The Spirit of United 93

Old habits die hard, even for jihadis. Not content with killing Christians and destroying churches throughout Africa, the Middle East and southern Asia, they decided to rekindle a Richard Reid style of attack. The latest attempt by the terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to murder residents of the Free World occurred on Christmas, undoubtedly, not a coincidence. Al-Kaida relishes timing their strikes on days of significance. Even the Islamic hijackings and slaughter of thousands of civilians on the eleventh of September in 2001 a carried historical link. On that same day in 1683, Christian forces crushed the jihadist invaders outside Vienna. From that point through centuries, civilized nations gradually pushed back or suppressed the Islamic plague. Unfortunately for the world, those forces did not eradicate the Mohamadan scourge.

This most recent incidence of jihad demonstrates the power and primacy of unassuming individuals over impotent or dhimmified bureaucrats. One Dutch man accomplished what scores, if not hundreds or thousands, of federal governmental employees failed to do: halt a jihadi intent on murdering residents of the Free World. He did not need “cultural sensitivity” brainwashing sessions by the Council on American-Islamic Relations or any other fifth-columnist organization. Neither did his bravery require consultation with moral relativist lawyers nor with irrelevant international treaties ignored by Islamists. This one man from the Netherlands has continued the spirit of resistance to Islam exemplified by the passengers on United Flight 93 on the eleventh of September in 2001.

One must ask why this savage was even allowed on this flight? A broader question needs to be addressed: Why are any Mohamadans permitted anywhere near aircraft anymore? How many times do jihadis have use civilian airplanes as an implement of war before governmental authorities in the Free World admit that such naïve lackadaisicalness leads to deaths of free people? Until someone with authority decides to bar these monsters from infiltrating situations which facilitate acts of jihad, non-combatants will continue to suffer and die at the hands of vermin like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

In the end, despite the suicidal naïveté of and constant acquiescence to Islamists’ demands by federal authorities, the jihadi failed in his mission to earn eternity in a free whorehouse. Fortunately, no civilized people died in his jihad. Sadly, the passengers did not fully impose justice on the savage. This lascivious Mohamadan was willing to cause deaths of dozens of people in addition to his own just to satisfy his libido. Everyone should notice that his morbid desire to slaughter for sexual gratification ended up sabotaging his own future pursuits. What delicious irony that his own act of jihad torched his own little minaret, hopefully beyond any further usage.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT, DECEMBER 2009

Jihadist Murders at Fort Hood

Some actions are so easily anticipated and foreseeable. When they occur, these incidents only surprise those ignorant of the causes or those willfully blind to reality. Such incidents include rabid dogs biting people, flies buzzing around freshly deposited feces and snakes sliding along the ground before striking their victims. Also in the category of expected occurrences, one finds the inevitability of Mohamadans murdering civilized people when the opportunity presents itself.

Today’s latest episode of a jihadi slaying American armed forces personnel has underscored the need for a ban on Mohamadans in the American armed forces. This continues a long string of fifth columnists within the various branches of U.S. Department of Defense who used their training to murder Americans. I provide a recap of just some of the jihads’ plots to attack and undermine for those who forgot or have buried their hands in the sands of useful idiocy:

-On June 1 of this year, Abdulhakim Mujahid fatally shot Private William Long and wounded Quinton Ezeagwula in Little Rock, Arkansas.

-On the twenty-third of March 2003, Sgt. Asan Akbar rolled live grenades into the tents of fellow soldiers then fired an automatic weapon at them at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait. This jihadi killed two officers and injured fourteen other soldiers.

-Jeffrey Leon Battle, one of the Portland Six tied to al-Kaida, joined the Army Reserves in order to learn how to kill American soldiers. On the fourth of October 2002 Jeffrey Leon Battle was arrested. According to the Justice Department, he planned to wage war against Americans in Afghanistan. On the second of December 2003, Battle pleaded guilty and received a sentence of 18 years in prison.

-In May of 2002, the federal agents arrested Semi Osman, a Mohamadan cleric and a mechanic in the Naval Reserves, as part of an investigation of a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Osman had access to fuel trucks like those employed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia 1996 that killed 19 U.S. airmen. In January 2003, he pleaded guilty to a weapons charge.

-Ali Mohamed, a secret member of Islamic Jihad, enlisted in the U.S. Army and reached the rank of sergeant. He taught a class on Islamic perceptions of America to special forces at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. He also taught at the JFK Special Operations Warfare School where he stole classified military documents. After leaving the Army in 1989, he joined al-Kaida. He spent the 1990s traveling around the world helping plot jihadist operations. The FBI finally arrested him in 1998. He pleaded guilty to conspiring with Osama Bin Laden to attack Western targets.

-John Allen Muhammad was mechanic, truck driver and specialist metalworker in the Louisiana National Guard and later in the U.S. Army. He earned commendations for marksmenship which used to shoo t and kill ten civilians and wounded three other in the autumn of 2002 in the metropolitan area of Washington, DC.

