The Pink Camel in the Room

In the wake of the Obama administration shutting down multiple American embassies, the reasons behind the closures remain obscured. Vague references and unconfirmed reports of impending threats float on the airwaves and on the Internet. People with a tenuous grasp on international affairs in the past few decades find such actions inexplicable and confusing. Those who view such events through the prism of political correctness will not allow themselves to admit what is occurring and why. Those who have been paying close attention as well as delving into the heart of the problem do understand.

How ignorant or delusional must someone be in order to be unable to see the obvious cause of the embassy closures? One only need glance at most types of calendars or at any source of news. Ramabomb, the annual bloodbath used by Mohamadans as justification for violence against infidels, ended this week. As per Islamic tradition, the first several days and the closing days of this period include numerous incidents of jihad. Such acts of mayhem include attacking churches, synagogues and other locations not frequented by Mohamadans. Additionally, non-Mohamadans experience an upsurge in threats from and assaults by jihadis against them. Does anyone truly believe that the closures occurred in countries throughout the Islamic bloc and in a few others close to jihadist hotspots by mere coincidence?

No one should expect Barack Obama or anyone else in his service to hint at any correlation between the fear of imminent attacks and the end of Ramabomb. Every one of Obama’s secretaries and other appointed officials, both former and current, has refused to utter accurate terms such as “jihadi” “Islamist”, “Moslem” or any others acknowledging the direct connection between numerous recent acts of terrorism and Islam.  Janet Napolitano, the Secretary of Homeland Security, has refused to say the word “terrorism”. (Instead, she spouts a long-winded and deliberately obfuscatory euphemism reeking of politically correctness: “made-made disasters”.)  Nidal Malik Hasan’s waging of jihad received the label of “work-place violence” by the federal government.  (Hasan’s mass murder is classified as though his rampage consisted of a mere scuffle between employees bickering over petty office politics or someone’s lunch missing from the refrigerator.) Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dismissed questions regarding the motivation and identities of the jihadis who stormed the American consulate in Benghazi with the flippant response, “What difference does it make?” Obama and his underlings refuse to follow a mandatory step when engaged in a war: identify the enemy.

President Obama and his Islamic-coddling crew’s have determined to claim credit for a lack of any jihadist attack on American soil during his tenure. That blew up in their faces (figuratively) and in the faces of multiples Americans (literally) at the Boston Marathon Massacre earlier this year. Failed attempts at jihad also happened on a flight into Detroit on Christmas of 2009 and at a Christmas tree lighting ceremony in Oregon in the following November. Are Americans expected to believe that the death of Osama bin Laden ended all jihadist attacks on the United States? Does Obama’s cult of personality think that his perceived messianic aura has shielded the United States from another incident of jihadis murdering thousands of Americans on par with that of the eleventh of September 2001?

So where are the love and peace from Mohamadans toward Americans expected by Obamaniacs following the election of a man raised as a Mohamadan? Islamists protesting across the world demonstrate as much animosity toward Barrack Obama as they express toward any other American. Will anyone in the media point out one glaring reason for Islamists’ contempt for Obama: his admitted apostasy from Islam? More importantly, will anyone in the Obama administration ever admit that Islam serves as the motivation of those determined to kill Americans and destroy the Free World?

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT AUGUST 2013

Barbarians Inside the Gates

Useful idiots for Islam and other clueless types are scratching their heads in bewilderment at Chechen jihadis detonating bombs to kill American civilians. They ignorantly or willfully focus on their nationality and their youth instead of their ideology. Chechens have no more reason for hostility toward the United States than they do against Switzerland. Americans played no role in the Chechen war against Russia. In truth, the Tsarnaev Brothers plotted and carried out their murderous plot due to Islam.

In the past, apologists for Islam deflected the focus on the Islamic basis of terrorist acts such as the bombing of the World Trade Center during the 1990s and the destruction of it in 2001. Those unwilling to admit the Islamic motivation for such acts of war portrayed them as actions of foreigners against the United States. However, during the years since 2001, Mohamadans, those who naturalized as American citizen, those born in the United States and those who merely entered the country, have launched deadly attacks. No longer are jihadis a problem from outside of the borders. Instead, jihadis spring up from the hostile horde, which has already infiltrated the country.

