignorant like your greedy wife. i took care of this and how that is talking about sex. a woman has no right to her body? what kind of islamic education did you get? did you miss this?:
'O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness, that ye may take away part of the dower [money given by the husband to the wife for the marriage contract] ye have given them, except where they have been guilty of open lewdness; on the contrary live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If ye take a dislike to them it may be that ye dislike a thing, and God brings about through it a great deal of good. (The Noble Quran, 4:19)'
"so over here if i go against my wife's will i'm doing a sin. and look at the ending. if i dont likeomething about her then theres other great things.
"'You still have not explained the illogical promise Mo (MHBHF) made to his followers about being spared the "cold of the moon" in paradise. You claim not to have found any illogic in the Koran. That is just one of many.
"Your statements have revealed yourself as an ignorant anus. You deny the widespread cases of Mohamadan men beating their wives, often fatally, feeling justified by Koran 4:34. Are you that delusional or just a committed liar?'
[76:13] They relax therein on luxurious furnishings. They suffer neither the heat of the sun, nor any cold.
cold moon?
"again islam doesnt allow wife beating. a tap is allowed after 3 tries if she goees towards whoredom. and no if it cant cause pain how can it be fatal? quit going onto jihadwatch buddy. i've an invitation for a debate with rob spenecer which he has yet to reply to.
"i know you let your wife be a slut at midnight but my faith tells women should always be on track. children learn more from their mothers. if they learn to be sluts then theres a problem. kinda like your kids. do you actually think when your daughter tells you she's going over to her friends house to study, she really gonna? no its like mother like daughter."
Charles Kastriot
June 28 at 2:42pm
"You are appallingly arrogant and ignorant. You claim to know about me, my wife and kids. What is my "faith cult", as you referred to it? Since you claim to know so much about them, tell me what are their names? What does she do for a living? How old are they? Where do they attend school? Go ahead and embarrass yourself even more by trying to answer those questions.
"What these supposed rights that non-Mohamadans have under Islam? Non-Mohamadans cannot build or repair their places of worship, openly express their beliefs in public, carry weapons, proselytize to gain converts to their faiths, testify against Mohamadans in trials among other injustices. Mohamadans have those rights in the Free World.
"You have been so thoroughly brainwashed you accept whatever drivel Islamists tell you that the Koran says. You refuse to see what the Koran actually says. You allow Islamists to blatantly add their own self-serving words to verses when those betray the evil or stupidity of Mo's (MHBHF) teachings. You accept their teachings that women exist to serve men as inferiors. Instead you swallow their disinformation like a sheep at a trough.
"Once again, you refuse to read the Koran objectively. 4:19 gives a man an excuse, his wife's supposed lewdness, an excuse to punish her. Under Sharia, lewdness is defined in open-ended ways such as showing any portion of her anatomy other than her eyes or hands. That is why Mohamadan women have to wear oppressive outfits so savages like you will not target them for beatings.
"You conveniently omitted the entire verse of 76:13. The reference the the supposed "cold of the moon" shows that Mo (MHBHF) was an ignorant savage. That shows you are one too for thinking he is the model for human beings.
"So, boy, run along now. Go sodomize your goats or fantasize about your next hijacking. Maybe your brain will congeal enough to function properly so you might actually read the Koran objectively. Hopefully, your suicide bombing vest will explode prematurely before you have the opportunity to kill any civilized people.
Ali Siddiqui
June 29 at 5:35pm
"LOL hey daddy calm down. your machines are done. no woman wants you now. Mrs Kastriot needs love thats why she doesnt want you. go look in your daughters room. see those condoms? those pills? are you fathering properly?
"'What these supposed rights that non-Mohamadans have under Islam? Non-Mohamadans cannot build or repair their places of worship, openly express their beliefs in public, carry weapons, proselytize to gain converts to their faiths, testify against Mohamadans in trials among other injustices. Mohamadans have those rights in the Free World. '
"again how can you call yourself a scholor? do you even know what the sharia is made from? yes non-muslims can have their own places of worship. we cannot carry weapons you imaginary cult. nor can we force non-muslims to accept islam.
"'You have been so thoroughly brainwashed you accept whatever drivel Islamists tell you that the Koran says. You refuse to see what the Koran actually says. You allow Islamists to blatantly add their own self-serving words to verses when those betray the evil or stupidity of Mo's (MHBHF) teachings. You accept their teachings that women exist to serve men as inferiors. Instead you swallow their disinformation like a sheep at a trough'
"is it that i've been brainwashed or you getting your scholorly excuses from the internet? i've memorized the quran in 3 languages (arabic of course, english,urdu plus i can translate into french which i've been taking since elementary).
how do we add our own words when you've been giving scholory excuses which come out of your daughter's vagina? you've without any islamic reference have given me what the quran or hadith say, i've refuted them and you countinue to throw your same laughable rubbish.
again women do not serve men like how you treat Mrs. Kastriot. i accept the quran whole heartedly which is why when fags like you lerk around like a drug addict around children's schools, i can wash away the myths and lies."
"'Once again, you refuse to read the Koran objectively. 4:19 gives a man an excuse, his wife's supposed lewdness, an excuse to punish her. Under Sharia, lewdness is defined in open-ended ways such as showing any portion of her anatomy other than her eyes or hands. That is why Mohamadan women have to wear oppressive outfits so savages like you will not target them for beatings'
"once again you've fucked your wife so bad not only has she left you but you cant concentrate on what i write without you grabbing your dick every few seconds. read the first part of the verse. once again i write:
O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness....
"islam doesnt allow women to dress like your wife at midnight or your daughter in a downtown strip club. it tells to dress modestly which is why muslim women CHOOSE to cover up. the burka and hijab takes the attraction of men away so 1) they keep their modesty 2) they keep their VIRGINITY (unlike your daughter) and 3) they want to be liked for WHO THEY ARE not how they look (again i make reference you your whore wife and daughter). yeah you tell me whats more oppressive.
"'You conveniently omitted the entire verse of 76:13. The reference the the supposed 'cold of the moon' shows that Mo (MHBHF) was an ignorant savage. That shows you are one too for thinking he is the model for human beings.'
"aright charles kasstriot go here:quranbrowser.com or quransearch.com and look up 76:13. again i wonder how you call yourself a scholor.
"'So, boy, run along now. Go sodomize your goats or fantasize about your next hijacking. Maybe your brain will congeal enough to function properly so you might actually read the Koran objectively. Hopefully, your suicide bombing vest will explode prematurely before you have the opportunity to kill any civilized people.'
"my next hijacking will be your bed along with your daughter (she can suck good) and mrs kastriot (she can lick but not as good as your daughter).
hopefully your not around when i have a little fun. when do you get home from work? maybe your wife can tell but i wont hear her since she'll have a mouthful of fun."
Charles Kastriot
Today at 12:11am
"I know perfectly well the source of Sharia. It comes from the rantings originating in the twisted and evil mind of Mo (May he burn in Hell forever). You are too blinded to see that the Koran and Hadiths were nothing more than self-serving drivel spewed by a pedophiliac dictator.
