Posts
A few months ago, a Mohamadan punk calling himself "Ali Siddiqi" hijacked an anti-Islamic group on Facebook. I had been a member of the group until this savage co-opted it to spew Islamic disinformation. So I quit the group. The following exchanges are his challenges and my responses. All of his rampant misspellings, ignorance of grammatical and capitalization rules and numerous vulgar comments have not been altered by me!
Ali Siddiqui
June 25 at 1:00am
"so you came back huh?
you cant put up a debate so wh should i keep you on the group? "
Charles Kastriot
June 25 at 6:34pm
"I have never been gone. I can debate you into the ground. Your ignorance of anything outside of the ideology created by Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in hell forever) is as glaring as the midday sun. I no interest in belonging to the group you hijacked."
Ali Siddiqui
June 25 at 6:59pm
"lol the one you mean you left? lol what a dumbass. you ran away from the debate we had because the holy spirit knew it couldnt guide you.
my ignorance? buddy you gave me what most anti-islamics give. the same stuff over and over and stupid christians like you haven't realised muslims have refuted all lies you christian sites have thrown at us."
Charles Kastriot
June 25 at 8:01pm
"I had more important activities at the time than spell out all the evils of Islam to an myopic savage like yourself. I can easily debate you and make you look like a fool. You refuse to accept any logic or information that contradicts the Koran and whatever else Mo (MHBHF) fabricated. You are a simpleton whose philosophy is "If Mohamad did or said it, it must be right." I do not need to lie about Mohamadans or Islam. Simply quoting the Koran incriminates Mo (MHBHF) and the ideology he created.
I will repeat what I said to you about the Holy Spirit. I could not care less about defending Christian mysticism. That is not my ideology. I am a Deist."
Ali Siddiqui
June 26 at 4:53pm
"you ran away from the women debate we had. and your saying you can make me look like a fool? i dont see where logic contradicts the quran."
Charles Kastriot
June 26 at 11:26pm
"Try explaining away Koran 76:13 in which Mo (MHBHF) claimed those who would kill & die for his benefit would spend eternity without experiencing the cold of the moon. The temperature on the moon reaches 138 degrees Celsius. Does that sound "cold" to you?
"As for women, Islamic misogyny is summed up in one verse. In 4:34, Mo (MHBHF) not only claimed that men are inherently superior to women but also that men are allowed to beat women. That is naked hatred of women and totally inexcusable."
Ali Siddiqui
June 27 at 1:47pm
"'As for women, Islamic misogyny is summed up in one verse. In 4:34, Mo (MHBHF) not only claimed that men are inherently superior to women but also that men are allowed to beat women. That is naked hatred of women and totally inexcusable.'
"buddy i've taken care of this. remember when you ran away?
do you reall think you can judge the gender equity by this one verse?
and no he ddn say women are inferior to men. men have more responsibilities than women. they have the same rights, diff roles.
"and yeah again theres 3 chances before a wife gets a lgith beating with a miswak. see those women in downtown? yeah islam doesn't alow that. if a wife is going towards prostitution, the husband has to talk to her. if she does it again the husband sleep elsewhere in the house. and if she still does it, then the husband can take that miswak (toothbrush) and tap her. its to cause emotional pain. now i dont know if you got a sex change, but women are emotional. alot more than men."
Charles Kastriot
June 27 at 2:48pm
"Koran 4:34 clearly states that men are SUPERIOR to women. Under Islamic law, women do not have the same rights as men. Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time. Women are not allowed to beat their husbands. Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance. Women are not allowed to exit their homes without hiding their heads and covering their entire bodies in oppressive outfits. These are just a few examples of women's inferiority under Islam.
"The Koran says NOTHING about giving women three chances before being beaten.It does not limit the size of an object that a man can use to hit a woman. Try reading the Koran instead of parroting Islamic disinformation.
"You want more proof of Islamic misogyny? Read Koran 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) stated that women as the same as real estate, an inanimate possession, that be entered whenever the male owners wish. Women are just property in the Mohamadan mindset. That is dehumanizingly evil.
"So you think because women are supposedly a lot more emotional than men that justifies beating and belittling women? Only cowardly savages like you think that way."
Ali Siddiqui
June 27 at 6:59pm
"'Koran 4:34 clearly states that men are SUPERIOR to women. Under Islamic law, women do not have the same rights as men. Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time. Women are not allowed to beat their husbands. Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance. Women are not allowed to exit their homes without hiding their heads and covering their entire bodies in oppressive outfits. These are just a few examples of women's inferiority under Islam.'
"lol. obviously i shouldnt debate with a scholor who's spent years analysing islam like you. i only copy and paste what i fon on the internet to support my claims.
it says they HAVE MORE RESPONSIBILITIES:
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996016420
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996015878
"'Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time.'
"so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands? no. islam says men can have more than 1 wife ONLY if he can provide and care for them with the same equality. if you read further you can see how God says he prefers men marry only one.
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996015724
"watching a video this question came up by a non-muslim women. the woman was pretty angry at this for some reason. she said with a temper 'why cant women in islam have more than one husband? the scholor asked if that woman has a husband, she said 'yes and when he comes home from work he's all grumpy and i get him a beer and cook for him'.
so the scholor asked 'then why do you want 4'?
'Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance'
"again if you weren a dried up pussy you'd remember i took care of this.
women get less inheritance because the law of Naqfa- the man has to support his wife, kids and sisters with the money FIRST before he can spend on what he wants. meanwhile since the wife doesnt have to provde any income, she gets less and she can spend it on whatever. same goes for when she has a job. she could be a millioanre and doesnt have to give a single penny towards the family needs. again thats the man's job. he could make 10 000 a year and the family has to be provided for first. again christianity, judaism and hinduism give ZERO inheritance to females.
"'The Koran says NOTHING about giving women three chances before being beaten.It does not limit the size of an object that a man can use to hit a woman. Try reading the Koran instead of parroting Islamic disinformation.'
"LOL another dried up puss remark. go read the actual verse mr scholor.
i've memorized the quran in 3 languages (arabic of course, english, and my own language urdu plus i can translate into french since i've been taking french immersion since kindergarden).
yes everysingle scholor says it has to be with a miswak or a cloth-http://www.islamonline.net/english/In_Depth/IslamWifeBeating/index.shtml
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996016760
http://whyislam.org/FamilyandGender/IslamandDomesticViolence/tabid/288/Default.aspx
"'You want more proof of Islamic misogyny? Read Koran 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) stated that women as the same as real estate, an inanimate possession, that be entered whenever the male owners wish. Women are just property in the Mohamadan mindset. That is dehumanizingly evil.'
"hmm mr scholor please read the hadiths behind this. before islam anal sex was practiced AGAINST women's will. muhammed pbuh said you can put your penis from any angle AS LONG AS its gets to the vagina. thats what it means by "wish". any way but anal sex is not allowed.
"'So you think because women are supposedly a lot more emotional than men that justifies beating and belittling women? Only cowardly savages like you think that way.'
"only a gay ass drug thinks the way you do. funny how you mix words and interpretations together. re-read what i said on what the wife has to do to get the non-painful beating. no where in the quran does it say men can beat their wives whenever. muslims dont hurt ot insult or beat anyone like how you do to your wife."
Charles Kastriot
June 27 at 10:43pm
"Well, you are cowardly punk. You resort to name-calling because you cannot defend the violent misogyny that Mo (MHBHF) put in the Koran.
