Posts
Once again, the nefarious schemes of the barbarians within the gates of the Free World have been exposed. The latest revelation of Colleen LaRose, a Western-born and raised Caucasian American woman participating in jihad against the United States should finally shatter the endlessly spouted deception from Islamists and their useful idiots. One must wonder if the wall of political correctness protecting the public perception of Islam will crumble due to this latest blow of truth.
Any measures taken against Mohamadans and any responses to the Islamic threat automatically receive the label "racist". Arab jihadis such as Nidal Malik Hassan is and the nineteen hijackers of the eleventh of September were also Caucasian. The majority of Americans are Caucasian just as the Arab jihadis are.
What is the basis for Islamists' screeches of "racism" every time a Mohamadan is frisked at an airport boarding area or Islamic organization is investigated by the media or law enforcement? Actually, the only basis is knowledge of the obsession of the vast majority of Americans with avoiding the mere accusation of racism against themselves. The Islamists' ubiquitous hurling of the "r-word" against the obstacles in their path to Islamization has served as a permanent "get out of trouble free" card. Their cynical ignoring of facts which undercut the potency of their favorite tactic demonstrates one of their principles: the ends (Islamization) justifies the means (takkiya).
Jihad Jane continues a growing line of American jihadis such as John Allen Mohammed, John Walker Lindh, Adam Gadahn, and Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad. This blond, blue-eyed woman could have served as a model for Nazi propaganda. Instead she chose to adhere to Islam, another form of totalitarianism but no less brutally hostile to representative democracy and the freedoms which it entails and she exploits. Unfortunately, the altruism of a Pennsylvania police officer prevented this most recent traitor from committing suicide in 2005.
Jihad Jane expressed her desperation to do something to ease the suffering of Mohamadans. What exactly is this supposed suffering and what was her plan to help end it? Colleen LaRose and her fellow Mohamadans object to a cartoon drawn by Lars Vilks. Their solution to art which they dislike is to kill of the artist. Mohamadans are practicing the solution to opposition instituted by their namesake whenever he learned of any poetry mocking his supposed prophetic status. Whenever Islamists and their useful idiots spout Islamic propaganda about the alleged compatibility of Islam within a representative democracy, clear-thinking people must keep this plot in mind. This conspiracy to murder belies how freedoms of speech and of expression are obliterated when Islamic principles are imposed. Just as any aspersion on Adolf Hitler in Nazi-dominated territory or objections to Karl Marx in communist regimes inevitably led to death sentences, the adherents of Islam will violently extinguish any source of criticism of the creator of their ideology.
Lost among the details of this manifestation of Islam in action has been the public defamation of an entire group of beings. Lars Vilks' drawing in question portrayed the head of the inventor of Islam on the body of a dog. The canine community did nothing to deserve this slander of guilt by association. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) frequently revealed his cynophobia in various Islamic texts. Mohamadans express hostility toward dogs; one could logically assume that the antipathy is mutual. Considering that no dog has admitted to having sexual relations with a nine year old girl nor robbed anyone opposed to their absolute dictatorship nor ordered the assassination of political opponents, this writer maintains that dogs, not Mohamadans, deserve the apology from Lars Vilks for his cartoon.
COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT MARCH 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
More Bleeting from a Mohamadan Sheep
One of the Mohamadan sheeple who has contacted me to spew Islamic disinformation resented my postings of her inanity. The following is her most recent messages with my responses. I have not altered anything that she or I initially wrote.
Fatima Shirazi March 1 at 10:17pm
"I was looking for a article I wrote on the internet, and I found your website..and you posted our entire conversation. Seriously? Its not okay to call muslims Mohamadan Sheeps. wow.....I did not want even to finish our conversation the first time around because I realized you have no thorough understanding of what Islam really represents, you just pick random schools of thought and lump Islam into one category. Open your eyes, there are more then one school of thought for Islam and there are more deep rooted meanings and reasons then you could ever understand. Enjoy your Islam hating."
