Defeat Islam!

Out Go the Dictators and in Come the Islamists

2011-10-21T03:02:00.001-04:00

The fall of Kadaffy’s regime and his death marks the most recent end of a dictatorship within the Islamic bloc. Over the several decades since the end of Ottoman then European colonization of the Middle East and North Africa, such violent changes in governments have occurred on a regular basis. While one might hope that Kadaffy’s demise would lead to freedom and justice, onlookers must realize who is consolidating power in Libya now. The logo of the crescent moon and five-pointed star has been an omnipresent symbol among the rebels. That symbol indicates the antithesis of representative democracy and of equal rights for all people.

In Egypt, the autocracy of Hosni Mubarak came to an end earlier this year. Under this regime, Islamists such as the Mooslum Brotherhood could not participate in political campaigns. Thus, Islamists were unable to impose their totalitarian agenda on Egyptian society. The somewhat secular government of Mubarek merely discriminated against Christians by making construction of churches impossible for all intents and purposes. Since the tumult and the new government, Islamists have murdered and assaulted Christians along with vandalizing and destroying churches. Police and military personnel have permitted the jihadis’ crimes against Christians, including siding with the jihadis in committing atrocities then arresting Christians for defending themselves.

The fascist entity of Saddam Hussein never singled out Christians for persecution. Since the American and British-led coalition toppled the Baathists, Islamists have declared jihad on the three percent of the Iraki population, which Christians constitute. Rampant church bombings have driven a large portion of that minority into emigration.

Anyone searching for the model of what will become of post-dictatorial countries in the Middle East and North Africa needs to study Iran. This country under the non-Islamist absolute monarch called the Shah permitted women more freedom than any other within the Islamic bloc. Since the rise of the theocracy, rampant misogyny swept Iran. In a matter of weeks, women with successful careers and control over their lives ended up in suffocating outfits and confided to their homes.

An observer of politics among the nations subjugated by Islam should see more possible seizures of power by Islamists in Turkey. Its staunchly secular legal code has been eroded by the rising tide of Islamization. The current prime minster belongs to an openly Islamist political party. In fact, a wife of his insists on wearing a head-rag in public in defiance of Turkish law forbidding the centuries’ old display of women’s inferior status.

Syria also appears high on the list of imminent victims of Islamist takeover. Despite Bashir Assad’s continuation of his father’s legacy of virulent anti-Jewish policies, including funding jihadist murderers who attack Israel, the Islamists expect more. Nothing short of full implementation of sharia will satisfy Islamists who have organized protests in Damascus and elsewhere.

The nations of the Free World cannot force Mohamadans to renounce their totalitarianism. Additionally, the civilized countries of the world should not favor either side in conflicts between nominally Islamic dictators and blatant Islamists. As long as the supporters of those two factions are destroying each other, the rest of the world remains less of a target of jihad.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT OCTOBER 2011

Etiquette for Ramabomb

2011-07-31T18:14:00.004-04:00

In response to Mohamadans and their useful idiots who stipulate that civilized people cater to the absurd dictates of a seventh century criminal during Ramabomb, I am reprising this list of demands.

-Remove your burkas, nikabs, and all other suffocatingly misogynistic clothing that Islamists demand that every woman wear. We object to women being forced to hide under oppressive outfits because some men erroneously think that they cannot control their libidos. If Mohamadans refuse to control their little minarets, then they need to be deported to the infernal regions where Islam reigns supreme. These shroud-like outfits particularly gall those of us in the Free World during the summer when they exacerbate your noxious body odors.

-Leave your absurd superstitions like fear of sitting toilets and dogs plus your phobias of pork and alcohol in the Islamic bloc when you enter the Free World. We do not like to be told what we are allowed to eat or drink based on others’ delusions.

-Cease quoting from the Koran or any other Islamic texts that encouraged those terrorists to commit mass murder and condones their actions. We know that your supposedly sacred scriptures are full of hateful oppression directed toward us. We resent the threats which your ilk spews in reciting these totalitarian texts.

-Dispense with any absurd and baseless conspiracies that anyone other than nineteen Arab Mohamadans committed these crimes. At least have the decency to admit that your totalitarian cult wants to kill us.

-Stop the plan to build the monument at Ground Zero to the Islamic terrorists who carried out the hijackings. The same sentiments are directed toward the construction of any more terrorist recruiting and training centers. Whether you label them as a "mosk, "madrassa, "community center" or any other moniker makes no difference. Such constructions will provoke a formidable backlash against those who wish to gloat over our losses.

I wish a peaceful August to all civilized people. To all Mohamadans, I hope for your complete failure in all your attempts at violence, better known as jihad, during Ramabomb.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT JULY 2011

Questions for Christophobic Media

2011-07-30T20:57:00.001-04:00

The joy of several prominent media outlets in response to the mass murder in Oslo more than a week remains unmistakable. The New York Times proclaimed Anders Behring Breivik as a “Christian extremist”. CNN referred to him as a “Christian fundamentalist”. The Washington Post insinuated that he is a “Christian terrorist”. Even Islamists such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations have gleefully spouted such inanities in the promotion of their totalitarian agenda.
In response, I submit these questions to all the Christophobes among the media and those in the blogosphere.
1. What evidence do any of you possess that Breivik practiced Christianity such as membership in a church? How can you willfully ignore his reference to his oxymoronic term “Christian atheism” to describe himself? Why do you instinctively assign his motivations to his supposed Christianity but not to his atheism?
2. Can you cite any Christian scriptures, Biblical or otherwise, which explain his murderous spree? On what basis do you ascribe his crimes as fundamentally Christian considering that no words attributed to Christ condone murder?
3. Why are you so reluctant to label blatantly and fervently violent jihadis as adherents to and practitioners of Islam? Since Breivik’s rampage, two reminders of the peril of Islamic terrorism to the Free World have occurred. A jihadi, Abdulhakim Muhammad, who murdered Private William Andrew Long, a recruiter for the U.S. Army, in Memphis received a life sentence for his crime committed in June of 2009. Also, a Mohamadan soldier, Naser Abdo, abandoned his assignment in Kentucky and gather weapons for another jihadist slaughter at Fort Hood before being arrested this week. These stand out among numerous other episodes of attempted or actual episodes of Islamic terrorism in the United States.
4. Why do you erroneously deny that Islamic texts repeatedly sanction violence in furtherance of imposition and maintenance of Mohamadan hegemony? Why do you ignore blatant verses that do permit, even celebrate, violence against non-Mohamadans?
5. If Breivik was motivated by hatred of Islam, why were his targets decidedly non-Islamic? Why did he plant a bomb near the Prime Minister’s office and then go on a shooting spree at a Labor Party children’s day camp? Mosks and other obvious Islamic targets dominate the ghettos in eastern Oslo.
6. Why are none of you blaming his homicidal streak on anabolic steroids when you are willing to consider other criminals’ usage of alcohol, stimulants, Twinkies or other substances as the true motivating force behind their horrific deeds?

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT JULY 2011

Post-mortem on Osama Bin Laden

2011-05-04T03:55:00.001-04:00

Americans rightfully celebrated Osama Bin Laden’s demise. Now, they have returned to the routine of life under the continual threat of jihadist violence. This includes preparing for anticipated reprisals by Mohamadans seeking revenge for the death of their poster boy. Before closing this chapter of Islam’s war against the Free World, a bit of review and some plans for the future are needed.

Soon after seeing reports that American forces had killed Osama bin Laden, I initially questioned the whereabouts of his corpse. Eventually after scanning various channels for more than an hour, the journalists announced that his body had been dumped into the Arabian Sea. While awaiting confirmation, I began to formulate a suitable fate for the cadaver. Although the United States Navy has disposed of Bin Laden’s remains, I offer these suggestions, both as an exercise in retributive brainstorming and ideas for any other Islamists eradicated in the future.

The American government could have exploited his corpse as a prop for videos to dishearten jihadis. His carcass could have been shown with a beer in one hand and a pork chop in the other, sitting on a beach in a Speedo man-bikini, apparently gawking at sunbathing beauties. This would have included captions indicating that Obama had renounced Islam after realizing what a miserable existence that he had endured following the absurd dictates of a seventh century criminal from Arabia. This first proposal combines the film Weekend at Bernie’s with hedonistic Koranic portrayals of paradise spun by the fabricator of Islam.

The Navy Seals could have attached some underwater cameras to Bin Laden before they dumped his body. Arrangements for pay-per-viewing would have been established so people could have seen his remains. The segment of the population who enjoys so-called “reality shows” would have loved this type of broadcast. Perhaps those hungering for ultimate justice could have been satiated by watching aquatic life forms feasting on him. British Petroleum managed to submerge a camera to monitor its leaking oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico long before it found a solution to the problem. Why should the federal government not have generated some revenue from the former “Public Enemy Number One” considering all that he had cost us?

Another possibility of benefitting financially from Bin Laden’s departure for Hell involves selling the jihadi’s carcass. Uncle Sam would have placed his corpse up for public auction for museums to purchase with the proceeds going to paying for the costs of combating against his fellow jihadis. I prefer that alternative to raising taxes. His digestive tract would have been stuffed with scraps of rancid pork and his body dressed in an outfit made of dog fur after it had been embalmed.

Continuing in the vein of incorporating Bin Laden’s cadaver into efforts to raise revenue for the federal government, what if it were publicly displayed at Ground Zero? I envisage a spectacle similar to that inflicted on Benito Mussolini’s corpse after his execution. People would have paid a fee for five seconds with his body to spit upon, kick, punch or otherwise defile as long as they do not unsecure it from its moorings. I suspect that competitions would have occurred in which Americans wait in line for their opportunity to inflict humiliation then try to outperform those who have already had their chance. Repeat business would have resulted, thus, increasing the profits to pay down the debt from the anti-jihadist effort.

Perhaps a specific type of business would prefer to claim Bin Laden’s remains. A pork processing plant could have dumped his corpse in a pit which is used for disposal of swine excrement. That exhibit could have been turned into tourist attraction. The company could have made it the highlight of the tour of its facility. If breweries and candy-making operations can invite customers inside their plants for tours, why should a pork processor not follow the same model?

Osama Bin Laden’s body could have been buried somewhere in the United States with a public pay toilet installed on top of it. Not only would the tolls to use the toilet defray the costs of operating the facility, it could easily become a cash cow. Every civilized human being needs a toilet at some point. Why not use one that makes a statement against the savage whose ideology would have precluded the invention of an implementation of sanitation?

Finally, this operation has shattered any delusions of Pakistan’s importance in the struggle against jihadis. The Obama administration plus the American intelligence and armed forces conducted the operation to eliminate Bin Laden without involving or even informing Pakistan. Previous experiences have taught Americans that Islamists have infiltrated Pakistan’s military, intelligence services and law enforcement. With this in mind, all American aid to Pakistan should be halted immediately in order to stop funding this regime of double-talking backstabbers. Those who turned a blind eye to the presence of the most famous jihadi in the world for years inside a conspicuously high security compound in the vicinity of their capital should never receive another penny from the taxpayers of the United States.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT MAY 2011

Do Not Give Them Hell, Barry

2011-03-24T19:38:00.002-04:00

On the day after Nazi Germany declared war on Soviet Russia in 1941, Senator Harry Truman stated publicly: "If we see that Germany is winning, we ought to help Russia and if Russia is winning, we ought to help Germany, and that way let them kill as many as possible,” That type of proposal has been branded as cynical, callous and Machiavellian in addition to other negative labels. However, Truman’s wish for mutual destruction of the forces of two different totalitarian ideologies resonates even in the current century. Those who hold the security of the Free World and that of the United States in particular as paramount should be wary of involvement in the ongoing civil war in Libya.

People clamoring for military, financial and other forms of aid should delve deeper into the words and deeds to the insurgents in Libya. Those rebels are shouting “Allahu Akbar!”, the equivalent of “Sieg Heil!” for Nazis and “Destroy the bourgeoisie!” for Marxists. Granted, Muamar Kadaffy has funded and sheltered terrorists who have killed Americans. However, those seeking to topple him show clear indications of having Islamist agenda. Their flag sports the crescent moon and star, the most recognizable symbol of Islam. Kadaffy’s regime instituted a flag without any Islamic reference. Kadaffy’s police have not instituted wide-scale imposition of Sharia such as suffocating clothing for women or stoning for rape victims on the scale as can be seen daily in Saudi Arabia or in Iran. Have any of the cheerleaders for the rebellion considered that the victory of Kadaffy’s opponents could easily turn Libya into another base from which Islamists spawn jihadist terrorism in the future?

If Obama wants to topple a regime headed by terrorist-coddling thugs, why has he not supported the protestors in Iran? Kadaffy gave up its research program into developing weapons of mass destruction. In contrast, the theocrats in Tehran have accelerated their quest to obtain nuclear weapons. His regime’s legal status of women is somewhat permissive by the misogynistic standards of the other Islamic states in the region, especially Iran. Kadaffy has curtailed the anti-American vitriol over the past few years while the verbal venom from Mahmood Ahmadinejad has escalated. In short, support for the opposition in Iran could not result in a government more hostile to freedom and civilization than the one already in power.

It is glaringly logical for the leader of the Free World to avoid doing anything that would assist those who want to destroy liberty and subjugate free people. Truman commented about not committing exclusively to one side in the war between Nazis and Communists, hoping they would annihilate each other in the long run. Likewise, President Obama should heed this example from the past and go one rational step further: sit back and let totalitarians destroy each other without aiding any of them. That provides a bulwark against the victors in this intra-savage war from turning their aggression on the Free World.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT MARCH 2011

Goats' Head-butts and Crocodile Tears

2011-03-13T01:53:00.000-05:00

Representative Keith Ellison’s crocodile tears flowed freely in front of Congress and the general public last week. He lamented the death of a Mohamadan fireman caused by Ellison’s fellow Islamists on the eleventh of September in 2001. Evidently, Ellison could not be bothered to mention or mourn any of the other nearly three thousand others who were murdered by those sharing Ellison’s ideology. After all, the brutal extermination of non-Mohamadans is not something over which two goats will butt heads, as the fabricator of Islam was fond of saying.

