Posts
Muzzammil Hassan unwittingly undermined the disinformation spewed forth by Bridges TV, his television station. His actions demonstrated the truth of the repressive and violent basis of Islamic marriages. Hassan's brutal treatment of his wife stands as just another tragic example in a historical legacy of Islam's misogyny, both verbal and physical. Whether the tales involve women resisting Islamic marriages or attempting to escape from them, sadly the fate of a woman is all too often the same: viciously violent death, usually at the hands of their husband or of her blood relatives.
These unions result from fathers arranging marriages for their daughters to the highest bidder or to whomever the father wants influence in future considerations. Marriage exists as a formal declaration of dominion of a man over a woman. It merely announces that a woman has submitted to the control of her husband and what compensation her father gained for relinquishing his authority over her. No thought is given to the "decadent, infidel notions" of "mutual respect", "consent", "romantic love" or "reciprocated affinity".
Why would Mohamadans hold any of those ideals with any esteem? After all, their namesake and role-model certainly did not. His early marriages to wealthy widows resulted from the need to indulge in his gold-digging urges. His later marriage to Aisha, a nine year girl, fed his pedophiliac desires. He collected numerous wives with casual avarice, only concerned with how his possession of them would satisfy his whims. A co-equal and monogamous relationship with a woman would have been viewed as an anathama to Mohamed ibn Abdullah just as representative democracy, use of underarm deodorant and daily bathing are to Islamists.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
French Collaboration, 21st Century Style
A small but significant percentage of the French population actively collaborated with the Nazi authorities following France's capitulation to Germany in 1940. These traitors included police officers who hunted down Jews and others who openly opposed to the fascist regime and sent them to the death camps. Sadly, this shamefully practice of acquiescing to totalitarians has experienced a renaissance in France.
As reported by the television network, France 2, ( http://jt.france2.fr/20h) on its 8 PM news broadcast on February 11, the French government requested that the Catholic University of Paris set up training for "Imams of the Republic". This program includes four hundred hours of classes including law, history and religion. The justification for this certification was stated as the government's need for representatives considered as "legitimate" by the "faithful", meaning Mohamedans in France. These representatives supposedly will become dedicated to French values of liberty, equality, fraternity and secularism. Apparently, non-Mohamedan officers lack the acumen to halt the practice of torching cars and of vandalizing businesses whenever the Mohamedans feel slighted by some cartoons or one of the own is injured or killed while committing criminal acts. Most egregious of all is the traitorous complicity of this Catholic university with the same savages who would eliminate it under a revived caliphate. Obviously, kowtowing to Islamists trumps any commitment to avoid church-state interactions.
The report features a graduate of the program, Mohamed Ali Bouharb, the first leader of "Moslem harmony" within the police department. He claimed that the text of the Koran has different contexts in different societies. He made such a statement either out of utter ignorance or deliberate dishonesty since the Koran clearly states that Islam must reign over the entire world with uniformity and opposes factionalism or dissension. Islamists vehemently object to the translation of the Koran from its seventh century Arabian Peninsular dialect into any other languages; how could anyone honestly believe that Islam can be molded into varying forms to fit into different societies?
The commitment to a Frenchified, secular role for this officer and other government-trained Islamic clerics seems absurd, at best. He claims commitment to secularism while proudly showing off the crescent moon on his uniform hat. Displayed very prominently in his office at his workplace, one can see a prayer rug laid on the floor and a Koran on his desk. Hypocritically, the French government baned the wearing of Islamic head-rags in public schools since they were labelled as "distracting". In contrast, this governmental employee is permitted to openly flaunt his Islamic affiliation and received taxpayer-funded training related to Islam. Granted that the head-rags stand out as an obvious sign of the repressive nature of Islam yet the adolescent girls wearing them were unlikely to carry firearms and certainly lacked the power to arrest anyone. This officer would have both the weapons and the cover of legal authority in his arsenal to threaten someone critical of Islam.