The following are some examples of Mohamadans who had been allowed to reside in the United States or been granted American citizenship before engaging in acts of jihad within the United States:

-25 January 1993, Mir Aimal Kasi, a Pakistani who entered the country with forged documents and bought a fake green card during his mid-twenties, fatally shot two employees of the CIA and injured three others.

-26 February, 1993, Ramzi Yousef who had claimed political asylum in order to be admitted into the United States, detonated a bomb inside the World Trade Center in New York, killing six people and injuring more than one thousand others. 

-23 February, 1997, Ali Abu Kamal, a Philistine immigrant, ascended the Empire State Building then shot one visitor and wounded six others.

-4 July 2002, Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, a green-card-holder from Egypt, shot to death two employees at Los Angeles International Airport.

- 6 March, 2006, Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar, who emigrated from Iran at the age of two, deliberately plowed his vehicle into a crowd at the University of North Carolina. He injured nine students.

- 12 February, 2007, Sulejman Talović, a Bosnian who arrived in the United States in 1998 and received permanent resident status seven years later, fatally shot five shoppers in a mall and injured four others.

- 1 May, 2010, Faisal Shahzad, who gained citizenship by marrying an American woman, attempted to use a car bomb to murder civilians in Times Square.

In all of these crimes, the jihadis justified their violence based on Islam. Some of them mentioned their sympathy for Philistines in mimicking Hezbollah’s, Hamas’ and other terrorist attacks on civilians. Many of these jihadis spouted Koranic exhortations toward hatred for Jews and Christians as their motivation. More recent jihadist attacks blamed American responses to previous terrorist attacks as the reason for further killing of American civilians.

These references do not include the jihadis spawned by Mohamdan infiltrators who later committed acts of jihad such as Nidal Malik Hasan or attempted to do so such as Naser Abdo. Neither do these include American born converts to Islam such as Michael Julius Ford, Hasan Karim Akbar and John Allen Muhammad who murdered fellow Americans to avenge perceived hostility to Islam. Nor do these include the numerous citizens of the United States, by birth or by naturalization, who have provided financing and other support for jihadist operations. Those include the Holy Land Foundation, the Global Relief Fund and the Benevolence International Foundation. Also not included are jihadis who entered into the United States on temporary visas in order to wage jihad such as the nineteen hijackers on 11 September 2001.

The solution to the influx of savages spouting an ideology hostile to the freedom and safety of all Americans is simple: ban any entry by Mohamadans into the United States. The basis for this move already exists in the Immigration and Naturalization Act. Those advocating any totalitarian ideology are ineligible for American citizenship as stated under Title III, Chapter 1, Act 313. Act 316 requires a favorable disposition by aliens toward the United States; obviously, those sympathizing with jihadis following the violent examples of the creator of Islam do not qualify. The act also bars those ineligible for citizenship from receiving resident status. Finally, since Islamists claim that the United States is at war with Islam, it is suicidally foolish to allow those adhering to Islam to enter into the country. Did the American authorities allow Nazis to immigrate or just visit the country while at war with their country?

This overdue defensive measure would end the invasion of savages who are too arrogant to work for “infidels” and too lazy to find any legal employment to support themselves. It is no coincidence that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was leeching off working Americans by means of welfare checks. Large numbers of other Mohamadans expect the people whom they despise to support them financially. Such expectation differs little from the jizya, protection money, which Jews and Christians had to pay their Mohamadan conquers for centuries to avoid being murdered or enslaved. Islamic scriptures give its adherents a sense of entitlement to the earnings of those not members of their totalitarian cult. The longer the gates remain open to infiltration by Islamic barbarians, the more will enter, resulting in more murder and mayhem directed against Americans.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT APRIL 2013

Benghazi Does Make a Difference, Hillary

During Hillary Clinton’s much delayed appearance before a Congressional committee to answer questions about the jihadist attacks on the eleventh of September last year, she snapped, "Four Americans are dead. What difference does it make?"

Such a callous disregard for the search for the truth reveals Hillary Clinton’s desire to hide any incriminating evidence, which might sink her presidential aspirations in the coming years. Despite the fact that a suspect had no role in killing anyone, it is still a crime for him/her to hide evidence or otherwise obstruct the pursuit of justice. People involved with covering up homicides can and should face punishment for their complicity in concealing those crimes. Did Hillary Clinton not learn this at Yale Law School? Perhaps she believes that she holds an exception to laws concerning obstruction of justice just as her husband claimed the privilege to commit perjury.