"Yes, there are a few non-Islamic places of worship left inside the Islamic Bloc. Those are the few that jihadis have not burn down or co-opted yet. Once the jihadis vandalize or destroy them, the non-Mohamadans are not allowed to rebuild or repair them, just as Sharia forbids them to do.
"Try reading an accurate translation of the Koran, not a copy filled with cover-ups of Mo's (MHBHF) numerous absurdities. The Islamists at those two websites conveniently deleted the obvious absurdity of "lunar cold" affecting people in Allah's whorehouse. By the way, the savages on those sites cannot even spell KORAN correctly.
"You are perfectly following the example of that sexual deviant you claim was a prophet. So does Allah help you type while you engage in autoerotic activities and fantasizing about real women instead of hideous Mohamadan cows draped in burkas? No wonder you are obsessed with the women and girls in my family! Obviously, you have stretched out your goat's anus beyond the point of any further pleasure so you need another outlet for your perversion.
"You think by hiding a woman under a huge cloth like a piece of furniture makes men respect them?! That's laughable. A man respects a woman or girl when he looks at her as a fellow human being, regardless of her appearance. You savages only look at women and girls as sexual outlets that need to be hidden because you refuse to control your sexual perversions.
"If you think you can rape any woman or girl in my family, I dare you to try. Any one of them will rip you puny testicles off and force-feed them to you before they send you to your eternal and infernal destination."
Charles Kastriot
Today at 12:24am
"By the way, since you think that quranbrowser.com and quransearch.com are so accurate, you should know that the translations on those sites of Koran 76:13 by Sale, Yusuf Ali, Hilali-Khan and Muhammad Al-Hilali/ Muhsin Khan all EXPLICITLY mention the moon as the source of cold. You have proved your ignorance once again. Stick with disciplines you know like hourly masturbation and being on the receiving end of sodomy."
Ali Siddiqui
June 25 at 1:00am
"so you came back huh?
you cant put up a debate so wh should i keep you on the group? "
Charles Kastriot
June 25 at 6:34pm
"I have never been gone. I can debate you into the ground. Your ignorance of anything outside of the ideology created by Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in hell forever) is as glaring as the midday sun. I no interest in belonging to the group you hijacked."
Ali Siddiqui
June 25 at 6:59pm
"lol the one you mean you left? lol what a dumbass. you ran away from the debate we had because the holy spirit knew it couldnt guide you.
my ignorance? buddy you gave me what most anti-islamics give. the same stuff over and over and stupid christians like you haven't realised muslims have refuted all lies you christian sites have thrown at us."
Charles Kastriot
June 25 at 8:01pm
"I had more important activities at the time than spell out all the evils of Islam to an myopic savage like yourself. I can easily debate you and make you look like a fool. You refuse to accept any logic or information that contradicts the Koran and whatever else Mo (MHBHF) fabricated. You are a simpleton whose philosophy is "If Mohamad did or said it, it must be right." I do not need to lie about Mohamadans or Islam. Simply quoting the Koran incriminates Mo (MHBHF) and the ideology he created.
I will repeat what I said to you about the Holy Spirit. I could not care less about defending Christian mysticism. That is not my ideology. I am a Deist."
Ali Siddiqui
June 26 at 4:53pm
"you ran away from the women debate we had. and your saying you can make me look like a fool? i dont see where logic contradicts the quran."
Charles Kastriot
June 26 at 11:26pm
"Try explaining away Koran 76:13 in which Mo (MHBHF) claimed those who would kill & die for his benefit would spend eternity without experiencing the cold of the moon. The temperature on the moon reaches 138 degrees Celsius. Does that sound "cold" to you?
"As for women, Islamic misogyny is summed up in one verse. In 4:34, Mo (MHBHF) not only claimed that men are inherently superior to women but also that men are allowed to beat women. That is naked hatred of women and totally inexcusable."
Ali Siddiqui
June 27 at 1:47pm
"'As for women, Islamic misogyny is summed up in one verse. In 4:34, Mo (MHBHF) not only claimed that men are inherently superior to women but also that men are allowed to beat women. That is naked hatred of women and totally inexcusable.'
"buddy i've taken care of this. remember when you ran away?
do you reall think you can judge the gender equity by this one verse?
and no he ddn say women are inferior to men. men have more responsibilities than women. they have the same rights, diff roles.
"and yeah again theres 3 chances before a wife gets a lgith beating with a miswak. see those women in downtown? yeah islam doesn't alow that. if a wife is going towards prostitution, the husband has to talk to her. if she does it again the husband sleep elsewhere in the house. and if she still does it, then the husband can take that miswak (toothbrush) and tap her. its to cause emotional pain. now i dont know if you got a sex change, but women are emotional. alot more than men."
Charles Kastriot
June 27 at 2:48pm
"Koran 4:34 clearly states that men are SUPERIOR to women. Under Islamic law, women do not have the same rights as men. Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time. Women are not allowed to beat their husbands. Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance. Women are not allowed to exit their homes without hiding their heads and covering their entire bodies in oppressive outfits. These are just a few examples of women's inferiority under Islam.
"The Koran says NOTHING about giving women three chances before being beaten.It does not limit the size of an object that a man can use to hit a woman. Try reading the Koran instead of parroting Islamic disinformation.
"You want more proof of Islamic misogyny? Read Koran 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) stated that women as the same as real estate, an inanimate possession, that be entered whenever the male owners wish. Women are just property in the Mohamadan mindset. That is dehumanizingly evil.
"So you think because women are supposedly a lot more emotional than men that justifies beating and belittling women? Only cowardly savages like you think that way."
Ali Siddiqui
June 27 at 6:59pm
"'Koran 4:34 clearly states that men are SUPERIOR to women. Under Islamic law, women do not have the same rights as men. Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time. Women are not allowed to beat their husbands. Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance. Women are not allowed to exit their homes without hiding their heads and covering their entire bodies in oppressive outfits. These are just a few examples of women's inferiority under Islam.'
"lol. obviously i shouldnt debate with a scholor who's spent years analysing islam like you. i only copy and paste what i fon on the internet to support my claims.
it says they HAVE MORE RESPONSIBILITIES:
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996016420
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996015878
"'Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time.'
"so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands? no. islam says men can have more than 1 wife ONLY if he can provide and care for them with the same equality. if you read further you can see how God says he prefers men marry only one.
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996015724
"watching a video this question came up by a non-muslim women. the woman was pretty angry at this for some reason. she said with a temper 'why cant women in islam have more than one husband? the scholor asked if that woman has a husband, she said 'yes and when he comes home from work he's all grumpy and i get him a beer and cook for him'.
so the scholor asked 'then why do you want 4'?
'Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance'
"again if you weren a dried up pussy you'd remember i took care of this.
women get less inheritance because the law of Naqfa- the man has to support his wife, kids and sisters with the money FIRST before he can spend on what he wants. meanwhile since the wife doesnt have to provde any income, she gets less and she can spend it on whatever. same goes for when she has a job. she could be a millioanre and doesnt have to give a single penny towards the family needs. again thats the man's job. he could make 10 000 a year and the family has to be provided for first. again christianity, judaism and hinduism give ZERO inheritance to females.