So what else moves Ellison to tears and angry denunciations? Where was his overt display of grief over the non-Mohamadans slaughtered by the Nidal Malik Hasan at Fort Hood? When did he express indignation over the thousands of American armed forces personnel killed by jihadis? How many times did he decry the recent foiled bombing and murder plots by jihadis such as those directed at Fort Dix, in Times Square, at the Christmas tree lighting ceremony in Portland or in the vicinity of Wrigley Field and elsewhere? His lack of any similar outburst following these true crimes reveals his indifference to the suffering of those outside of his totalitarian cult.

What did Ellison accomplish with his opening of the water works? Only time will tell. He drew another card from the deck of perpetual Mohamadan victimhood and played it in front of the entire nation. His tantrum may succeed in squelching any further investigation of the Islamist agenda of undermining national security and general tranquility of the American public. Likely, he will add more irrelevant tear-jerking rants to halt improvements in security that focus on the most likely and recurring perpetrators of terrorism, his fellow Mohamadans. Given his Islam-supremacist viewpoints, any discomfort of or offense taken by Mohamadans supersede the peace of mind and right to live of infidels.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT MARCH 2011

Obama's Missed and Dismissed Opportunities

2011-02-01T15:11:00.000-05:00

The specter of a secret allegiance to Islam has hung over Obama since the presidential campaign of 2008. His membership in a church led by a racist and anti-American preacher did little to dismiss the speculation. His pronouncement of his Islamic middle name during his taking of the oath of office seemed like a taunt toward those questioning his affiliation. His Ameriphobic speech in Cairo threw into doubt whether he considered the United States as more of a threat to the world than Islamists whose goal is imposition of a world-wide caliphate, the Mohamadan version of a totalitarian regime. His reaction to uprisings in Islamic countries has further heightened the uncertainty over his true loyalty.

Obama has repeatedly shown his affinity for heavy-handed governmental policies. He and his wife want to dictate how and what people eat and what types of foods are permitted to be sold. He has hinted at suppression of media that have been used to express criticism of governmental officials or historical personalities. His administration has attempted to mandate how and on what Americans spend their money in terms of their own health. Obama and his underlings have committed multiple incidents of overreaching statist commandments while scoffing dismissively at proponents of individual freedom.

Islam manifests itself in similarly collectivist and dictatorial fashion. Islamists demand the banning of consumption of or even the presence of food which its adherents do not eat such as pork. Islamists expect to censor all media that question or criticize their ideology or the megalomaniac who fabricated it. Islamists demand that their cohorts and even non-Mohamadans hand over sums of money in order for redistribution to those deemed worthy by those Islamists in power. Proponents of Islam give its followers license to threaten and kill anyone impeding their seizure of power over societies, dismissing the very concept of freedom of religion, of speech and other inalienable liberties.

Obama has embraced the Egyptian protestors demanding the ousting of an autocratic yet non-Islamist regime. Mubarak would never be confused for a supporter of human rights or representative democracy. However, his government has maintained the bulwark against the tide of complete Islamization which has been overwhelming other areas in the Middle East and starting to infect Europe and North America. The unmistakable presence of the terrorists known as the Mooslum Brotherhood within the demonstrations demands that someone claiming to support democracy should not align himself with those jihadis.

In contrast, Obama refrained from publicly supporting demonstrators against the Islamic theocracy in Iran. Instead of doing anything to exhort those demonstrating against a regime hostile to the Free World, Obama remained mute. He could have fanned the flames of discontent within a hostile state, possibly resulting in the toppling of that totalitarian state. Someone looking out for the vested interests of the United States had an incentive to foment chaos in Iran, if only to disrupt and delay the Iranian program seeking nuclear weapons. The occupant of the White House ignored Rahm Emanual’s credo of “never letting a crisis go to waste” when presented with a chance to sabotage his country’s enemies while distancing himself from any association with Islam.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT JANUARY 2011

My Conflict with the Thought Police

2010-11-30T23:39:00.002-05:00

Last week, the Thought Police at Facebook disabled my account. Today, I opened the reply to my appeal to Facebook. It follows:

“Hi Charles,

After reviewing your situation, we have determined that you violated our Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Please note that content which contains hate speech or promotes violence is not allowed on the site.

As such, we will not be able to reactivate your account for any reason. Unfortunately, we cannot provide additional information as to why your account was disabled. This decision is final and cannot be appealed.

Thanks for your understanding,

Daphne
User Operations
Facebook”

I replied in this message:

“Daphne:

In response to your charges, I will reply to the first one. I admit that I despise Islam. That is due to my opposition to the sexual molestation of pre-pubescent girls, to a man having multiple wives and beating them and exploiting them as mere sexual outlets and to misogyny in general. All of the Mohamadan perpetrators of these hateful acts find support for their crimes in the Koran and other Islamic texts. Does Facebook consider these above criticism? Do you, Daphne, as a woman, not want to condemn such cruelties instead of silencing someone who exposes these outrages?

As for your second accusation, I have never promoted violence in any post on Facebook. I advocated the execution of those who murder. In accordance with the criminal justice system of my country, the United States of America, such a statement does not violate any law against promoting violence. If you or your website consider the administration of capital punishment as ‘violence’, then you must ban all Islamic groups and Mohamadan accounts in order to remain consistent to your principles. Islamic scriptures and those who adhere to them demand executions of people without even a trial by jury in front of an impartial judge, an attorney to represent the interest of the accused or the possibility of appeal. The calls for killing people include supposed crimes such as a woman who was raped facing execution for adultery or for a Mohamadan who renounces Islam.

This banishment from Facebook obviously stems from the concerted effort by Islamists to deny me the right to express my views. The group behind revolutionmuslim.com has targeted me along with other detractors of Islam and its creator. In June of this year, this website encouraged its readers to file complaints on Facebook against us in order to squelch any criticism to Islam. Does Facebook support the freedom of thought and expression or does it want to implement the totalitarian demands of Islamists?

Wishing you imminent enlightenment,

Charles Kastriot”

This is the reply I received:

“Hi Charles,

Unfortunately, your account has been permanently disabled for violating Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. We will not be able to reactivate it for any reason, nor will we provide further information about your violation or the systems we have in place. This decision is final and cannot be appealed.

Thanks,

Daphne
User Operations
Facebook”

The most disappointing aspect of this decision is the loss of contact with my friends. I have gained valuable insight and reassuring encouragement from many associates. I have connected with more than one thousand, six hundred civilized people who realize the imminent threat of Islam to freedom, human rights and representative government.

drivel from Mohamadan sheep named Ahle Tauheed

2010-10-15T03:18:00.002-04:00

Ahle Tauheed sent this message to me through Facebook on the fourth of October 2010 at 10:04 am:
"burn all u want u son of still u cnt erase the glorys quran u kafiir may allah curse u die a dogs death ameen"

My reply on the fifth of October at 12:48am follows:
"I have no intention of erasing the absurd collection of moronic rantings called the Koran. I enjoy using pages from Korans as toilet paper far too much. Enjoy spending eternity being sodomized by a pig and being roasted in Hell. The child-molesting and murderous thief who fabricated your laughable totalitarian ideology is already receiving such punishment for his lifetime of evil.

"Your ignorance of grammar, punctuation and spelling reveal your general cerebral atrophy. Years of Islamic brainwashing have token a tragic toll on your mind. I know as much, if not more, about Islam than you do. The difference lies in the fact that I criticize the sexual perversion, misogyny, violence and totalitarianism inherent to Islam while you embrace those evils."

On the ninth of October at 12:19pm, the savage sent this message:
"ist learn islam moron u dnt even know anthing abt islam what u will defeat it , dum blind and deaf, the world will hear ur moranic calls oh man u will regret th day will come u can sit like a enuch and make websitse and facebook accounts tht all u can u enuch u dnt even who whos ur father ur linage is like tht like pigs ur people beget and unlawful piglets like u are born no wonder u end up doing this enuck like thinks ,u willsuffer 100%"

On October 15 at 12:26am, I replied:
"Your ignorance of grammar, punctuation and spelling reveal your general cerebral atrophy. Years of Islamic brainwashing have token a tragic toll on your mind. I know as much, if not more, about Islam than you do. The difference lies in the fact that I criticize the sexual perversion, misogyny, violence and totalitarianism inherent to Islam while you embrace those evils."

Who Is Obfuscating Sharia?

2010-09-24T22:04:00.002-04:00

The residents of the Free World have arrived at a pivotal crossroads in the continuum of human history. However, not all members of this collective realize critical importance of their current location or even that history was ever plodding along with them included. Sadly, far too many do not realize that they find themselves at a juncture eerily similar to that of their parents and grandparents in the twentieth century.

I suspect that a majority of people living in North America and in Europe sense the menace festering within their respective countries. Certainly, only a tiny minority, just some Mohamadans and other dimwits in fact, deny the acts of war perpetrated by Mohamad Atta and his fellow hijackers in September of 2001, Nidal Malik Hassan at Fort Hood in 2009, or the jihadis’ bombings in Madrid in March of 2004 or in London in July of 2005. The recurring threats of Osama bin Laden, Anwar al-Awlaki, Anjem Choudary and other Islamist blowhards frequently remind anyone willing to pay attention of Islam’s malevolence. Even non-violent acts such as Feisal Abdul Rauf’s effort to build a monument to terrorism at Ground Zero grab the attention of conscientious people. However, efforts to propagate and impose Islam and its legal code, Sharia, occur in deceivingly forms hidden under condescension and dishonesty.

A recent example of the insidious efforts to camouflage the malignancy of Islam appeared on the Huffington Post website. On the third of September, 2010, Sumbul Ali-Karamali concocted a piece of Islamist disinformation entitled “Who’s Afraid of Sharia?” This authoress demonstrated takkiya, the Islamic practice of lying to infidels in order to benefit Mohamadans and their ideology, in undiluted toxicity. Besides denying the desire to spread their brand of totalitarianism which its inventor, Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in Hell forever), ordered his legions to do, she also attempted to obscure its malignancy. As Mohamad (MHBHF) declared in Koran 3:28, those following his ideology are permitted to pretend to befriend non-Mohamadans in order to avoid awakening Americans to their true intentions of eventual subjugation. The authoress certainly has adopted this advice.

This authoress claimed, “No one is advocating Sharia in the USA”. Omar M. Ahmad, founder of the Council on American Islamic Relations, said, "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant." He also declared, "The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America”. Is that not a sufficiently blunt statement of intent to impose Sharia from the creator of one of the foremost Islamist organization in the United States?

The takkiya continued with the statement “(T)hese six principles (of Sharia) sound a lot like those espoused in my very own Constitution of the United States. Except that these were developed over a thousand years ago.” I am compelled to shine the light of truth on these principles to expose their antithesis to the United States’ Constitution and another other document based on human rights, on the rule of law and on government based on consent of the governed.
6 principals allegedly espoused by Sharia follow below:

1.The right to the protection of life: Is she referring to the killing endorsed and practiced by Islam’s inventor? In March 624, Mo (MHBHF) recruited one of his goons to assassinate Asma bint Marwan, a poetess critical of Mohamad (MHBHF). The Mohamadan crept into her house, removed the child sleeping at her breast, drew his sword, and plunged it into her, killing her in her sleep. In April 624, Abu Afak, an elder of Medina had written a derogatory poem about Muhammad. Mo (MHBHF) asked his gang, "Who will deal with this rascal for me?" That night, one member, Salim bin Umayr, went and killed him. In September 624, Kab bin al-Ashraf, a member of the Jewish al-Nadr tribe in Medina wrote a widely circulated poem hostile to the Mohamadans. His writing recounted Mo’s (MHBHF) thugs slaughtering inhabitants of Mecca. Mohamad (MHBHF) asked, "Who would rid me of Kab?" Five Mohamadans volunteered. They informed him, "O apostle of God [Mohamad], we shall have to tell lies." He answered, "Say what you like, for you are free in the matter." Takkiya was thus born out of the lips of Islam fabricator. These examples are but a few of those who perished at the hands of Mohamad’s henchmen acting under his orders.

2.The right to the protection of family: Does she mean wife-beating and honor killing any female members who are raped? Koran Chapter 4:34 authorizes wife-beating. Mohamadan women are regularly brutalized for refusing to follow Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) commandment (Koran 24:31) to cover themselves completely. Sharia relies on testimony of only male witnesses without permitting other evidence such DNA samples taken from the victim.

3.The right to the protection of education: Exceptions to this alleged right include questioning Islam and renouncing it after discovering the numerous absurdities and cruelties enshrined within the Koran and Hadiths. Examples are Mo’s (MHBHF) laughable tale about the sun setting in a muddy spring as stated in Koran 18:86 and its place of rising in 18:90. Also, Mo (MHBHF) stated that the Earth is flat in Koran verses 79:30, 21:31 20:53 and 27:61. Koran 9:11-12 states that apostates will be treated ruthlessly for leaving Islam.

4. The right to the protection of religion: Sharia imposes draconian limitations on Jews & Christians. The Islamic legal code forbids them from building new churches or synagogues or repairing such existing structures. Sharia bars those groups from openly expressing, either verbally or physically, any manifestation of their faith such as praying in public, wearing a cross or a Star of David or reading from the Bible. As Koran 9:29 mandated, Mohamadans forcibly collect protection money from conquered Jews and Christians for more than millennium. After Mohamadans had bled those groups white, the Islamic authorities seized Jewish and Christian children as slaves. Under Sharia, Mohamadans grant Jews and Christians only as much freedom of religion as parasites allow their hosts the freedom to live.

5. The right to the protection of property: Women are considered property, on par with real estate. Mohamad (MHBHF) clearly stated in Koran 2:223 that women are to be exploited for the sexual gratification of their husbands just as fields exist for the use of their owners.