"You still have not justified men being allowed to have multiple wives. You betray your own misogyny by your question "so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands?" You obviously only view a wife as sexual outlet and domestic servant, not as an equal member in a partnership.
"You keep referring to a supposed lack of inheritance for women in Judaism, Hinduism and Christianity. As I pointed out to you previously which you refuse to accept, none of those are the legal codes in any country, not even Israel or India. Christianity is not a political ideology as Islam is so your point is a non-sequitor. There is no Christian equivalent to Sharia. Israel, India and Christian countries are representative democracies in which laws are based on the will of the citizens through elected officials. Islamic regimes are based on the whims and example of the dictatorship of Mo (MHBHF).
"Your cited Islamic experts can obfuscate and fabricate whatever they wish about Koran 4:34. That will not change the fact that NO limitation on what a man is permitted to use to beat his wives or how many times he must warn her is listed in the Koran.
"Further proof of your objectification of women is your evasion of addressing the point of 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) equated women with A PIECE OF LAND, a mere possession, not a fellow human being. Under that verse, women have no right to their own bodies. They have no right to decline sex. A man owns her and uses her for his own gratification, regardless of what she wants.
"You still have not explained the illogical promise Mo (MHBHF) made to his followers about being spared the "cold of the moon" in paradise. You claim not to have found any illogic in the Koran. That is just one of many.
"Your statements have revealed yourself as an ignorant anus. You deny the widespread cases of Mohamadan men beating their wives, often fatally, feeling justified by Koran 4:34. Are you that delusional or just a committed liar?"
Ali Siddiqui
June 28 at 12:01pm
"'Well, you are cowardly punk. You resort to name-calling because you cannot defend the violent misogyny that Mo (MHBHF) put in the Koran.
'You still have not justified men being allowed to have multiple wives. You betray your own misogyny by your question "so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands?" You obviously only view a wife as sexual outlet and domestic servant, not as an equal member in a partnership.'
"your stupidity allows me to call you a fag. you call yourself a scholr yet fail to give any point in your scholory claims.
and mr scholor i took care of polygamy. i gave you links that go directly to scholors, female ones too. islam doesnt allow women to be sexual objects like your cult faith.
i'm saying thats what having more husbands would be like. how can she satisfy all of her husbands? again you've read the entire quran and you still fail to understand.
"'You keep referring to a supposed lack of inheritance for women in Judaism, Hinduism and Christianity. As I pointed out to you previously which you refuse to accept, none of those are the legal codes in any country, not even Israel or India. Christianity is not a political ideology as Islam is so your point is a non-sequitor. There is no Christian equivalent to Sharia. Israel, India and Christian countries are representative democracies in which laws are based on the will of the citizens through elected officials. Islamic regimes are based on the whims and example of the dictatorship of Mo (MHBHF).'
"again mr scholor when you ran away from the debte several months ago, i told you i'm talking about faith not countries. any faith can be put as political. christianity use to in the medevil era. and islam is not the same as christianity. it gives people rightd even non-muslims. dont bother mr scholor taking verses from the quran. most of it talks about war in which we cant start in islam. again the Us has christian values in their government systems.
"'Your cited Islamic experts can obfuscate and fabricate whatever they wish about Koran 4:34. That will not change the fact that NO limitation on what a man is permitted to use to beat his wives or how many times he must warn her is listed in the Koran'
"fabricate? its all in the islamic scriptures. you can whine all you want fag, it wont change a thing. again mr scholor if you didnt ignore my previous posts you'd see how i took care of this. see your wife in downtown? yeah islam doesnt allow that. it doesnt allow women to be whore's like her. when women start to move towards this,the husband has the right to stop her. and again the beating is a tap. it cant hurt. i think your wife needs a fist in her stomach but i cant since islam doesnt allow pain to women.
"'Further proof of your objectification of women is your evasion of addressing the point of 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) equated women with A PIECE OF LAND, a mere possession, not a fellow human being. Under that verse, women have no right to their own bodies. They have no right to decline sex. A man owns her and uses her for his own gratification, regardless of what she wants'
"dont be ignorant like your greedy wife. i took care of this and how that is talking about sex. a woman has no right to her body? what kind of islamic education did you get? did you miss this?:
'O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness, that ye may take away part of the dower [money given by the husband to the wife for the marriage contract] ye have given them, except where they have been guilty of open lewdness; on the contrary live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If ye take a dislike to them it may be that ye dislike a thing, and God brings about through it a great deal of good. (The Noble Quran, 4:19)'
"so over here if i go against my wife's will i'm doing a sin. and look at the ending. if i dont likeomething about her then theres other great things.
"'You still have not explained the illogical promise Mo (MHBHF) made to his followers about being spared the "cold of the moon" in paradise. You claim not to have found any illogic in the Koran. That is just one of many.
"Your statements have revealed yourself as an ignorant anus. You deny the widespread cases of Mohamadan men beating their wives, often fatally, feeling justified by Koran 4:34. Are you that delusional or just a committed liar?'
[76:13] They relax therein on luxurious furnishings. They suffer neither the heat of the sun, nor any cold.
cold moon?
"again islam doesnt allow wife beating. a tap is allowed after 3 tries if she goees towards whoredom. and no if it cant cause pain how can it be fatal? quit going onto jihadwatch buddy. i've an invitation for a debate with rob spenecer which he has yet to reply to.
"i know you let your wife be a slut at midnight but my faith tells women should always be on track. children learn more from their mothers. if they learn to be sluts then theres a problem. kinda like your kids. do you actually think when your daughter tells you she's going over to her friends house to study, she really gonna? no its like mother like daughter."
Charles Kastriot
June 28 at 2:42pm
"You are appallingly arrogant and ignorant. You claim to know about me, my wife and kids. What is my "faith cult", as you referred to it? Since you claim to know so much about them, tell me what are their names? What does she do for a living? How old are they? Where do they attend school? Go ahead and embarrass yourself even more by trying to answer those questions.
"What these supposed rights that non-Mohamadans have under Islam? Non-Mohamadans cannot build or repair their places of worship, openly express their beliefs in public, carry weapons, proselytize to gain converts to their faiths, testify against Mohamadans in trials among other injustices. Mohamadans have those rights in the Free World.
"You have been so thoroughly brainwashed you accept whatever drivel Islamists tell you that the Koran says. You refuse to see what the Koran actually says. You allow Islamists to blatantly add their own self-serving words to verses when those betray the evil or stupidity of Mo's (MHBHF) teachings. You accept their teachings that women exist to serve men as inferiors. Instead you swallow their disinformation like a sheep at a trough.
"Once again, you refuse to read the Koran objectively. 4:19 gives a man an excuse, his wife's supposed lewdness, an excuse to punish her. Under Sharia, lewdness is defined in open-ended ways such as showing any portion of her anatomy other than her eyes or hands. That is why Mohamadan women have to wear oppressive outfits so savages like you will not target them for beatings.
"You conveniently omitted the entire verse of 76:13. The reference the the supposed "cold of the moon" shows that Mo (MHBHF) was an ignorant savage. That shows you are one too for thinking he is the model for human beings.
"So, boy, run along now. Go sodomize your goats or fantasize about your next hijacking. Maybe your brain will congeal enough to function properly so you might actually read the Koran objectively. Hopefully, your suicide bombing vest will explode prematurely before you have the opportunity to kill any civilized people.
Ali Siddiqui
June 29 at 5:35pm
"LOL hey daddy calm down. your machines are done. no woman wants you now. Mrs Kastriot needs love thats why she doesnt want you. go look in your daughters room. see those condoms? those pills? are you fathering properly?