"'The Koran says NOTHING about giving women three chances before being beaten.It does not limit the size of an object that a man can use to hit a woman. Try reading the Koran instead of parroting Islamic disinformation.'
"LOL another dried up puss remark. go read the actual verse mr scholor.
i've memorized the quran in 3 languages (arabic of course, english, and my own language urdu plus i can translate into french since i've been taking french immersion since kindergarden).
yes everysingle scholor says it has to be with a miswak or a cloth-http://www.islamonline.net/english/In_Depth/IslamWifeBeating/index.shtml
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996016760
http://whyislam.org/FamilyandGender/IslamandDomesticViolence/tabid/288/Default.aspx
"'You want more proof of Islamic misogyny? Read Koran 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) stated that women as the same as real estate, an inanimate possession, that be entered whenever the male owners wish. Women are just property in the Mohamadan mindset. That is dehumanizingly evil.'
"hmm mr scholor please read the hadiths behind this. before islam anal sex was practiced AGAINST women's will. muhammed pbuh said you can put your penis from any angle AS LONG AS its gets to the vagina. thats what it means by "wish". any way but anal sex is not allowed.
"'So you think because women are supposedly a lot more emotional than men that justifies beating and belittling women? Only cowardly savages like you think that way.'
"only a gay ass drug thinks the way you do. funny how you mix words and interpretations together. re-read what i said on what the wife has to do to get the non-painful beating. no where in the quran does it say men can beat their wives whenever. muslims dont hurt ot insult or beat anyone like how you do to your wife."
Charles Kastriot
June 27 at 10:43pm
"Well, you are cowardly punk. You resort to name-calling because you cannot defend the violent misogyny that Mo (MHBHF) put in the Koran.
"You still have not justified men being allowed to have multiple wives. You betray your own misogyny by your question "so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands?" You obviously only view a wife as sexual outlet and domestic servant, not as an equal member in a partnership.
"You keep referring to a supposed lack of inheritance for women in Judaism, Hinduism and Christianity. As I pointed out to you previously which you refuse to accept, none of those are the legal codes in any country, not even Israel or India. Christianity is not a political ideology as Islam is so your point is a non-sequitor. There is no Christian equivalent to Sharia. Israel, India and Christian countries are representative democracies in which laws are based on the will of the citizens through elected officials. Islamic regimes are based on the whims and example of the dictatorship of Mo (MHBHF).
"Your cited Islamic experts can obfuscate and fabricate whatever they wish about Koran 4:34. That will not change the fact that NO limitation on what a man is permitted to use to beat his wives or how many times he must warn her is listed in the Koran.
"Further proof of your objectification of women is your evasion of addressing the point of 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) equated women with A PIECE OF LAND, a mere possession, not a fellow human being. Under that verse, women have no right to their own bodies. They have no right to decline sex. A man owns her and uses her for his own gratification, regardless of what she wants.
"You still have not explained the illogical promise Mo (MHBHF) made to his followers about being spared the "cold of the moon" in paradise. You claim not to have found any illogic in the Koran. That is just one of many.
"Your statements have revealed yourself as an ignorant anus. You deny the widespread cases of Mohamadan men beating their wives, often fatally, feeling justified by Koran 4:34. Are you that delusional or just a committed liar?"
Ali Siddiqui
June 28 at 12:01pm
"'Well, you are cowardly punk. You resort to name-calling because you cannot defend the violent misogyny that Mo (MHBHF) put in the Koran.
'You still have not justified men being allowed to have multiple wives. You betray your own misogyny by your question "so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands?" You obviously only view a wife as sexual outlet and domestic servant, not as an equal member in a partnership.'
"your stupidity allows me to call you a fag. you call yourself a scholr yet fail to give any point in your scholory claims.
and mr scholor i took care of polygamy. i gave you links that go directly to scholors, female ones too. islam doesnt allow women to be sexual objects like your cult faith.
i'm saying thats what having more husbands would be like. how can she satisfy all of her husbands? again you've read the entire quran and you still fail to understand.
"'You keep referring to a supposed lack of inheritance for women in Judaism, Hinduism and Christianity. As I pointed out to you previously which you refuse to accept, none of those are the legal codes in any country, not even Israel or India. Christianity is not a political ideology as Islam is so your point is a non-sequitor. There is no Christian equivalent to Sharia. Israel, India and Christian countries are representative democracies in which laws are based on the will of the citizens through elected officials. Islamic regimes are based on the whims and example of the dictatorship of Mo (MHBHF).'
"again mr scholor when you ran away from the debte several months ago, i told you i'm talking about faith not countries. any faith can be put as political. christianity use to in the medevil era. and islam is not the same as christianity. it gives people rightd even non-muslims. dont bother mr scholor taking verses from the quran. most of it talks about war in which we cant start in islam. again the Us has christian values in their government systems.
"'Your cited Islamic experts can obfuscate and fabricate whatever they wish about Koran 4:34. That will not change the fact that NO limitation on what a man is permitted to use to beat his wives or how many times he must warn her is listed in the Koran'
"fabricate? its all in the islamic scriptures. you can whine all you want fag, it wont change a thing. again mr scholor if you didnt ignore my previous posts you'd see how i took care of this. see your wife in downtown? yeah islam doesnt allow that. it doesnt allow women to be whore's like her. when women start to move towards this,the husband has the right to stop her. and again the beating is a tap. it cant hurt. i think your wife needs a fist in her stomach but i cant since islam doesnt allow pain to women.
"'Further proof of your objectification of women is your evasion of addressing the point of 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) equated women with A PIECE OF LAND, a mere possession, not a fellow human being. Under that verse, women have no right to their own bodies. They have no right to decline sex. A man owns her and uses her for his own gratification, regardless of what she wants'
"dont be ignorant like your greedy wife. i took care of this and how that is talking about sex. a woman has no right to her body? what kind of islamic education did you get? did you miss this?:
'O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness, that ye may take away part of the dower [money given by the husband to the wife for the marriage contract] ye have given them, except where they have been guilty of open lewdness; on the contrary live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If ye take a dislike to them it may be that ye dislike a thing, and God brings about through it a great deal of good. (The Noble Quran, 4:19)'
"so over here if i go against my wife's will i'm doing a sin. and look at the ending. if i dont likeomething about her then theres other great things.
"'You still have not explained the illogical promise Mo (MHBHF) made to his followers about being spared the "cold of the moon" in paradise. You claim not to have found any illogic in the Koran. That is just one of many.
"Your statements have revealed yourself as an ignorant anus. You deny the widespread cases of Mohamadan men beating their wives, often fatally, feeling justified by Koran 4:34. Are you that delusional or just a committed liar?'
[76:13] They relax therein on luxurious furnishings. They suffer neither the heat of the sun, nor any cold.
cold moon?
"again islam doesnt allow wife beating. a tap is allowed after 3 tries if she goees towards whoredom. and no if it cant cause pain how can it be fatal? quit going onto jihadwatch buddy. i've an invitation for a debate with rob spenecer which he has yet to reply to.