Hillary, how about the need to root out nincompoops in the Department of State who deny the Islamic basis for terrorist attacks Americans? The appointment of a “Special Representative to Muslim Communities” indicates the pre-occupation with “outreach” to those who loathe American freedoms.  The coddling of Mohamadans with the “2012 hours Against Hate” campaign blinds them to the blatantly hateful and violent basis of Islam. Evidently, they cannot bother to read or listen to the invective, all of which is rooted in the Koran and other Islamic scriptures, spewed by Islamists at American society. Slavish adherence to multiculturalism will never overcome the reality of Islamic malignancy.

When the usefully idiotic bureaucrats rarely do acknowledge any connection between violence by Mohamadans committed against Americans, the blame falls on the Americans. An example of this “blame the victim” mentality occurred when the Egyptian-born Christian man who created a video critical of Mohamad, the inventor of Islam, faced condemnation for the coordinated assaults on American diplomatic personnel and installations on the anniversary of the jihadist attacks of the eleventh of September. After those acts of jihad, the dhimmis in the State Department spent 70,000 dollars on television commercials apologizing to Mohamadans whose turbans or burkas were in a bunch over someone criticizing the criminal who fabricated their totalitarian ideology. The State Department did disavow such linkage a month later yet the slander had already smeared this man for simply expressing his opinions. The incident also painted Americans as sniveling cowards who kowtow to savages’ demands to never have their beliefs questioned.

For Hillary to question the need for an inquiry demonstrates her incompetence. The impotent response to the attacks on an American consulate and an American embassy serves as glaring examples of Obama’s administration. Those murders of an ambassador and three others in the consulate and ransacking of diplomatic facilities qualify as acts of war by jihadis, both under international law and in common sense. In response, not one of those jihadis has been killed or captured by American forces. No one should expect anything else from members of an administration spouting Orwellian euphemisms such as “man-made disasters” instead of calling acts of jihad what they are: terrorism.

Underscoring the appalling ineptitude is the sale of F-16s to a regime run by Islamists. The Mooslum Brotherhood seized power in Egypt last year. Its members have dedicated their lives to imposing their totalitarian ideology on the entire world. Their leader, Mohamad Morsi, has already issued emergency decrees, which have granted him extraordinary levels of control, a favorite tactic of dictators in the past and in the present. Supplying those barbarians with such weaponry reeks of foolishness on par with the owner of a firearms store handing a loaded high-powered rifle to a known criminal with a long history of armed robberies.

Fortunately for American interests, Hillary Clinton will resign from her post this week. Sadly for cause of justice, she will not face any punishment for her negligence. That duty will fall to the voters in the United States should she dare to seek the presidency again. She clearly lacks the competence and courage for that solemn responsibility.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT JANUARY 2013

Jihad Jane and the Victims of the Danish Cartoon

Once again, the nefarious schemes of the barbarians within the gates of the Free World have been exposed. The latest revelation of Colleen LaRose, a Western-born and raised Caucasian American woman participating in jihad against the United States should finally shatter the endlessly spouted deception from Islamists and their useful idiots. One must wonder if the wall of political correctness protecting the public perception of Islam will crumble due to this latest blow of truth.

Any measures taken against Mohamadans and any responses to the Islamic threat automatically receive the label "racist". Arab jihadis such as Nidal Malik Hassan is and the nineteen hijackers of the eleventh of September were also Caucasian. The majority of Americans are Caucasian just as the Arab jihadis are.

What is the basis for Islamists' screeches of "racism" every time a Mohamadan is frisked at an airport boarding area or Islamic organization is investigated by the media or law enforcement? Actually, the only basis is knowledge of the obsession of the vast majority of Americans with avoiding the mere accusation of racism against themselves. The Islamists' ubiquitous hurling of the "r-word" against the obstacles in their path to Islamization has served as a permanent "get out of trouble free" card. Their cynical ignoring of facts which undercut the potency of their favorite tactic demonstrates one of their principles: the ends (Islamization) justifies the means (takkiya).

Jihad Jane continues a growing line of American jihadis such as John Allen Mohammed, John Walker Lindh, Adam Gadahn, and Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad. This blond, blue-eyed woman could have served as a model for Nazi propaganda. Instead she chose to adhere to Islam, another form of totalitarianism but no less brutally hostile to representative democracy and the freedoms which it entails and she exploits. Unfortunately, the altruism of a Pennsylvania police officer prevented this most recent traitor from committing suicide in 2005.