Charles Kastriot March 1 at 11:08pm
"Only two 'schools' of Islam exist: yours, which obfuscates the plethora of evils (totalitarianism, misogyny, pedophilia, thievery and so forth) and the other school which openly admits and embraces these evils. There is nothing deeper to Islam than the libido and whims of its fabricator, Mohamad (May he burn Hell forever). Enjoy being beaten for not hiding yourself under a drape in your posted photograph. Hopefully, your batterer will beat some wisdom and enlightenment into your brain."
Fatima Shirazi March 1 at 11:50pm
"Be careful every time you turn your ignition key.
May Allah bless you and forgive you."
Charles Kastriot March 2 at 1:07am
"What a typical Mohamadan response. Of course, savages such as yourself would never dare to try to harm me face-to-face. Your ilk prefer cowardly attacks like car bombings which you referenced in addition to hijacking planes then crashing them into buildings. May you burn in Hell forever alongside the criminal who created your totalitarian ideology."
Unfortunately for the Free World, this barbarian resides within the realm of civilization. We should be concerned about what type of terrorism with which this Fifth Columnist is involved. Hopefully, civilized people will keep a watchful eye on this enemy and remove her from their soil.
Fatima Shirazi March 1 at 10:17pm
"I was looking for a article I wrote on the internet, and I found your website..and you posted our entire conversation. Seriously? Its not okay to call muslims Mohamadan Sheeps. wow.....I did not want even to finish our conversation the first time around because I realized you have no thorough understanding of what Islam really represents, you just pick random schools of thought and lump Islam into one category. Open your eyes, there are more then one school of thought for Islam and there are more deep rooted meanings and reasons then you could ever understand. Enjoy your Islam hating."
Charles Kastriot March 1 at 11:08pm
"Only two 'schools' of Islam exist: yours, which obfuscates the plethora of evils (totalitarianism, misogyny, pedophilia, thievery and so forth) and the other school which openly admits and embraces these evils. There is nothing deeper to Islam than the libido and whims of its fabricator, Mohamad (May he burn Hell forever). Enjoy being beaten for not hiding yourself under a drape in your posted photograph. Hopefully, your batterer will beat some wisdom and enlightenment into your brain."
Fatima Shirazi March 1 at 11:50pm
"Be careful every time you turn your ignition key.
May Allah bless you and forgive you."
Charles Kastriot March 2 at 1:07am
"What a typical Mohamadan response. Of course, savages such as yourself would never dare to try to harm me face-to-face. Your ilk prefer cowardly attacks like car bombings which you referenced in addition to hijacking planes then crashing them into buildings. May you burn in Hell forever alongside the criminal who created your totalitarian ideology."
Unfortunately for the Free World, this barbarian resides within the realm of civilization. We should be concerned about what type of terrorism with which this Fifth Columnist is involved. Hopefully, civilized people will keep a watchful eye on this enemy and remove her from their soil.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Punched into Recognition
So Ahmedinejad much ballyhooed "punch to West" has occurred. Does anyone in the Free World feel punch-drunk or even slightly dazed? Instead of describing the announcement as a punch, it would be more accurate to call it the latest slap to the collective face of the civilized people of the world. Ahmedinejad has repeatedly struck the cheeks of a slumbering Uncle Sam who is determined to continue his dream of willful ignorance.
Uncle Sam keeps brushing away attempts at reveille by his only true friend in Ahmadinejad's otherwise overtly hostile neighborhood. Despite Israel's meager population and limited resources and territory, it is willing to face down the Iranian blowhard. Realistic Israelis can see the imminent atomic assault on their country. The primary factor impeding the Israels' proactive elimination of Iran's capacity for nuclear attacks lie in hope that other civilized nations will find a way to halt the threat of attacks originating from Iran. Up to this date, no member of the Free World has demonstrated any determination to stop the jihadis in Iran from gaining means to propagate Islam through nuclear weapons. Nuclear-armed jihadis will afford the free people of the world the same options they have always proposed: convert to Islam, accept inferior status including paying protection money or die at the hands of the savages.