"i know you let your wife be a slut at midnight but my faith tells women should always be on track. children learn more from their mothers. if they learn to be sluts then theres a problem. kinda like your kids. do you actually think when your daughter tells you she's going over to her friends house to study, she really gonna? no its like mother like daughter."
Charles Kastriot
June 28 at 2:42pm
"You are appallingly arrogant and ignorant. You claim to know about me, my wife and kids. What is my "faith cult", as you referred to it? Since you claim to know so much about them, tell me what are their names? What does she do for a living? How old are they? Where do they attend school? Go ahead and embarrass yourself even more by trying to answer those questions.
"What these supposed rights that non-Mohamadans have under Islam? Non-Mohamadans cannot build or repair their places of worship, openly express their beliefs in public, carry weapons, proselytize to gain converts to their faiths, testify against Mohamadans in trials among other injustices. Mohamadans have those rights in the Free World.
"You have been so thoroughly brainwashed you accept whatever drivel Islamists tell you that the Koran says. You refuse to see what the Koran actually says. You allow Islamists to blatantly add their own self-serving words to verses when those betray the evil or stupidity of Mo's (MHBHF) teachings. You accept their teachings that women exist to serve men as inferiors. Instead you swallow their disinformation like a sheep at a trough.
"Once again, you refuse to read the Koran objectively. 4:19 gives a man an excuse, his wife's supposed lewdness, an excuse to punish her. Under Sharia, lewdness is defined in open-ended ways such as showing any portion of her anatomy other than her eyes or hands. That is why Mohamadan women have to wear oppressive outfits so savages like you will not target them for beatings.
"You conveniently omitted the entire verse of 76:13. The reference the the supposed "cold of the moon" shows that Mo (MHBHF) was an ignorant savage. That shows you are one too for thinking he is the model for human beings.
"So, boy, run along now. Go sodomize your goats or fantasize about your next hijacking. Maybe your brain will congeal enough to function properly so you might actually read the Koran objectively. Hopefully, your suicide bombing vest will explode prematurely before you have the opportunity to kill any civilized people.
Ali Siddiqui
June 29 at 5:35pm
"LOL hey daddy calm down. your machines are done. no woman wants you now. Mrs Kastriot needs love thats why she doesnt want you. go look in your daughters room. see those condoms? those pills? are you fathering properly?
"'What these supposed rights that non-Mohamadans have under Islam? Non-Mohamadans cannot build or repair their places of worship, openly express their beliefs in public, carry weapons, proselytize to gain converts to their faiths, testify against Mohamadans in trials among other injustices. Mohamadans have those rights in the Free World. '
"again how can you call yourself a scholor? do you even know what the sharia is made from? yes non-muslims can have their own places of worship. we cannot carry weapons you imaginary cult. nor can we force non-muslims to accept islam.
"'You have been so thoroughly brainwashed you accept whatever drivel Islamists tell you that the Koran says. You refuse to see what the Koran actually says. You allow Islamists to blatantly add their own self-serving words to verses when those betray the evil or stupidity of Mo's (MHBHF) teachings. You accept their teachings that women exist to serve men as inferiors. Instead you swallow their disinformation like a sheep at a trough'
"is it that i've been brainwashed or you getting your scholorly excuses from the internet? i've memorized the quran in 3 languages (arabic of course, english,urdu plus i can translate into french which i've been taking since elementary).
how do we add our own words when you've been giving scholory excuses which come out of your daughter's vagina? you've without any islamic reference have given me what the quran or hadith say, i've refuted them and you countinue to throw your same laughable rubbish.
again women do not serve men like how you treat Mrs. Kastriot. i accept the quran whole heartedly which is why when fags like you lerk around like a drug addict around children's schools, i can wash away the myths and lies."
"'Once again, you refuse to read the Koran objectively. 4:19 gives a man an excuse, his wife's supposed lewdness, an excuse to punish her. Under Sharia, lewdness is defined in open-ended ways such as showing any portion of her anatomy other than her eyes or hands. That is why Mohamadan women have to wear oppressive outfits so savages like you will not target them for beatings'
"once again you've fucked your wife so bad not only has she left you but you cant concentrate on what i write without you grabbing your dick every few seconds. read the first part of the verse. once again i write:
O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness....
"islam doesnt allow women to dress like your wife at midnight or your daughter in a downtown strip club. it tells to dress modestly which is why muslim women CHOOSE to cover up. the burka and hijab takes the attraction of men away so 1) they keep their modesty 2) they keep their VIRGINITY (unlike your daughter) and 3) they want to be liked for WHO THEY ARE not how they look (again i make reference you your whore wife and daughter). yeah you tell me whats more oppressive.
"'You conveniently omitted the entire verse of 76:13. The reference the the supposed 'cold of the moon' shows that Mo (MHBHF) was an ignorant savage. That shows you are one too for thinking he is the model for human beings.'
"aright charles kasstriot go here:quranbrowser.com or quransearch.com and look up 76:13. again i wonder how you call yourself a scholor.
"'So, boy, run along now. Go sodomize your goats or fantasize about your next hijacking. Maybe your brain will congeal enough to function properly so you might actually read the Koran objectively. Hopefully, your suicide bombing vest will explode prematurely before you have the opportunity to kill any civilized people.'
"my next hijacking will be your bed along with your daughter (she can suck good) and mrs kastriot (she can lick but not as good as your daughter).
hopefully your not around when i have a little fun. when do you get home from work? maybe your wife can tell but i wont hear her since she'll have a mouthful of fun."
Charles Kastriot
Today at 12:11am
"I know perfectly well the source of Sharia. It comes from the rantings originating in the twisted and evil mind of Mo (May he burn in Hell forever). You are too blinded to see that the Koran and Hadiths were nothing more than self-serving drivel spewed by a pedophiliac dictator.
"Yes, there are a few non-Islamic places of worship left inside the Islamic Bloc. Those are the few that jihadis have not burn down or co-opted yet. Once the jihadis vandalize or destroy them, the non-Mohamadans are not allowed to rebuild or repair them, just as Sharia forbids them to do.
"Try reading an accurate translation of the Koran, not a copy filled with cover-ups of Mo's (MHBHF) numerous absurdities. The Islamists at those two websites conveniently deleted the obvious absurdity of "lunar cold" affecting people in Allah's whorehouse. By the way, the savages on those sites cannot even spell KORAN correctly.
"You are perfectly following the example of that sexual deviant you claim was a prophet. So does Allah help you type while you engage in autoerotic activities and fantasizing about real women instead of hideous Mohamadan cows draped in burkas? No wonder you are obsessed with the women and girls in my family! Obviously, you have stretched out your goat's anus beyond the point of any further pleasure so you need another outlet for your perversion.
"You think by hiding a woman under a huge cloth like a piece of furniture makes men respect them?! That's laughable. A man respects a woman or girl when he looks at her as a fellow human being, regardless of her appearance. You savages only look at women and girls as sexual outlets that need to be hidden because you refuse to control your sexual perversions.
"If you think you can rape any woman or girl in my family, I dare you to try. Any one of them will rip you puny testicles off and force-feed them to you before they send you to your eternal and infernal destination."