Jihad Jane expressed her desperation to do something to ease the suffering of Mohamadans. What exactly is this supposed suffering and what was her plan to help end it? Colleen LaRose and her fellow Mohamadans object to a cartoon drawn by Lars Vilks. Their solution to art which they dislike is to kill of the artist. Mohamadans are practicing the solution to opposition instituted by their namesake whenever he learned of any poetry mocking his supposed prophetic status. Whenever Islamists and their useful idiots spout Islamic propaganda about the alleged compatibility of Islam within a representative democracy, clear-thinking people must keep this plot in mind. This conspiracy to murder belies how freedoms of speech and of expression are obliterated when Islamic principles are imposed. Just as any aspersion on Adolf Hitler in Nazi-dominated territory or objections to Karl Marx in communist regimes inevitably led to death sentences, the adherents of Islam will violently extinguish any source of criticism of the creator of their ideology.

Lost among the details of this manifestation of Islam in action has been the public defamation of an entire group of beings. Lars Vilks' drawing in question portrayed the head of the inventor of Islam on the body of a dog. The canine community did nothing to deserve this slander of guilt by association. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) frequently revealed his cynophobia in various Islamic texts. Mohamadans express hostility toward dogs; one could logically assume that the antipathy is mutual. Considering that no dog has admitted to having sexual relations with a nine year old girl nor robbed anyone opposed to their absolute dictatorship nor ordered the assassination of political opponents, this writer maintains that dogs, not Mohamadans, deserve the apology from Lars Vilks for his cartoon.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT MARCH 2010

The Spirit of United 93

Old habits die hard, even for jihadis. Not content with killing Christians and destroying churches throughout Africa, the Middle East and southern Asia, they decided to rekindle a Richard Reid style of attack. The latest attempt by the terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to murder residents of the Free World occurred on Christmas, undoubtedly, not a coincidence. Al-Kaida relishes timing their strikes on days of significance. Even the Islamic hijackings and slaughter of thousands of civilians on the eleventh of September in 2001 a carried historical link. On that same day in 1683, Christian forces crushed the jihadist invaders outside Vienna. From that point through centuries, civilized nations gradually pushed back or suppressed the Islamic plague. Unfortunately for the world, those forces did not eradicate the Mohamadan scourge.

This most recent incidence of jihad demonstrates the power and primacy of unassuming individuals over impotent or dhimmified bureaucrats. One Dutch man accomplished what scores, if not hundreds or thousands, of federal governmental employees failed to do: halt a jihadi intent on murdering residents of the Free World. He did not need “cultural sensitivity” brainwashing sessions by the Council on American-Islamic Relations or any other fifth-columnist organization. Neither did his bravery require consultation with moral relativist lawyers nor with irrelevant international treaties ignored by Islamists. This one man from the Netherlands has continued the spirit of resistance to Islam exemplified by the passengers on United Flight 93 on the eleventh of September in 2001.

One must ask why this savage was even allowed on this flight? A broader question needs to be addressed: Why are any Mohamadans permitted anywhere near aircraft anymore? How many times do jihadis have use civilian airplanes as an implement of war before governmental authorities in the Free World admit that such naïve lackadaisicalness leads to deaths of free people? Until someone with authority decides to bar these monsters from infiltrating situations which facilitate acts of jihad, non-combatants will continue to suffer and die at the hands of vermin like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

In the end, despite the suicidal naïveté of and constant acquiescence to Islamists’ demands by federal authorities, the jihadi failed in his mission to earn eternity in a free whorehouse. Fortunately, no civilized people died in his jihad. Sadly, the passengers did not fully impose justice on the savage. This lascivious Mohamadan was willing to cause deaths of dozens of people in addition to his own just to satisfy his libido. Everyone should notice that his morbid desire to slaughter for sexual gratification ended up sabotaging his own future pursuits. What delicious irony that his own act of jihad torched his own little minaret, hopefully beyond any further usage.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT, DECEMBER 2009

Jihadist Murders at Fort Hood

Some actions are so easily anticipated and foreseeable. When they occur, these incidents only surprise those ignorant of the causes or those willfully blind to reality. Such incidents include rabid dogs biting people, flies buzzing around freshly deposited feces and snakes sliding along the ground before striking their victims. Also in the category of expected occurrences, one finds the inevitability of Mohamadans murdering civilized people when the opportunity presents itself.