"'What these supposed rights that non-Mohamadans have under Islam? Non-Mohamadans cannot build or repair their places of worship, openly express their beliefs in public, carry weapons, proselytize to gain converts to their faiths, testify against Mohamadans in trials among other injustices. Mohamadans have those rights in the Free World. '
"again how can you call yourself a scholor? do you even know what the sharia is made from? yes non-muslims can have their own places of worship. we cannot carry weapons you imaginary cult. nor can we force non-muslims to accept islam.
"'You have been so thoroughly brainwashed you accept whatever drivel Islamists tell you that the Koran says. You refuse to see what the Koran actually says. You allow Islamists to blatantly add their own self-serving words to verses when those betray the evil or stupidity of Mo's (MHBHF) teachings. You accept their teachings that women exist to serve men as inferiors. Instead you swallow their disinformation like a sheep at a trough'
"is it that i've been brainwashed or you getting your scholorly excuses from the internet? i've memorized the quran in 3 languages (arabic of course, english,urdu plus i can translate into french which i've been taking since elementary).
how do we add our own words when you've been giving scholory excuses which come out of your daughter's vagina? you've without any islamic reference have given me what the quran or hadith say, i've refuted them and you countinue to throw your same laughable rubbish.
again women do not serve men like how you treat Mrs. Kastriot. i accept the quran whole heartedly which is why when fags like you lerk around like a drug addict around children's schools, i can wash away the myths and lies."
"'Once again, you refuse to read the Koran objectively. 4:19 gives a man an excuse, his wife's supposed lewdness, an excuse to punish her. Under Sharia, lewdness is defined in open-ended ways such as showing any portion of her anatomy other than her eyes or hands. That is why Mohamadan women have to wear oppressive outfits so savages like you will not target them for beatings'
"once again you've fucked your wife so bad not only has she left you but you cant concentrate on what i write without you grabbing your dick every few seconds. read the first part of the verse. once again i write:
O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness....
"islam doesnt allow women to dress like your wife at midnight or your daughter in a downtown strip club. it tells to dress modestly which is why muslim women CHOOSE to cover up. the burka and hijab takes the attraction of men away so 1) they keep their modesty 2) they keep their VIRGINITY (unlike your daughter) and 3) they want to be liked for WHO THEY ARE not how they look (again i make reference you your whore wife and daughter). yeah you tell me whats more oppressive.
"'You conveniently omitted the entire verse of 76:13. The reference the the supposed 'cold of the moon' shows that Mo (MHBHF) was an ignorant savage. That shows you are one too for thinking he is the model for human beings.'
"aright charles kasstriot go here:quranbrowser.com or quransearch.com and look up 76:13. again i wonder how you call yourself a scholor.
"'So, boy, run along now. Go sodomize your goats or fantasize about your next hijacking. Maybe your brain will congeal enough to function properly so you might actually read the Koran objectively. Hopefully, your suicide bombing vest will explode prematurely before you have the opportunity to kill any civilized people.'
"my next hijacking will be your bed along with your daughter (she can suck good) and mrs kastriot (she can lick but not as good as your daughter).
hopefully your not around when i have a little fun. when do you get home from work? maybe your wife can tell but i wont hear her since she'll have a mouthful of fun."
Charles Kastriot
Today at 12:11am
"I know perfectly well the source of Sharia. It comes from the rantings originating in the twisted and evil mind of Mo (May he burn in Hell forever). You are too blinded to see that the Koran and Hadiths were nothing more than self-serving drivel spewed by a pedophiliac dictator.
"Yes, there are a few non-Islamic places of worship left inside the Islamic Bloc. Those are the few that jihadis have not burn down or co-opted yet. Once the jihadis vandalize or destroy them, the non-Mohamadans are not allowed to rebuild or repair them, just as Sharia forbids them to do.
"Try reading an accurate translation of the Koran, not a copy filled with cover-ups of Mo's (MHBHF) numerous absurdities. The Islamists at those two websites conveniently deleted the obvious absurdity of "lunar cold" affecting people in Allah's whorehouse. By the way, the savages on those sites cannot even spell KORAN correctly.
"You are perfectly following the example of that sexual deviant you claim was a prophet. So does Allah help you type while you engage in autoerotic activities and fantasizing about real women instead of hideous Mohamadan cows draped in burkas? No wonder you are obsessed with the women and girls in my family! Obviously, you have stretched out your goat's anus beyond the point of any further pleasure so you need another outlet for your perversion.
"You think by hiding a woman under a huge cloth like a piece of furniture makes men respect them?! That's laughable. A man respects a woman or girl when he looks at her as a fellow human being, regardless of her appearance. You savages only look at women and girls as sexual outlets that need to be hidden because you refuse to control your sexual perversions.
"If you think you can rape any woman or girl in my family, I dare you to try. Any one of them will rip you puny testicles off and force-feed them to you before they send you to your eternal and infernal destination."
Charles Kastriot
Today at 12:24am
"By the way, since you think that quranbrowser.com and quransearch.com are so accurate, you should know that the translations on those sites of Koran 76:13 by Sale, Yusuf Ali, Hilali-Khan and Muhammad Al-Hilali/ Muhsin Khan all EXPLICITLY mention the moon as the source of cold. You have proved your ignorance once again. Stick with disciplines you know like hourly masturbation and being on the receiving end of sodomy."
Friday, August 7, 2009
Friday, July 3, 2009
The Case Against Iran
Why should we care about what is happening in Iran? Are any of you worried that your lives will be impacted negatively by the civil unrest there? Do any you have a burning desire to spend your next vacation there? How many of you are eager to see such cultural attractions as a public hanging of a woman accused of adultery or a flogging of a girl for exposing some of her hair in public? Why should anyone living in the United States spend even a few seconds pondering the events unfolding there and their possible implications?
Despite the fact that we live thousands of miles from Iran, we are not immune to the events occurring there. The days of willful isolationism have ended. The people of the United States can no longer rely on the notion that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans provide sufficient buffers against any harm emanating from that region of the world. The tremendous distance between the United States and one of Iran’s neighbors, Afghanistan, did not prevent the launching of suicide attacks from the other side of the world on the United States on the eleventh of September 2001.
For thirty years, the Iranian regime has been involved in undeclared war against the United States. One of the first acts of the Islamic regime was the seizure of American embassy. On the fourth of November, 1979, militants backing the Islamic regime attacked the American embassy in Tehran and seized the occupants. The Iranian regime imprisoned these fifty Americans for four hundred forty-four days.
On three occasions in 1983, terrorists who received funding and logistical support from Iran attacked Americans. On the eighteenth of April, a suicide bomber from the Shiite terrorist group, Hezbollah, crashed a pickup truck laden with explosives into the American Embassy in Beirut. Seventeen Americans and forty-six others died as a result. On the twenty-third of October, Hezbollah struck in similar fashion; this time the group targeted the U.S. Marines’ barracks in Beirut. The Marines had been sent to Lebanon to serve as members of a multi-national peace-keeping force during the Lebanese civil war. On the twelfth of December of the same year, another Shiite terrorist organization supported by Iran, Al Dawa, sent a suicide truck bomber to attack the American embassy in Kuwait. Five people died and more than eighty suffered injuries.
Attacks on embassies and military installations are blatant acts of war. All embassies are considered sovereign territory of the nation-state maintaining the embassy, regardless of location. However, Americans failed to realize that they had been dragged in this war and refused to reply to repeated attacks.