Charles Kastriot
Today at 12:24am
"By the way, since you think that quranbrowser.com and quransearch.com are so accurate, you should know that the translations on those sites of Koran 76:13 by Sale, Yusuf Ali, Hilali-Khan and Muhammad Al-Hilali/ Muhsin Khan all EXPLICITLY mention the moon as the source of cold. You have proved your ignorance once again. Stick with disciplines you know like hourly masturbation and being on the receiving end of sodomy."
Friday, July 3, 2009
The Case Against Iran
Why should we care about what is happening in Iran? Are any of you worried that your lives will be impacted negatively by the civil unrest there? Do any you have a burning desire to spend your next vacation there? How many of you are eager to see such cultural attractions as a public hanging of a woman accused of adultery or a flogging of a girl for exposing some of her hair in public? Why should anyone living in the United States spend even a few seconds pondering the events unfolding there and their possible implications?
Despite the fact that we live thousands of miles from Iran, we are not immune to the events occurring there. The days of willful isolationism have ended. The people of the United States can no longer rely on the notion that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans provide sufficient buffers against any harm emanating from that region of the world. The tremendous distance between the United States and one of Iran’s neighbors, Afghanistan, did not prevent the launching of suicide attacks from the other side of the world on the United States on the eleventh of September 2001.
For thirty years, the Iranian regime has been involved in undeclared war against the United States. One of the first acts of the Islamic regime was the seizure of American embassy. On the fourth of November, 1979, militants backing the Islamic regime attacked the American embassy in Tehran and seized the occupants. The Iranian regime imprisoned these fifty Americans for four hundred forty-four days.
On three occasions in 1983, terrorists who received funding and logistical support from Iran attacked Americans. On the eighteenth of April, a suicide bomber from the Shiite terrorist group, Hezbollah, crashed a pickup truck laden with explosives into the American Embassy in Beirut. Seventeen Americans and forty-six others died as a result. On the twenty-third of October, Hezbollah struck in similar fashion; this time the group targeted the U.S. Marines’ barracks in Beirut. The Marines had been sent to Lebanon to serve as members of a multi-national peace-keeping force during the Lebanese civil war. On the twelfth of December of the same year, another Shiite terrorist organization supported by Iran, Al Dawa, sent a suicide truck bomber to attack the American embassy in Kuwait. Five people died and more than eighty suffered injuries.
Attacks on embassies and military installations are blatant acts of war. All embassies are considered sovereign territory of the nation-state maintaining the embassy, regardless of location. However, Americans failed to realize that they had been dragged in this war and refused to reply to repeated attacks.
Iranian regime has been involved in terrorism and other threats to peace and stability in the Middle East. Iranian-backed Hezbollah suicide bombers also struck the French peacekeepers in Beirut the same days as the attacks on the Marines’ barracks. Hezbollah members have repeatedly engaged in kidnappings of Lebanese Christians and foreign journalists, professor, members of the media and others since the mid-eighties. These same militants periodically fire rockets at Israeli civilians from inside Lebanese borders. They smuggle suicide bombers into Israel who then set off explosive vests full of shrapnel on buses or in other public places.
Additionally, the Iranian theocracy has been working to acquire nuclear technology for several years. One must question why a country possessing such an abundance of petroleum would pursue a more costly and less secure form of energy. Iran’s petroleum reserves, one of the largest in the world, serve as the foundation of its economy. Claims for the need to acquire atomic power appear, at best, as a bizarre waste of resources considering Iran’s staggering illiteracy and poverty rates. These problems will only continue to mount considering that nearly a majority of the population is less than thirty years old. Ahmadinejad’s bellicose pronouncements against Israel, the United States and anyone else who may oppose Iranian hegemony in the Middle East betray his regime’s true, malignant designs for the acquisition and implementation of nuclear capability.
Iranians have been suffering under yoke of totalitarian government for thirty years. A pretense of representative democracy has existed in Iran since the revolution. However, these elections should be misconstrued as free and open. All candidates for any office must receive approval by the Guardian Council, twelve men appointed by the true leader of Iran, the unelected and unimpeachable Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Anyone deemed insufficiently adherent to Shiism is disqualified. In the parliamentary elections of 2008, this despotic dozen barred nearly two thousand of the nine thousand candidates who applied to run for seats. Political debates are illegal. No political advertisements ever appear on Iranian television which a governmental monopoly.
Azeri Turks, an ethnic minority comprising a quarter of the Iranian population, are targets of slander in governmental media. News reports have portrayed Azeris as cockroaches and dimwits because Azeris typically speak Farsi, the official language of Iran, with difficulty. The Persian majority of the regime has outlawed the use of Turkish names for geographic locations and children. The mere act of printing anything in Turkish has been deemed a criminal offense.
The Arab minority in Iran face continuous harassment and loss of property. The Arab minority lives in the southwestern portion of Iran. The government regularly seizes their property to give to the burgeoning Persia populace. When the Arabs protest, they are rounded up under the charge of subverting the Shiite regime as agents of the Saudi kingdom.
Oppression of women has been sited as one of the contributing factors to the tumult. An entire generation has grown up under Islamic tyranny yet the governmental propaganda has not fully brainwashed all of those born since the establishment of the Shiite regime. Iranian women and girls catch glimpses of liberated women across the world despite the extensive censorship of foreign media by the Islamic morality police. They realize that women elsewhere do not endure beatings, fines or imprisonment for not covering their hair or wearing anything other than shapeless and oppressively uncomfortable outfits.
Multiple forms of legalized sexual exploitation and abuse haunt Iranian women. Three decades have been blighted with the executions of women and girls for offenses such as adultery, many of whom were in fact raped and did not consent to any extramarital sexual acts. Thousands of teenaged girls from impoverished rural families have been sold off to men in their forties or older. These arranged marriages last only short-term, leaving the girls as destitute as before but also stigmatized as a discarded wife. Additionally, Iranian law permits de facto prostitution under the moniker of “temporary marriages”. These arrangements consist of a man signing a legal contract with a pre-determined termination date of the so-called marriage and a sum paid to the woman. These marriages typically last only a few days or even hours, depending on the whim of the man signing the document.
Persecution of religious minorities has grown rampant under the Islamic theocracy. Applicants to universities must pass a test of knowledge of Shiite Islam, even those Iranian citizens who belong to another sect of Islam or to another religion altogether. Laws forbid the scriptures of any other religion to be translated in Farsi. Only Shiites are allowed to evangelize; members of any other religious group face imprisonment or execution for trying to convert Shiites Iranians to any other faith. All religious minorities must serve in the Iranian military but are barred from becoming officers. If a Shiite kills a non-Shiite, the Shiite cannot be executed under Iranian law. If one member of a non-Shiite family converts to Islam, then that convert automatically inherits all of his/her family’s property regardless of the family’s wishes. If an Iranian was born and raised as a Shiite, he/she faces execution for leaving Islam to accept another religion.