Today’s latest episode of a jihadi slaying American armed forces personnel has underscored the need for a ban on Mohamadans in the American armed forces. This continues a long string of fifth columnists within the various branches of U.S. Department of Defense who used their training to murder Americans. I provide a recap of just some of the jihads’ plots to attack and undermine for those who forgot or have buried their hands in the sands of useful idiocy:

-On June 1 of this year, Abdulhakim Mujahid fatally shot Private William Long and wounded Quinton Ezeagwula in Little Rock, Arkansas.

-On the twenty-third of March 2003, Sgt. Asan Akbar rolled live grenades into the tents of fellow soldiers then fired an automatic weapon at them at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait. This jihadi killed two officers and injured fourteen other soldiers.

-Jeffrey Leon Battle, one of the Portland Six tied to al-Kaida, joined the Army Reserves in order to learn how to kill American soldiers. On the fourth of October 2002 Jeffrey Leon Battle was arrested. According to the Justice Department, he planned to wage war against Americans in Afghanistan. On the second of December 2003, Battle pleaded guilty and received a sentence of 18 years in prison.

-In May of 2002, the federal agents arrested Semi Osman, a Mohamadan cleric and a mechanic in the Naval Reserves, as part of an investigation of a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Osman had access to fuel trucks like those employed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia 1996 that killed 19 U.S. airmen. In January 2003, he pleaded guilty to a weapons charge.

-Ali Mohamed, a secret member of Islamic Jihad, enlisted in the U.S. Army and reached the rank of sergeant. He taught a class on Islamic perceptions of America to special forces at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. He also taught at the JFK Special Operations Warfare School where he stole classified military documents. After leaving the Army in 1989, he joined al-Kaida. He spent the 1990s traveling around the world helping plot jihadist operations. The FBI finally arrested him in 1998. He pleaded guilty to conspiring with Osama Bin Laden to attack Western targets.

-John Allen Muhammad was mechanic, truck driver and specialist metalworker in the Louisiana National Guard and later in the U.S. Army. He earned commendations for marksmenship which used to shoo t and kill ten civilians and wounded three other in the autumn of 2002 in the metropolitan area of Washington, DC.

A person need only read any of the numerous violently totalitarian scriptures serving as the foundation of Islam. These Islamic plots to murder Americans, civilians and armed forces personnel, and undermine national security further highlight the danger of allowing Mohamadans into the organizations sworn to protect the United States. How many more treacherous savages have to infiltrate American armed forces then slaughter the true defenders of freedom before the U.S. government bars these hostile barbarians from its military?

COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Sympathy for a Devil

This author has been accused of promoting hatred of Mohamadans. I have been criticized for automatically concluding that Islamists are guilty of committing acts of war and terrorism against the Free World. "Never mind that the overwhelming number of bombings across the world, both of the suicidal and homicidal varieties, occur in furtherance of the jihad," say Islamists and their useful idiots. So do they have a point that the goons holding a Koran in one hand while torching churches and the Christians inside them or while vandalizing Jewish-owned business or cemeteries did not constitute a concerted effort by Islamists to attack infidels? In an attempt at cultural sensitivity, conflict resolution and reconciliation with Mohamadans, I will serve as the defense attorney in the court of public opinion for Najibullah Zazi, the Mohamadan in the United States recently arrested for involvement with a terrorist plot targeting New York. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/national/main5321252.shtml?tag=stack)

Has anyone considered the possibility all of his secretive dealings were an effort to surprise New Yorkers? On the eighth anniversary of the jihadist attacks on the World Trade Center, maybe he was planning a citywide gift distribution. After consulting a list of traditional gifts for anniversaries, Zazi could have been secretly arranging the placement of improvised explosive devices in pottery or bronze receptacles through the city. The residents could have been greeted with lovely gunpowder-fueled displays spelling out "I heart NY" in shrapnel. Perhaps he preferred the modern suggestion of lace or linen so we can deduce what he had in mind: new burkas for every woman in the city! So, FBI, are you happy now that you ruined the surprise for everyone? What a bunch of spoilsports!