As far as property belonging to non-Mohamadans, those owners have no rights under Sharia. After Islamic hordes subjugated various lands, soon after the jihadis finished with raping and robbing the inhabitants, they desecrated or destroyed churches, synagogues, temples and other similar edifices. The Islamic conquerors converted these structures into mosks or other Islamic buildings or built Islamic structures on those sites. The Hagia Sophia in Constantinople plus the Church of Saint Nicholas and the Cathedral of Saint Helen in Damascus stand out as a few examples of Mohamadans’ co-opting of non-Islamic landmarks.

6. The right to the protection of human dignity: verses belittling Jews, Christians and others. Go to Defeat the Third Jihad to read the 527 verses (http://dttj.blogspot.com/2010/08/intolerance-toward-non-muslims-in-quran.html) critical of and hostile toward non-Mohamadans.

This Islamist continued with these declarations, “(T)he whole body of Islamic texts, which includes the (Koran), the sayings of the Prophet, and the books of interpretive literature written by medieval Muslim scholars. The first two are considered divine.” So rantings of Mo (MHBHF) are considered divine? Mo (MHBHF) received supposed revelations that always conveniently permitted him to do whatever he wanted, whether taking his daughter-in-law for his own wife after seeing her undressing, giving him permission to have an unlimited number of wives while other men were limited to four, and increasing his share of booty stolen from people who rejected his claim to prophethood and dictatorship. Where are the accounts of eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen or heard Allah's alleged “revelations” to Mo (MHBHF)? No one else heard Mo's (MHBHF) so-called “revelations”. He claimed to be alone whenever he claimed that Allah gave him a message. That is a suspiciously convenient cover for such a huckster like Mo (MHBHF).

“No religion gets to be 1400 years old and the second largest in the world unless it's flexible and adaptable,” Ali-Karamali lied. Koran 2:2 clearly states that whatever Mo (MHBHF) said is recorded in the Koran is absolutely true and not to be doubted. Therefore, anyone remaining true to the rantings of Mo (MHBHF) must maintain that the Koran is inerrant and immutable. This authoress dishonestly declares that Islam has allows for change of its doctrines and has morphed over time. Any deviance from the littoral words of the Koran has rarely occurred and was quickly and brutally crushed by Islamists.

“(A)dultery was made such a fantastically difficult crime to prove that the punishment was impossible to apply. Historically, stoning was very rarely implemented in the Islamic world,” she denied history. As decreed by Mo (MHBHF), four witnesses needed (Koran 24:4 and 24:13 plus Hadith Bukhari 5:59:462), otherwise a raped woman accusing her victimizer incriminates herself as to having committed adultery. Koran 2:282 establishes that a woman's testimony is worth only half that of a man's in court so any “he said, she said” disputes always give a man more credibility despite any evidence to the contrary.

The dishonesty continues with her unsubstantiated claim that “(t)he vast majority of Muslims today do not believe in stoning people for adultery.” Says who? Has this authoress conducted a comprehensive survey of Mohamadans’ views of Koran-based executions of those accused of adultery? If so, then she must publish them. Otherwise, she is merely spouting baseless propaganda of Islam’s apologists.

“As for other scary stories attributed to (Sharia), like honor killings, veiling of women, and female genital cutting, these are cultural practices and not Islamic,” denies this authoress. Mohamadan women are regularly brutalized for refusing to follow Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) commandment in Koran 24:31 to cover themselves completely. According to the Hadith of Umm Atiyyah, Mohamad (MHBHF) stated that the cutting of female genitals is acceptable. In Koran 24:2, Mo (MHBHF) mandated flogging for those accused of fornication. The Hadith of Sahi Muslim No. 4206 outlines Mohamad (MHBHF) ordering the execution by stoning of a woman who admitted to adultery. Under Sharia, women receive only half a share of inheritance (Koran 4:11) and their testimony is worth only half of that from a man (Koran 2:282). Hadith of Sahih Bukhari,Volume 3, Book 48, Number 826 derides women’s intelligence, thus supporting the misogynistic elements of Islamic laws.

Ali-Karamali denies reality in her statement, “(Sharia) is a set of religious principles and is not the law of the land anywhere in the world.” Saudi Arabia, Iran and Sudan govern with Sharia as the sole legal code within their borders. The unfortunate citizens of those countries must adhere to the dictates of Mo (MHBHF) or else face the punishments ordered by the inventor of Islam.

She blatantly lied, “the Prophet himself never tried to implement an ‘Islamic state,’ " Mo (MHBHF) was the dictator of Medina and later the rest of the Arabian Peninsula. His pronouncements were the law which he fabricated and abrogated whenever the whim struck him. His unquestionable orders were codified into what we now call Sharia.

The authoress ignored historical evidence in claiming “(t)raditionally, in the Islamic world, the institutions that governed were always separate from the institutions that developed religion.” Mo’s succeeding caliphates were all absolute overlords in all matters, religious and political. Whatever fiat that they decreed, was an order which no one could challenge without risking his or her life.

She persisted with the takkiya such as “every Islamic empire was a multi-religious, multicultural empire, in which religious minorities were governed by their own laws.” Jews & Christians had odious restrictions and mandates hoisted on them for refusing to convert to Islam. I refer her to my response to the fourth tenet of Sharia. Jews and Christians could not proselytize to Mohamadans. Mohamadans were forbidden to renounce Islam without facing execution.

“In fact, Islam contains plenty of concepts consistent with modern democracy,” Ali-Karamali laughably wrote without providing a shred of evidence to support this absurd claim. Representative democracy is the complete antithesis of Islam. No one was allowed to vote to overturn any of Mo’s (MHBHF) dictates or remove him from his self-appointed position of “prophet”. The same autocratic standards applied under the absolute dictators who followed Mo (MHBHF) as “caliphs”. Under a modern democracy, a government derives its power from the consent of the citizens through elections. Under Islam, governance is based on the whimsical rantings of one megalomaniac which are not open to alteration or abolition.

“The (Koran) contains many verses advocating religious tolerance,” spewed this Islamist in hopes of deceiving those ignorant of the entire Koran. Those few verses of apparent tolerance occurred when Mo (MHBHF) and his cult were a weak minority in Mecca. After seizing power in Medina and amassing a massive army, he abrogated those verses and replaced them anti-Jewish, Christophobic and otherwise violently hostile rantings. Among the last orders from Mo (MHBHF) include this verse, "Fight against such as those to whom the Scriptures were given (Jews and Christians).until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued." (Koran 9:29)

Despite clear contradictions located in the Koran, the authoress spewed “(i)t is established in Islam that you don't need to be Muslim to go to heaven.” I quote the Koran: "The only true faith in God's sight is Islam." (3:19) "It is He who has sent forth His apostle with guidance and the true Faith [(Islam) to make it triumphant over all religions, however much the idolaters (non-Mohamadans) may dislike it." (9:31). Koran 4:47 commands Jews and Christians to believe Mo’s (MHBHF) ideology or they will be destroyed.

She deceptively offered, “The only verses about fighting in the (Koran) refer specifically to the polytheistic Arab tribes who were trying to kill the Prophet in the (seven)th century.” I refer her to my response to the first tenet of Sharia. In those three examples, Mo (MHBHF) ordered murders of poets simply for composing verses critical of Mohamad (MHBHF), not for threatening his life. Mo (MHBHF) urged murder of his enemies in Koranic verses 2:244, 2:191, 2:216, 4:76, 4:89, 5:33, 9:5, 9:73, 9:111 and 9:123

This Islamist spewed more lies, “the (Koran) repeatedly commands particular respect of Jews and Christians. It is established in Islam that you don't need to be Muslim to go to heaven.” A blatant lie since 9:29 specifically calls for fighting and subjugating Jews and Christians. The next verse erroneously accuses Jews of claiming that Ezra is the son of God. Due to this supposed sin of Jews and Christians declaring that God has a son, Mo (MHBHF) pronounced in 3:151 that Allah will terrorize them. Koran (5:59-60) says the “People of the Bible” are descended from apes and pigs. The Hadith of Ishaq:250 supports this claim. Koran 59:14 reads "The Jews are devoid of sense. There is a grievous punishment awaiting them. Satan tells them not to believe so they will end up in Hell." Hadith Bukhari (59:727) indicates "Allah's curse be on the Jews and the Christians" was among Mo’s (MHBHF) final words before his death. Ishaq 240 quotes Mo (MHBHF) "The Jews are a nation of liars” and “The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people" Koran 3:118, 5:51, 80 and 3:28 plus Hadiths Ishaq:364, and Hadith of Ishaq:262 forbids befriending Jews and Christians and threaten damnation for Mohamadans who do so. Hadith of Tabari VIII:130 details "The Messenger said during his final illness, 'Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.' Umar investigated the matter, then sent to the Jews, saying: 'Allah has given permission for you to be expelled; for I have received word that the Prophet said that two religions cannot coexist in Arabia." Koran 98:1 "Surely the unbelievers and idolaters from the People of the Book will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures." She must expect that no Jew or Christian would ever try to verify her patently false utterances.

“Repeating a lie over and over again doesn't make it true; but it certainly results in people believing the lie,” the authoress concluded. Finally, something uttered by this authoress which contains any truth. She is following example of her fellow Islamists who engage of repeated spewing of disinformation to shroud the truly violent, misogynistic and oppressive cornerstones of Islam. Like their fellow advocate of a species of totalitarianism, Joseph Goebbels stated, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.

COPYRIGHT SEPTEMBER 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Condensed Retort to Ground Zero Monstrosity

2010-09-09T17:24:00.003-04:00

I wish to respond to the Islamists, their useful idiots and the ignorant sheeple who indignantly whine about the opposition to the proposed monstrosity at Ground Zero. All of these bleat about the freedoms enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Ironically, these same liberties will disappear if the Islamists ever seize control of the United States' government. Until the Islamists achieve their goal of undermining and destroying the American republic, they will continue, with the aid of other statists and other mushy-headed types, to squeal about imagined injustices against Mohamadans.

The opposition to the planned monument to the jihadis' mass murder at Ground Zero is not denying Islamists' freedom of religion. They are free to pray to their meteorite in Mecca, spout the hateful and violent verses of the criminal who fabricated their totalitarian ideology and otherwise continue to wallow in their pitiful lunacy. However, the civilized people in the United States do not have to permit the construction of structures that will bolster the Islamic infection. This insult to the memory of all the murdered civilians will serve as yet another malignant tumor which will further metastasize the cancer called Islam.

As Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson wisely stated, "The Bill of Rights is not a suicide pact."

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2010

Messages from a Mohamadan in Spain

2010-09-08T03:06:00.003-04:00

Last week, I received a message from a particularly idiotic Mohamadan who is a member of the occupation of Spain. I am posting his drivel and my replies. I have not altered anything which he or I wrote other to translate them into English:

Bilal Borras Navarro September 2 at 1:14pm
"no hay nada más atrevido que la ignorancia. Ni todos los marroquis son musulmanes ni todos los españoles son católicos"
"there is nothing more daring than ignorance. Not all Moroccans are Muslims and not all are Catholic Spanish"

My reply on September 2 at 1:32pm
"What is the point of your message? I never said anything about all Moroccans being Mohamadans or all Spanish being Catholic. There is nothing more suicidally asinine than a resident of the Free World apologizing for Islam."

From Bilal Borras Navarro on September 3 at 9:51am
yo no hago apología del Islam, y soy musulman, y español como el que más. ERES RACISTA, entonces?
"I make no apology for Islam, and I am Muslim, and Spanish as they come. YOU ARE RACIST, then?"

From me on September 4 at 9:04am:
"Provide one example of my alleged racism! You Mohamadans falsely accuse anyone who criticizes your totalitarian ideology of racism. Since you are obviously not smart enough to figure this out on your own, I will spell it out for you. ISLAM IS NOT A RACE!

"You are a disgrace to the memory of the millions of Spaniards who suffered for centuries under Islamic tyranny and oppression!"

From Bilal Borras Navarro on September 5 at 6:00am:
"es verdad,era mejor la Santa Inquisicion, si pensabas de otra forma ibas a la hoguera, asi conquistamos las Americas y los Ingleses el resto del mundo. IMPONIENDO NUESTRA VERDAD, LA VERDADERA. TODOS IRAN AL CIELO POR SUS BUENAS ACCIONES. VERDAAAAAD????
Gracias a la cultura de otras naciones las matematicas, la agricultura, la astrofisica, la astronomia, y otras ciencias que ahora consideramos nuestras seguirian en el olvido y seguiriamos pensando que la Tierra es plana, es lo que pensaba el Cristianismo, les debes tanto que os da miedo admitirlo"

"is true, the Holy Inquisition was better, if you thought otherwise were going to the bonfire, so we conquer the Americas and the English the rest of the world. Impose our TRUE, TRUE. ALL go to heaven for good deeds. VERDAAAAAD?? Thanks to the culture of other nations in math, agriculture, astrophysics, astronomy and other sciences that we now consider our would follow into oblivion and continue to feel that the earth is flat, it's what I thought Christianity , we must therefore admit that I'm afraid"

My response on September 7 at 11:42pm:
"So you prefer the centuries of Islamic relegation of others to third class status, forced to pay protection money, called jizya, to their Mohamadan oppressors or face death or enslavement? So you agree with Sharia-based injunctions against non-Mohamadans reciting their scriptures aloud, ringing bells, wearing identifiable symbols of their differing religions and any other manifestations of pride and fealty to other faiths? Do you support Islamic mandates to destroy churches, temples and other non-Islamic structures or else, forcibly seize them then convert into mosks, madrassas or other Islamic buildings? The violent and oppressive elements of the Spanish Inquisition have no basis for support within Christian scriptures, canonical or apocryphal. In contrast, the Koran and Hadiths openly mandate the murder, robbery, rape and enslavement of those who disagree with Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) totalitarian lunacy.

"In referencing the Spanish and English colonization, you conveniently ignore the Islamic conquest and subjugation of huge swaths of territory in Europe, Africa and Asia. Mohamadans killed or enslaved millions of Christians and others for more than a millennium. All these atrocities occurred with the blessing of the criminal who fabricated your ideology.

"As your spouting of that Islamic fallacy about Christianity supporting the idea of a 'flat Earth', name any verse in the Bible which states that error.