Iranian regime has been involved in terrorism and other threats to peace and stability in the Middle East. Iranian-backed Hezbollah suicide bombers also struck the French peacekeepers in Beirut the same days as the attacks on the Marines’ barracks. Hezbollah members have repeatedly engaged in kidnappings of Lebanese Christians and foreign journalists, professor, members of the media and others since the mid-eighties. These same militants periodically fire rockets at Israeli civilians from inside Lebanese borders. They smuggle suicide bombers into Israel who then set off explosive vests full of shrapnel on buses or in other public places.
Additionally, the Iranian theocracy has been working to acquire nuclear technology for several years. One must question why a country possessing such an abundance of petroleum would pursue a more costly and less secure form of energy. Iran’s petroleum reserves, one of the largest in the world, serve as the foundation of its economy. Claims for the need to acquire atomic power appear, at best, as a bizarre waste of resources considering Iran’s staggering illiteracy and poverty rates. These problems will only continue to mount considering that nearly a majority of the population is less than thirty years old. Ahmadinejad’s bellicose pronouncements against Israel, the United States and anyone else who may oppose Iranian hegemony in the Middle East betray his regime’s true, malignant designs for the acquisition and implementation of nuclear capability.
Iranians have been suffering under yoke of totalitarian government for thirty years. A pretense of representative democracy has existed in Iran since the revolution. However, these elections should be misconstrued as free and open. All candidates for any office must receive approval by the Guardian Council, twelve men appointed by the true leader of Iran, the unelected and unimpeachable Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Anyone deemed insufficiently adherent to Shiism is disqualified. In the parliamentary elections of 2008, this despotic dozen barred nearly two thousand of the nine thousand candidates who applied to run for seats. Political debates are illegal. No political advertisements ever appear on Iranian television which a governmental monopoly.
Azeri Turks, an ethnic minority comprising a quarter of the Iranian population, are targets of slander in governmental media. News reports have portrayed Azeris as cockroaches and dimwits because Azeris typically speak Farsi, the official language of Iran, with difficulty. The Persian majority of the regime has outlawed the use of Turkish names for geographic locations and children. The mere act of printing anything in Turkish has been deemed a criminal offense.
The Arab minority in Iran face continuous harassment and loss of property. The Arab minority lives in the southwestern portion of Iran. The government regularly seizes their property to give to the burgeoning Persia populace. When the Arabs protest, they are rounded up under the charge of subverting the Shiite regime as agents of the Saudi kingdom.
Oppression of women has been sited as one of the contributing factors to the tumult. An entire generation has grown up under Islamic tyranny yet the governmental propaganda has not fully brainwashed all of those born since the establishment of the Shiite regime. Iranian women and girls catch glimpses of liberated women across the world despite the extensive censorship of foreign media by the Islamic morality police. They realize that women elsewhere do not endure beatings, fines or imprisonment for not covering their hair or wearing anything other than shapeless and oppressively uncomfortable outfits.
Multiple forms of legalized sexual exploitation and abuse haunt Iranian women. Three decades have been blighted with the executions of women and girls for offenses such as adultery, many of whom were in fact raped and did not consent to any extramarital sexual acts. Thousands of teenaged girls from impoverished rural families have been sold off to men in their forties or older. These arranged marriages last only short-term, leaving the girls as destitute as before but also stigmatized as a discarded wife. Additionally, Iranian law permits de facto prostitution under the moniker of “temporary marriages”. These arrangements consist of a man signing a legal contract with a pre-determined termination date of the so-called marriage and a sum paid to the woman. These marriages typically last only a few days or even hours, depending on the whim of the man signing the document.
Persecution of religious minorities has grown rampant under the Islamic theocracy. Applicants to universities must pass a test of knowledge of Shiite Islam, even those Iranian citizens who belong to another sect of Islam or to another religion altogether. Laws forbid the scriptures of any other religion to be translated in Farsi. Only Shiites are allowed to evangelize; members of any other religious group face imprisonment or execution for trying to convert Shiites Iranians to any other faith. All religious minorities must serve in the Iranian military but are barred from becoming officers. If a Shiite kills a non-Shiite, the Shiite cannot be executed under Iranian law. If one member of a non-Shiite family converts to Islam, then that convert automatically inherits all of his/her family’s property regardless of the family’s wishes. If an Iranian was born and raised as a Shiite, he/she faces execution for leaving Islam to accept another religion.
The Jewish population has dwindled to twenty-five percent of its total before the Islamic Revolution. Iranian Jews are forbidden to travel as an entire family outside of the country to prevent their emigration. They are not allowed to operate their own private schools. Officials of the Islamic regime control the school with obvious antagonism such as mandating Saturday as a school day, in violation of the Jewish Sabbath. Any Jewish protests against the hostile policies result in arrests, imprisonment or executions on baseless charges of espionage or subversion under the auspices of Israel.
Since the beginning of Ahmadinejad’s presidency four years ago, persecution of Sufis, a minority sect of Islam, has increased remarkably. Agents of the Shiite regime have destroyed Sufis’ place of worship, shrines and other locations where Sufis gather. Additionally, Sufis are regularly arrested then flogged or forced to sign documents renouncing Sufism.
Christians in Iran have endured oppression since the early days of the Islamic regime. Assyrians and Armenians, ethnic minorities who are Christians, constantly endure governmental surveillance of their religious services. The Ministry of Islamic Guidance has ordered the closing of many churches and other Christian buildings, including all their bookstores in 1990. The Iranian government forbids both groups to accept any new members among other ethnicities in the country.
Zoroastrians, the majority of the people in pre-Islamic Iran, suffer oppression as well. Their faith predates Islam by at least a thousand, seven hundred years yet less than hundred thousand at the present time. They face the same third-class status as other religious minorities.
Bahais, another indigenous religious sect, have not even received the flimsy promises of tolerance accorded to Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians by the Shiite government. This persecution persists despite the fact that the Bahai faith originated in the mid-nineteenth century in Iran when it was called Persia. Almost immediately after Ayatollah Khomeini and his legions seized power in 1978, the mullahs exhorted the followers to pillage Bahai temples and assault the congregants.
The Iranian theocracy has demonstrated similarities to other repressive regimes since its inception thirty years ago. Totalitarian regimes have engaged in banning of any use of minorities languages. The fascist government of Spain suppressed all public use of the Basque and Catalan languages by those two ethnicities. The Communist Chinese government has engaged in a systematic effort to eliminate the Tibetan language and distinctive culture. The Nazi and Soviet regimes fanned the flames of religious hostility toward their Jewish population to rally support for wide-spread imprisonment and seizure of Jewish property. Popular revolts against tyranny met ruthless crackdowns just as those which occurred in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and in Nazi-occupied Warsaw in 1943. The mullahs in charge of Iran have either modeled their oligarchy on preceding authoritarian factions or are engaging in a frightening similar coincidence.
The current resistance movement has been swelling for years. The suspicious outcome of this presidential election only served as the tipping point. Years of misogyny, ethnic chauvinism and religious persecution have all contributed to the boiling cauldron that Iran has become. Finally, the contentious situation has boiled over and spilled into the streets throughout Iran.
The United States stood by passively when the Islamic militants toppled the Shah of Iran. Granted, the Shah headed an autocratic and corrupt regime. However, the most egregious sins of the monarchy pale in comparison to the totalitarians currently in power in Iran. The consequences of the outcome of this tumult far outweigh any importance associated with the death of an androgynous pop singer or that of faded sex symbol from the 1970s.