Did the FBI consider the possibility that Zazi's reference to an actual, planned wedding was, in fact, legitimate but just not recognized under the American legal system? News out of Sudan showed that Islamists do not discriminate against people with an alternative sexual orientation(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm)Moral relativists certainly should demand that the FBI display a higher level of tolerance for this cultural aspect of Islam, in addition to other cherished Islamic practices like female genital mutilation, wife-beating and murder of rape victims. Once again, Americans have demonstrated their bigotry toward sexual minorities!

Undoubtedly, people in the United States will label Zazi as an "extremist" or a "radical" adherent of Islam. A more unfounded accusation could not be hurled at him. Zazi has faithfully devoted himself to following the tenets and commandments of the Koran. He has not strayed into un-Islamic activities like befriending infidels, repairing vandalized churches or synagogues, protesting against terrorism, composing music or creating works of art like sculptures or portraits. Therefore, those who have besmirched his allegiance to Allah should acknowledge Zazi's commitment to true Islam!

Is it too much to ask for Americans to view the situation from Zazi's point of view? We should consider his unease about seeing his relatives for the upcoming the celebration of Eid al-Fitr. He would have had to face yet another plethora of irritating comments from his parents such as "Your older brother Mohamad killed three infidels and one apostate during Ramadan. That's more than you killed all year! Even your younger brother Mohamad martyred himself last month. Why can't you stop being such a slacker and act like your brothers?" Due to his shirking of his responsibilities to Allah and Mohamad, Zazi's parents will not give him that brand new explosive vest on which he has had eye for months now. Instead, he will have to settle for a box cutter as the gift from his parents. That kind of torture would not be permitted by the United Nations yet we expect that this young man to suffer like this? Have you no heart, Americans?

I would like to offer a compromise. We should allow him to behead a few members of Code Pink or the John Adams Project to placate his demanding parents. The members of those groups would just blame the slayings on George Bush, Israel's existence, global warming or any other culprit except for Islam. So what would be the problem?

In conclusion, I wish to all my devoted Mohamadan readers, HAVE AN EXPLOSIVE EID AL-FITR!

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009

Persecution of Patriots

Hidden by the ongoing debate and protests over the proposed socialization of the American health care system in addition to the recent death of the man responsible for Mary Jo Kopechne's death, the Obama administration has started its torment of the defenders of American security. The Obama regime has been returning political favors to those that supported his campaign. Among these are the self-loathing Americans who want the United States to accept defeat and retreat on all of fronts in the Islamic war against the Free World. Therefore, the Obamaniacs have demanded that their messiah's henchmen unsheathe their daggers then plunge them into the exposed backs of patriots combating jihadis.

American service personnel have already been forced to concede to Islamists' demands regarding the treatment of the jihadis. American tax dollars were spent to provide a Koran, prayer rug and prayer beads to every captured jihadi. This funding of religious instruction exists in addition to the highly expensive provision of halal meals to cater to the savages' tastes. All of this undeserved treatment of these criminals flies in the face of the Geneva Convention. None of these goons were wearing a distinguishable military uniform while engaged in such activities as firing on American and allied forces, planting explosives and other acts of war.

There is no precedent for this appeasement of Islamists' demands for undeserved treatment. German prisoners during the Second World War never received free copies of Mein Kempf during their captivity. During that same war, the few Japanese soldiers captured by American were not issued any means to commit ritualistic suicide as their ideology mandated. Additionally, captured communist forces during the wars in Korea and Vietnam never were issued copies of The Communist Manifesto or any other Marxist literature supplied by the country that they sought to defeat. One must ask why do adherents to Islam deserve complementary implements of their ideology when adherents to other strains of totalitarianism were denied similar luxuries. Not only were Axis and Communist forces never pampered in captivity, those who engaged in military operations while not in uniform were frequently executed. Anyone involved in acts of sabotage or other hostility while not in uniform are considered as spies; those have no protections under the Geneva Convention. Instead of bowing down to Allah five times per day, these jihadis should reserve some gratitude for Uncle Sam for his naive and short-sighted magnanimity.

So what practices have drawn the ire of the useful idiots more concerned about pleasing Islamists than preventing further acts of jihad against the United States? Some of these prisoners were strip-searched, had ink smeared on their faces, were held in solitary confinement, were deprived of shoes, had cigar smoke blown in their faces or saw an interrogator squat over, stand on or kick a Koran. Can anyone hand-wringing over these incidents name just one person who has ever died or suffered disabling injuries from any of these actions?