A person need only read any of the numerous violently totalitarian scriptures serving as the foundation of Islam. These Islamic plots to murder Americans, civilians and armed forces personnel, and undermine national security further highlight the danger of allowing Mohamadans into the organizations sworn to protect the United States. How many more treacherous savages have to infiltrate American armed forces then slaughter the true defenders of freedom before the U.S. government bars these hostile barbarians from its military?

COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Mohamadan Posing as a Concerned Jew

For the amusement of my associates, below is a message on Facebook which I received from a purported Jew who objected to my logo on Facebook. I have not altered anything which he or I wrote.

Daniel Sidon, October 4 at 6:26am: "you are against what? religion? why you making this to your profile photo? I am Jew and I respect Islam, because there is lot of similarities, that bad and stupid people which are figting for hamas etc. they will fight also without islam! they aren't following islam and jihad. jihad is strictly self-defensive! be so kind and put there something whats telling to others how you are nice, or ugly, but not how you're same stupid! thanks"

Charles Kastriot, October 6 at 12:02am "I am not against religion. I oppose Islam and all other forms of totalitarianism. My profile photo represents my opposition to the cancer that threatens democracy and freedom across the world.
If you are truly Jewish, which I highly doubt, try reading the Koran before you defend Islam. It is full of anti-Jewish rhetoric. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) merely co-opted some superficial elements of Judaism to lure Arabian Jews into his self-aggrandizing cult. After all but a few refused, he waged jihad on them, killing or enslaving all of the Jewish tribes of Arabia.

Hamas and other Islamists are simply following the example of Mo (MHBHF) as he dictated in the Koran. Just as Mo (MHBHF) ordered assassinations of critics, robbed anyone not in his cult, had sex with a multitude of women and pre-pubescent girls and committed numerous other crimes, Hamas and others such savages imitate his loathsome pattern.
If you think that by serving Mohamadans as their useful idiot, that they will not eventually slit your throat too? Stop being a craven dhimmi!"

Daniel Sidon, October 6 at 8:43am
"maybe YOU can try to read Koran."

I tried to reply to this anemic statement but this coward blocked me! Now, I am completely convinced that this invertabrate is actually a Mohamadan.

Sympathy for a Devil

This author has been accused of promoting hatred of Mohamadans. I have been criticized for automatically concluding that Islamists are guilty of committing acts of war and terrorism against the Free World. "Never mind that the overwhelming number of bombings across the world, both of the suicidal and homicidal varieties, occur in furtherance of the jihad," say Islamists and their useful idiots. So do they have a point that the goons holding a Koran in one hand while torching churches and the Christians inside them or while vandalizing Jewish-owned business or cemeteries did not constitute a concerted effort by Islamists to attack infidels? In an attempt at cultural sensitivity, conflict resolution and reconciliation with Mohamadans, I will serve as the defense attorney in the court of public opinion for Najibullah Zazi, the Mohamadan in the United States recently arrested for involvement with a terrorist plot targeting New York. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/national/main5321252.shtml?tag=stack)

Has anyone considered the possibility all of his secretive dealings were an effort to surprise New Yorkers? On the eighth anniversary of the jihadist attacks on the World Trade Center, maybe he was planning a citywide gift distribution. After consulting a list of traditional gifts for anniversaries, Zazi could have been secretly arranging the placement of improvised explosive devices in pottery or bronze receptacles through the city. The residents could have been greeted with lovely gunpowder-fueled displays spelling out "I heart NY" in shrapnel. Perhaps he preferred the modern suggestion of lace or linen so we can deduce what he had in mind: new burkas for every woman in the city! So, FBI, are you happy now that you ruined the surprise for everyone? What a bunch of spoilsports!

Did the FBI consider the possibility that Zazi's reference to an actual, planned wedding was, in fact, legitimate but just not recognized under the American legal system? News out of Sudan showed that Islamists do not discriminate against people with an alternative sexual orientation(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm)Moral relativists certainly should demand that the FBI display a higher level of tolerance for this cultural aspect of Islam, in addition to other cherished Islamic practices like female genital mutilation, wife-beating and murder of rape victims. Once again, Americans have demonstrated their bigotry toward sexual minorities!

Undoubtedly, people in the United States will label Zazi as an "extremist" or a "radical" adherent of Islam. A more unfounded accusation could not be hurled at him. Zazi has faithfully devoted himself to following the tenets and commandments of the Koran. He has not strayed into un-Islamic activities like befriending infidels, repairing vandalized churches or synagogues, protesting against terrorism, composing music or creating works of art like sculptures or portraits. Therefore, those who have besmirched his allegiance to Allah should acknowledge Zazi's commitment to true Islam!