Perhaps, the popular uprisings in Iran have convinced leaders of the civilized nations that the Islamic regime and its nuclear weapons program are teetering on collapse. The line of reasoning follows: "Why bother to provoke the Iranian regime when, by ignoring it, its oppressed citizens will soon topple it? A bellicose response to Ahmadinejad would just give him a rallying cry against the infidels."
One could be tempted to support those rallying in the streets of Iran simply because they seem to view the Islamic regime as a common enemy. Granted, the unrest may distract the regime from reaching its goal of nuclear capability. This view could prove true but no definite list of the objectives of the protesters has been clearly demonstrated.
Anyone outside Iran must wonder about the goals of the demonstrators. Are they pushing for a complete upheaval of Iranian society, including purging of Islam and other Arabian elements of their society? Do they want to abolish the theocracy in favor of a secular government? Do they demand a Persian version of a fascist state like the one formerly in Irak, led by an autocrat who played on ethnic and sectarian strife to wield absolute power? Do they merely seek more economic opportunities and openness with the West? Will they settle for less odious treatment of women, non-Shi'ites and non-Persians while continuing to chafe under the yoke of Islamic totalitarianism? Before embracing the angry crowds surging in the streets of Iran, the residents of the Free World must delve deeper into words and actions of the individuals within the movement.
Will Uncle Sam eventually rouse himself from this self-destructive slumber? One might be reminded of another allegorical character, Rip Van Winkle, who awoke from his decades-long nap. Unfortunately for him, Rip hardly recognized his surroundings after being unconscious for such an extended period of time. The world had changed noticeably and in ways which Rip did not like. For hope of the Free World, Uncle Sam must snap out of this suicidally somnolent state before his world has declined in a Dark Age of Islamic hegemony.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Uncle Sam keeps brushing away attempts at reveille by his only true friend in Ahmadinejad's otherwise overtly hostile neighborhood. Despite Israel's meager population and limited resources and territory, it is willing to face down the Iranian blowhard. Realistic Israelis can see the imminent atomic assault on their country. The primary factor impeding the Israels' proactive elimination of Iran's capacity for nuclear attacks lie in hope that other civilized nations will find a way to halt the threat of attacks originating from Iran. Up to this date, no member of the Free World has demonstrated any determination to stop the jihadis in Iran from gaining means to propagate Islam through nuclear weapons. Nuclear-armed jihadis will afford the free people of the world the same options they have always proposed: convert to Islam, accept inferior status including paying protection money or die at the hands of the savages.
Perhaps, the popular uprisings in Iran have convinced leaders of the civilized nations that the Islamic regime and its nuclear weapons program are teetering on collapse. The line of reasoning follows: "Why bother to provoke the Iranian regime when, by ignoring it, its oppressed citizens will soon topple it? A bellicose response to Ahmadinejad would just give him a rallying cry against the infidels."
One could be tempted to support those rallying in the streets of Iran simply because they seem to view the Islamic regime as a common enemy. Granted, the unrest may distract the regime from reaching its goal of nuclear capability. This view could prove true but no definite list of the objectives of the protesters has been clearly demonstrated.
Anyone outside Iran must wonder about the goals of the demonstrators. Are they pushing for a complete upheaval of Iranian society, including purging of Islam and other Arabian elements of their society? Do they want to abolish the theocracy in favor of a secular government? Do they demand a Persian version of a fascist state like the one formerly in Irak, led by an autocrat who played on ethnic and sectarian strife to wield absolute power? Do they merely seek more economic opportunities and openness with the West? Will they settle for less odious treatment of women, non-Shi'ites and non-Persians while continuing to chafe under the yoke of Islamic totalitarianism? Before embracing the angry crowds surging in the streets of Iran, the residents of the Free World must delve deeper into words and actions of the individuals within the movement.