Mohamad al-Kahtani, the would-be twentieth hijacker of the plot on the eleventh of September in 2001, faced annoyances such as sleep deprivation, exposure to cold and insults to female members of his family. Many of the members of the American armed forces have endured the same treatment during their training. When will any member of the ACLU or any other jihadi-coddling group lift a finger to halt to rough treatment meted out to American service personnel?

In a pursuit of justice, someone should conduct of poll of survivors of jihadist violence. The question would ask, “Would you rather undergo the same treatment suffered by the prisoners at GITMO or would prefer the fate of the passengers of the hijacked planes and by the occupants of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?” Maybe such an undertaking would open the eyes of the “Hate America First” crowd to see the folly of their myopic and self-destructive agenda.

COPYRIGHT CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009

Religious Indoctrination Led to Murder

A murder occurring this week has not caused a huge nation-wide outrage that it merits. A blatant act of terrorism occurred in the United States, in broad daylight and front of witnesses that demonstrates the gall of the murderer. A violent religious fanatic fatally shot a man simply because that man had training in and engaged in a legal profession. Granted, the victim’s form of employment has raised controversy in some narrow-minded social circles. Although these virulent critics would viciously accuse the victim of engaging in murder, he had not done so under any definition of American jurisprudence. The victim was never arrested for nor charged with any homicides. Despite those circumstances, a blood-thirsty zealot assumed the role of judge, jury and executioner.

American society cannot survive such unapologetic aggression based on a malevolent ideology masquerading as religion. Apparently, this assassin believes that he had divine sanction for his blatant and pre-meditated murder. Undoubtedly, he will defend his action by quoting his faith’s scriptures. This trial will display the oppressive bigotry of the murder’s ilk, bent on imposing their despotic theocracy on the entire United States of America. People who cherish the freedom to live their lives without the shackles of the murderer’s hateful constraints can no longer remain silent. Do the American people want a representative democracy that functions under the rule of law determined by the consent of the governed and not by the dictates of practitioners of an intolerant ideology which originated in the Middle East more than a millennium ago?

The myopic sheep of his congregation will likely distance themselves from this crime, at least, publicly. A few might openly condemn his act. However, away from cameras and prying eyes of non-believers, they will smile, laugh and shout his praises for slaughtering a man that they all loathed. They will strive to assure the country that his actions do not represent their movement’s true intentions and that the killer had strayed from their guidance into extremism. The adherents’ spokesmen have mastered duplicitous statements that fool the bulk of non-believers. Too many gullible Americans so desperately want to avoid conflict that they swallow the double-speak despite glaring inconsistencies. Eventually, that forced consumption of disinformation will lead to either the expectoration of the multitude of lies or irrevocable asphyxiation. Sadly, a significant number of the alleged intellectuals among the media, academia and other spheres of influence have already succumbed to the latter, leading to their obvious brain-dead status.

In conclusion, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad’s murder of Private William Long at an Army-Navy recruiting office in Little Rock, Arkansas should remind all Americans that jihadis do not exist and operate solely in backwaters in which Islam reigns. This latest act of Islamic aggression directed at a defender of freedom should serve notice that those residing in the United States must maintain vigilance against future incidents of savagery. Additionally, this incident underscores the necessity of the total elimination of the malignancy from the entire world, starting within the borders of the United States of America.

COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Timely Reminder

Among the ongoing debates within the Obama Administration and the rest of the American society about the fate of the war criminals detained at Guantanamo Bay, jihadis reminded those paying attention why the facility exists in the first place. Four career criminals were in the process of waging jihad in New York. In the nearly eight years since the Islamic terrorists destroyed the World Trade Center, the Koran and its exhortations to violence and oppression of non-Mohamadans have not changed. The Islamists' will to impose Islamic dictates on the Free World has not evaporated either.

The continued detainment of jihadis at Guantanamo Bay does inspire other Mohamadans to respond to calls for jihad, as well as it should. If they die in the process of killing non-Mohamadans, they believe an eternity in a free bordello awaits them. If they succeed in murdering so-called "infidels" yet survive the attacks, they will be hailed as heroes throughout the Islamic bloc. If they are captured in the process of jihad, they will be rewarded with three halal meals per day plus a Koran, prayers beads and rug in addition to exercise equipment and furnished living quarters, all paid for by the suicidally naive U.S. government. With these three possible outcomes serving as the only consequences of engaging in jihad versus Americans, one must wonder why all Mohamadan males are not pursuing this path to limitless sex, fame or leisure.