Where is Charles Martel when France desperately needs him again? Hopefully, his spirit of resistance will imbue someone with the courage to resist this and all other forms of Sharia-creep. Otherwise, France will continue to slide into the abyss of Islamification.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
As reported by the television network, France 2, ( http://jt.france2.fr/20h) on its 8 PM news broadcast on February 11, the French government requested that the Catholic University of Paris set up training for "Imams of the Republic". This program includes four hundred hours of classes including law, history and religion. The justification for this certification was stated as the government's need for representatives considered as "legitimate" by the "faithful", meaning Mohamedans in France. These representatives supposedly will become dedicated to French values of liberty, equality, fraternity and secularism. Apparently, non-Mohamedan officers lack the acumen to halt the practice of torching cars and of vandalizing businesses whenever the Mohamedans feel slighted by some cartoons or one of the own is injured or killed while committing criminal acts. Most egregious of all is the traitorous complicity of this Catholic university with the same savages who would eliminate it under a revived caliphate. Obviously, kowtowing to Islamists trumps any commitment to avoid church-state interactions.
The report features a graduate of the program, Mohamed Ali Bouharb, the first leader of "Moslem harmony" within the police department. He claimed that the text of the Koran has different contexts in different societies. He made such a statement either out of utter ignorance or deliberate dishonesty since the Koran clearly states that Islam must reign over the entire world with uniformity and opposes factionalism or dissension. Islamists vehemently object to the translation of the Koran from its seventh century Arabian Peninsular dialect into any other languages; how could anyone honestly believe that Islam can be molded into varying forms to fit into different societies?
The commitment to a Frenchified, secular role for this officer and other government-trained Islamic clerics seems absurd, at best. He claims commitment to secularism while proudly showing off the crescent moon on his uniform hat. Displayed very prominently in his office at his workplace, one can see a prayer rug laid on the floor and a Koran on his desk. Hypocritically, the French government baned the wearing of Islamic head-rags in public schools since they were labelled as "distracting". In contrast, this governmental employee is permitted to openly flaunt his Islamic affiliation and received taxpayer-funded training related to Islam. Granted that the head-rags stand out as an obvious sign of the repressive nature of Islam yet the adolescent girls wearing them were unlikely to carry firearms and certainly lacked the power to arrest anyone. This officer would have both the weapons and the cover of legal authority in his arsenal to threaten someone critical of Islam.
Where is Charles Martel when France desperately needs him again? Hopefully, his spirit of resistance will imbue someone with the courage to resist this and all other forms of Sharia-creep. Otherwise, France will continue to slide into the abyss of Islamification.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Friday, February 6, 2009
Lowering of Defenses
President Obama's catering to Islamists and their useful idiots among the hand-wringing and spineless Hate America crowd has already born bitter fruit. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29042139) In 2000, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri led a covert operation to destroy an American warship, the USS Cole. Despite this clear act of war, he will not face charges in a military tribunal. Unfortunately, this savage, along with the hundreds of other jihadis in American custody will be treated as mere common criminals instead of what they truly are. They operate as members of a hostile army with the exception of no distinguishable uniform. The most consideration these jihads deserve is a trial by military tribunal. They refuse to conform to the protocols of the Geneva Convention. Therefore, they have no right to claim any protections afforded to legitimate POWs. What this savage and the others of his ilk should receive is simple: a bungee-jump with the tether wrapped around their necks.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Bigger Fish to Fry?
In the wake of the Israeli Defense Force's squandered opportunity to obliterate HAMAS, we can only hope that the halt is due to another more dangerous threat. Instead of resolving the situation of regularly launched missiles into Israeli civilian areas from the Gaza Strip, there may exist the likelihood of fewer yet more dangerous missiles from Iran. A homeowner should cease squashing flies infesting his/her home when scorpions are on the verge of invading.