"In contrast, Mohamad (MHBHF) clearly exposed his erroneous belief that the Earth is flat. In Koran 18:86, he describes someone traveling to the place where the sun sets. In 18:90, he mentions someone traveling to where the Sun rises. Koran 36:37-38 and the Hadith by Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 421 confirms Mo's (MHBHF) absurd error on what happens to the sun when it "sets". Only an ignorant savage would think that a person find such a place considering that the setting of the Sun is merely the Earth rotating away from the Sun, not a place at the end of a flat surface where the Sun disappears.

"In three different Koranic verses (verses 20:55, 2:20 and 71:18-19), Mo (MHBHF) claimed that Allah spread out the Earth like a carpet. That is not possible considering that the Earth is a sphere which has no flat surface. In four different passages of the Koran (31:9, 16:15, 78:6-7, 21:32 Mo (MHBHF) stated that mountains are needed to keep the Earth pinned down so it will not roll up like a scroll would. In Koran verses 20:53, 43:10, 78:6 and 79:30, Mo (MHBHF) said that Allah spread out the Earth like a bed, an obvious flat surface.

"I see that you have already proceeded to the next page of the script of Islamic disinformation. I challenged you to name any proof of my supposed racism. Of course, you cannot since I never made any statements regarding race. You then jumped to the Islamic fallacy of the supposed infallibility of the Koran and its creator, Mohamad ibn Abdullah (MHBHF). I am sure that you will turn to the last page of the Mohamadan playbook for your next message to me: baseless insults and threats of violence toward me and my family.

"So what attracts you to Islam? Do you like beating women and treating them like mere property to use for your own sexual gratification? Do you enjoy having sex with a pre-pubescent girl just like Mo (MHBHF) did? Are you looking forward to killing some non-Mohamadans so you can spend eternity in an orgy?"

Obama's Next Vacation Destination

2010-09-07T17:06:00.002-04:00

I am expecting to read a news report to this effect any day in the near future.

White House spokesman Jayson Blair announced today the intended destination for President Obama’s next vacation. “The President will depart from Washington and fly to Saudi Arabia with Americans of Middle Eastern origin. He intends to spend a few days in Mecca conducting meetings between his traveling companions and Islamic clergy and Saudi governmental officials.” Blair continued, “The reason for their journey to Mecca is to perform the hajj, the required pilgrimage for all adherents to Islam once in their lives.”

In response to a reporter’s questioning of why President Obama would engage in an obviously Islamic ritual, Blair replied, “The President wants to demonstrate his heartfelt adherence to Christianity while also showing the whole world his commitment to religious diversity.”

The reporter persisted, “How is the President demonstrating his Christian beliefs by performing an Islamic ritual?”

Blair declined to comment then called on another reporter.

The second reporter inquired, “Considering that Saudi Arabia bars all non-Mooslums from entering Mecca and even imprisons anyone espousing non-Islamic beliefs or possessing texts and implements used by other religions within the Saudi kingdom, how is the President’s action connected to religious diversity?”

Blair waved to members of White House security and whispered to them out of range of the microphone. The security members forcibly escorted both reporters out of the White House. Blair informed the remainder of the media, “There will be no further questions taken.”

COPYRIGHT SEPTEMBER 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Cultural Sensitivity for That Sacred Day in September

2010-08-23T16:25:00.003-04:00

The people of the Free World will be commemorating the deaths of nearly three thousand civilians at the hands of jihadis next month. What can Mohamadans do to ensure that they do not unwittingly offend their civilized counterparts during the sacred month of September? In response to the demands of Mohamadans and of their useful idiots for deference to Islamic mandates regarding Ramabomb, I submit this list of equitable responses from them.

-Remove your burkas, nikabs, and all other misogynistic clothing that Islamists demand that every woman wear. We object to women being forced to hide under oppressive outfits because some men erroneously think that they cannot control their libidos.

-Leave your absurd superstitions like fear of sitting toilets and dogs plus your phobia of pork and alcohol in the Islamic bloc when you enter the Free World. We do not like to be told what we are allowed to eat or drink based on others’ delusions.

-Cease quoting from the Koran or any other Islamic texts that encouraged those terrorists to commit mass murder and condones their actions. We know that your supposedly sacred scriptures are full of hateful oppression directed toward us. We resent the threats which your ilk spews in reciting these totalitarian texts.

-Dispense with any absurd and baseless conspiracies that anyone other than nineteen Arab Mohamadans committed these crimes. At least have the decency to admit that your cult wants to kill us.

-Stop the plan to build a monument near Ground Zero to the Islamic terrorists who carried out the hijackings. Such a construction will provoke a formidable backlash against those who wish to gloat over our losses.

I wish a peaceful eleventh of September to all civilized people. Likewise, to all Mohamadans, I hope for your complete failure in all your attempts at violence during the remainder of Ramabomb.

COPYRIGHT AUGUST 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Tough Times for Gaza Residents

2010-08-07T22:06:00.001-04:00

I wonder if it is possible to ever find an honest assessment such as this hypothetical report about the Philistines...

Tough Times for Gaza Residents
By Mohamad al-Dhimmi for the Al-Jihad Network

Months of restrictions by Israel on the inflow of goods into Gaza Strip has caused shortages of essential items in high demand among the residents. Tensions have been rising among the local population as they scramble to improvise so as to avoid disruption of their lives. Residents gladly spoke to this reporter in order to vent their frustrations and demand that the rest of the world break the blockade.

One of them, Ahmad Waeef-Beetah, lamented the loss of his prized cane.

"It broke last week as I was hitting my second wife. Since then I have had to use one of my shoes to keep her in accordance with the will of Allah. Can you imagine having to beat your wives with an old sandal? Because of the inhuman blockade, I have to remove my shoes, give them to a wife to clean, beat her with it then hand it back to her for another cleaning. It's barbaric what the Jews are forcing me to resort to," Waeef-Beetah moaned.

He continued, "Yesterday, I was so exhausted after discipling wife number one and number two, I didn't have any strength to deal with my other two wives." At this point, tears began welling up in his eyes as his voice began to escalate, "I had to order number three and number four to beat each other. At first, I felt so ashamed that I couldn't perform my duties proscribed by Allah."
Regaining his composure, a smile crept across his face after he wiped his cheeks, "As I sat in my home watching them smack each other, I felt the presence of Allah comforting me. My shame disappeared as I continued to see them striking one another. Soon, the sight of the blood and their shrieking had made my minaret fully vertical. Praise be to Allah!"

A health-care provider, Aiduh Kuttah, also bitterly complained about the dearth of medical supplies available to her. "The Jews have hurt my livelihood with their blockade. It has been harder to find the right type of tools I use to perform cliterectomies. Parents keep contacting me to cut their daughter's private parts as the Prophet proscribed but all my small razor blades are very dull now. I have tried larger objects which I never heard of before. I found something called a 'steak knife' that infidels use. I have heard the infidels use of these items when they sit, men and women together, in the same room, women's faces shamelessly uncovered, eating at the same time. What an abomination! May Allah forgive me for resorting to using the wicked implements of the infidels for a holy practice."

A youth counselor, Anas T. Kaboom complained about shortages affecting his group's activities for the neighborhood children.

"I have struggled to find enough properly fitting vests for the children. Many of the vests are too small to be correctly loaded. Others lack enough pockets and the pockets are too small to hold enough nails, ball bearings or any other type of small objects. Sometimes, the pockets rip open when we try to pack in a lot of shards of glass or screws," he lamented.
He paused to stop himself from sobbing then resumed, "The children are becoming impatient waiting to martyr themselves. They cry every day when I have to tell them that we don't have enough explosives for everybody. So scuffles break out when they stand in line to gather supplies to make their vests to go to Paradise. I bet the wicked Jews are laughing evilly when they see these wonderful boys and girls being deprived of the chance to go to their eternal reward. I curse Israel for this injustice!" He spat on the ground after completing his statement.

Locals are placing hope in rumors of a flotilla of more cargo ships setting sail from Europe and Turkey. Additionally, huge groups of the faithful engage in mass prayer sessions five times per day in between shopping at the newly opened mega-mall which opened in Gaza in July.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT AUGUST 2010

Unexpected Inspiration

2010-06-14T18:09:00.007-04:00

Just as I was starting to believe that none of my articles were being read or even noticed, I recently received two messages through Facebook. Two Mohamadans reminded me why I compose and publish the truth about the evils of Islam and why it must be destroyed. Mohamadans have sent me two types of correspondence. One, usually from females, consists of gushing praise for Islam and Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) along with claims that I do not understand Islam. The other type, usually from males, includes vulgar insults and threats of violence, usually of a sexual nature. This month, I have received an example of each.

The first example arrived from a savage calling himself "Bakor". On the tenth of June, at 3:18pm, I received this bilge from this foul-mouthed barbarian. It appears exactly in the same form in which I received it.

"hi this message is actually something else intended
FUCK YOU BITCH MUTHA fucka!!!!! if you dare say a thing about islam again i will pound the fuck out of u!!!!!!! and make u suck my dick like a pretty boy that u r! and PS ur pic doesnt represent islam just PAKISTAN and they are worth more then u bitch"

Later that day, I replied,
"My picture represents Islam since it has been used by Mohamadans for centuries in reference to the fictitious lunar deity called Allah. Pakistan is not the only Islamic wasteland which features the crescent moon. Malaysia, Algeria, Turkey and several other hellholes also display it on their flags as does the Red Crescent Organization. Obviously, you need to do some research, you ignorant savage.

I will continue to speak the truth about Islam, Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) and the morons like you who adhere to his insane rantings. I dare you to try to stop me. If you attack me, I would enjoy reducing you to a whimpering and bloody stain on the ground!

Unlike you, I have zero interest in homosexual activity so take your offer of fellatio to the other perverts who flock to your mosk. You should stick to what is your expertise: raping little boys and being sodomized by pigs. Burn in Hell alongside the criminal who fabricated your ideology!"

The following day I found this message in my inbox on my Facebook page from Yasmin Adam on June 11 at 8:39am:
"ur profile pic is very provoking
and i'm really sad that there's ppl like u in the world coz terrorists come out from ppl like u who hate a religions and act like fanatics ewww i'm disgusted seriously u such a racist"

Here is my reply on June 12 at 12:24am:
"Terrorists do not come from people who support democracy, advocate for equal rights for women and extol capitalism like myself."

"I dare you to provide any evidence of my supposed racism. Name just one shred of proof that have criticized or discriminated against anyone because of his/her race!

"I am really sad that naive and dishonest people like exist to apologize for true terrorists who propagate Islam."

This is how she answered on June 12 at 11:51am:
"ur profile picture show that u support racism
i'm not going to tell u "O islam is a great religion blah blah blah" coz i don't care what u think of islam or muslims
but it just piss me off that When u attack black people,they call it Racism. When u attack Jewish people,they call it Anti-semetism. When you attack women, they call it Sexism. When you attack homosexuality,they call it Intolerance. When u attack ur country,they call it Treason.But when u attack islam u want to call it democracy??"

So I started dismantling her warped vision of the world, distorted by Islamic disinformation on June 12 at 12:15pm:
"Islam is an ideology, not a race. Therefore opposition to Islam has no connection to racism. Mohamadans consist of various races.

"Yes, criticism of Islam is an expression of democratic freedom. Under democracy, a government derives its power by consent of the citizens and the will of the majority to choose its leaders. One of the most important God-given rights is the freedom of speech.

"Under Islam, a government derives its power by adherence to the rantings of a seventh century Arabian criminal and brutally crushing anyone who does not hold those views. Anyone differing with the lunacy spouted by Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) is oppressed, threatened or killed in an Islamic regime.

"Islam consists of totalitarianism, misogyny, terrorism, pedophilia, violence and other despicable traits. So why do you defend an ideology that promotes dictatorship, wife-beating, polygyny, sex with pre-pubescent girls plus murder, rape and robbery of non-believers?"

She tried soft-peddle Islam at this point on June 12 at 4:23pm:
"o-k-a-y may i knew from where u learned that?
i'm a muslim girl who live in a muslim country and let me tell u how we live
i have two sisters they r both married to the guy they love and by their choice
and about polygyny it's a choice if the wife didn't agree then she can get divorce
and about the governmet thing all the governmnets everywhere is assholes they lie and manipulate with their people
and don't u dare insult muhmad (peace be upon him) coz u know nothing about him, u r just a guy who is blind with hate and it really kills me to hear what u just said about my religion

I'M A MUSLIM AND I'M NOT A TERRORIST"

At this point, I decided to inundate her with quotes taken straight from Islamic texts to expose her to what her ideology truly supports on June 13 at 11:55pm"
"I learned about the various evils spouted by Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) by reading a Koran and other Islamic texts. Simply by pointing to verses from the Koran and other sources, I will enlighten you about your ideology.

"Have you ever even read any of Mo's (MHBHF) rantings? I do not mean mindlessly reciting or memorizing verses in an archaic dialect of Arabic which very few Mohamadans understand. I refer to reading the Koran or other Islamic texts in a language in which you can read and comprehend.

"The difference between a democratic government and an Islamic one is that under democracy, any laws can be changed by the citizens. Under an Islamic regime, no one is allowed to institute a law that contradicts whatever Mo (MHBHF) ordered or forbid. Islamist justify their terrorism, misogyny, totalitarianism, pedophilia, violence and other despicable crimes by pointing to the words and deeds of Mo (MHBHF).

"Regarding divorce women have no freedom to dump a husband for his polygyny since Mo (MHBHF) restricted their freedom to divorce (Hadith Bukhari vol.7 no.121,122 p.93 and vol.7 chapter 93 vol.7 no.130 p.99) In fact, Mo authorized polygyny. So you accept the practice of allowing Mohamadan men to have simultaneous sexual relationships with multiple wives and slaves while a Mohamadan woman must remain monogamous to this man (Koran 4:3)? Do you like being viewed as a piece of property which Mo (MHBHF) did in Koran 2:223 or as an animal as he did in Hadith Tabari Vol 9, Number 1754 ? Do enjoy the idea that your testimony must be corroborated by another woman to be considered equal to the testimony of just one man (Koran 2:282 and Hadith Bukhari 6:301)?Are you happy with receiving only half of an inheritance of a male relative (Koran 4:11)? So you consider yourself as inferior to men as Mo (MHBHF) proclaimed in Koran 2:228 and 4:34?