Is it too much to ask for Americans to view the situation from Zazi's point of view? We should consider his unease about seeing his relatives for the upcoming the celebration of Eid al-Fitr. He would have had to face yet another plethora of irritating comments from his parents such as "Your older brother Mohamad killed three infidels and one apostate during Ramadan. That's more than you killed all year! Even your younger brother Mohamad martyred himself last month. Why can't you stop being such a slacker and act like your brothers?" Due to his shirking of his responsibilities to Allah and Mohamad, Zazi's parents will not give him that brand new explosive vest on which he has had eye for months now. Instead, he will have to settle for a box cutter as the gift from his parents. That kind of torture would not be permitted by the United Nations yet we expect that this young man to suffer like this? Have you no heart, Americans?

I would like to offer a compromise. We should allow him to behead a few members of Code Pink or the John Adams Project to placate his demanding parents. The members of those groups would just blame the slayings on George Bush, Israel's existence, global warming or any other culprit except for Islam. So what would be the problem?

In conclusion, I wish to all my devoted Mohamadan readers, HAVE AN EXPLOSIVE EID AL-FITR!

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009

Persecution of Patriots

Hidden by the ongoing debate and protests over the proposed socialization of the American health care system in addition to the recent death of the man responsible for Mary Jo Kopechne's death, the Obama administration has started its torment of the defenders of American security. The Obama regime has been returning political favors to those that supported his campaign. Among these are the self-loathing Americans who want the United States to accept defeat and retreat on all of fronts in the Islamic war against the Free World. Therefore, the Obamaniacs have demanded that their messiah's henchmen unsheathe their daggers then plunge them into the exposed backs of patriots combating jihadis.

American service personnel have already been forced to concede to Islamists' demands regarding the treatment of the jihadis. American tax dollars were spent to provide a Koran, prayer rug and prayer beads to every captured jihadi. This funding of religious instruction exists in addition to the highly expensive provision of halal meals to cater to the savages' tastes. All of this undeserved treatment of these criminals flies in the face of the Geneva Convention. None of these goons were wearing a distinguishable military uniform while engaged in such activities as firing on American and allied forces, planting explosives and other acts of war.

There is no precedent for this appeasement of Islamists' demands for undeserved treatment. German prisoners during the Second World War never received free copies of Mein Kempf during their captivity. During that same war, the few Japanese soldiers captured by American were not issued any means to commit ritualistic suicide as their ideology mandated. Additionally, captured communist forces during the wars in Korea and Vietnam never were issued copies of The Communist Manifesto or any other Marxist literature supplied by the country that they sought to defeat. One must ask why do adherents to Islam deserve complementary implements of their ideology when adherents to other strains of totalitarianism were denied similar luxuries. Not only were Axis and Communist forces never pampered in captivity, those who engaged in military operations while not in uniform were frequently executed. Anyone involved in acts of sabotage or other hostility while not in uniform are considered as spies; those have no protections under the Geneva Convention. Instead of bowing down to Allah five times per day, these jihadis should reserve some gratitude for Uncle Sam for his naive and short-sighted magnanimity.

So what practices have drawn the ire of the useful idiots more concerned about pleasing Islamists than preventing further acts of jihad against the United States? Some of these prisoners were strip-searched, had ink smeared on their faces, were held in solitary confinement, were deprived of shoes, had cigar smoke blown in their faces or saw an interrogator squat over, stand on or kick a Koran. Can anyone hand-wringing over these incidents name just one person who has ever died or suffered disabling injuries from any of these actions?

Mohamad al-Kahtani, the would-be twentieth hijacker of the plot on the eleventh of September in 2001, faced annoyances such as sleep deprivation, exposure to cold and insults to female members of his family. Many of the members of the American armed forces have endured the same treatment during their training. When will any member of the ACLU or any other jihadi-coddling group lift a finger to halt to rough treatment meted out to American service personnel?

In a pursuit of justice, someone should conduct of poll of survivors of jihadist violence. The question would ask, “Would you rather undergo the same treatment suffered by the prisoners at GITMO or would prefer the fate of the passengers of the hijacked planes and by the occupants of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?” Maybe such an undertaking would open the eyes of the “Hate America First” crowd to see the folly of their myopic and self-destructive agenda.

COPYRIGHT CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009

Second Part of Conversation with Mohamadan idiot named Mohammad Irfaan

Here are second batch of rantings from the Mohamadan sheep calling himself "Mohammad Irfaan" along with my responses. I have not altered anything that he or I said. The lunacies in addition to the misspellings and errors of capitalization and punctuation are all his own.

Mohammad Irfaan
August 11 at 6:42am

"Hey Charlie.. what your producing is complete rubbish.

"these verses don't not even exist in the Qur'an.. total fabircation!

"Islam says one should not burden one's wife with work that is toilsome and hard upon her (wife).

"Says also says that A Muslim woman also has obligations. All the laws and regulations pertaining to prayer, fasting, charity, pilgrimage, doing good deeds, etc., apply to women, albeit with minor differences having mainly to do with female physiology.