All of these examples I have cited should motivate every American to support efforts to assist the toppling of the Iranian theocracy. The United States must organize an international boycott of Iran petroleum. Additionally, American naval forces should lead a blockade of Iranian ports used to export its petroleum. Without the profits from the sale of its petroleum, the Iranian regime will soon collapse. Then all of the citizens can unite to establish a true republic with legitimate multi-party elections, equality under the law for women and the end of antagonism toward non-Shiites and non-Persians. Finally, this undeclared war will come to an en
COPYRIGHT JULY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Sources for this article:
http://www.cswusa.com/Countries/Iran.htm
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/02/again_religious_persecution_in.html
http://forums.contracostatimes.com/topic/islamic-republic-of-irans-persecution-oppression-of-minorities-islamic-apartheid
http://www.iranfocus.com/en/human-rights/iranian-authorities-destroy-sufi-holy-site-in-isfahan-17207.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022903488_2.html
http://parsikhabar.net/irans-last-zoroastrians-worried-by-youth-exodus/
http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org/stories.asp?id=343
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88148974
Despite the fact that we live thousands of miles from Iran, we are not immune to the events occurring there. The days of willful isolationism have ended. The people of the United States can no longer rely on the notion that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans provide sufficient buffers against any harm emanating from that region of the world. The tremendous distance between the United States and one of Iran’s neighbors, Afghanistan, did not prevent the launching of suicide attacks from the other side of the world on the United States on the eleventh of September 2001.
For thirty years, the Iranian regime has been involved in undeclared war against the United States. One of the first acts of the Islamic regime was the seizure of American embassy. On the fourth of November, 1979, militants backing the Islamic regime attacked the American embassy in Tehran and seized the occupants. The Iranian regime imprisoned these fifty Americans for four hundred forty-four days.
On three occasions in 1983, terrorists who received funding and logistical support from Iran attacked Americans. On the eighteenth of April, a suicide bomber from the Shiite terrorist group, Hezbollah, crashed a pickup truck laden with explosives into the American Embassy in Beirut. Seventeen Americans and forty-six others died as a result. On the twenty-third of October, Hezbollah struck in similar fashion; this time the group targeted the U.S. Marines’ barracks in Beirut. The Marines had been sent to Lebanon to serve as members of a multi-national peace-keeping force during the Lebanese civil war. On the twelfth of December of the same year, another Shiite terrorist organization supported by Iran, Al Dawa, sent a suicide truck bomber to attack the American embassy in Kuwait. Five people died and more than eighty suffered injuries.
Attacks on embassies and military installations are blatant acts of war. All embassies are considered sovereign territory of the nation-state maintaining the embassy, regardless of location. However, Americans failed to realize that they had been dragged in this war and refused to reply to repeated attacks.
Iranian regime has been involved in terrorism and other threats to peace and stability in the Middle East. Iranian-backed Hezbollah suicide bombers also struck the French peacekeepers in Beirut the same days as the attacks on the Marines’ barracks. Hezbollah members have repeatedly engaged in kidnappings of Lebanese Christians and foreign journalists, professor, members of the media and others since the mid-eighties. These same militants periodically fire rockets at Israeli civilians from inside Lebanese borders. They smuggle suicide bombers into Israel who then set off explosive vests full of shrapnel on buses or in other public places.
Additionally, the Iranian theocracy has been working to acquire nuclear technology for several years. One must question why a country possessing such an abundance of petroleum would pursue a more costly and less secure form of energy. Iran’s petroleum reserves, one of the largest in the world, serve as the foundation of its economy. Claims for the need to acquire atomic power appear, at best, as a bizarre waste of resources considering Iran’s staggering illiteracy and poverty rates. These problems will only continue to mount considering that nearly a majority of the population is less than thirty years old. Ahmadinejad’s bellicose pronouncements against Israel, the United States and anyone else who may oppose Iranian hegemony in the Middle East betray his regime’s true, malignant designs for the acquisition and implementation of nuclear capability.
Iranians have been suffering under yoke of totalitarian government for thirty years. A pretense of representative democracy has existed in Iran since the revolution. However, these elections should be misconstrued as free and open. All candidates for any office must receive approval by the Guardian Council, twelve men appointed by the true leader of Iran, the unelected and unimpeachable Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Anyone deemed insufficiently adherent to Shiism is disqualified. In the parliamentary elections of 2008, this despotic dozen barred nearly two thousand of the nine thousand candidates who applied to run for seats. Political debates are illegal. No political advertisements ever appear on Iranian television which a governmental monopoly.
Azeri Turks, an ethnic minority comprising a quarter of the Iranian population, are targets of slander in governmental media. News reports have portrayed Azeris as cockroaches and dimwits because Azeris typically speak Farsi, the official language of Iran, with difficulty. The Persian majority of the regime has outlawed the use of Turkish names for geographic locations and children. The mere act of printing anything in Turkish has been deemed a criminal offense.
The Arab minority in Iran face continuous harassment and loss of property. The Arab minority lives in the southwestern portion of Iran. The government regularly seizes their property to give to the burgeoning Persia populace. When the Arabs protest, they are rounded up under the charge of subverting the Shiite regime as agents of the Saudi kingdom.
Oppression of women has been sited as one of the contributing factors to the tumult. An entire generation has grown up under Islamic tyranny yet the governmental propaganda has not fully brainwashed all of those born since the establishment of the Shiite regime. Iranian women and girls catch glimpses of liberated women across the world despite the extensive censorship of foreign media by the Islamic morality police. They realize that women elsewhere do not endure beatings, fines or imprisonment for not covering their hair or wearing anything other than shapeless and oppressively uncomfortable outfits.
Multiple forms of legalized sexual exploitation and abuse haunt Iranian women. Three decades have been blighted with the executions of women and girls for offenses such as adultery, many of whom were in fact raped and did not consent to any extramarital sexual acts. Thousands of teenaged girls from impoverished rural families have been sold off to men in their forties or older. These arranged marriages last only short-term, leaving the girls as destitute as before but also stigmatized as a discarded wife. Additionally, Iranian law permits de facto prostitution under the moniker of “temporary marriages”. These arrangements consist of a man signing a legal contract with a pre-determined termination date of the so-called marriage and a sum paid to the woman. These marriages typically last only a few days or even hours, depending on the whim of the man signing the document.
Persecution of religious minorities has grown rampant under the Islamic theocracy. Applicants to universities must pass a test of knowledge of Shiite Islam, even those Iranian citizens who belong to another sect of Islam or to another religion altogether. Laws forbid the scriptures of any other religion to be translated in Farsi. Only Shiites are allowed to evangelize; members of any other religious group face imprisonment or execution for trying to convert Shiites Iranians to any other faith. All religious minorities must serve in the Iranian military but are barred from becoming officers. If a Shiite kills a non-Shiite, the Shiite cannot be executed under Iranian law. If one member of a non-Shiite family converts to Islam, then that convert automatically inherits all of his/her family’s property regardless of the family’s wishes. If an Iranian was born and raised as a Shiite, he/she faces execution for leaving Islam to accept another religion.
The Jewish population has dwindled to twenty-five percent of its total before the Islamic Revolution. Iranian Jews are forbidden to travel as an entire family outside of the country to prevent their emigration. They are not allowed to operate their own private schools. Officials of the Islamic regime control the school with obvious antagonism such as mandating Saturday as a school day, in violation of the Jewish Sabbath. Any Jewish protests against the hostile policies result in arrests, imprisonment or executions on baseless charges of espionage or subversion under the auspices of Israel.