"I will continue to insult Mo (MHBHF) and all the weak-minded sheep who blindly adhere to his evil rantings. I will never stop until everyone in the world has been liberated from his totalitarianism. Which is more deplorable, for you to feel "killed" from reading the truth about Islam and its fabricator (MHBHF) or for you and other Mohamadans to kill those who disagree with your ideology?

ISLAM IS TERRORISM!"

Yasmin's pathetic whimper came like this on June 14 at 5:49am:
"well,it still hurt when u say this bad words but i trust my ppl so much and i LOVE my religion and i won't give up on my ppl and again i don't care what u think and islam will propagate around the wold isn't it amazing how there's ppl like u who hate islam and say bad things about it but there's ppl still convert !
anyways thank u for the good talk u just made me believe more in my religion ^_^ i'll pray for u"

She sent to me a link to YouTube.com for a recording entitled "Fuck You" by Lily Allen.

In conclusion, I concluded this exchange like this earlier today:
"I am not amazed that barbarous men and feeble-minded women convert to Islam. This ideology is well suited for their mental and moral deficiencies. The same sort of moronic savages have always embraced other forms of totalitarianism too.

"Many Mohamadans have renounced Islam. Those with enough strength of character and wisdom realize the absurd insanity of Mo's (MHBHF) rantings. Of course, they are not as highly visible as sheep who are seduced by Islam. Also, the ex-Mohamadans live in fear of murder by jihadis determined to enforce Mo's (MHBHF) commandment to kill anyone who abandons Islam.

"I am not surprised that you cannot refute any of the statements which I made exposing the numerous evils of your ideology. You may choose to continue your blissful ignorance instead of confronting the appalling crimes advocated and celebrated by your fellow Mohamadans. However, you only perpetuate the self-destructive insanity.

"By the way, your feebly vulgar link made me laugh. This pathetic attempt at a response shows how meager is your level of cerebral functioning after years of Islamic brainwashing."

In closing, I would like to thank both Bakor and Yasmin. You two numskulls have encouraged me to further pursue the obliteration of Islam.

Return to Their Place of Origin

2010-06-05T00:01:00.017-04:00

Helen Thomas' comments regarding Jews supposedly occupying Arab lands provided some provocative suggestions. This White House reporter demands that one group of people should return to their place of origin. In order to remain honestly consistent, why is she not demanding the expulsion of recent infiltrators into the United States of America, Canada and Europe?

Thomas' comments included the desire for Jews to return to Poland and Germany. One can rightfully ask where should the Sephardim go? What would be the fate of Jews who left, often expelled involuntarily and under threat of violence, from Yemen, Iran, Morocco and other Islamic nations? Also, what about the Jews living in the territory surrounding Jerusalem for centuries despite the Islamic conquest and subsequent oppression?

So where are Thomas' calls for the removal of outsiders who have been encroaching into the country of her residence? Mohamadans have been infiltrating the United States of American for decades. They have been granted citizenship despite violating standards mandated by Congress as essential for gaining citizenship. The Immigration and Naturalization Act of bars anyone espousing a totalitarian ideology in Section 313 under Title III of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. Considering that Islamic governance is based on enforcing the whimsical utterances of seventh century dictator and his successors instead of consent of the citizens and will of the majority, Islam clearly demonstrates its totalitarian foundation. Additionally, anyone engaging in polygamy or intending to do so cannot legally naturalize under Section 212(10)(A) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. However, Islam explicitly permits polygamy while considering a man with several simultaneous marriages as the role model for human behavior. Therefore, one can logically assume that anyone adhering to Islam does so in opposition to representative democracy and its ideals.

While discussing the topic of people returning to their place of origin, Helen Thomas should follow her own demands. She has one of two options. First of them is for Helen Thomas to leave the United States to go back to Lebanon, the place of her parents' birth. Otherwise, she must return to her other homeland where she was better suited in her role of hostess of "Tales from the Crypt".

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT JUNE 2010

my contribution to "Everybody Draw Mohamad Day"

2010-05-21T02:27:00.000-04:00

Out of Sight, Not out of Mind

2010-05-15T20:14:00.010-04:00

A recent press release has faded too quickly from the national consciousness. Like fireworks, some news stories burst into public view then fade immediately upon the explosion of another event. In contrast to the awesome beauty of fireworks displays, this announcement deserves a glaring spotlight to expose one of the most awfully ugly aspects of Islam. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/health/policy/07cuts.html?partner=rss&emc=rss)

The American Academy of Pediatrics decided to change its previous opposition to any medically unnecessary procedure performed on the genitals of a girl. Its members indicated that the federal law barring such procedures should be modified to allow some form of restricted cutting of female genitals. Their argument supposes that families will take their girls outside of the United States in order to lacerate them if not allowed to undergo genital mutilation in the USA. Does the AAP consider the words of Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) in the Hadith of Umm ‘Atiyyah condoning cutting female genitalia as superseding proven gynecological evidence of the harm of female genital mutilation? Such compromise at the expense of girls’ physical and mental health reeks of acquiescence to Sharia-creep.

The line of reasoning of the proposed change in policy stands out as tragically laughable. A counter analogy that I would offer is the advice to leave the doors and windows open in one’s house for the benefit of burglars. Following the rationale of the AAP, burglars are just going to break into houses anyway. Why not make it easier for them? With this type of submission to their demands, the results would end less destructively. Sure, the appliances, jewelry and other valuables will be stolen but at least the burglars will not be prosecuted and homeowner will not incur the cost of replacing damaged doors or windows.

Any form of female genital mutilation is a totally unnecessary procedure. It not only robs the victims of sexual pleasure it also interfere with proper functioning of female excretory system. This criminal act involves intentionally damaging or amputating a healthy organ and surrounding vital tissue. One has to wonder if Islamists would endorse castration for a lustful man who refuses to control his sexual impulses. Given that Islam’s inventor felt no need to rein in his libido, why would those following his ideology have such concerns?

This inhumane butchery follows in the vein of misogyny rampant throughout Islam. The Mohamadan mentality rooted in Sharia holds a woman responsible for all perceived problems related to sexuality. If she is raped, she must prove herself innocent with the testimony of four male witnesses. The burden falls on women to wear suffocating and dehumanizing outfits in order to hide themselves from the gazes of men. Instead of teaching boys to respect women as equal members of humanity, Islamists consider women as inherently inferior. Boys are indoctrinated into viewing females as either subordinate family members or as inferior objects created for their sexual gratification. Of course, all of this negativity directed toward the feminine half of humanity originated in the mind of and out of the libido of Islam’s fabricator (May he burn in Hell forever).

This tradition of savagery occurs solely for the benefit of Mohamadans who believe that its victims will not commit fornication or adultery. Apparently these Neanderthals never considered other, non-sadistic alternatives. A few come to my mind. First of all, the marriage of pre-pubescent or teenage girls to men twice their age or older would certainly motivate a girl to rebel by seeking affection of someone else. If women are allowed to choose their own husbands, they are much less likely to try to seek extramarital relationships with men. Women’s fidelity is easier to secure if their husband respond in kind. Why should a woman feel compelled to remain monogamously loyal to her husband while he is allowed to engage in de facto debauchery under the guise of polygyny and unrestricted sexual activity with his female slaves or servants called "concubines"?

As long as men view the Koran and Islamic texts as the guide to proper treatment of women, atrocities like FGM will continue. If Mohamadan men want to dabble in some radical measures to maintain the loyalty of their wives, perhaps they might consider thinking of a wife as equal partner in a relationship, not merely as an inherently inferior outlet for their sexual urges. If Mohamadan men want to engage in some further extremism, they could include some flowers and breaks from domestic drudgery from time to time. I am sure that women would appreciate that "outside of the Koran" type of thinking.

Islamists and their useful idiots relish attempts of conflation of female genital mutilation and circumcision. No scientist would make an analogy between circumcision and FGM unless he is hopelessly blinded by devotion to every word in Islamic texts. Circumcision involves the cutting of a section of superficial skin. This procedure does not obstruct normal functioning of the incised area. For the women and uncircumcised men in my readership, I relate circumcision to the removal of an earlobe. Obviously, the ear’s appearance would be altered. Nevertheless, the functioning of the ear would not be damaged or destroyed. Normal hearing would continue despite such a superfluous procedure. The hygienic benefits resulting from circumcision have been discussed for decades and will probably be up for debate in the foreseeable future. However, clitorectomies or any cutting of female genitals provides no benefit to the victim, only pain and degradation.

A clear-thinking person must certainly wonder about the silence of feminists on this issue. The mere discussion of anything short of totally unrestricted abortion at any point of a pregnancy fully funded by taxpayers elicits shrieks of ”misogyny” from the National Organization for Women and its cohorts. Where are demonstrations in the streets demanding harsher penalties for those mutilating the genitals of girls? Why are no feminists protesting outside the offices of the Council on American-Islamic Relations and those of other Islamists clamoring for those groups to condemn publicly all forms of female genital mutilation? Does the feminists’ fear of jihadist reprisal override their often bellowed concern for women’s health and choice? Apparently, feminist allegiance to political correctness precludes any criticism that Mohamadans would label as "Islamophobic".

The AAP’s acquiescence to Islamic barbarity must never be tolerated. Georganne Chapin, executive director of an advocacy group called Intact America, rightfully illuminated the situation. She stated, “There are countries in the world that allow wife beating, slavery and child abuse, but we don’t allow people to practice those customs in this country. We don’t let people have slavery a little bit because they’re going to do it anyway, or beat their wives a little bit because they’re going to do it anyway.” It behooves us to take heed of her words to spare any more girls this cruel indignity and severely punish those who inflict such torture.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT MAY 2010

Lesson Learned Yet?

2010-05-04T02:50:00.016-04:00

A series of questions weighs heavily on my mind so I would like to pose them to anyone reading this article. How many more Mohamadans have to plot to kill Americans? Do they need to string together a chain of successful mass murders? Have the recent failed bombing attempts by jihadis lulled the American people into a false sense of security? How much more infrastructure must they destroy? What is necessary for both the majority of Americans and their elected leaders to remove their muzzles and admit who is the enemy and what is their objective?

The attention of the country is focused on the most recent act of jihad. We must take advantage of this spotlight to further illuminate the rancidly totalitarian core of Islam. Politicians in Washington would have a greater inclination to counteract the jihad when their constituents are clamoring for steps to halt and roll back Islamization. The notoriously ephemeral attention span of the general American public must be channeled toward anti-Islamic counteroffensive before the media steers their minds away from the imminent Islamic threat.

We must support those in political positions who are willing to enact measures curtailing Islamists' power and influence. Senator Joseph Lieberman has proposed stripping citizenship from turncoat American citizens who join terrorist organizations (http://congress.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/05/05/lieberman-seeks-to-strip-citizenship-of-americans-overseas-with-ties-to-terror-orgs). Representative Sue Myrick has composed a list of countermeasures against Islamists called the "Wake Up America Agenda" (http://www.house.gov/list/press/nc09_myrick/wakeupamerica41808.html). Such initiatives need the support of everyone opposed to Islamization of the United States. The responsibility falls on the American electorate to demand that its representatives take action.

Islamists reveal their inherently totalitarian ideology, both blatantly and subtly. Anyone willing to read Islamic texts cannot escape the unmistakeably clear nature of Islam. Consequently, Mohamadans express notions and support measures which enforce Islamic supremacy. Islam rejects the concept of a government based on the consent of the governed. Islamic rule depends on the whimsical pronouncements of a seventh century Arabian dictator. Equality of citizens under an objective legal code does not exist under Sharia. In a truly Islamic regime, women are inherently relegated to an inferior caste with non-Mohamadans relegated even lower. An absolute monarchy such as Saudi Arabia or a single party dictatorship like the one in Iran are the only options for a country adhering to Islamic governance.

Additionally, we must demand a cessation of the entry of Mohamadans into the United States for the purpose of immigration and naturalization. Their totalitarian ideology dictates that its adherents must subdue non-believers and subjugate the whole world. Section 313 in Chapter 2 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act expressly forbids citizenship for anyone espousing any totalitarian ideology. As previously detailed, Islam clearly falls within the definition of totalitarianism. Therefore, those Americans cherishing their representative democracy must demand the exclusion and expulsion of those who will undermine and destroy the republic.

COPYRIGHT MAY 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Comedy Central’s Capitulation

2010-04-28T22:42:00.004-04:00

Last week, a prominent media organization in the United States succumbed to the inundation of Sharia-creep. Comedy Central joined the growing list of dhimmified American companies by caving into threats from jihadis who objected to any negative references to Islam or its fabricator. Not out of respect for all religions did this cable television outlet stifle images of Islam's creator. The hypocritical wimps in the upper echelon of network management censored Trey Parker and Matt Stone’s opus due to politically correct gutlessness.

Trey Parker and Matt Stone had featured Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) in an episode which originally was broadcast in July of 2001. Since Islamists had not yet launched the official start of the jihad in the United States, this depiction passed through Comedy Central’s self-imposed censorship. The license to impose Sharia granted to Mohamadans following the terrorist attacks of the eleventh of September 2001 trumped Parker and Stone’s inclusion of an image of Mohamad (MHBHF) in an April 2006 episode. In their recent attempt, they flirted with including an image of Mohamad (MHBHF) in the first half of the two part episode. However, Comedy Central obscured the image of the fabricator of Islam in both broadcasts, including bleeping his name in the latter.