"Before marriage, a woman has the right to choose her husband. Islamic law is very strict regarding the necessity of having the woman's consent for marriage. The groom gives a marriage dowry to the bride for her own personal use. She keeps her own family name, rather than taking her husband's. As a wife, a woman has the right to be supported by her husband even if she is already rich. She also has the right to seek divorce and custody of young children. She does not return the dowry, except in a few unusual situations

"Finally I end with the World of Al-Mighty Allah....

"'And among His signs is this: that He created mates for you from yourselves that you may find rest and peace of mind in them, and He ordained between you love and mercy. Certainly, herein indeed are signs for people who reflect.' [Noble Quran 30:21]"


Charles Kastriot
August 11 at 10:02am
"You are partially right about the quotes I provided to you. They are complete rubbish but so is the entire Koran and all other the drivel which Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) fabricated and spewed.

"In contrast, you did not give any Koranic verses which substantiate the supposed rights of women under Islamic tyranny. You are a pathetic debater and delusional sheep.

"How can you dare to say what I quoted does not exist in the Koran? I provided the entire verse and gave you the chapter and verse numbers so you can look them up for yourself. You obviously never read the Koran. You are just regurgitating Islamic propaganda that has been drilled into your skull. You are a brainwashed robot."

Mohammad Irfaan
August 12 at 3:49am

"Hey Charlie Kid you little child...

"your bullshit is a load of crap. I am a Muslim fully read the Qur'an understood!

"The bullshit verse your saying does not exist in the Qur'an.. so better luck next time. Islam uplifts the women and gives it a higher status unlike you fools, Islam teaches us to eat, clothe, bathe ourselves, clean ourselves and many more.. what does your religion offer you?

"finally kid i would like to end with the Words of Al-Mighty Allah The Master of the Universe...

"'And If an evil worship comes to you from shaitan (Satan) then seek refuge with Allah. Verily He is All-Hearer, All-Knower. '

(Al Quran, 7:200)"

Mohammad Irfaan
August 12 at 3:50am

"Regards to debating, its pointless debating with you, because to debate the opponents needs to have some or little knowledge, unfortunately your Null!"

Charles Kastriot
August 12 at 12:34pm
"If the verse of Koran 4:34 does not say what I quoted, what does it say? You have proved that you are a liar by claiming to have read the Koran yet denying the existence of the misogynistic verse which I spelled out for you to read.

"My religion offers me the freedom to use my God-given powers of observation and reasoning, unlike your totalitarian ideology of blindly accepting the ludicrous dictates of a criminal.

"By calling me a 'kid', you only insult yourself because this 'kid' has outdebated you and revealed your ignorance of your own religion."

Mohammad Irfaan
August 13 at 3:22am

"ha ha I laugh in your face... your talking total rubbish.

"You can't prove anything from what you believe and try to use the Qur'an to go against Islam.. but you've lost once again.

"We Muslims believe in Moses and Jesus as one of the greatest Prophets of Al-Mighty Allah, we also believe Jesus was taken up alive and will be coming back to earth on the second comming, this also says in the real testiment the old Bible.. the One eyed monster the Jaal will come and Jesus will fight and destroy it.

"There are many simiarlities between Islam, Christianity and Jewdaism, but we must all unite and believe in what is in all faiths which is Believing in One God (Al-Mighty Allah).

"Qur'an Is the solution for Mankind!"

Charles Kastriot
August 14 at 12:25am
"You are a laughably ignorant buffoon. You cannot handle someone like me who has actually read that worthless bilge called the Koran. I quoted the Koran to prove the oppression and violence that Mohamad (May he burn in hell forever) endorsed. You childishly rant and scream baseless insults because you have failed to substantiate your absurd claims. Just because you deny the misogyny and violence inherent in Islam does not erase those evils from the heart of Mo's (MHBHF) fabricated ideology. Try reading Koran 4:34 and other verses espousing misogyny and violence before making any more stupid denials of Islam's misogyny and violence.

"I believe in one God, just not the phony lunar deity that Mo (MHBHF) claimed gave him the privilege to steal other men's wives, have sex with children, rob, murder and commit numerous other crimes."

Mohammad Irfaan
August 14 at 3:32am

"HEY LITTLE ONE you Kid, You get amuzed so easily lol.

"I do not need to prove or provide evidence my holy book the Al-Qur'an is the word of Al-Mighty Allah. what your quoting and asking me to look up is pure Bull shit, there is no such thing in the Qur'an in that particular verse. I understand the Qur'an AllahmidAllah, where you understanding finishes, mine starts!

"Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him (InshAllah) taught us many good deeds including treating others as human, loving kids, respecting elders, protecting the women, providing them with all the help and having no burden on the women.

"there is none worthy of worship expect Al-Mighty Allah and Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him (InshAllah) is the final messenger and servant of Al-Mighty Allah.

"ISLAM = THE SOLUTION FOR HUMANITY..

"you believe or you don't believe, my job was to convey the message of Peace, the message of submission to Al-Mighty Allah, the message of Good!

"You ponder over it or ignore thats totally upto you mate!

"ps. you knowledge on Islam is apaulling, i'm ashmed of You!