This week, the Iranian regime has launched a satellite, proving it does possess the technology to launch other, more menacing items too. This action has made the security situation clear: the Free World must act now before Iranian missiles start raining down on Israel and other civilized countries. How long before Iranian missiles will be fitted with biological or chemical weapons? Will the world soon find out the true purpose of Iran's allegedly "peaceful" use nuclear technology to attach nuclear warheads to these missiles?(http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iran-satellite4-2009feb04,0,4385361.story )
The nominal leader of Iran, Mahmoud Akhmadinewhackjob, has betrayed his regime's true intentions in past statements. His blatant anti-Israeli rhetoric, including questioning the historical veracity of the Nazis' genocidal activities aimed at Jews, demonstrates his commitment to the ongoing jihad against Jews. He spouts Islamic rhetoric, straight from the most virulent verses of the Koran. As reprehensibly evil as Mohamad ibn Abdullah, the fabricator of Islam, was, he never possessed the power to destroy tens of thousands of people in a matter of minutes. For that reason, the time to act, not negotiate with savages or deny reality, has arrived.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
This week, the Iranian regime has launched a satellite, proving it does possess the technology to launch other, more menacing items too. This action has made the security situation clear: the Free World must act now before Iranian missiles start raining down on Israel and other civilized countries. How long before Iranian missiles will be fitted with biological or chemical weapons? Will the world soon find out the true purpose of Iran's allegedly "peaceful" use nuclear technology to attach nuclear warheads to these missiles?(http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iran-satellite4-2009feb04,0,4385361.story )
The nominal leader of Iran, Mahmoud Akhmadinewhackjob, has betrayed his regime's true intentions in past statements. His blatant anti-Israeli rhetoric, including questioning the historical veracity of the Nazis' genocidal activities aimed at Jews, demonstrates his commitment to the ongoing jihad against Jews. He spouts Islamic rhetoric, straight from the most virulent verses of the Koran. As reprehensibly evil as Mohamad ibn Abdullah, the fabricator of Islam, was, he never possessed the power to destroy tens of thousands of people in a matter of minutes. For that reason, the time to act, not negotiate with savages or deny reality, has arrived.
COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Turning rabid dogs into a respectable species
Newly inaugurated President Barack Hussein Obama has initiated the process of weakening counter-jihad measures at the disposal of the U.S.A. Whether or not his executive orders emanate from treachery, gullibility or pressure from Islamists and their useful idiots remains to be seen. Regardless, he has hamstrung those attempting to defend the U.S.A.
As reported yesterday, (www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28788175) jihadis will be granted the same rights as prisoners of war (POWs). This decision disregards the fact that these jihadis and others on the loose have been conducting military operations without wearing a distinguishable uniform. Under the Geneva Convention regarding POWs, anyone engaged in military actions while not in uniform is considered as a spy. Spies are specifically exempted from the protections of the Geneva Convention. Therefore, the Barack Hussein Obama regime has granted jihadis the gift of selectively favorable application of the conventions of war. Now, they have the best of both worlds: greater ease of conducting bombings, assassinations and other forms of covert operations while now having the security of knowing they will be treated as legitimate armed forces' personnel and the protections which accompany that designation. So what will happen to the jihadis held at Guantanamo Bay? Will those released follow the others who have been released to rejoin the jihad? Dick Morris reported in his latest book, Fleeced, that ten percent of the freed jihadis were recaptured or killed while attacking American or allied forces. What horrible acts will the released jihadis commit upon release?
Instead of trying the jihadis in criminal trials or simply releasing them, the Administration should implement of policy of de-Islamization. POWs from Axis Power regimes held by American forces during World War Two attended classes to refute and undermine years of fascist propaganda to which those detainees had been exposed and forced to parrot. After being forced to examine Islamic beliefs and doctrines in an environment other than a mosque or madrassa, some jihadis may question their willingness to kill and destroy for Allah and Mohamad (may he burn in hell forever).
Granted, some of the jihadis have been so thoroughly brainwashed that it would not be humanly possible to enlighten them. We can only hope and demand that those remain imprisoned permanently, if not executed. Turning loose these savages would be as insanely dangerous as releasing rabid dogs from quarantine.