Since the beginning of Ahmadinejad’s presidency four years ago, persecution of Sufis, a minority sect of Islam, has increased remarkably. Agents of the Shiite regime have destroyed Sufis’ place of worship, shrines and other locations where Sufis gather. Additionally, Sufis are regularly arrested then flogged or forced to sign documents renouncing Sufism.
Christians in Iran have endured oppression since the early days of the Islamic regime. Assyrians and Armenians, ethnic minorities who are Christians, constantly endure governmental surveillance of their religious services. The Ministry of Islamic Guidance has ordered the closing of many churches and other Christian buildings, including all their bookstores in 1990. The Iranian government forbids both groups to accept any new members among other ethnicities in the country.
Zoroastrians, the majority of the people in pre-Islamic Iran, suffer oppression as well. Their faith predates Islam by at least a thousand, seven hundred years yet less than hundred thousand at the present time. They face the same third-class status as other religious minorities.
Bahais, another indigenous religious sect, have not even received the flimsy promises of tolerance accorded to Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians by the Shiite government. This persecution persists despite the fact that the Bahai faith originated in the mid-nineteenth century in Iran when it was called Persia. Almost immediately after Ayatollah Khomeini and his legions seized power in 1978, the mullahs exhorted the followers to pillage Bahai temples and assault the congregants.
The Iranian theocracy has demonstrated similarities to other repressive regimes since its inception thirty years ago. Totalitarian regimes have engaged in banning of any use of minorities languages. The fascist government of Spain suppressed all public use of the Basque and Catalan languages by those two ethnicities. The Communist Chinese government has engaged in a systematic effort to eliminate the Tibetan language and distinctive culture. The Nazi and Soviet regimes fanned the flames of religious hostility toward their Jewish population to rally support for wide-spread imprisonment and seizure of Jewish property. Popular revolts against tyranny met ruthless crackdowns just as those which occurred in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and in Nazi-occupied Warsaw in 1943. The mullahs in charge of Iran have either modeled their oligarchy on preceding authoritarian factions or are engaging in a frightening similar coincidence.
The current resistance movement has been swelling for years. The suspicious outcome of this presidential election only served as the tipping point. Years of misogyny, ethnic chauvinism and religious persecution have all contributed to the boiling cauldron that Iran has become. Finally, the contentious situation has boiled over and spilled into the streets throughout Iran.
The United States stood by passively when the Islamic militants toppled the Shah of Iran. Granted, the Shah headed an autocratic and corrupt regime. However, the most egregious sins of the monarchy pale in comparison to the totalitarians currently in power in Iran. The consequences of the outcome of this tumult far outweigh any importance associated with the death of an androgynous pop singer or that of faded sex symbol from the 1970s.
All of these examples I have cited should motivate every American to support efforts to assist the toppling of the Iranian theocracy. The United States must organize an international boycott of Iran petroleum. Additionally, American naval forces should lead a blockade of Iranian ports used to export its petroleum. Without the profits from the sale of its petroleum, the Iranian regime will soon collapse. Then all of the citizens can unite to establish a true republic with legitimate multi-party elections, equality under the law for women and the end of antagonism toward non-Shiites and non-Persians. Finally, this undeclared war will come to an en
COPYRIGHT JULY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT
Sources for this article:
http://www.cswusa.com/Countries/Iran.htm
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/02/again_religious_persecution_in.html
http://forums.contracostatimes.com/topic/islamic-republic-of-irans-persecution-oppression-of-minorities-islamic-apartheid
http://www.iranfocus.com/en/human-rights/iranian-authorities-destroy-sufi-holy-site-in-isfahan-17207.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022903488_2.html
http://parsikhabar.net/irans-last-zoroastrians-worried-by-youth-exodus/
http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org/stories.asp?id=343
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88148974
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Iranian Rebellion: linear or meandering?
Popular rebellions throughout history have proved extremely difficult to gauge. Pundits and politicians attempt to project their final results. Often sparked by dour economic conditions combined with repressive governmental actions, rebellions open the portals for inundations of demands for economic and social transformations.
The French Revolution started when peasants' crops failed leading to famine. Decades of deficit spending precluded the ability of King Louis the Fourteenth's regime from doing much to alleviate the suffering. The knowledge of the aristocracy's opulence sparked the peasantry's rage. Intermingling with this anger, advocates of the Enlightenment, enthralled with novelties called representative democracy and liberty, joined the anti-monarchical chorus. The fervor eventually led to verbal and physical assaults on Catholic installations and clergy. The urge to overthrow all peripherals of the system even lead to abolition of the Christian calendar and its replacement by a week of ten days and a year that started on the day of the autumnal equinox.
The Russian Revolution grew out of opposition to Czar Nicholas the Second's decision to enter the First World War. Political minorities, factions of Marxism, anarchism and capitalism, became involved in the opposition to the monarchy; they disagreed on what form of government should replace it but all openly pushed for the end of the Czarist autocracy. Eventually, the totalitarianism of the Bolsheviks replaced the autocracy of the Czar. This upheaval led to fundamental changes such as the full-scale oppression of the Orthodox Christian Church and its institutions, even its calendar which the monarchy had used for centuries.
At the present, the world is watching the tumult occurring in Iran. After thirty years under a totalitarian government, the Islam-based oppression is chafing some teens and twenty-somethings. Despite the mullahs' efforts to isolate Iranians, increased ease of communication with the Free World has allowed the penetration of non-Islamic concepts. During the street protests, women have dared to pull back their legally-mandated head-coverings to un-Islamic standards, if not remove them completely. Reports indicate that demonstrators have yelled, "Death to the dictator!" and "Death to Khamenei!" If those have been occurring, the rebellion exceeds a mere burst of outrage by devotees of a candidate who lost an election. The suicide bombing of the mausoleum of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution which installed the Islamic regime, carries profound significance. That act of violence may portend opposition to the entire theocracy, not simply to the loony figurehead who holds the position of President of the Islamic regime.
Some question Mir Mousavi's alleged reformist agenda. Considering that politicians truly antipathic toward Islamic regime are never permitted to seek offices in the government, such skepticism is warranted. Therefore, one can rightfully question Mousavi's commitment to advocate for personal freedom and legitimate democracy in Iran.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never attempted to hide his mental instability. He openly denies the Nazi genocide directed at Jews. He leaves a seat vacant just in case a supposed messianic figure called the "Twelfth Imam" happens to stop by wherever Ahmadinejad is making a public appearance. He actually says with a straight face that Iran wants a nuclear energy program for strictly peaceful purposes. How can any sane person justify the pursuit of nuclear technology for energy production in a country which is one of the largest exporters of petroleum in the world? I suppose Ahmadinejad expects that the "Twelfth Imam" will provide some sort of rational explanation or just bring the nuclear weapons himself, rendering the secretive program obsolete.
No one knows how this tumult will resolve itself. The theocrats in Iran may unleash a torrent of violence to crackdown on the protestors. However, that could possibly fan the blames of opposition causing undecided Iranians to side with the anti-regime forces. Middle Eastern experts might try to predict the outcome yet they have limited access to current developments inside Iran. Intelligence agencies of various countries are undoubtedly extracting all possible information that their agents can obtain. Nevertheless, a multitude of surveillance technology and inside sources cannot provide perfect clairvoyance and clairaudience. In the end, we will only know the fate of Iran after the demonstrations have concluded, either victoriously or in vain.
COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
The French Revolution started when peasants' crops failed leading to famine. Decades of deficit spending precluded the ability of King Louis the Fourteenth's regime from doing much to alleviate the suffering. The knowledge of the aristocracy's opulence sparked the peasantry's rage. Intermingling with this anger, advocates of the Enlightenment, enthralled with novelties called representative democracy and liberty, joined the anti-monarchical chorus. The fervor eventually led to verbal and physical assaults on Catholic installations and clergy. The urge to overthrow all peripherals of the system even lead to abolition of the Christian calendar and its replacement by a week of ten days and a year that started on the day of the autumnal equinox.
The Russian Revolution grew out of opposition to Czar Nicholas the Second's decision to enter the First World War. Political minorities, factions of Marxism, anarchism and capitalism, became involved in the opposition to the monarchy; they disagreed on what form of government should replace it but all openly pushed for the end of the Czarist autocracy. Eventually, the totalitarianism of the Bolsheviks replaced the autocracy of the Czar. This upheaval led to fundamental changes such as the full-scale oppression of the Orthodox Christian Church and its institutions, even its calendar which the monarchy had used for centuries.
At the present, the world is watching the tumult occurring in Iran. After thirty years under a totalitarian government, the Islam-based oppression is chafing some teens and twenty-somethings. Despite the mullahs' efforts to isolate Iranians, increased ease of communication with the Free World has allowed the penetration of non-Islamic concepts. During the street protests, women have dared to pull back their legally-mandated head-coverings to un-Islamic standards, if not remove them completely. Reports indicate that demonstrators have yelled, "Death to the dictator!" and "Death to Khamenei!" If those have been occurring, the rebellion exceeds a mere burst of outrage by devotees of a candidate who lost an election. The suicide bombing of the mausoleum of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution which installed the Islamic regime, carries profound significance. That act of violence may portend opposition to the entire theocracy, not simply to the loony figurehead who holds the position of President of the Islamic regime.
Some question Mir Mousavi's alleged reformist agenda. Considering that politicians truly antipathic toward Islamic regime are never permitted to seek offices in the government, such skepticism is warranted. Therefore, one can rightfully question Mousavi's commitment to advocate for personal freedom and legitimate democracy in Iran.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never attempted to hide his mental instability. He openly denies the Nazi genocide directed at Jews. He leaves a seat vacant just in case a supposed messianic figure called the "Twelfth Imam" happens to stop by wherever Ahmadinejad is making a public appearance. He actually says with a straight face that Iran wants a nuclear energy program for strictly peaceful purposes. How can any sane person justify the pursuit of nuclear technology for energy production in a country which is one of the largest exporters of petroleum in the world? I suppose Ahmadinejad expects that the "Twelfth Imam" will provide some sort of rational explanation or just bring the nuclear weapons himself, rendering the secretive program obsolete.
No one knows how this tumult will resolve itself. The theocrats in Iran may unleash a torrent of violence to crackdown on the protestors. However, that could possibly fan the blames of opposition causing undecided Iranians to side with the anti-regime forces. Middle Eastern experts might try to predict the outcome yet they have limited access to current developments inside Iran. Intelligence agencies of various countries are undoubtedly extracting all possible information that their agents can obtain. Nevertheless, a multitude of surveillance technology and inside sources cannot provide perfect clairvoyance and clairaudience. In the end, we will only know the fate of Iran after the demonstrations have concluded, either victoriously or in vain.
COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Videos of Islamic Infection of the Free World
Here is a video from Arkansas of an Islamist spouting anti-Jewish and anti-American lies plus the usual Islamic disinformation. This occurred on the day of the memorial service for Private William Long who was murdered by one of her fellow savages. Her vehicle is a Toyota minivan, license plate is from Louisiana, number PNE 729. If you see her, yell the pro-violence, anti-Jewish and anti-Christian Koranic verses at her:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqopnIAnmAw&feature=related&pos=0
Here is one from the Czech Republic. An undercover crew of journalists infiltrated a mosque. They expose a Czech Mohamadan denying the existence of misogynistic and violent Koranic verses despite having them read to him and justified by a Islamic cleric.
http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2009/05/i-muslim.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqopnIAnmAw&feature=related&pos=0
Here is one from the Czech Republic. An undercover crew of journalists infiltrated a mosque. They expose a Czech Mohamadan denying the existence of misogynistic and violent Koranic verses despite having them read to him and justified by a Islamic cleric.
http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2009/05/i-muslim.html
Monday, June 1, 2009
Religious Indoctrination Led to Murder
A murder occurring this week has not caused a huge nation-wide outrage that it merits. A blatant act of terrorism occurred in the United States, in broad daylight and front of witnesses that demonstrates the gall of the murderer. A violent religious fanatic fatally shot a man simply because that man had training in and engaged in a legal profession. Granted, the victim’s form of employment has raised controversy in some narrow-minded social circles. Although these virulent critics would viciously accuse the victim of engaging in murder, he had not done so under any definition of American jurisprudence. The victim was never arrested for nor charged with any homicides. Despite those circumstances, a blood-thirsty zealot assumed the role of judge, jury and executioner.
American society cannot survive such unapologetic aggression based on a malevolent ideology masquerading as religion. Apparently, this assassin believes that he had divine sanction for his blatant and pre-meditated murder. Undoubtedly, he will defend his action by quoting his faith’s scriptures. This trial will display the oppressive bigotry of the murder’s ilk, bent on imposing their despotic theocracy on the entire United States of America. People who cherish the freedom to live their lives without the shackles of the murderer’s hateful constraints can no longer remain silent. Do the American people want a representative democracy that functions under the rule of law determined by the consent of the governed and not by the dictates of practitioners of an intolerant ideology which originated in the Middle East more than a millennium ago?
The myopic sheep of his congregation will likely distance themselves from this crime, at least, publicly. A few might openly condemn his act. However, away from cameras and prying eyes of non-believers, they will smile, laugh and shout his praises for slaughtering a man that they all loathed. They will strive to assure the country that his actions do not represent their movement’s true intentions and that the killer had strayed from their guidance into extremism. The adherents’ spokesmen have mastered duplicitous statements that fool the bulk of non-believers. Too many gullible Americans so desperately want to avoid conflict that they swallow the double-speak despite glaring inconsistencies. Eventually, that forced consumption of disinformation will lead to either the expectoration of the multitude of lies or irrevocable asphyxiation. Sadly, a significant number of the alleged intellectuals among the media, academia and other spheres of influence have already succumbed to the latter, leading to their obvious brain-dead status.
In conclusion, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad’s murder of Private William Long at an Army-Navy recruiting office in Little Rock, Arkansas should remind all Americans that jihadis do not exist and operate solely in backwaters in which Islam reigns. This latest act of Islamic aggression directed at a defender of freedom should serve notice that those residing in the United States must maintain vigilance against future incidents of savagery. Additionally, this incident underscores the necessity of the total elimination of the malignancy from the entire world, starting within the borders of the United States of America.
COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
American society cannot survive such unapologetic aggression based on a malevolent ideology masquerading as religion. Apparently, this assassin believes that he had divine sanction for his blatant and pre-meditated murder. Undoubtedly, he will defend his action by quoting his faith’s scriptures. This trial will display the oppressive bigotry of the murder’s ilk, bent on imposing their despotic theocracy on the entire United States of America. People who cherish the freedom to live their lives without the shackles of the murderer’s hateful constraints can no longer remain silent. Do the American people want a representative democracy that functions under the rule of law determined by the consent of the governed and not by the dictates of practitioners of an intolerant ideology which originated in the Middle East more than a millennium ago?