Charles Kastriot
Today at 5:54pm
"My knowledge of Islam is no less than yours. You will not even acknowledge the existence of obvious violent and misogynistic verses in Mohamad's (May He Burn in Hell Forever) contrived rantings even after I supplied the quotes to you, including chapter and verse numbers. Therefore, I can conclude that you must be one of the following:
1. illiterate
2. a lunatic who clings to his delusions despite overwhelming evidence disproving the existence of his fantasies
3. a liar determined to deny the truth of the misogynistic and violent contents found throughout the Koran

"You cannot provide any evidence of any supposed divine origin of the Koran other than Mohamad (May He Burn in Hell Forever) said so. Anyone can claim "divine origin" for his or her words, even a seventh century, child-molesting, murderous, thieving Arabian megalomaniac.

"You are more pathetic than a sheep. In the defense of a sheep, he lacks the cerebral capacity to reason and discern wisdom and decency from self-serving perversion and anti-social behavior. You have voluntarily forfeited any human capacity for advanced thought. You have accepted Mohamad's (May He Burn in Hell Forever) drivel as perfect simply because he claimed divine origin for it without even questioning his lunacy. George Orwell certainly had someone just like you when he wrote 1984."

Conversation with Mohamadan Idiot Named Mohammad Irfaan

For the amusement of the readers, I present my dialogue from Facebook with a Mohamadan moron calling himself Mohammad Irfaan. I have not changed any of his statements nor any of mine. The errors in capitalization, grammar and punctuation, faulty logic and denial of reality presented below are all his own.

Mohammad Irfaan
July 10 at 7:00am
"Bismillah-Hir-Rahman-Nir-Rahim - In the Name of Allah The Most Kind the Most Mercificul.

"I would like to invite you to the Faith of Islam - The Solution for Humanity!"

Charles Kastriot
July 10 at 10:36am
"In the name of the dignity, liberty and equality of every human being, I invite you to renounce Islam- The Scourge of Humanity!"

Mohammad Irfaan
July 13 at 1:10am

"Islam is Dignity, liberty and Equality!!!"

Charles Kastriot
July 15 at 9:29pm
"Mohamad (MHBHF) declared that women are inherently inferior in Koran, Chapter Four. He also mandated subserviant status for non-Mohamadans in Koran, Chapter Nine. Therefore, equality of all humans is not possible under Islam.

"Liberty for Mohamadans to renounce Islam under Sharia or question Islamic doctrines does not exist. Apostacy is punished by execution. The freedom to create laws on the consensus of the governed is the antithesis of Islam. Islam is the whole world conforming to the whims and opinions of Mo (MHBHF). Thus, liberity is not possible under Islam.

"The only dignity accorded to anyone under Islam is to the clerics who emulate Mo(MHBHF) and the goons that enforce the tyrannical reign of Islamic regimes. Women have no such luxury;they have to hope that none of their hair peeks through their oppressive outfits or that no one rapes them. Otherwise they face floggings or stonings. These exist in addition to the dehumanizing Islamic practices of polygyny, female genital mutilation and wife-beating. There is no dignity under Islam for women and girls."

Mohammad Irfaan
July 16 at 2:41am

"Hey Charles, it seems you your not bright enough nor literate enough to understand the Qur'an. Al-Mighty Allah Tala has put a balance between men and women. If so, for the sake of the argument, why don't say FIFA have men playing women in football, why don't you see boxing matches being fought between men and women - wherez equality in that!

"the Qur'an has an absolute balance between men and women, some areas where men have more share, and some where women have a higher share, it completly addes to equality between both sexes.

"You guys (western) actually downgrade your women, you sell your mothers, daughters, wife's and sisters to people, advertise them almost naked, Islam respects them, covers them and gives total protection, thats why 2/3 of people accpeting Islam in America are women - WHY?"

Charles Kastriot
July 19 at 8:33am
"It seems you are so blinded by your brainwashing that you cannot see the inferor status of women under Islam. If they are equal under Islam, why cannot a women have multiple husbands but a man can have multiple wives? Why does a woman only receive half of a share of inheritance while a man receives a whole share? Why is the testimony of one man equal the testimony of two women? Name one specific area in which have more privilege than a man under Islam.

"You refuse to see how Islam degrades women. How is respectful of women to force them to wear black, suffocating clothing, especially in desert climates? Why are you Mohamadans so threatened by seeing such benign images such as a woman's face, hair or ankle? The answer lies in the fact that Mohamadans only view women and girls as their inferior servants (family members) or potential sexual objects (all other women in the world).

"There is no protection for sexually exploited women under Islam. If a woman is raped, she must provide four witness of the rape to exonerate herself. If not, she faces execution. If four men witness a rape and do nothing to stop it, they are either accomplices or too cowardly to testify against the rapist(s) anyway.