The creators of South Park have not shied away from disparaging other religions. An episode that originally aired on the nineteenth of November in 2003 detailed the origin of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. It featured a musical recounting of Joseph Smith’s acquisition of the Book of Mormon laced with a choral voice-over of "Dumb, dumb, dumb" ; anyone who questioned Smith’s pronouncement was serenaded with a voice-over of "Smart, smart, smart". On the sixteenth of November in 2005, Comedy Central ran of an episode mocking Scientologists’ beliefs regarding the story of the origin of life on Earth in addition to labeling the Church of Scientology’s leadership as solely interesting in financially exploiting its members. A Christmas-related show broadcast in 2002 portrayed Christ as an automatic rifle-wielding avenger who shot and stabbed Iraqis who had kidnapped and tortured Santa Claus. Multiple episodes have blatantly attacked the Catholic Church including showing the College of Cardinals openly admitting to sexual activity with children. Consequently, any claims by Comedy Central about the desire to avoid insulting others’ religious beliefs stand out as disingenuously false.

Americans must question whether or not their media outlets will continue to silence any negative remarks toward or squelch any unflattering depictions of any Islamic-related issues. A dozen jihadis boasting of a supposed Mohamadan revolution cowed a popular and successful cable outlet. The thinly veiled threat of one traitorous American named Zachary Adam Chesser made an entire network cower in fear then acquiesce to the demands of these savages. No longer does public opinion need to be measured in the millions or even in tens of thousands to induce a change in subject matter. The totalitarian ultimatums of a mere handful of Mohamadans suffices to crush the freedom of speech of all Americans. Considering Comedy Central’s continuous kowtowing to jihadis’ threats and burning desire to placate Mohamadans, one should expect the executives of the network to act proactively to forestall any further alleged blasphemy. Therefore, it is a matter of time until the executives behead Parker and Stone in accordance with Sharia, just to be on the safe side.

COPYRIGHT APRIL 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Did the Earth Move for You?

2010-04-21T03:16:00.001-04:00

Hojjat ol-eslam Kazem Sediki, an Islamic prayer leader in Iran, has blamed women’s lack of hiding themselves under oppressively suffocating outfits for an increased number of earthquakes. Conveniently, he overlooked the fact that numerous bare-breasted women on many beaches throughout France have not resulted in calamitous earthquakes in the French Riviera. The resorts along Mexico’s eastern shores and in the Caribbean Sea have not been swallowed by gaping fissures in the ground due to the presence of bikini-clad women. Along the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean and of the Gulf of Mexico of the United States, scantily-clad women have never induced such seismic retribution for decades now. So why exactly are Iranian women the cause of terrestrial rumblings?

This cleric’s remarks are typical of Islamists’ knee-jerk misogyny. The exposure of women’s hair, ankles, arms or faces supposedly causes calamities. Such absurdity makes perfect sense only to buffoons who have been mind-numbed through years of Islamic indoctrination. Who has time to study geology to understand the true causes of earthquakes? These savages certainly do not since they have been pre-occupied with robotically reciting the Koran. Why study an objective science when they can parrot verses which very few of them even understand due to ignorance of the seventh century dialect of the Arabian Peninsula in which Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) fabricated the Koranic verses? Anyone with at least a minimal level of scientific education guffawed uproariously upon hearing Sediki’s statements.

Apparently, this numbskull never considered the possibility that his country has experienced earthquakes as punishment for its Islamic regime’s three decades of repression. Certainly a just deity would avenge the frequent stonings of women who report being raped but cannot clear the ridiculous hurdle of proof required by Sharia that four male witnesses observed the crime. Additionally, a wrathful god
would surely punish those who flog women because a few strands of hair peeked through the tents mandated as “appropriate garments” by Islamists like Sediki. Divine retribution is due to the ruling clerics for their continued repression of democracy and secularism advocates.

Such admonishments seem even more hypocritical considering the practice of “temporary marriages” sanctioned by the Islamic regime. Iranian men pay women to sign contracts of marriage which stipulate when their marriage will end and how much the women will receive as compensation. These matrimonial farces often last for just a few days, frequently for a mere hour or two. This institution is de facto prostitution promoted for unmarried young males, especially among those studying to become Islamic clerics in the city of Kom. These arrangements including written documents between the johns and the whores only give a phony veneer of legitimacy in the eyes of the Islamists but not to any clear-thinking person.

Sediki’s ranting has further illuminated the dangerous insanity of the Islamic regime. With such ignorant leaders in charge of this totalitarian regime, how can anyone in the Free World not shudder at the thought of these barbarians safely handling radioactive materials for use in a nuclear power program? Of course, anyone subscribing to the Iranian disinformation about wanting a nuclear power program for peaceful civilian use certainly lacks the wisdom to see through the Iranians’ lies anyway.

COPYRIGHT APRIL 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Jihad Jane and the Victims of the Danish Cartoon

2010-03-10T22:20:00.014-05:00

Once again, the nefarious schemes of the barbarians within the gates of the Free World have been exposed. The latest revelation of Colleen LaRose, a Western-born and raised Caucasian American woman participating in jihad against the United States should finally shatter the endlessly spouted deception from Islamists and their useful idiots. One must wonder if the wall of political correctness protecting the public perception of Islam will crumble due to this latest blow of truth.

Any measures taken against Mohamadans and any responses to the Islamic threat automatically receive the label "racist". Arab jihadis such as Nidal Malik Hassan is and the nineteen hijackers of the eleventh of September were also Caucasian. The majority of Americans are Caucasian just as the Arab jihadis are.

What is the basis for Islamists' screeches of "racism" every time a Mohamadan is frisked at an airport boarding area or Islamic organization is investigated by the media or law enforcement? Actually, the only basis is knowledge of the obsession of the vast majority of Americans with avoiding the mere accusation of racism against themselves. The Islamists' ubiquitous hurling of the "r-word" against the obstacles in their path to Islamization has served as a permanent "get out of trouble free" card. Their cynical ignoring of facts which undercut the potency of their favorite tactic demonstrates one of their principles: the ends (Islamization) justifies the means (takkiya).

Jihad Jane continues a growing line of American jihadis such as John Allen Mohammed, John Walker Lindh, Adam Gadahn, and Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad. This blond, blue-eyed woman could have served as a model for Nazi propaganda. Instead she chose to adhere to Islam, another form of totalitarianism but no less brutally hostile to representative democracy and the freedoms which it entails and she exploits. Unfortunately, the altruism of a Pennsylvania police officer prevented this most recent traitor from committing suicide in 2005.

Jihad Jane expressed her desperation to do something to ease the suffering of Mohamadans. What exactly is this supposed suffering and what was her plan to help end it? Colleen LaRose and her fellow Mohamadans object to a cartoon drawn by Lars Vilks. Their solution to art which they dislike is to kill of the artist. Mohamadans are practicing the solution to opposition instituted by their namesake whenever he learned of any poetry mocking his supposed prophetic status. Whenever Islamists and their useful idiots spout Islamic propaganda about the alleged compatibility of Islam within a representative democracy, clear-thinking people must keep this plot in mind. This conspiracy to murder belies how freedoms of speech and of expression are obliterated when Islamic principles are imposed. Just as any aspersion on Adolf Hitler in Nazi-dominated territory or objections to Karl Marx in communist regimes inevitably led to death sentences, the adherents of Islam will violently extinguish any source of criticism of the creator of their ideology.

Lost among the details of this manifestation of Islam in action has been the public defamation of an entire group of beings. Lars Vilks' drawing in question portrayed the head of the inventor of Islam on the body of a dog. The canine community did nothing to deserve this slander of guilt by association. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) frequently revealed his cynophobia in various Islamic texts. Mohamadans express hostility toward dogs; one could logically assume that the antipathy is mutual. Considering that no dog has admitted to having sexual relations with a nine year old girl nor robbed anyone opposed to their absolute dictatorship nor ordered the assassination of political opponents, this writer maintains that dogs, not Mohamadans, deserve the apology from Lars Vilks for his cartoon.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT MARCH 2010

More Bleeting from a Mohamadan Sheep

2010-03-02T04:09:00.003-05:00

One of the Mohamadan sheeple who has contacted me to spew Islamic disinformation resented my postings of her inanity. The following is her most recent messages with my responses. I have not altered anything that she or I initially wrote.

Fatima Shirazi March 1 at 10:17pm
"I was looking for a article I wrote on the internet, and I found your website..and you posted our entire conversation. Seriously? Its not okay to call muslims Mohamadan Sheeps. wow.....I did not want even to finish our conversation the first time around because I realized you have no thorough understanding of what Islam really represents, you just pick random schools of thought and lump Islam into one category. Open your eyes, there are more then one school of thought for Islam and there are more deep rooted meanings and reasons then you could ever understand. Enjoy your Islam hating."

Charles Kastriot March 1 at 11:08pm
"Only two 'schools' of Islam exist: yours, which obfuscates the plethora of evils (totalitarianism, misogyny, pedophilia, thievery and so forth) and the other school which openly admits and embraces these evils. There is nothing deeper to Islam than the libido and whims of its fabricator, Mohamad (May he burn Hell forever). Enjoy being beaten for not hiding yourself under a drape in your posted photograph. Hopefully, your batterer will beat some wisdom and enlightenment into your brain."

Fatima Shirazi March 1 at 11:50pm
"Be careful every time you turn your ignition key.

May Allah bless you and forgive you."

Charles Kastriot March 2 at 1:07am
"What a typical Mohamadan response. Of course, savages such as yourself would never dare to try to harm me face-to-face. Your ilk prefer cowardly attacks like car bombings which you referenced in addition to hijacking planes then crashing them into buildings. May you burn in Hell forever alongside the criminal who created your totalitarian ideology."

Unfortunately for the Free World, this barbarian resides within the realm of civilization. We should be concerned about what type of terrorism with which this Fifth Columnist is involved. Hopefully, civilized people will keep a watchful eye on this enemy and remove her from their soil.

Punched into Recognition

2010-02-11T22:29:00.014-05:00

So Ahmedinejad much ballyhooed "punch to West" has occurred. Does anyone in the Free World feel punch-drunk or even slightly dazed? Instead of describing the announcement as a punch, it would be more accurate to call it the latest slap to the collective face of the civilized people of the world. Ahmedinejad has repeatedly struck the cheeks of a slumbering Uncle Sam who is determined to continue his dream of willful ignorance.

Uncle Sam keeps brushing away attempts at reveille by his only true friend in Ahmadinejad's otherwise overtly hostile neighborhood. Despite Israel's meager population and limited resources and territory, it is willing to face down the Iranian blowhard. Realistic Israelis can see the imminent atomic assault on their country. The primary factor impeding the Israels' proactive elimination of Iran's capacity for nuclear attacks lie in hope that other civilized nations will find a way to halt the threat of attacks originating from Iran. Up to this date, no member of the Free World has demonstrated any determination to stop the jihadis in Iran from gaining means to propagate Islam through nuclear weapons. Nuclear-armed jihadis will afford the free people of the world the same options they have always proposed: convert to Islam, accept inferior status including paying protection money or die at the hands of the savages.

Perhaps, the popular uprisings in Iran have convinced leaders of the civilized nations that the Islamic regime and its nuclear weapons program are teetering on collapse. The line of reasoning follows: "Why bother to provoke the Iranian regime when, by ignoring it, its oppressed citizens will soon topple it? A bellicose response to Ahmadinejad would just give him a rallying cry against the infidels."
One could be tempted to support those rallying in the streets of Iran simply because they seem to view the Islamic regime as a common enemy. Granted, the unrest may distract the regime from reaching its goal of nuclear capability. This view could prove true but no definite list of the objectives of the protesters has been clearly demonstrated.

Anyone outside Iran must wonder about the goals of the demonstrators. Are they pushing for a complete upheaval of Iranian society, including purging of Islam and other Arabian elements of their society? Do they want to abolish the theocracy in favor of a secular government? Do they demand a Persian version of a fascist state like the one formerly in Irak, led by an autocrat who played on ethnic and sectarian strife to wield absolute power? Do they merely seek more economic opportunities and openness with the West? Will they settle for less odious treatment of women, non-Shi'ites and non-Persians while continuing to chafe under the yoke of Islamic totalitarianism? Before embracing the angry crowds surging in the streets of Iran, the residents of the Free World must delve deeper into words and actions of the individuals within the movement.

Will Uncle Sam eventually rouse himself from this self-destructive slumber? One might be reminded of another allegorical character, Rip Van Winkle, who awoke from his decades-long nap. Unfortunately for him, Rip hardly recognized his surroundings after being unconscious for such an extended period of time. The world had changed noticeably and in ways which Rip did not like. For hope of the Free World, Uncle Sam must snap out of this suicidally somnolent state before his world has declined in a Dark Age of Islamic hegemony.

COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2010 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

The Spirit of United 93

2009-12-28T22:21:00.002-05:00

Old habits die hard, even for jihadis. Not content with killing Christians and destroying churches throughout Africa, the Middle East and southern Asia, they decided to rekindle a Richard Reid style of attack. The latest attempt by the terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to murder residents of the Free World occurred on Christmas, undoubtedly, not a coincidence. Al-Kaida relishes timing their strikes on days of significance. Even the Islamic hijackings and slaughter of thousands of civilians on the eleventh of September in 2001 a carried historical link. On that same day in 1683, Christian forces crushed the jihadist invaders outside Vienna. From that point through centuries, civilized nations gradually pushed back or suppressed the Islamic plague. Unfortunately for the world, those forces did not eradicate the Mohamadan scourge.

This most recent incidence of jihad demonstrates the power and primacy of unassuming individuals over impotent or dhimmified bureaucrats. One Dutch man accomplished what scores, if not hundreds or thousands, of federal governmental employees failed to do: halt a jihadi intent on murdering residents of the Free World. He did not need “cultural sensitivity” brainwashing sessions by the Council on American-Islamic Relations or any other fifth-columnist organization. Neither did his bravery require consultation with moral relativist lawyers nor with irrelevant international treaties ignored by Islamists. This one man from the Netherlands has continued the spirit of resistance to Islam exemplified by the passengers on United Flight 93 on the eleventh of September in 2001.