The myopic sheep of his congregation will likely distance themselves from this crime, at least, publicly. A few might openly condemn his act. However, away from cameras and prying eyes of non-believers, they will smile, laugh and shout his praises for slaughtering a man that they all loathed. They will strive to assure the country that his actions do not represent their movement’s true intentions and that the killer had strayed from their guidance into extremism. The adherents’ spokesmen have mastered duplicitous statements that fool the bulk of non-believers. Too many gullible Americans so desperately want to avoid conflict that they swallow the double-speak despite glaring inconsistencies. Eventually, that forced consumption of disinformation will lead to either the expectoration of the multitude of lies or irrevocable asphyxiation. Sadly, a significant number of the alleged intellectuals among the media, academia and other spheres of influence have already succumbed to the latter, leading to their obvious brain-dead status.
In conclusion, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad’s murder of Private William Long at an Army-Navy recruiting office in Little Rock, Arkansas should remind all Americans that jihadis do not exist and operate solely in backwaters in which Islam reigns. This latest act of Islamic aggression directed at a defender of freedom should serve notice that those residing in the United States must maintain vigilance against future incidents of savagery. Additionally, this incident underscores the necessity of the total elimination of the malignancy from the entire world, starting within the borders of the United States of America.
COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Sunday, May 24, 2009
Timely Reminder
Among the ongoing debates within the Obama Administration and the rest of the American society about the fate of the war criminals detained at Guantanamo Bay, jihadis reminded those paying attention why the facility exists in the first place. Four career criminals were in the process of waging jihad in New York. In the nearly eight years since the Islamic terrorists destroyed the World Trade Center, the Koran and its exhortations to violence and oppression of non-Mohamadans have not changed. The Islamists' will to impose Islamic dictates on the Free World has not evaporated either.
The continued detainment of jihadis at Guantanamo Bay does inspire other Mohamadans to respond to calls for jihad, as well as it should. If they die in the process of killing non-Mohamadans, they believe an eternity in a free bordello awaits them. If they succeed in murdering so-called "infidels" yet survive the attacks, they will be hailed as heroes throughout the Islamic bloc. If they are captured in the process of jihad, they will be rewarded with three halal meals per day plus a Koran, prayers beads and rug in addition to exercise equipment and furnished living quarters, all paid for by the suicidally naive U.S. government. With these three possible outcomes serving as the only consequences of engaging in jihad versus Americans, one must wonder why all Mohamadan males are not pursuing this path to limitless sex, fame or leisure.
This latest Islamic plot to attack Americans also raises an inexplicable phenomenon. The sheer stupidity of permitting Islamic clerics to enter American prisons stands out as astounding act of national self-immolation. These Islamists prey on criminals who already have little to no regard for the lives and property of law-abiding Americans. The Islamists give them an excuse for their rage against democracy, capitalism and freethinking. Then they encapsulate their lusts for murder, theft and rape by justifying such crimes as permissible by following the example of Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in hell forever) as recorded in the Koran and the hadiths.
Never in the history of the United States were enemy agents allowed to enter the country so openly and operate so freely as during this current war. The Nazi regime was not allowed to send representatives to scour Depression-era American jails for potential recruits for the SS or Wehrmacht. Without a doubt, Americans with Fascist or Marxist sympathies cruised "Hoovervilles" to stir up anti-republicanism or anti-capitalism. However, they did not do so with explicit approval of federal, state or local governmental sanction. The politically-correct acquiescence to Islamists' demands will continue to produce future enemy agents bent on murder and destruction within the United States. Prison authorities or the politicians controlling the funds supporting those authorities must halt this treacherous permissiveness before more home-grown jihadis strike again.
COPYRIGHT MAY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
The continued detainment of jihadis at Guantanamo Bay does inspire other Mohamadans to respond to calls for jihad, as well as it should. If they die in the process of killing non-Mohamadans, they believe an eternity in a free bordello awaits them. If they succeed in murdering so-called "infidels" yet survive the attacks, they will be hailed as heroes throughout the Islamic bloc. If they are captured in the process of jihad, they will be rewarded with three halal meals per day plus a Koran, prayers beads and rug in addition to exercise equipment and furnished living quarters, all paid for by the suicidally naive U.S. government. With these three possible outcomes serving as the only consequences of engaging in jihad versus Americans, one must wonder why all Mohamadan males are not pursuing this path to limitless sex, fame or leisure.
This latest Islamic plot to attack Americans also raises an inexplicable phenomenon. The sheer stupidity of permitting Islamic clerics to enter American prisons stands out as astounding act of national self-immolation. These Islamists prey on criminals who already have little to no regard for the lives and property of law-abiding Americans. The Islamists give them an excuse for their rage against democracy, capitalism and freethinking. Then they encapsulate their lusts for murder, theft and rape by justifying such crimes as permissible by following the example of Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in hell forever) as recorded in the Koran and the hadiths.
Never in the history of the United States were enemy agents allowed to enter the country so openly and operate so freely as during this current war. The Nazi regime was not allowed to send representatives to scour Depression-era American jails for potential recruits for the SS or Wehrmacht. Without a doubt, Americans with Fascist or Marxist sympathies cruised "Hoovervilles" to stir up anti-republicanism or anti-capitalism. However, they did not do so with explicit approval of federal, state or local governmental sanction. The politically-correct acquiescence to Islamists' demands will continue to produce future enemy agents bent on murder and destruction within the United States. Prison authorities or the politicians controlling the funds supporting those authorities must halt this treacherous permissiveness before more home-grown jihadis strike again.
COPYRIGHT MAY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Catering to Islamists' tastes
We, the members of the Society for the Defeat of Islam, are promoting a boycott of both Kentucky Fried Chicken and Domino's Pizza. As detailed in these two links below, both companies have kowtowed to demands by Islamists to implement "halal only" locations. We must not allow these incidents of Sharia-creep to continue unchallenged. If these two dhimmified corporations value the business of Mohamadans this much, then they should try to survive financially without the business of freedom-loving people. Credit for the links goes to Cuhraytin Erumy.
KFC: http://tinyurl.com/c7jl5v
Domino's: http://tinyurl.com/r87nq5
Additionally, we ask for everyone to contact both KFC and Domino's to voice our objections to their pandering to Mohamadans. It is vital to inform them of our campaign. If we succeed in reducing their profits yet they do not know about our campaign, they may just assume the losses were due to the economic decline.
Here is the contact information for KFC: http://www.kfc.com/contact
This is for Domino’s: https://info.dominos.com/dominos_pizza/contact.nsf/frmContact?openform
We must inform both that we will continue with the boycott of all their restaurants until they end all halal menus. This means revoking halal menus at corporate-owned locations and terminating franchises for those who maintain halal outlets.
Will you join our effort?
COPYRIGHT MAY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
KFC: http://tinyurl.com/c7jl5v
Domino's: http://tinyurl.com/r87nq5
Additionally, we ask for everyone to contact both KFC and Domino's to voice our objections to their pandering to Mohamadans. It is vital to inform them of our campaign. If we succeed in reducing their profits yet they do not know about our campaign, they may just assume the losses were due to the economic decline.
Here is the contact information for KFC: http://www.kfc.com/contact
This is for Domino’s: https://info.dominos.com/dominos_pizza/contact.nsf/frmContact?openform
We must inform both that we will continue with the boycott of all their restaurants until they end all halal menus. This means revoking halal menus at corporate-owned locations and terminating franchises for those who maintain halal outlets.
Will you join our effort?
COPYRIGHT MAY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)