"Under Western laws, it is illegal to sell any human being. Under Islam women and girls are regularly sold by their families, often pre-teen girls are sold to men in their thirties and forties. Pedophilia is a crime in the Free World; in the Islamic bloc, it is accepted as another way to emulate Mohamad (MHBHF). Under Islam, enslavement of non-Mohamadans is condoned; in the civilized world, enslavement of anyone was outlawed two centuries ago.

"As for your argument about segregation of women and men in soccer and boxing, that is done for competitive balance. The same reason exists for the various weight classifications dividing men in boxing. Officials want a fight to be determined based on skill, not sheer size. That is why a hundred kilogram man does not fight a seventy kilogram man. Also, twelve year old boys do not compete in the same leagues as twenty-five year old men. It is a matter of physical maturity and length of time spent in training. At least women are free to compete openly in soccer, boxing and other sports in the Free World. That is not the case in the Islamic bloc.

"Obviously your Islamic indoctrination of relying on the Koran and Hadiths for all of life's questions has destroyed any mental capacity for you to determine answers on your own. A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Only you can liberate your brain from the cancer called Islam.

"Who says two-thirds of people converting to Islam are women? Name your source. This sounds like typical Islamic phony propaganda. While you search for an objective source for that, find out how many women renounce Islam once they arrive in the Free World. Their numbers continue to grow without much publicity."

Mohammad Irfaan
July 20 at 3:33am

"I'm Impressed by your words but not Influenced at all!

"Regards to the women being degraded etc by Islam - trust me your under a huge illusion. The Question of Hijab: Suppression Or Liberation?

"'Why do Muslim women have to cover their heads?' This question is one which is asked by Muslim and non-Muslim alike. For many women it is the truest test of being a Muslim so your no the only one.

"The answer to the question is very simple - Muslim women observe HIJAB (covering the head and the body) because Allah has told them to do so.

"'O Prophet, tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their outer garments around them (when they go out or are among men). That is better in order that they may be known (to be Muslims) and not annoyed...' [Noble Quran 33:59]"

"PLEASE CONTINUE TO READ...

"Other secondary reasons include the requirement for modesty in both men and women. Both will then be evaluated for intelligence and skills instead of looks and sexuality. An Iranian school girl is quoted as saying, 'We want to stop men from treating us like sex objects, as they have always done. We want them to ignore our appearance and to be attentive to our personalities and mind. We want them to take us seriously and treat us as equals and not just chase us around for our bodies and physical looks.' A Muslim woman who covers her head is making a statement about her identity. Anyone who sees her will know that she is a Muslim and has a good moral character. Many Muslim women who cover are filled with dignity and self esteem; they are pleased to be identified as a Muslim woman. As a chaste, modest, pure woman, she does not want her sexuality to enter into interactions with men in the smallest degree. A woman who covers herself is concealing her sexuality but allowing her femininity to be brought out.

"Islam has no fixed standard as to the style of dress or type of clothing that Muslims must wear. However, some requirements must be met. The first of these requirements is the parts of the body which must be covered. Islam has two sources for guidance and rulings: first, the Quran, the revealed word of Allah and secondly, the Hadith or the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) who was chosen by Allah to be the role model for mankind.

"Often forgotten is the fact that modern Western dress is a new invention. Looking at the clothing of women as recently as seventy years ago, we see clothing similar to Hijab. These active and hard-working women of the West were not inhibited by their clothing which consisted of long, full dresses and various types of head covering. Muslim women who wear Hijab do not find it impractical or interfering with their activities in all levels and walks of life. Hijab is not merely a covering dress but more importantly, it is behavior, manners, speech and appearance in public. Dress is only one facet of the total being. The basic requirement of the Muslim woman's dress apply to the Muslim man's clothing with the difference being mainly in degree. Modesty requires that the area between the navel and the knee be covered in front of all people except the wife. The clothing of men should not be like the dress of women, nor should it be tight or provocative. A Muslim should dress to show his identity as a Muslim. Men are not allowed to wear gold or silk. However, both are allowed for women.

"For both men and women, clothing requirements are not meant to be a restriction but rather a way in which society will function in a proper, Islamic manner."

Mohammad Irfaan
July 20 at 3:47am

"At a time when the rest of the world, from Greece and Rome to India and China, considered women as no better than children or even slaves, with no rights whatsoever, Islam acknowledged women's equality with men in a great many respects. The Quran states:

"'And among His signs is this: that He created mates for you from yourselves that you may find rest and peace of mind in them, and He ordained between you love and mercy. Certainly, herein indeed are signs for people who reflect.' [Noble Quran 30:21]

"Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said:

"'The most perfect in faith amongst believers is he who is best in manners and kindest to his wife.' [Abu Dawud]

"With regard to education, both women and men have the same rights and obligations. This is clear in Prophet Muhammad's saying:

"'Seeking knowledge is mandatory for every believer.' [Ibn Majah]

"A woman is to be treated as God has endowed her, with rights, such as to be treated as an individual, with the right to own and dispose of her own property and earnings, enter into contracts, even after marriage. She has the right to be educated and to work outside the home if she so chooses. She has the right to inherit from her father, mother, and husband.