This latest Islamic plot to attack Americans also raises an inexplicable phenomenon. The sheer stupidity of permitting Islamic clerics to enter American prisons stands out as astounding act of national self-immolation. These Islamists prey on criminals who already have little to no regard for the lives and property of law-abiding Americans. The Islamists give them an excuse for their rage against democracy, capitalism and freethinking. Then they encapsulate their lusts for murder, theft and rape by justifying such crimes as permissible by following the example of Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in hell forever) as recorded in the Koran and the hadiths.

Never in the history of the United States were enemy agents allowed to enter the country so openly and operate so freely as during this current war. The Nazi regime was not allowed to send representatives to scour Depression-era American jails for potential recruits for the SS or Wehrmacht. Without a doubt, Americans with Fascist or Marxist sympathies cruised "Hoovervilles" to stir up anti-republicanism or anti-capitalism. However, they did not do so with explicit approval of federal, state or local governmental sanction. The politically-correct acquiescence to Islamists' demands will continue to produce future enemy agents bent on murder and destruction within the United States. Prison authorities or the politicians controlling the funds supporting those authorities must halt this treacherous permissiveness before more home-grown jihadis strike again.

COPYRIGHT MAY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Lowering of Defenses

President Obama's catering to Islamists and their useful idiots among the hand-wringing and spineless Hate America crowd has already born bitter fruit. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29042139) In 2000, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri led a covert operation to destroy an American warship, the USS Cole. Despite this clear act of war, he will not face charges in a military tribunal. Unfortunately, this savage, along with the hundreds of other jihadis in American custody will be treated as mere common criminals instead of what they truly are. They operate as members of a hostile army with the exception of no distinguishable uniform. The most consideration these jihads deserve is a trial by military tribunal. They refuse to conform to the protocols of the Geneva Convention. Therefore, they have no right to claim any protections afforded to legitimate POWs. What this savage and the others of his ilk should receive is simple: a bungee-jump with the tether wrapped around their necks.

COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Victory for Islam?

Does Senator Barrack Hussein Obama's election to the presidency of the U.S.A. equate to a victory for Islamists? Here are some points confirming or opposing that:

FOR
1. As a candidate, he openly stated opposition to the continuation of the U.S. involvement in the Iraqi theater of operations in Islam's war on the Free World. He has said he wants to withdraw U.S. forces in short order, regardless of the level of preparation of the current Iraqi government to assume full authority. The inevitable catastrophe which would result if Islamists topple the popularly-elected officials was not even addressed during the campaign.
2. Obama attended Islamic schools in his pre-teen years. Those years of indoctrination have either made him friendly toward Islam or resentful of the forced immersion in an Islamic cesspool. He has not publicly proclaimed any negativity toward Islam.
3. Obama possessed enough political savvy to deny any affiliation to Islam during the campaign. Now that he has been elected, he does not have to worry about raising anxiety of Americans about the possibility of a Mohamedan in charge of their country.
4. He has been highly critical of the detention of jihadis at Guantanamo Bay. If he follows through on his statements uttered to the appeasement movement, he will give them rights accorded to U.S. citizens in criminal trials, despite their ineligibility for protection for those or even those granted to prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention. He will order the release of some, if not all, detainees without even bringing them to trial to placate the "Hate America First" crowd.
5. Under Islamic law, anyone born to a Mohamadan is automatically considered as a Mohamadan. Therefore, Obama is a Mohamadan since his father was openly Mohamadan. Islamic law does not consider the fact that his mother was not Mohamadan since the mother's faith is not relevant in their opinions and Mohamadan women are not allowed to marry non-Mohamadans. Will Islamists call for Obama's murder in accordance with the Koranic verse
4:89?

AGAINST
1. Obama has publicly stated that he is not Mohamadan. No evidence of his involvement in Islamic organizations or even membership in a mosque has been brought to public attention.
2. Obama has declared his intention to hunt down Osama bin Laden, even sending American forces into Pakistan if necessary to accomplish that.

After weighing both sides, it is still not possible to read Obama's mind. We can only judge his statements and actions. Also, we have to stay vigilant and active to ensure that he does not further the agenda of the Islamists and their useful idiots.

COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.