The Jewish population has dwindled to twenty-five percent of its total before the Islamic Revolution. Iranian Jews are forbidden to travel as an entire family outside of the country to prevent their emigration. They are not allowed to operate their own private schools. Officials of the Islamic regime control the school with obvious antagonism such as mandating Saturday as a school day, in violation of the Jewish Sabbath. Any Jewish protests against the hostile policies result in arrests, imprisonment or executions on baseless charges of espionage or subversion under the auspices of Israel.
Since the beginning of Ahmadinejad’s presidency four years ago, persecution of Sufis, a minority sect of Islam, has increased remarkably. Agents of the Shiite regime have destroyed Sufis’ place of worship, shrines and other locations where Sufis gather. Additionally, Sufis are regularly arrested then flogged or forced to sign documents renouncing Sufism.
Christians in Iran have endured oppression since the early days of the Islamic regime. Assyrians and Armenians, ethnic minorities who are Christians, constantly endure governmental surveillance of their religious services. The Ministry of Islamic Guidance has ordered the closing of many churches and other Christian buildings, including all their bookstores in 1990. The Iranian government forbids both groups to accept any new members among other ethnicities in the country.
Zoroastrians, the majority of the people in pre-Islamic Iran, suffer oppression as well. Their faith predates Islam by at least a thousand, seven hundred years yet less than hundred thousand at the present time. They face the same third-class status as other religious minorities.
Bahais, another indigenous religious sect, have not even received the flimsy promises of tolerance accorded to Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians by the Shiite government. This persecution persists despite the fact that the Bahai faith originated in the mid-nineteenth century in Iran when it was called Persia. Almost immediately after Ayatollah Khomeini and his legions seized power in 1978, the mullahs exhorted the followers to pillage Bahai temples and assault the congregants.
The Iranian theocracy has demonstrated similarities to other repressive regimes since its inception thirty years ago. Totalitarian regimes have engaged in banning of any use of minorities languages. The fascist government of Spain suppressed all public use of the Basque and Catalan languages by those two ethnicities. The Communist Chinese government has engaged in a systematic effort to eliminate the Tibetan language and distinctive culture. The Nazi and Soviet regimes fanned the flames of religious hostility toward their Jewish population to rally support for wide-spread imprisonment and seizure of Jewish property. Popular revolts against tyranny met ruthless crackdowns just as those which occurred in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and in Nazi-occupied Warsaw in 1943. The mullahs in charge of Iran have either modeled their oligarchy on preceding authoritarian factions or are engaging in a frightening similar coincidence.
The current resistance movement has been swelling for years. The suspicious outcome of this presidential election only served as the tipping point. Years of misogyny, ethnic chauvinism and religious persecution have all contributed to the boiling cauldron that Iran has become. Finally, the contentious situation has boiled over and spilled into the streets throughout Iran.
The United States stood by passively when the Islamic militants toppled the Shah of Iran. Granted, the Shah headed an autocratic and corrupt regime. However, the most egregious sins of the monarchy pale in comparison to the totalitarians currently in power in Iran. The consequences of the outcome of this tumult far outweigh any importance associated with the death of an androgynous pop singer or that of faded sex symbol from the 1970s.
All of these examples I have cited should motivate every American to support efforts to assist the toppling of the Iranian theocracy. The United States must organize an international boycott of Iran petroleum. Additionally, American naval forces should lead a blockade of Iranian ports used to export its petroleum. Without the profits from the sale of its petroleum, the Iranian regime will soon collapse. Then all of the citizens can unite to establish a true republic with legitimate multi-party elections, equality under the law for women and the end of antagonism toward non-Shiites and non-Persians. Finally, this undeclared war will come to an en
COPYRIGHT JULY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Sources for this article:
http://www.cswusa.com/Countries/Iran.htm
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/02/again_religious_persecution_in.html
http://forums.contracostatimes.com/topic/islamic-republic-of-irans-persecution-oppression-of-minorities-islamic-apartheid
http://www.iranfocus.com/en/human-rights/iranian-authorities-destroy-sufi-holy-site-in-isfahan-17207.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022903488_2.html
http://parsikhabar.net/irans-last-zoroastrians-worried-by-youth-exodus/
http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org/stories.asp?id=343
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88148974
Despite the fact that we live thousands of miles from Iran, we are not immune to the events occurring there. The days of willful isolationism have ended. The people of the United States can no longer rely on the notion that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans provide sufficient buffers against any harm emanating from that region of the world. The tremendous distance between the United States and one of Iran’s neighbors, Afghanistan, did not prevent the launching of suicide attacks from the other side of the world on the United States on the eleventh of September 2001.
For thirty years, the Iranian regime has been involved in undeclared war against the United States. One of the first acts of the Islamic regime was the seizure of American embassy. On the fourth of November, 1979, militants backing the Islamic regime attacked the American embassy in Tehran and seized the occupants. The Iranian regime imprisoned these fifty Americans for four hundred forty-four days.
On three occasions in 1983, terrorists who received funding and logistical support from Iran attacked Americans. On the eighteenth of April, a suicide bomber from the Shiite terrorist group, Hezbollah, crashed a pickup truck laden with explosives into the American Embassy in Beirut. Seventeen Americans and forty-six others died as a result. On the twenty-third of October, Hezbollah struck in similar fashion; this time the group targeted the U.S. Marines’ barracks in Beirut. The Marines had been sent to Lebanon to serve as members of a multi-national peace-keeping force during the Lebanese civil war. On the twelfth of December of the same year, another Shiite terrorist organization supported by Iran, Al Dawa, sent a suicide truck bomber to attack the American embassy in Kuwait. Five people died and more than eighty suffered injuries.
Attacks on embassies and military installations are blatant acts of war. All embassies are considered sovereign territory of the nation-state maintaining the embassy, regardless of location. However, Americans failed to realize that they had been dragged in this war and refused to reply to repeated attacks.
Iranian regime has been involved in terrorism and other threats to peace and stability in the Middle East. Iranian-backed Hezbollah suicide bombers also struck the French peacekeepers in Beirut the same days as the attacks on the Marines’ barracks. Hezbollah members have repeatedly engaged in kidnappings of Lebanese Christians and foreign journalists, professor, members of the media and others since the mid-eighties. These same militants periodically fire rockets at Israeli civilians from inside Lebanese borders. They smuggle suicide bombers into Israel who then set off explosive vests full of shrapnel on buses or in other public places.
Additionally, the Iranian theocracy has been working to acquire nuclear technology for several years. One must question why a country possessing such an abundance of petroleum would pursue a more costly and less secure form of energy. Iran’s petroleum reserves, one of the largest in the world, serve as the foundation of its economy. Claims for the need to acquire atomic power appear, at best, as a bizarre waste of resources considering Iran’s staggering illiteracy and poverty rates. These problems will only continue to mount considering that nearly a majority of the population is less than thirty years old. Ahmadinejad’s bellicose pronouncements against Israel, the United States and anyone else who may oppose Iranian hegemony in the Middle East betray his regime’s true, malignant designs for the acquisition and implementation of nuclear capability.