"Before marriage, a woman has the right to choose her husband. Islamic law is very strict regarding the necessity of having the woman's consent for marriage. The groom gives a marriage dowry to the bride for her own personal use. She keeps her own family name, rather than taking her husband's. As a wife, a woman has the right to be supported by her husband even if she is already rich. She also has the right to seek divorce and custody of young children. She does not return the dowry, except in a few unusual situations.

"Despite the fact that in many places and times Muslim communities have not always adhered to all or even many of the foregoing in practice, the ideal has been there for 1,400 years, while virtually all other major civilizations did not begin to address these issues or change their negative attitudes until the 19th and 20th centuries, and there are still many contemporary civilizations which have yet to do so.

"Finally...

"The issue of women in Islam, is topic of great misunderstanding and distortion due partly to a lack of understanding, but also partly due to misbehavior of some Muslims which has been taken to represent the teachings of Islam!"

Charles Kastriot
July 21 at 9:04am
"If you know Islam as well as you claim, you know that hadiths are disputed by various sects and schools of Islam. Some hadiths are labeled sound by some groups but others call the same hadiths false. All of sects and schools consider the Koran is the ultimate source of Islamic doctrine. In the fourth chapter of the Koran appropriately titled 'Women', Mohamad (May he burn in hell forever) clearly states that women are inherently inferior to men and that a man is permitted to beat his multiple wives. Any Mohamadan man who takes multiple wives and beats them is not misunderstanding or distorting Islam. On the contrary, he is emulating Mo (MHBHF) who the Koran states is the paragon and example of ideal human behavior.

"As for oppressive clothing required for women, why must women suffer in suffocating outfits? Men can control their thoughts and actions in regards to women. Even if a women completely hides herself in the outfits identical to a tent, a man can still view her as a sexual object. No amount of hiding herself under layer upon layer of clothing by a woman can make men stop viewing her as a carnal outlet for their sexual gratification. The problem of objectivication of women and girls lies in the minds of sexually compulsive men like Mo (MHBHF).

"On what basis do you claim that a DEITY ordered that women must wear suffocating outfits? It was Mo (MHBHF) that uttered those words recorded in the Koran. He alone claimed to receive those commandments. None of his contemporaries heard any divine voices telling them to how to think or act. There is zero independent corroboration of any divine origin of any of Mo(MHBHF)'s fabrications.

"Can you not see that Mo (MHBHF) was a charlatan who eventually deluded enough people to rise to the level of a dictator? He conveniently received exemptions to rules to which everyone else had to comply. He could have an unlimited number of wives; other men had a four wife limit. Mo (MHBHF) was entitled to twenty percent of the booty from his lackeys robbing other tribes; everyone else settled for smaller shares, even though they actually risked their lives to commit the crimes and Mo (MHBHF) just gave orders. After seeing the wife of his adopted son undresing and he started lusting for her, he just so happened to receive a self-serving alleged "revelation" so he could seize another man's wife for Mo(MHBHF)'s own exploitation.

"(MHBHF) was nothing more than sexually-obsessed, megalomaniacal, evilly manipulative child molester. He exploited the gullibility, greed and superstitious beliefs of ignorant people around him then built up a totalitarian regime with himself wielding the sole position of power. He stands in a long line of similar despots throughout history such as Adolf Hitler, Genghis Khan, Joseph Stalin, Napoleon Bonaparte and other self-appointed so-called "prophets" espousing new ideologies who morphed into absolute tyrants.

Mohammad Irfaan
July 23 at 3:40am

"Hey Charles - seriously I do not know where you get your false sources from.. regards to man beating his wife is totally against Islam - Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad (Peace and Blessing Be Upon him InshAllah) always learned us to love and care for the wives.

"Regarding the cover up of Muslim Women, every Muslim women whom covers does it so by its own personal DESIRE.. its not that if you don't cover you will get killed or beated to death - But Islam order a women to cover up, shez allowed to show her face, hands and ankles - So i don't see where she suffocates!

"A wife (women) can earn as much as she wants and spend it where ever she prefers, according to Islam the women does not need to share money or her finance with her husband, but the Husband has been given the duty to provide full financial support to his wife - Therefore here the women is given huge respect, as the man takes the financial burden!

"Regarding Muhammad Peace and Blessing Be Upon Him InshAllah...

"Almost everyone on the earth today is discussing Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him. People want to know, 'Who was he exactly?' 'What did he teach?' 'Why was he loved so much by some and hated so much by others?' 'Did he live up to his claims?' 'Was he a holy man?' 'Was he a prophet of God?' 'What is the truth about this man - Muhammad?'

"How can we discover the truth and be totally honest in our judgment?

"We will begin with the very simple historical evidences, facts as narrated by thousands of people, many of whom knew him personally. The following is based on books, manuscripts, texts and actual eyewitness accounts, too numerous list herein, yet all have been preserved in original form throughout the centuries by both Muslims and non-Muslims.