Will Uncle Sam eventually rouse himself from this self-destructive slumber? One might be reminded of another allegorical character, Rip Van Winkle, who awoke from his decades-long nap. Unfortunately for him, Rip hardly recognized his surroundings after being unconscious for such an extended period of time. The world had changed noticeably and in ways which Rip did not like. For hope of the Free World, Uncle Sam must snap out of this suicidally somnolent state before his world has declined in a Dark Age of Islamic hegemony.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Monday, December 28, 2009
The Spirit of United 93
Old habits die hard, even for jihadis. Not content with killing Christians and destroying churches throughout Africa, the Middle East and southern Asia, they decided to rekindle a Richard Reid style of attack. The latest attempt by the terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to murder residents of the Free World occurred on Christmas, undoubtedly, not a coincidence. Al-Kaida relishes timing their strikes on days of significance. Even the Islamic hijackings and slaughter of thousands of civilians on the eleventh of September in 2001 a carried historical link. On that same day in 1683, Christian forces crushed the jihadist invaders outside Vienna. From that point through centuries, civilized nations gradually pushed back or suppressed the Islamic plague. Unfortunately for the world, those forces did not eradicate the Mohamadan scourge.
This most recent incidence of jihad demonstrates the power and primacy of unassuming individuals over impotent or dhimmified bureaucrats. One Dutch man accomplished what scores, if not hundreds or thousands, of federal governmental employees failed to do: halt a jihadi intent on murdering residents of the Free World. He did not need “cultural sensitivity” brainwashing sessions by the Council on American-Islamic Relations or any other fifth-columnist organization. Neither did his bravery require consultation with moral relativist lawyers nor with irrelevant international treaties ignored by Islamists. This one man from the Netherlands has continued the spirit of resistance to Islam exemplified by the passengers on United Flight 93 on the eleventh of September in 2001.
One must ask why this savage was even allowed on this flight? A broader question needs to be addressed: Why are any Mohamadans permitted anywhere near aircraft anymore? How many times do jihadis have use civilian airplanes as an implement of war before governmental authorities in the Free World admit that such naïve lackadaisicalness leads to deaths of free people? Until someone with authority decides to bar these monsters from infiltrating situations which facilitate acts of jihad, non-combatants will continue to suffer and die at the hands of vermin like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
In the end, despite the suicidal naïveté of and constant acquiescence to Islamists’ demands by federal authorities, the jihadi failed in his mission to earn eternity in a free whorehouse. Fortunately, no civilized people died in his jihad. Sadly, the passengers did not fully impose justice on the savage. This lascivious Mohamadan was willing to cause deaths of dozens of people in addition to his own just to satisfy his libido. Everyone should notice that his morbid desire to slaughter for sexual gratification ended up sabotaging his own future pursuits. What delicious irony that his own act of jihad torched his own little minaret, hopefully beyond any further usage.
COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT, DECEMBER 2009
This most recent incidence of jihad demonstrates the power and primacy of unassuming individuals over impotent or dhimmified bureaucrats. One Dutch man accomplished what scores, if not hundreds or thousands, of federal governmental employees failed to do: halt a jihadi intent on murdering residents of the Free World. He did not need “cultural sensitivity” brainwashing sessions by the Council on American-Islamic Relations or any other fifth-columnist organization. Neither did his bravery require consultation with moral relativist lawyers nor with irrelevant international treaties ignored by Islamists. This one man from the Netherlands has continued the spirit of resistance to Islam exemplified by the passengers on United Flight 93 on the eleventh of September in 2001.
One must ask why this savage was even allowed on this flight? A broader question needs to be addressed: Why are any Mohamadans permitted anywhere near aircraft anymore? How many times do jihadis have use civilian airplanes as an implement of war before governmental authorities in the Free World admit that such naïve lackadaisicalness leads to deaths of free people? Until someone with authority decides to bar these monsters from infiltrating situations which facilitate acts of jihad, non-combatants will continue to suffer and die at the hands of vermin like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
In the end, despite the suicidal naïveté of and constant acquiescence to Islamists’ demands by federal authorities, the jihadi failed in his mission to earn eternity in a free whorehouse. Fortunately, no civilized people died in his jihad. Sadly, the passengers did not fully impose justice on the savage. This lascivious Mohamadan was willing to cause deaths of dozens of people in addition to his own just to satisfy his libido. Everyone should notice that his morbid desire to slaughter for sexual gratification ended up sabotaging his own future pursuits. What delicious irony that his own act of jihad torched his own little minaret, hopefully beyond any further usage.
COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT, DECEMBER 2009
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Jihadist Murders at Fort Hood
Some actions are so easily anticipated and foreseeable. When they occur, these incidents only surprise those ignorant of the causes or those willfully blind to reality. Such incidents include rabid dogs biting people, flies buzzing around freshly deposited feces and snakes sliding along the ground before striking their victims. Also in the category of expected occurrences, one finds the inevitability of Mohamadans murdering civilized people when the opportunity presents itself.
Today’s latest episode of a jihadi slaying American armed forces personnel has underscored the need for a ban on Mohamadans in the American armed forces. This continues a long string of fifth columnists within the various branches of U.S. Department of Defense who used their training to murder Americans. I provide a recap of just some of the jihads’ plots to attack and undermine for those who forgot or have buried their hands in the sands of useful idiocy:
-On June 1 of this year, Abdulhakim Mujahid fatally shot Private William Long and wounded Quinton Ezeagwula in Little Rock, Arkansas.
-On the twenty-third of March 2003, Sgt. Asan Akbar rolled live grenades into the tents of fellow soldiers then fired an automatic weapon at them at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait. This jihadi killed two officers and injured fourteen other soldiers.
-Jeffrey Leon Battle, one of the Portland Six tied to al-Kaida, joined the Army Reserves in order to learn how to kill American soldiers. On the fourth of October 2002 Jeffrey Leon Battle was arrested. According to the Justice Department, he planned to wage war against Americans in Afghanistan. On the second of December 2003, Battle pleaded guilty and received a sentence of 18 years in prison.
-In May of 2002, the federal agents arrested Semi Osman, a Mohamadan cleric and a mechanic in the Naval Reserves, as part of an investigation of a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Osman had access to fuel trucks like those employed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia 1996 that killed 19 U.S. airmen. In January 2003, he pleaded guilty to a weapons charge.
-Ali Mohamed, a secret member of Islamic Jihad, enlisted in the U.S. Army and reached the rank of sergeant. He taught a class on Islamic perceptions of America to special forces at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. He also taught at the JFK Special Operations Warfare School where he stole classified military documents. After leaving the Army in 1989, he joined al-Kaida. He spent the 1990s traveling around the world helping plot jihadist operations. The FBI finally arrested him in 1998. He pleaded guilty to conspiring with Osama Bin Laden to attack Western targets.
-John Allen Muhammad was mechanic, truck driver and specialist metalworker in the Louisiana National Guard and later in the U.S. Army. He earned commendations for marksmenship which used to shoo t and kill ten civilians and wounded three other in the autumn of 2002 in the metropolitan area of Washington, DC.
A person need only read any of the numerous violently totalitarian scriptures serving as the foundation of Islam. These Islamic plots to murder Americans, civilians and armed forces personnel, and undermine national security further highlight the danger of allowing Mohamadans into the organizations sworn to protect the United States. How many more treacherous savages have to infiltrate American armed forces then slaughter the true defenders of freedom before the U.S. government bars these hostile barbarians from its military?
COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Today’s latest episode of a jihadi slaying American armed forces personnel has underscored the need for a ban on Mohamadans in the American armed forces. This continues a long string of fifth columnists within the various branches of U.S. Department of Defense who used their training to murder Americans. I provide a recap of just some of the jihads’ plots to attack and undermine for those who forgot or have buried their hands in the sands of useful idiocy:
-On June 1 of this year, Abdulhakim Mujahid fatally shot Private William Long and wounded Quinton Ezeagwula in Little Rock, Arkansas.