COPYRIGHT JANUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
As reported yesterday, (www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28788175) jihadis will be granted the same rights as prisoners of war (POWs). This decision disregards the fact that these jihadis and others on the loose have been conducting military operations without wearing a distinguishable uniform. Under the Geneva Convention regarding POWs, anyone engaged in military actions while not in uniform is considered as a spy. Spies are specifically exempted from the protections of the Geneva Convention. Therefore, the Barack Hussein Obama regime has granted jihadis the gift of selectively favorable application of the conventions of war. Now, they have the best of both worlds: greater ease of conducting bombings, assassinations and other forms of covert operations while now having the security of knowing they will be treated as legitimate armed forces' personnel and the protections which accompany that designation. So what will happen to the jihadis held at Guantanamo Bay? Will those released follow the others who have been released to rejoin the jihad? Dick Morris reported in his latest book, Fleeced, that ten percent of the freed jihadis were recaptured or killed while attacking American or allied forces. What horrible acts will the released jihadis commit upon release?
Instead of trying the jihadis in criminal trials or simply releasing them, the Administration should implement of policy of de-Islamization. POWs from Axis Power regimes held by American forces during World War Two attended classes to refute and undermine years of fascist propaganda to which those detainees had been exposed and forced to parrot. After being forced to examine Islamic beliefs and doctrines in an environment other than a mosque or madrassa, some jihadis may question their willingness to kill and destroy for Allah and Mohamad (may he burn in hell forever).
Granted, some of the jihadis have been so thoroughly brainwashed that it would not be humanly possible to enlighten them. We can only hope and demand that those remain imprisoned permanently, if not executed. Turning loose these savages would be as insanely dangerous as releasing rabid dogs from quarantine.
COPYRIGHT JANUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Pounding HAMAS into Hummus
Israel has an opportunity to rid itself of the perennial hemorrhoid called HAMAS. Actually, the destruction of this group of murderous jihadis would benefit the rest of the Free World. If Hezbollah continues to launch attacks from Lebanon into Israel, then the same treatment should be meted out to those savages also.
This toughest aspect of this endeavour is resisting the temptation to cave into the demands of the hand-wringing numskulls in the mainstream media and the anti-Jewish elements in positions of political power throughout Europe & North America. Islamists and members of the Appeasement Movement are whining about Mohamadans killed or injured by Israeli counter-attacks. However, they were noticeably silent when HAMAS' provocative attacks killed and injured Israelis, predominately civilians. Do not mistake their concern for the suffering of Mohamadans as concern for all human beings in this conflict. They have obviously aligned themselves with the jihadis in this conflict.
Therefore, this posting stands as a bit of unsolicited advice to all Israelis: DO NOT STOP UNTIL HAMAS IS OBLITERATED! That means every member that can be found must be killed, especially those in positions of power within the organization. Under no circumstances should ANY cease-fire take place. That would only allow the jihadis more time to smuggle in more weapons, other supplies and possibly foreign fighters to continue their attacks. Do not delay operations for any humanitarian reasons to benefit the Mohamadans. They will not hate you any less, no matter how much civility or charity you display toward the savages.
COPYRIGHT JANUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
This toughest aspect of this endeavour is resisting the temptation to cave into the demands of the hand-wringing numskulls in the mainstream media and the anti-Jewish elements in positions of political power throughout Europe & North America. Islamists and members of the Appeasement Movement are whining about Mohamadans killed or injured by Israeli counter-attacks. However, they were noticeably silent when HAMAS' provocative attacks killed and injured Israelis, predominately civilians. Do not mistake their concern for the suffering of Mohamadans as concern for all human beings in this conflict. They have obviously aligned themselves with the jihadis in this conflict.
Therefore, this posting stands as a bit of unsolicited advice to all Israelis: DO NOT STOP UNTIL HAMAS IS OBLITERATED! That means every member that can be found must be killed, especially those in positions of power within the organization. Under no circumstances should ANY cease-fire take place. That would only allow the jihadis more time to smuggle in more weapons, other supplies and possibly foreign fighters to continue their attacks. Do not delay operations for any humanitarian reasons to benefit the Mohamadans. They will not hate you any less, no matter how much civility or charity you display toward the savages.
COPYRIGHT JANUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Victory for Islam?