One must ask why this savage was even allowed on this flight? A broader question needs to be addressed: Why are any Mohamadans permitted anywhere near aircraft anymore? How many times do jihadis have use civilian airplanes as an implement of war before governmental authorities in the Free World admit that such naïve lackadaisicalness leads to deaths of free people? Until someone with authority decides to bar these monsters from infiltrating situations which facilitate acts of jihad, non-combatants will continue to suffer and die at the hands of vermin like Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.

In the end, despite the suicidal naïveté of and constant acquiescence to Islamists’ demands by federal authorities, the jihadi failed in his mission to earn eternity in a free whorehouse. Fortunately, no civilized people died in his jihad. Sadly, the passengers did not fully impose justice on the savage. This lascivious Mohamadan was willing to cause deaths of dozens of people in addition to his own just to satisfy his libido. Everyone should notice that his morbid desire to slaughter for sexual gratification ended up sabotaging his own future pursuits. What delicious irony that his own act of jihad torched his own little minaret, hopefully beyond any further usage.

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT, DECEMBER 2009

Jihadist Murders at Fort Hood

2009-11-05T22:25:00.004-05:00

Some actions are so easily anticipated and foreseeable. When they occur, these incidents only surprise those ignorant of the causes or those willfully blind to reality. Such incidents include rabid dogs biting people, flies buzzing around freshly deposited feces and snakes sliding along the ground before striking their victims. Also in the category of expected occurrences, one finds the inevitability of Mohamadans murdering civilized people when the opportunity presents itself.

Today’s latest episode of a jihadi slaying American armed forces personnel has underscored the need for a ban on Mohamadans in the American armed forces. This continues a long string of fifth columnists within the various branches of U.S. Department of Defense who used their training to murder Americans. I provide a recap of just some of the jihads’ plots to attack and undermine for those who forgot or have buried their hands in the sands of useful idiocy:

-On June 1 of this year, Abdulhakim Mujahid fatally shot Private William Long and wounded Quinton Ezeagwula in Little Rock, Arkansas.

-On the twenty-third of March 2003, Sgt. Asan Akbar rolled live grenades into the tents of fellow soldiers then fired an automatic weapon at them at Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait. This jihadi killed two officers and injured fourteen other soldiers.

-Jeffrey Leon Battle, one of the Portland Six tied to al-Kaida, joined the Army Reserves in order to learn how to kill American soldiers. On the fourth of October 2002 Jeffrey Leon Battle was arrested. According to the Justice Department, he planned to wage war against Americans in Afghanistan. On the second of December 2003, Battle pleaded guilty and received a sentence of 18 years in prison.

-In May of 2002, the federal agents arrested Semi Osman, a Mohamadan cleric and a mechanic in the Naval Reserves, as part of an investigation of a terrorist training camp in Oregon. Osman had access to fuel trucks like those employed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia 1996 that killed 19 U.S. airmen. In January 2003, he pleaded guilty to a weapons charge.

-Ali Mohamed, a secret member of Islamic Jihad, enlisted in the U.S. Army and reached the rank of sergeant. He taught a class on Islamic perceptions of America to special forces at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. He also taught at the JFK Special Operations Warfare School where he stole classified military documents. After leaving the Army in 1989, he joined al-Kaida. He spent the 1990s traveling around the world helping plot jihadist operations. The FBI finally arrested him in 1998. He pleaded guilty to conspiring with Osama Bin Laden to attack Western targets.

-John Allen Muhammad was mechanic, truck driver and specialist metalworker in the Louisiana National Guard and later in the U.S. Army. He earned commendations for marksmenship which used to shoo t and kill ten civilians and wounded three other in the autumn of 2002 in the metropolitan area of Washington, DC.

A person need only read any of the numerous violently totalitarian scriptures serving as the foundation of Islam. These Islamic plots to murder Americans, civilians and armed forces personnel, and undermine national security further highlight the danger of allowing Mohamadans into the organizations sworn to protect the United States. How many more treacherous savages have to infiltrate American armed forces then slaughter the true defenders of freedom before the U.S. government bars these hostile barbarians from its military?

COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Mohamadan Posing as a Concerned Jew

2009-10-06T18:47:00.002-04:00

For the amusement of my associates, below is a message on Facebook which I received from a purported Jew who objected to my logo on Facebook. I have not altered anything which he or I wrote.

Daniel Sidon, October 4 at 6:26am: "you are against what? religion? why you making this to your profile photo? I am Jew and I respect Islam, because there is lot of similarities, that bad and stupid people which are figting for hamas etc. they will fight also without islam! they aren't following islam and jihad. jihad is strictly self-defensive! be so kind and put there something whats telling to others how you are nice, or ugly, but not how you're same stupid! thanks"

Charles Kastriot, October 6 at 12:02am "I am not against religion. I oppose Islam and all other forms of totalitarianism. My profile photo represents my opposition to the cancer that threatens democracy and freedom across the world.
If you are truly Jewish, which I highly doubt, try reading the Koran before you defend Islam. It is full of anti-Jewish rhetoric. Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) merely co-opted some superficial elements of Judaism to lure Arabian Jews into his self-aggrandizing cult. After all but a few refused, he waged jihad on them, killing or enslaving all of the Jewish tribes of Arabia.

Hamas and other Islamists are simply following the example of Mo (MHBHF) as he dictated in the Koran. Just as Mo (MHBHF) ordered assassinations of critics, robbed anyone not in his cult, had sex with a multitude of women and pre-pubescent girls and committed numerous other crimes, Hamas and others such savages imitate his loathsome pattern.
If you think that by serving Mohamadans as their useful idiot, that they will not eventually slit your throat too? Stop being a craven dhimmi!"

Daniel Sidon, October 6 at 8:43am
"maybe YOU can try to read Koran."

I tried to reply to this anemic statement but this coward blocked me! Now, I am completely convinced that this invertabrate is actually a Mohamadan.

Sympathy for a Devil

2009-09-18T19:39:00.014-04:00

This author has been accused of promoting hatred of Mohamadans. I have been criticized for automatically concluding that Islamists are guilty of committing acts of war and terrorism against the Free World. "Never mind that the overwhelming number of bombings across the world, both of the suicidal and homicidal varieties, occur in furtherance of the jihad," say Islamists and their useful idiots. So do they have a point that the goons holding a Koran in one hand while torching churches and the Christians inside them or while vandalizing Jewish-owned business or cemeteries did not constitute a concerted effort by Islamists to attack infidels? In an attempt at cultural sensitivity, conflict resolution and reconciliation with Mohamadans, I will serve as the defense attorney in the court of public opinion for Najibullah Zazi, the Mohamadan in the United States recently arrested for involvement with a terrorist plot targeting New York. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/national/main5321252.shtml?tag=stack)

Has anyone considered the possibility all of his secretive dealings were an effort to surprise New Yorkers? On the eighth anniversary of the jihadist attacks on the World Trade Center, maybe he was planning a citywide gift distribution. After consulting a list of traditional gifts for anniversaries, Zazi could have been secretly arranging the placement of improvised explosive devices in pottery or bronze receptacles through the city. The residents could have been greeted with lovely gunpowder-fueled displays spelling out "I heart NY" in shrapnel. Perhaps he preferred the modern suggestion of lace or linen so we can deduce what he had in mind: new burkas for every woman in the city! So, FBI, are you happy now that you ruined the surprise for everyone? What a bunch of spoilsports!

Did the FBI consider the possibility that Zazi's reference to an actual, planned wedding was, in fact, legitimate but just not recognized under the American legal system? News out of Sudan showed that Islamists do not discriminate against people with an alternative sexual orientation(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm)Moral relativists certainly should demand that the FBI display a higher level of tolerance for this cultural aspect of Islam, in addition to other cherished Islamic practices like female genital mutilation, wife-beating and murder of rape victims. Once again, Americans have demonstrated their bigotry toward sexual minorities!

Undoubtedly, people in the United States will label Zazi as an "extremist" or a "radical" adherent of Islam. A more unfounded accusation could not be hurled at him. Zazi has faithfully devoted himself to following the tenets and commandments of the Koran. He has not strayed into un-Islamic activities like befriending infidels, repairing vandalized churches or synagogues, protesting against terrorism, composing music or creating works of art like sculptures or portraits. Therefore, those who have besmirched his allegiance to Allah should acknowledge Zazi's commitment to true Islam!

Is it too much to ask for Americans to view the situation from Zazi's point of view? We should consider his unease about seeing his relatives for the upcoming the celebration of Eid al-Fitr. He would have had to face yet another plethora of irritating comments from his parents such as "Your older brother Mohamad killed three infidels and one apostate during Ramadan. That's more than you killed all year! Even your younger brother Mohamad martyred himself last month. Why can't you stop being such a slacker and act like your brothers?" Due to his shirking of his responsibilities to Allah and Mohamad, Zazi's parents will not give him that brand new explosive vest on which he has had eye for months now. Instead, he will have to settle for a box cutter as the gift from his parents. That kind of torture would not be permitted by the United Nations yet we expect that this young man to suffer like this? Have you no heart, Americans?

I would like to offer a compromise. We should allow him to behead a few members of Code Pink or the John Adams Project to placate his demanding parents. The members of those groups would just blame the slayings on George Bush, Israel's existence, global warming or any other culprit except for Islam. So what would be the problem?

In conclusion, I wish to all my devoted Mohamadan readers, HAVE AN EXPLOSIVE EID AL-FITR!

COPYRIGHT BY CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009

Persecution of Patriots

2009-08-28T00:16:00.014-04:00

Hidden by the ongoing debate and protests over the proposed socialization of the American health care system in addition to the recent death of the man responsible for Mary Jo Kopechne's death, the Obama administration has started its torment of the defenders of American security. The Obama regime has been returning political favors to those that supported his campaign. Among these are the self-loathing Americans who want the United States to accept defeat and retreat on all of fronts in the Islamic war against the Free World. Therefore, the Obamaniacs have demanded that their messiah's henchmen unsheathe their daggers then plunge them into the exposed backs of patriots combating jihadis.

American service personnel have already been forced to concede to Islamists' demands regarding the treatment of the jihadis. American tax dollars were spent to provide a Koran, prayer rug and prayer beads to every captured jihadi. This funding of religious instruction exists in addition to the highly expensive provision of halal meals to cater to the savages' tastes. All of this undeserved treatment of these criminals flies in the face of the Geneva Convention. None of these goons were wearing a distinguishable military uniform while engaged in such activities as firing on American and allied forces, planting explosives and other acts of war.

There is no precedent for this appeasement of Islamists' demands for undeserved treatment. German prisoners during the Second World War never received free copies of Mein Kempf during their captivity. During that same war, the few Japanese soldiers captured by American were not issued any means to commit ritualistic suicide as their ideology mandated. Additionally, captured communist forces during the wars in Korea and Vietnam never were issued copies of The Communist Manifesto or any other Marxist literature supplied by the country that they sought to defeat. One must ask why do adherents to Islam deserve complementary implements of their ideology when adherents to other strains of totalitarianism were denied similar luxuries. Not only were Axis and Communist forces never pampered in captivity, those who engaged in military operations while not in uniform were frequently executed. Anyone involved in acts of sabotage or other hostility while not in uniform are considered as spies; those have no protections under the Geneva Convention. Instead of bowing down to Allah five times per day, these jihadis should reserve some gratitude for Uncle Sam for his naive and short-sighted magnanimity.

So what practices have drawn the ire of the useful idiots more concerned about pleasing Islamists than preventing further acts of jihad against the United States? Some of these prisoners were strip-searched, had ink smeared on their faces, were held in solitary confinement, were deprived of shoes, had cigar smoke blown in their faces or saw an interrogator squat over, stand on or kick a Koran. Can anyone hand-wringing over these incidents name just one person who has ever died or suffered disabling injuries from any of these actions?

Mohamad al-Kahtani, the would-be twentieth hijacker of the plot on the eleventh of September in 2001, faced annoyances such as sleep deprivation, exposure to cold and insults to female members of his family. Many of the members of the American armed forces have endured the same treatment during their training. When will any member of the ACLU or any other jihadi-coddling group lift a finger to halt to rough treatment meted out to American service personnel?

In a pursuit of justice, someone should conduct of poll of survivors of jihadist violence. The question would ask, “Would you rather undergo the same treatment suffered by the prisoners at GITMO or would prefer the fate of the passengers of the hijacked planes and by the occupants of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?” Maybe such an undertaking would open the eyes of the “Hate America First” crowd to see the folly of their myopic and self-destructive agenda.

COPYRIGHT CHARLES KASTRIOT SEPTEMBER 2009

Second Part of Conversation with Mohamadan idiot named Mohammad Irfaan

2009-08-15T20:57:00.003-04:00

Here are second batch of rantings from the Mohamadan sheep calling himself "Mohammad Irfaan" along with my responses. I have not altered anything that he or I said. The lunacies in addition to the misspellings and errors of capitalization and punctuation are all his own.

Mohammad Irfaan
August 11 at 6:42am

"Hey Charlie.. what your producing is complete rubbish.

"these verses don't not even exist in the Qur'an.. total fabircation!

"Islam says one should not burden one's wife with work that is toilsome and hard upon her (wife).

"Says also says that A Muslim woman also has obligations. All the laws and regulations pertaining to prayer, fasting, charity, pilgrimage, doing good deeds, etc., apply to women, albeit with minor differences having mainly to do with female physiology.

"Before marriage, a woman has the right to choose her husband. Islamic law is very strict regarding the necessity of having the woman's consent for marriage. The groom gives a marriage dowry to the bride for her own personal use. She keeps her own family name, rather than taking her husband's. As a wife, a woman has the right to be supported by her husband even if she is already rich. She also has the right to seek divorce and custody of young children. She does not return the dowry, except in a few unusual situations

"Finally I end with the World of Al-Mighty Allah....

"'And among His signs is this: that He created mates for you from yourselves that you may find rest and peace of mind in them, and He ordained between you love and mercy. Certainly, herein indeed are signs for people who reflect.' [Noble Quran 30:21]"

Charles Kastriot
August 11 at 10:02am
"You are partially right about the quotes I provided to you. They are complete rubbish but so is the entire Koran and all other the drivel which Mohamad (May he burn in Hell forever) fabricated and spewed.