-On the twenty-third of March 2003, Sgt. Asan Akbar rolled live grenades into the tents of fellow soldiers then fired an automatic weapon at them at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait. This jihadi killed two officers and injured fourteen other soldiers.
-Jeffrey Leon Battle, one of the Portland Six tied to al-Kaida, joined the Army Reserves in order to learn how to kill American soldiers. On the fourth of October 2002 Jeffrey Leon Battle was arrested. According to the Justice Department, he planned to wage war against Americans in Afghanistan. On the second of December 2003, Battle pleaded guilty and received a sentence of 18 years in prison.
-In May of 2002, the federal agents arrested Semi Osman, a Mohamadan cleric and a mechanic in the Naval Reserves, as part of an investigation of a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Osman had access to fuel trucks like those employed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia 1996 that killed 19 U.S. airmen. In January 2003, he pleaded guilty to a weapons charge.
-Ali Mohamed, a secret member of Islamic Jihad, enlisted in the U.S. Army and reached the rank of sergeant. He taught a class on Islamic perceptions of America to special forces at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. He also taught at the JFK Special Operations Warfare School where he stole classified military documents. After leaving the Army in 1989, he joined al-Kaida. He spent the 1990s traveling around the world helping plot jihadist operations. The FBI finally arrested him in 1998. He pleaded guilty to conspiring with Osama Bin Laden to attack Western targets.
-John Allen Muhammad was mechanic, truck driver and specialist metalworker in the Louisiana National Guard and later in the U.S. Army. He earned commendations for marksmenship which used to shoo t and kill ten civilians and wounded three other in the autumn of 2002 in the metropolitan area of Washington, DC.
A person need only read any of the numerous violently totalitarian scriptures serving as the foundation of Islam. These Islamic plots to murder Americans, civilians and armed forces personnel, and undermine national security further highlight the danger of allowing Mohamadans into the organizations sworn to protect the United States. How many more treacherous savages have to infiltrate American armed forces then slaughter the true defenders of freedom before the U.S. government bars these hostile barbarians from its military?
COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Mohamadan Posing as a Concerned Jew
For the amusement of my associates, below is a message on Facebook which I received from a purported Jew who objected to my logo on Facebook. I have not altered anything which he or I wrote.
Daniel Sidon, October 4 at 6:26am: "you are against what? religion? why you making this to your profile photo? I am Jew and I respect Islam, because there is lot of similarities, that bad and stupid people which are figting for hamas etc. they will fight also without islam! they aren't following islam and jihad. jihad is strictly self-defensive! be so kind and put there something whats telling to others how you are nice, or ugly, but not how you're same stupid! thanks"
Charles Kastriot, October 6 at 12:02am "I am not against religion. I oppose Islam and all other forms of totalitarianism. My profile photo represents my opposition to the cancer that threatens democracy and freedom across the world.
If you are truly Jewish, which I highly doubt, try reading the Koran before you defend Islam. It is full of anti-Jewish rhetoric. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) merely co-opted some superficial elements of Judaism to lure Arabian Jews into his self-aggrandizing cult. After all but a few refused, he waged jihad on them, killing or enslaving all of the Jewish tribes of Arabia.
Hamas and other Islamists are simply following the example of Mo (MHBHF) as he dictated in the Koran. Just as Mo (MHBHF) ordered assassinations of critics, robbed anyone not in his cult, had sex with a multitude of women and pre-pubescent girls and committed numerous other crimes, Hamas and others such savages imitate his loathsome pattern.
If you think that by serving Mohamadans as their useful idiot, that they will not eventually slit your throat too? Stop being a craven dhimmi!"
Daniel Sidon, October 6 at 8:43am
"maybe YOU can try to read Koran."
I tried to reply to this anemic statement but this coward blocked me! Now, I am completely convinced that this invertabrate is actually a Mohamadan.