"Muhammad ibn (son of) Abdullah ibn (son of) Abdul Mutalib, was born in the year 570 C.E. (Christian Era) in Makkah, Felix Arabia (today: Saudi Arabia) and he died in 633 C.E. in Yathrib (today: Madinah, Saudi Arabia).

"A. His names: When he was born, his grandfather, Abdul Mutalib, gave him the name Muhammad. And it means 'praised one' or 'praising one.' He was later called 'As-Saddiq' (the Truthful) by all of those who knew of his truthful and honest nature. He always said only the truth. He was also called 'Al-Amin' (the Trustworthy) due to his integrity and always upholding any trust given to him. When the tribes were battling against each other, both sides would entrust him with their possessions during the fighting, even if it might be against some of his own tribesmen, because they knew he would always uphold any trust given to him. All of his names indicated the very nature of a man who was praised for his honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. He was also well known for advocating the reconciliation of kinship and relationships. He ordered his followers to always honor the 'ties of the wombs' (siblings and other close relatives).

"Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, taught that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was the immaculate conception and miracle birth of Mary, and that she was the best creation of Almighty God. He insisted even to the Jews of Madinah, that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was the Messiah, the Christ, the one predicted to come in their Torah (Old Testament). He also taught that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, did many miracles by the permission of Almighty God, curing the lepers, restoring sight to the blind and even bringing a dead man back to life, and he was not dead, rather Almighty God had raised him up. He also predicted Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, is going to return again in the Last Days to lead the true believers in a victory over the evil and unrighteous people, and he will destroy the Anti-Christ.

"PLUS...

"Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, forbade any killing, even when his followers were being killed, until the orders for retaliation came from Allah. Even then the limits were clearly spelled out and only those engaged in active combat against the Muslims or Islam were to be fought in combat. And even then, only according to very strict rules from Allah.

Charles Kastriot
August 6 at 11:18pm
"My sources are the Koran and Hadiths. Koran Chapter 4:34 authorizes wife-beating. Mohamadan women are regularly brutalized for refusing to follow Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) commandment (Koran 24:31) to cover themselves completely. Mo (MHBHF) urged murder of his enemies in Koran (2:244, 2:191, 2:216, 4:76, 4:89, 5:33, 9:5, 9:73, 9:111 and 9:123, in addition to numerous others). So where do you obtain your phony Islamic propaganda?

"Mohamadan men hold total authority over their wives according to Koran 4:34. Therefore, a man can prevent his wives from holding jobs thus being totally dependent on his support. This is a common tactic to keep Mohamadan women dependent on their husband despite his infidelity (polygyny) and his Koran-authorized beatings.

"Where are the accounts of eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen or heard Allah's alleged 'revelations' to Mo (MHBHF)? NO ONE ELSE heard Mo's so-called 'revelations'. He claimed to be alone whenever Allah allegedly gave him a message. That is a suspiciously convenient cover for such a huckster like Mo (MHBHF). He fabricated supposedly divine messages whenever he wanted something like larger portions of stolen goods, taking someone else's wife and such criminal behavior."

Mohammad Irfaan
Today at 4:26am

"Hey seems you invented your own false book where you quoting from.
Islam is against beating of the wife, the Holy Book of Al-Mighty Allah the Al-Qur'an is against the beating of the wife.

"A women if she wishes can work and in Islam there is not stopping. Islam has put the financial burden on the Husband, its the Husband's duty to provide food and shelter for the women, if the women earns money too she is not oblighed to support the Husband, if she wishes fair enough else it is not compulsory to give her money to the Husband. Islam AllhamdiAllah has given huge respect to women, we Muslims cover our women and its something that Muslim women prefer, unlike the western society, they love to display their mothers, daughters and wives nude on tv.

"Islam is pure and a solution for Mankind!"

Charles Kastriot
August 10, 2009 at 10:47am
"I did not invent a false book for those quotes. I typed quotes from Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) false book. Since you obviously never read his loathsome fabrication or are simply lying about its contents, I will spell out the entire Koranic verse 4:34.
"'Men stand superior to women in that God hath preferred some of them over others, and in that they expend of their wealth: and the virtuous women, devoted, careful (in their husbands') absence, as God has cared for them. But those whose perverseness ye fear, admonish them and remove them into bed-chambers and beat them; but if they submit to you, then do not seek a way against them; verily, God is high and great.'

"Since I provided Koranic evidence proving Islamic sanctioning of wife-beating, I dare you to provide any Koranic verse giving women the right to work even if her husband objects to that.

"Where have you seen women nude on television? I can tell you that in my country, the United States, NO ONE, female or male, is allowed to appear nude on over-the-air broadcast or basic cable television.

"Yes, you Mohamadans cover your women, just like civilized people cover furniture. That is logical since you savages consider women as objects to be collected like multiple possessions (Koran 4:3) then exploited sexually (Koran 2:223).

"Islam is pure evil and the bane of humanity!"