Iranians have been suffering under yoke of totalitarian government for thirty years. A pretense of representative democracy has existed in Iran since the revolution. However, these elections should be misconstrued as free and open. All candidates for any office must receive approval by the Guardian Council, twelve men appointed by the true leader of Iran, the unelected and unimpeachable Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Anyone deemed insufficiently adherent to Shiism is disqualified. In the parliamentary elections of 2008, this despotic dozen barred nearly two thousand of the nine thousand candidates who applied to run for seats. Political debates are illegal. No political advertisements ever appear on Iranian television which a governmental monopoly.
Azeri Turks, an ethnic minority comprising a quarter of the Iranian population, are targets of slander in governmental media. News reports have portrayed Azeris as cockroaches and dimwits because Azeris typically speak Farsi, the official language of Iran, with difficulty. The Persian majority of the regime has outlawed the use of Turkish names for geographic locations and children. The mere act of printing anything in Turkish has been deemed a criminal offense.
The Arab minority in Iran face continuous harassment and loss of property. The Arab minority lives in the southwestern portion of Iran. The government regularly seizes their property to give to the burgeoning Persia populace. When the Arabs protest, they are rounded up under the charge of subverting the Shiite regime as agents of the Saudi kingdom.
Oppression of women has been sited as one of the contributing factors to the tumult. An entire generation has grown up under Islamic tyranny yet the governmental propaganda has not fully brainwashed all of those born since the establishment of the Shiite regime. Iranian women and girls catch glimpses of liberated women across the world despite the extensive censorship of foreign media by the Islamic morality police. They realize that women elsewhere do not endure beatings, fines or imprisonment for not covering their hair or wearing anything other than shapeless and oppressively uncomfortable outfits.
Multiple forms of legalized sexual exploitation and abuse haunt Iranian women. Three decades have been blighted with the executions of women and girls for offenses such as adultery, many of whom were in fact raped and did not consent to any extramarital sexual acts. Thousands of teenaged girls from impoverished rural families have been sold off to men in their forties or older. These arranged marriages last only short-term, leaving the girls as destitute as before but also stigmatized as a discarded wife. Additionally, Iranian law permits de facto prostitution under the moniker of “temporary marriages”. These arrangements consist of a man signing a legal contract with a pre-determined termination date of the so-called marriage and a sum paid to the woman. These marriages typically last only a few days or even hours, depending on the whim of the man signing the document.
Persecution of religious minorities has grown rampant under the Islamic theocracy. Applicants to universities must pass a test of knowledge of Shiite Islam, even those Iranian citizens who belong to another sect of Islam or to another religion altogether. Laws forbid the scriptures of any other religion to be translated in Farsi. Only Shiites are allowed to evangelize; members of any other religious group face imprisonment or execution for trying to convert Shiites Iranians to any other faith. All religious minorities must serve in the Iranian military but are barred from becoming officers. If a Shiite kills a non-Shiite, the Shiite cannot be executed under Iranian law. If one member of a non-Shiite family converts to Islam, then that convert automatically inherits all of his/her family’s property regardless of the family’s wishes. If an Iranian was born and raised as a Shiite, he/she faces execution for leaving Islam to accept another religion.
The Jewish population has dwindled to twenty-five percent of its total before the Islamic Revolution. Iranian Jews are forbidden to travel as an entire family outside of the country to prevent their emigration. They are not allowed to operate their own private schools. Officials of the Islamic regime control the school with obvious antagonism such as mandating Saturday as a school day, in violation of the Jewish Sabbath. Any Jewish protests against the hostile policies result in arrests, imprisonment or executions on baseless charges of espionage or subversion under the auspices of Israel.
Since the beginning of Ahmadinejad’s presidency four years ago, persecution of Sufis, a minority sect of Islam, has increased remarkably. Agents of the Shiite regime have destroyed Sufis’ place of worship, shrines and other locations where Sufis gather. Additionally, Sufis are regularly arrested then flogged or forced to sign documents renouncing Sufism.
Christians in Iran have endured oppression since the early days of the Islamic regime. Assyrians and Armenians, ethnic minorities who are Christians, constantly endure governmental surveillance of their religious services. The Ministry of Islamic Guidance has ordered the closing of many churches and other Christian buildings, including all their bookstores in 1990. The Iranian government forbids both groups to accept any new members among other ethnicities in the country.
Zoroastrians, the majority of the people in pre-Islamic Iran, suffer oppression as well. Their faith predates Islam by at least a thousand, seven hundred years yet less than hundred thousand at the present time. They face the same third-class status as other religious minorities.
Bahais, another indigenous religious sect, have not even received the flimsy promises of tolerance accorded to Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians by the Shiite government. This persecution persists despite the fact that the Bahai faith originated in the mid-nineteenth century in Iran when it was called Persia. Almost immediately after Ayatollah Khomeini and his legions seized power in 1978, the mullahs exhorted the followers to pillage Bahai temples and assault the congregants.
The Iranian theocracy has demonstrated similarities to other repressive regimes since its inception thirty years ago. Totalitarian regimes have engaged in banning of any use of minorities languages. The fascist government of Spain suppressed all public use of the Basque and Catalan languages by those two ethnicities. The Communist Chinese government has engaged in a systematic effort to eliminate the Tibetan language and distinctive culture. The Nazi and Soviet regimes fanned the flames of religious hostility toward their Jewish population to rally support for wide-spread imprisonment and seizure of Jewish property. Popular revolts against tyranny met ruthless crackdowns just as those which occurred in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and in Nazi-occupied Warsaw in 1943. The mullahs in charge of Iran have either modeled their oligarchy on preceding authoritarian factions or are engaging in a frightening similar coincidence.
The current resistance movement has been swelling for years. The suspicious outcome of this presidential election only served as the tipping point. Years of misogyny, ethnic chauvinism and religious persecution have all contributed to the boiling cauldron that Iran has become. Finally, the contentious situation has boiled over and spilled into the streets throughout Iran.
The United States stood by passively when the Islamic militants toppled the Shah of Iran. Granted, the Shah headed an autocratic and corrupt regime. However, the most egregious sins of the monarchy pale in comparison to the totalitarians currently in power in Iran. The consequences of the outcome of this tumult far outweigh any importance associated with the death of an androgynous pop singer or that of faded sex symbol from the 1970s.
All of these examples I have cited should motivate every American to support efforts to assist the toppling of the Iranian theocracy. The United States must organize an international boycott of Iran petroleum. Additionally, American naval forces should lead a blockade of Iranian ports used to export its petroleum. Without the profits from the sale of its petroleum, the Iranian regime will soon collapse. Then all of the citizens can unite to establish a true republic with legitimate multi-party elections, equality under the law for women and the end of antagonism toward non-Shiites and non-Persians. Finally, this undeclared war will come to an en
COPYRIGHT JULY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Sources for this article:
http://www.cswusa.com/Countries/Iran.htm
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/02/again_religious_persecution_in.html
http://forums.contracostatimes.com/topic/islamic-republic-of-irans-persecution-oppression-of-minorities-islamic-apartheid
http://www.iranfocus.com/en/human-rights/iranian-authorities-destroy-sufi-holy-site-in-isfahan-17207.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022903488_2.html
http://parsikhabar.net/irans-last-zoroastrians-worried-by-youth-exodus/
http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org/stories.asp?id=343
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88148974
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Iranian Rebellion: linear or meandering?