Daniel Sidon, October 4 at 6:26am: "you are against what? religion? why you making this to your profile photo? I am Jew and I respect Islam, because there is lot of similarities, that bad and stupid people which are figting for hamas etc. they will fight also without islam! they aren't following islam and jihad. jihad is strictly self-defensive! be so kind and put there something whats telling to others how you are nice, or ugly, but not how you're same stupid! thanks"
Charles Kastriot, October 6 at 12:02am "I am not against religion. I oppose Islam and all other forms of totalitarianism. My profile photo represents my opposition to the cancer that threatens democracy and freedom across the world.
If you are truly Jewish, which I highly doubt, try reading the Koran before you defend Islam. It is full of anti-Jewish rhetoric. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) merely co-opted some superficial elements of Judaism to lure Arabian Jews into his self-aggrandizing cult. After all but a few refused, he waged jihad on them, killing or enslaving all of the Jewish tribes of Arabia.
Hamas and other Islamists are simply following the example of Mo (MHBHF) as he dictated in the Koran. Just as Mo (MHBHF) ordered assassinations of critics, robbed anyone not in his cult, had sex with a multitude of women and pre-pubescent girls and committed numerous other crimes, Hamas and others such savages imitate his loathsome pattern.
If you think that by serving Mohamadans as their useful idiot, that they will not eventually slit your throat too? Stop being a craven dhimmi!"
Daniel Sidon, October 6 at 8:43am
"maybe YOU can try to read Koran."
I tried to reply to this anemic statement but this coward blocked me! Now, I am completely convinced that this invertabrate is actually a Mohamadan.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Sympathy for a Devil
This author has been accused of promoting hatred of Mohamadans. I have been criticized for automatically concluding that Islamists are guilty of committing acts of war and terrorism against the Free World. "Never mind that the overwhelming number of bombings across the world, both of the suicidal and homicidal varieties, occur in furtherance of the jihad," say Islamists and their useful idiots. So do they have a point that the goons holding a Koran in one hand while torching churches and the Christians inside them or while vandalizing Jewish-owned business or cemeteries did not constitute a concerted effort by Islamists to attack infidels? In an attempt at cultural sensitivity, conflict resolution and reconciliation with Mohamadans, I will serve as the defense attorney in the court of public opinion for Najibullah Zazi, the Mohamadan in the United States recently arrested for involvement with a terrorist plot targeting New York. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/national/main5321252.shtml?tag=stack)
Has anyone considered the possibility all of his secretive dealings were an effort to surprise New Yorkers? On the eighth anniversary of the jihadist attacks on the World Trade Center, maybe he was planning a citywide gift distribution. After consulting a list of traditional gifts for anniversaries, Zazi could have been secretly arranging the placement of improvised explosive devices in pottery or bronze receptacles through the city. The residents could have been greeted with lovely gunpowder-fueled displays spelling out "I heart NY" in shrapnel. Perhaps he preferred the modern suggestion of lace or linen so we can deduce what he had in mind: new burkas for every woman in the city! So, FBI, are you happy now that you ruined the surprise for everyone? What a bunch of spoilsports!
Did the FBI consider the possibility that Zazi's reference to an actual, planned wedding was, in fact, legitimate but just not recognized under the American legal system? News out of Sudan showed that Islamists do not discriminate against people with an alternative sexual orientation(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm)Moral relativists certainly should demand that the FBI display a higher level of tolerance for this cultural aspect of Islam, in addition to other cherished Islamic practices like female genital mutilation, wife-beating and murder of rape victims. Once again, Americans have demonstrated their bigotry toward sexual minorities!
Undoubtedly, people in the United States will label Zazi as an "extremist" or a "radical" adherent of Islam. A more unfounded accusation could not be hurled at him. Zazi has faithfully devoted himself to following the tenets and commandments of the Koran. He has not strayed into un-Islamic activities like befriending infidels, repairing vandalized churches or synagogues, protesting against terrorism, composing music or creating works of art like sculptures or portraits. Therefore, those who have besmirched his allegiance to Allah should acknowledge Zazi's commitment to true Islam!