Does Senator Barrack Hussein Obama's election to the presidency of the U.S.A. equate to a victory for Islamists? Here are some points confirming or opposing that:
FOR
1. As a candidate, he openly stated opposition to the continuation of the U.S. involvement in the Iraqi theater of operations in Islam's war on the Free World. He has said he wants to withdraw U.S. forces in short order, regardless of the level of preparation of the current Iraqi government to assume full authority. The inevitable catastrophe which would result if Islamists topple the popularly-elected officials was not even addressed during the campaign.
2. Obama attended Islamic schools in his pre-teen years. Those years of indoctrination have either made him friendly toward Islam or resentful of the forced immersion in an Islamic cesspool. He has not publicly proclaimed any negativity toward Islam.
3. Obama possessed enough political savvy to deny any affiliation to Islam during the campaign. Now that he has been elected, he does not have to worry about raising anxiety of Americans about the possibility of a Mohamedan in charge of their country.
4. He has been highly critical of the detention of jihadis at Guantanamo Bay. If he follows through on his statements uttered to the appeasement movement, he will give them rights accorded to U.S. citizens in criminal trials, despite their ineligibility for protection for those or even those granted to prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention. He will order the release of some, if not all, detainees without even bringing them to trial to placate the "Hate America First" crowd.
5. Under Islamic law, anyone born to a Mohamadan is automatically considered as a Mohamadan. Therefore, Obama is a Mohamadan since his father was openly Mohamadan. Islamic law does not consider the fact that his mother was not Mohamadan since the mother's faith is not relevant in their opinions and Mohamadan women are not allowed to marry non-Mohamadans. Will Islamists call for Obama's murder in accordance with the Koranic verse
4:89?
AGAINST
1. Obama has publicly stated that he is not Mohamadan. No evidence of his involvement in Islamic organizations or even membership in a mosque has been brought to public attention.
2. Obama has declared his intention to hunt down Osama bin Laden, even sending American forces into Pakistan if necessary to accomplish that.
After weighing both sides, it is still not possible to read Obama's mind. We can only judge his statements and actions. Also, we have to stay vigilant and active to ensure that he does not further the agenda of the Islamists and their useful idiots.
COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
FOR
1. As a candidate, he openly stated opposition to the continuation of the U.S. involvement in the Iraqi theater of operations in Islam's war on the Free World. He has said he wants to withdraw U.S. forces in short order, regardless of the level of preparation of the current Iraqi government to assume full authority. The inevitable catastrophe which would result if Islamists topple the popularly-elected officials was not even addressed during the campaign.
2. Obama attended Islamic schools in his pre-teen years. Those years of indoctrination have either made him friendly toward Islam or resentful of the forced immersion in an Islamic cesspool. He has not publicly proclaimed any negativity toward Islam.
3. Obama possessed enough political savvy to deny any affiliation to Islam during the campaign. Now that he has been elected, he does not have to worry about raising anxiety of Americans about the possibility of a Mohamedan in charge of their country.
4. He has been highly critical of the detention of jihadis at Guantanamo Bay. If he follows through on his statements uttered to the appeasement movement, he will give them rights accorded to U.S. citizens in criminal trials, despite their ineligibility for protection for those or even those granted to prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention. He will order the release of some, if not all, detainees without even bringing them to trial to placate the "Hate America First" crowd.
5. Under Islamic law, anyone born to a Mohamadan is automatically considered as a Mohamadan. Therefore, Obama is a Mohamadan since his father was openly Mohamadan. Islamic law does not consider the fact that his mother was not Mohamadan since the mother's faith is not relevant in their opinions and Mohamadan women are not allowed to marry non-Mohamadans. Will Islamists call for Obama's murder in accordance with the Koranic verse
4:89?
AGAINST
1. Obama has publicly stated that he is not Mohamadan. No evidence of his involvement in Islamic organizations or even membership in a mosque has been brought to public attention.
2. Obama has declared his intention to hunt down Osama bin Laden, even sending American forces into Pakistan if necessary to accomplish that.
After weighing both sides, it is still not possible to read Obama's mind. We can only judge his statements and actions. Also, we have to stay vigilant and active to ensure that he does not further the agenda of the Islamists and their useful idiots.
COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)