Popular rebellions throughout history have proved extremely difficult to gauge. Pundits and politicians attempt to project their final results. Often sparked by dour economic conditions combined with repressive governmental actions, rebellions open the portals for inundations of demands for economic and social transformations.
The French Revolution started when peasants' crops failed leading to famine. Decades of deficit spending precluded the ability of King Louis the Fourteenth's regime from doing much to alleviate the suffering. The knowledge of the aristocracy's opulence sparked the peasantry's rage. Intermingling with this anger, advocates of the Enlightenment, enthralled with novelties called representative democracy and liberty, joined the anti-monarchical chorus. The fervor eventually led to verbal and physical assaults on Catholic installations and clergy. The urge to overthrow all peripherals of the system even lead to abolition of the Christian calendar and its replacement by a week of ten days and a year that started on the day of the autumnal equinox.
The Russian Revolution grew out of opposition to Czar Nicholas the Second's decision to enter the First World War. Political minorities, factions of Marxism, anarchism and capitalism, became involved in the opposition to the monarchy; they disagreed on what form of government should replace it but all openly pushed for the end of the Czarist autocracy. Eventually, the totalitarianism of the Bolsheviks replaced the autocracy of the Czar. This upheaval led to fundamental changes such as the full-scale oppression of the Orthodox Christian Church and its institutions, even its calendar which the monarchy had used for centuries.
At the present, the world is watching the tumult occurring in Iran. After thirty years under a totalitarian government, the Islam-based oppression is chafing some teens and twenty-somethings. Despite the mullahs' efforts to isolate Iranians, increased ease of communication with the Free World has allowed the penetration of non-Islamic concepts. During the street protests, women have dared to pull back their legally-mandated head-coverings to un-Islamic standards, if not remove them completely. Reports indicate that demonstrators have yelled, "Death to the dictator!" and "Death to Khamenei!" If those have been occurring, the rebellion exceeds a mere burst of outrage by devotees of a candidate who lost an election. The suicide bombing of the mausoleum of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution which installed the Islamic regime, carries profound significance. That act of violence may portend opposition to the entire theocracy, not simply to the loony figurehead who holds the position of President of the Islamic regime.
Some question Mir Mousavi's alleged reformist agenda. Considering that politicians truly antipathic toward Islamic regime are never permitted to seek offices in the government, such skepticism is warranted. Therefore, one can rightfully question Mousavi's commitment to advocate for personal freedom and legitimate democracy in Iran.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never attempted to hide his mental instability. He openly denies the Nazi genocide directed at Jews. He leaves a seat vacant just in case a supposed messianic figure called the "Twelfth Imam" happens to stop by wherever Ahmadinejad is making a public appearance. He actually says with a straight face that Iran wants a nuclear energy program for strictly peaceful purposes. How can any sane person justify the pursuit of nuclear technology for energy production in a country which is one of the largest exporters of petroleum in the world? I suppose Ahmadinejad expects that the "Twelfth Imam" will provide some sort of rational explanation or just bring the nuclear weapons himself, rendering the secretive program obsolete.
No one knows how this tumult will resolve itself. The theocrats in Iran may unleash a torrent of violence to crackdown on the protestors. However, that could possibly fan the blames of opposition causing undecided Iranians to side with the anti-regime forces. Middle Eastern experts might try to predict the outcome yet they have limited access to current developments inside Iran. Intelligence agencies of various countries are undoubtedly extracting all possible information that their agents can obtain. Nevertheless, a multitude of surveillance technology and inside sources cannot provide perfect clairvoyance and clairaudience. In the end, we will only know the fate of Iran after the demonstrations have concluded, either victoriously or in vain.
COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
The French Revolution started when peasants' crops failed leading to famine. Decades of deficit spending precluded the ability of King Louis the Fourteenth's regime from doing much to alleviate the suffering. The knowledge of the aristocracy's opulence sparked the peasantry's rage. Intermingling with this anger, advocates of the Enlightenment, enthralled with novelties called representative democracy and liberty, joined the anti-monarchical chorus. The fervor eventually led to verbal and physical assaults on Catholic installations and clergy. The urge to overthrow all peripherals of the system even lead to abolition of the Christian calendar and its replacement by a week of ten days and a year that started on the day of the autumnal equinox.
The Russian Revolution grew out of opposition to Czar Nicholas the Second's decision to enter the First World War. Political minorities, factions of Marxism, anarchism and capitalism, became involved in the opposition to the monarchy; they disagreed on what form of government should replace it but all openly pushed for the end of the Czarist autocracy. Eventually, the totalitarianism of the Bolsheviks replaced the autocracy of the Czar. This upheaval led to fundamental changes such as the full-scale oppression of the Orthodox Christian Church and its institutions, even its calendar which the monarchy had used for centuries.
At the present, the world is watching the tumult occurring in Iran. After thirty years under a totalitarian government, the Islam-based oppression is chafing some teens and twenty-somethings. Despite the mullahs' efforts to isolate Iranians, increased ease of communication with the Free World has allowed the penetration of non-Islamic concepts. During the street protests, women have dared to pull back their legally-mandated head-coverings to un-Islamic standards, if not remove them completely. Reports indicate that demonstrators have yelled, "Death to the dictator!" and "Death to Khamenei!" If those have been occurring, the rebellion exceeds a mere burst of outrage by devotees of a candidate who lost an election. The suicide bombing of the mausoleum of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution which installed the Islamic regime, carries profound significance. That act of violence may portend opposition to the entire theocracy, not simply to the loony figurehead who holds the position of President of the Islamic regime.
Some question Mir Mousavi's alleged reformist agenda. Considering that politicians truly antipathic toward Islamic regime are never permitted to seek offices in the government, such skepticism is warranted. Therefore, one can rightfully question Mousavi's commitment to advocate for personal freedom and legitimate democracy in Iran.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never attempted to hide his mental instability. He openly denies the Nazi genocide directed at Jews. He leaves a seat vacant just in case a supposed messianic figure called the "Twelfth Imam" happens to stop by wherever Ahmadinejad is making a public appearance. He actually says with a straight face that Iran wants a nuclear energy program for strictly peaceful purposes. How can any sane person justify the pursuit of nuclear technology for energy production in a country which is one of the largest exporters of petroleum in the world? I suppose Ahmadinejad expects that the "Twelfth Imam" will provide some sort of rational explanation or just bring the nuclear weapons himself, rendering the secretive program obsolete.
No one knows how this tumult will resolve itself. The theocrats in Iran may unleash a torrent of violence to crackdown on the protestors. However, that could possibly fan the blames of opposition causing undecided Iranians to side with the anti-regime forces. Middle Eastern experts might try to predict the outcome yet they have limited access to current developments inside Iran. Intelligence agencies of various countries are undoubtedly extracting all possible information that their agents can obtain. Nevertheless, a multitude of surveillance technology and inside sources cannot provide perfect clairvoyance and clairaudience. In the end, we will only know the fate of Iran after the demonstrations have concluded, either victoriously or in vain.
COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)