Is it too much to ask for Americans to view the situation from Zazi's point of view? We should consider his unease about seeing his relatives for the upcoming the celebration of Eid al-Fitr. He would have had to face yet another plethora of irritating comments from his parents such as "Your older brother Mohamad killed three infidels and one apostate during Ramadan. That's more than you killed all year! Even your younger brother Mohamad martyred himself last month. Why can't you stop being such a slacker and act like your brothers?" Due to his shirking of his responsibilities to Allah and Mohamad, Zazi's parents will not give him that brand new explosive vest on which he has had eye for months now. Instead, he will have to settle for a box cutter as the gift from his parents. That kind of torture would not be permitted by the United Nations yet we expect that this young man to suffer like this? Have you no heart, Americans?
I would like to offer a compromise. We should allow him to behead a few members of Code Pink or the John Adams Project to placate his demanding parents. The members of those groups would just blame the slayings on George Bush, Israel's existence, global warming or any other culprit except for Islam. So what would be the problem?
In conclusion, I wish to all my devoted Mohamadan readers, HAVE AN EXPLOSIVE EID AL-FITR!
COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009
Has anyone considered the possibility all of his secretive dealings were an effort to surprise New Yorkers? On the eighth anniversary of the jihadist attacks on the World Trade Center, maybe he was planning a citywide gift distribution. After consulting a list of traditional gifts for anniversaries, Zazi could have been secretly arranging the placement of improvised explosive devices in pottery or bronze receptacles through the city. The residents could have been greeted with lovely gunpowder-fueled displays spelling out "I heart NY" in shrapnel. Perhaps he preferred the modern suggestion of lace or linen so we can deduce what he had in mind: new burkas for every woman in the city! So, FBI, are you happy now that you ruined the surprise for everyone? What a bunch of spoilsports!
Did the FBI consider the possibility that Zazi's reference to an actual, planned wedding was, in fact, legitimate but just not recognized under the American legal system? News out of Sudan showed that Islamists do not discriminate against people with an alternative sexual orientation(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm)Moral relativists certainly should demand that the FBI display a higher level of tolerance for this cultural aspect of Islam, in addition to other cherished Islamic practices like female genital mutilation, wife-beating and murder of rape victims. Once again, Americans have demonstrated their bigotry toward sexual minorities!
Undoubtedly, people in the United States will label Zazi as an "extremist" or a "radical" adherent of Islam. A more unfounded accusation could not be hurled at him. Zazi has faithfully devoted himself to following the tenets and commandments of the Koran. He has not strayed into un-Islamic activities like befriending infidels, repairing vandalized churches or synagogues, protesting against terrorism, composing music or creating works of art like sculptures or portraits. Therefore, those who have besmirched his allegiance to Allah should acknowledge Zazi's commitment to true Islam!
Is it too much to ask for Americans to view the situation from Zazi's point of view? We should consider his unease about seeing his relatives for the upcoming the celebration of Eid al-Fitr. He would have had to face yet another plethora of irritating comments from his parents such as "Your older brother Mohamad killed three infidels and one apostate during Ramadan. That's more than you killed all year! Even your younger brother Mohamad martyred himself last month. Why can't you stop being such a slacker and act like your brothers?" Due to his shirking of his responsibilities to Allah and Mohamad, Zazi's parents will not give him that brand new explosive vest on which he has had eye for months now. Instead, he will have to settle for a box cutter as the gift from his parents. That kind of torture would not be permitted by the United Nations yet we expect that this young man to suffer like this? Have you no heart, Americans?
I would like to offer a compromise. We should allow him to behead a few members of Code Pink or the John Adams Project to placate his demanding parents. The members of those groups would just blame the slayings on George Bush, Israel's existence, global warming or any other culprit except for Islam. So what would be the problem?
In conclusion, I wish to all my devoted Mohamadan readers, HAVE AN EXPLOSIVE EID AL-FITR!
COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)