"In contrast, you did not give any Koranic verses which substantiate the supposed rights of women under Islamic tyranny. You are a pathetic debater and delusional sheep.

"How can you dare to say what I quoted does not exist in the Koran? I provided the entire verse and gave you the chapter and verse numbers so you can look them up for yourself. You obviously never read the Koran. You are just regurgitating Islamic propaganda that has been drilled into your skull. You are a brainwashed robot."

Mohammad Irfaan
August 12 at 3:49am

"Hey Charlie Kid you little child...

"your bullshit is a load of crap. I am a Muslim fully read the Qur'an understood!

"The bullshit verse your saying does not exist in the Qur'an.. so better luck next time. Islam uplifts the women and gives it a higher status unlike you fools, Islam teaches us to eat, clothe, bathe ourselves, clean ourselves and many more.. what does your religion offer you?

"finally kid i would like to end with the Words of Al-Mighty Allah The Master of the Universe...

"'And If an evil worship comes to you from shaitan (Satan) then seek refuge with Allah. Verily He is All-Hearer, All-Knower. '

(Al Quran, 7:200)"

Mohammad Irfaan
August 12 at 3:50am

"Regards to debating, its pointless debating with you, because to debate the opponents needs to have some or little knowledge, unfortunately your Null!"

Charles Kastriot
August 12 at 12:34pm
"If the verse of Koran 4:34 does not say what I quoted, what does it say? You have proved that you are a liar by claiming to have read the Koran yet denying the existence of the misogynistic verse which I spelled out for you to read.

"My religion offers me the freedom to use my God-given powers of observation and reasoning, unlike your totalitarian ideology of blindly accepting the ludicrous dictates of a criminal.

"By calling me a 'kid', you only insult yourself because this 'kid' has outdebated you and revealed your ignorance of your own religion."

Mohammad Irfaan
August 13 at 3:22am

"ha ha I laugh in your face... your talking total rubbish.

"You can't prove anything from what you believe and try to use the Qur'an to go against Islam.. but you've lost once again.

"We Muslims believe in Moses and Jesus as one of the greatest Prophets of Al-Mighty Allah, we also believe Jesus was taken up alive and will be coming back to earth on the second comming, this also says in the real testiment the old Bible.. the One eyed monster the Jaal will come and Jesus will fight and destroy it.

"There are many simiarlities between Islam, Christianity and Jewdaism, but we must all unite and believe in what is in all faiths which is Believing in One God (Al-Mighty Allah).

"Qur'an Is the solution for Mankind!"

Charles Kastriot
August 14 at 12:25am
"You are a laughably ignorant buffoon. You cannot handle someone like me who has actually read that worthless bilge called the Koran. I quoted the Koran to prove the oppression and violence that Mohamad (May he burn in hell forever) endorsed. You childishly rant and scream baseless insults because you have failed to substantiate your absurd claims. Just because you deny the misogyny and violence inherent in Islam does not erase those evils from the heart of Mo's (MHBHF) fabricated ideology. Try reading Koran 4:34 and other verses espousing misogyny and violence before making any more stupid denials of Islam's misogyny and violence.

"I believe in one God, just not the phony lunar deity that Mo (MHBHF) claimed gave him the privilege to steal other men's wives, have sex with children, rob, murder and commit numerous other crimes."

Mohammad Irfaan
August 14 at 3:32am

"HEY LITTLE ONE you Kid, You get amuzed so easily lol.

"I do not need to prove or provide evidence my holy book the Al-Qur'an is the word of Al-Mighty Allah. what your quoting and asking me to look up is pure Bull shit, there is no such thing in the Qur'an in that particular verse. I understand the Qur'an AllahmidAllah, where you understanding finishes, mine starts!

"Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him (InshAllah) taught us many good deeds including treating others as human, loving kids, respecting elders, protecting the women, providing them with all the help and having no burden on the women.

"there is none worthy of worship expect Al-Mighty Allah and Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him (InshAllah) is the final messenger and servant of Al-Mighty Allah.

"ISLAM = THE SOLUTION FOR HUMANITY..

"you believe or you don't believe, my job was to convey the message of Peace, the message of submission to Al-Mighty Allah, the message of Good!

"You ponder over it or ignore thats totally upto you mate!

"ps. you knowledge on Islam is apaulling, i'm ashmed of You!

Charles Kastriot
Today at 5:54pm
"My knowledge of Islam is no less than yours. You will not even acknowledge the existence of obvious violent and misogynistic verses in Mohamad's (May He Burn in Hell Forever) contrived rantings even after I supplied the quotes to you, including chapter and verse numbers. Therefore, I can conclude that you must be one of the following:
1. illiterate
2. a lunatic who clings to his delusions despite overwhelming evidence disproving the existence of his fantasies
3. a liar determined to deny the truth of the misogynistic and violent contents found throughout the Koran

"You cannot provide any evidence of any supposed divine origin of the Koran other than Mohamad (May He Burn in Hell Forever) said so. Anyone can claim "divine origin" for his or her words, even a seventh century, child-molesting, murderous, thieving Arabian megalomaniac.

"You are more pathetic than a sheep. In the defense of a sheep, he lacks the cerebral capacity to reason and discern wisdom and decency from self-serving perversion and anti-social behavior. You have voluntarily forfeited any human capacity for advanced thought. You have accepted Mohamad's (May He Burn in Hell Forever) drivel as perfect simply because he claimed divine origin for it without even questioning his lunacy. George Orwell certainly had someone just like you when he wrote 1984."

Conversation with Mohamadan Idiot Named Mohammad Irfaan

2009-08-10T23:52:00.003-04:00

For the amusement of the readers, I present my dialogue from Facebook with a Mohamadan moron calling himself Mohammad Irfaan. I have not changed any of his statements nor any of mine. The errors in capitalization, grammar and punctuation, faulty logic and denial of reality presented below are all his own.

Mohammad Irfaan
July 10 at 7:00am
"Bismillah-Hir-Rahman-Nir-Rahim - In the Name of Allah The Most Kind the Most Mercificul.

"I would like to invite you to the Faith of Islam - The Solution for Humanity!"

Charles Kastriot
July 10 at 10:36am
"In the name of the dignity, liberty and equality of every human being, I invite you to renounce Islam- The Scourge of Humanity!"

Mohammad Irfaan
July 13 at 1:10am

"Islam is Dignity, liberty and Equality!!!"

Charles Kastriot
July 15 at 9:29pm
"Mohamad (MHBHF) declared that women are inherently inferior in Koran, Chapter Four. He also mandated subserviant status for non-Mohamadans in Koran, Chapter Nine. Therefore, equality of all humans is not possible under Islam.

"Liberty for Mohamadans to renounce Islam under Sharia or question Islamic doctrines does not exist. Apostacy is punished by execution. The freedom to create laws on the consensus of the governed is the antithesis of Islam. Islam is the whole world conforming to the whims and opinions of Mo (MHBHF). Thus, liberity is not possible under Islam.

"The only dignity accorded to anyone under Islam is to the clerics who emulate Mo(MHBHF) and the goons that enforce the tyrannical reign of Islamic regimes. Women have no such luxury;they have to hope that none of their hair peeks through their oppressive outfits or that no one rapes them. Otherwise they face floggings or stonings. These exist in addition to the dehumanizing Islamic practices of polygyny, female genital mutilation and wife-beating. There is no dignity under Islam for women and girls."

Mohammad Irfaan
July 16 at 2:41am

"Hey Charles, it seems you your not bright enough nor literate enough to understand the Qur'an. Al-Mighty Allah Tala has put a balance between men and women. If so, for the sake of the argument, why don't say FIFA have men playing women in football, why don't you see boxing matches being fought between men and women - wherez equality in that!

"the Qur'an has an absolute balance between men and women, some areas where men have more share, and some where women have a higher share, it completly addes to equality between both sexes.

"You guys (western) actually downgrade your women, you sell your mothers, daughters, wife's and sisters to people, advertise them almost naked, Islam respects them, covers them and gives total protection, thats why 2/3 of people accpeting Islam in America are women - WHY?"

Charles Kastriot
July 19 at 8:33am
"It seems you are so blinded by your brainwashing that you cannot see the inferor status of women under Islam. If they are equal under Islam, why cannot a women have multiple husbands but a man can have multiple wives? Why does a woman only receive half of a share of inheritance while a man receives a whole share? Why is the testimony of one man equal the testimony of two women? Name one specific area in which have more privilege than a man under Islam.

"You refuse to see how Islam degrades women. How is respectful of women to force them to wear black, suffocating clothing, especially in desert climates? Why are you Mohamadans so threatened by seeing such benign images such as a woman's face, hair or ankle? The answer lies in the fact that Mohamadans only view women and girls as their inferior servants (family members) or potential sexual objects (all other women in the world).

"There is no protection for sexually exploited women under Islam. If a woman is raped, she must provide four witness of the rape to exonerate herself. If not, she faces execution. If four men witness a rape and do nothing to stop it, they are either accomplices or too cowardly to testify against the rapist(s) anyway.

"Under Western laws, it is illegal to sell any human being. Under Islam women and girls are regularly sold by their families, often pre-teen girls are sold to men in their thirties and forties. Pedophilia is a crime in the Free World; in the Islamic bloc, it is accepted as another way to emulate Mohamad (MHBHF). Under Islam, enslavement of non-Mohamadans is condoned; in the civilized world, enslavement of anyone was outlawed two centuries ago.

"As for your argument about segregation of women and men in soccer and boxing, that is done for competitive balance. The same reason exists for the various weight classifications dividing men in boxing. Officials want a fight to be determined based on skill, not sheer size. That is why a hundred kilogram man does not fight a seventy kilogram man. Also, twelve year old boys do not compete in the same leagues as twenty-five year old men. It is a matter of physical maturity and length of time spent in training. At least women are free to compete openly in soccer, boxing and other sports in the Free World. That is not the case in the Islamic bloc.

"Obviously your Islamic indoctrination of relying on the Koran and Hadiths for all of life's questions has destroyed any mental capacity for you to determine answers on your own. A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Only you can liberate your brain from the cancer called Islam.

"Who says two-thirds of people converting to Islam are women? Name your source. This sounds like typical Islamic phony propaganda. While you search for an objective source for that, find out how many women renounce Islam once they arrive in the Free World. Their numbers continue to grow without much publicity."

Mohammad Irfaan
July 20 at 3:33am

"I'm Impressed by your words but not Influenced at all!

"Regards to the women being degraded etc by Islam - trust me your under a huge illusion. The Question of Hijab: Suppression Or Liberation?

"'Why do Muslim women have to cover their heads?' This question is one which is asked by Muslim and non-Muslim alike. For many women it is the truest test of being a Muslim so your no the only one.

"The answer to the question is very simple - Muslim women observe HIJAB (covering the head and the body) because Allah has told them to do so.

"'O Prophet, tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their outer garments around them (when they go out or are among men). That is better in order that they may be known (to be Muslims) and not annoyed...' [Noble Quran 33:59]"

"PLEASE CONTINUE TO READ...

"Other secondary reasons include the requirement for modesty in both men and women. Both will then be evaluated for intelligence and skills instead of looks and sexuality. An Iranian school girl is quoted as saying, 'We want to stop men from treating us like sex objects, as they have always done. We want them to ignore our appearance and to be attentive to our personalities and mind. We want them to take us seriously and treat us as equals and not just chase us around for our bodies and physical looks.' A Muslim woman who covers her head is making a statement about her identity. Anyone who sees her will know that she is a Muslim and has a good moral character. Many Muslim women who cover are filled with dignity and self esteem; they are pleased to be identified as a Muslim woman. As a chaste, modest, pure woman, she does not want her sexuality to enter into interactions with men in the smallest degree. A woman who covers herself is concealing her sexuality but allowing her femininity to be brought out.

"Islam has no fixed standard as to the style of dress or type of clothing that Muslims must wear. However, some requirements must be met. The first of these requirements is the parts of the body which must be covered. Islam has two sources for guidance and rulings: first, the Quran, the revealed word of Allah and secondly, the Hadith or the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) who was chosen by Allah to be the role model for mankind.

"Often forgotten is the fact that modern Western dress is a new invention. Looking at the clothing of women as recently as seventy years ago, we see clothing similar to Hijab. These active and hard-working women of the West were not inhibited by their clothing which consisted of long, full dresses and various types of head covering. Muslim women who wear Hijab do not find it impractical or interfering with their activities in all levels and walks of life. Hijab is not merely a covering dress but more importantly, it is behavior, manners, speech and appearance in public. Dress is only one facet of the total being. The basic requirement of the Muslim woman's dress apply to the Muslim man's clothing with the difference being mainly in degree. Modesty requires that the area between the navel and the knee be covered in front of all people except the wife. The clothing of men should not be like the dress of women, nor should it be tight or provocative. A Muslim should dress to show his identity as a Muslim. Men are not allowed to wear gold or silk. However, both are allowed for women.

"For both men and women, clothing requirements are not meant to be a restriction but rather a way in which society will function in a proper, Islamic manner."

Mohammad Irfaan
July 20 at 3:47am

"At a time when the rest of the world, from Greece and Rome to India and China, considered women as no better than children or even slaves, with no rights whatsoever, Islam acknowledged women's equality with men in a great many respects. The Quran states:

"'And among His signs is this: that He created mates for you from yourselves that you may find rest and peace of mind in them, and He ordained between you love and mercy. Certainly, herein indeed are signs for people who reflect.' [Noble Quran 30:21]

"Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said:

"'The most perfect in faith amongst believers is he who is best in manners and kindest to his wife.' [Abu Dawud]

"With regard to education, both women and men have the same rights and obligations. This is clear in Prophet Muhammad's saying:

"'Seeking knowledge is mandatory for every believer.' [Ibn Majah]

"A woman is to be treated as God has endowed her, with rights, such as to be treated as an individual, with the right to own and dispose of her own property and earnings, enter into contracts, even after marriage. She has the right to be educated and to work outside the home if she so chooses. She has the right to inherit from her father, mother, and husband.

"Before marriage, a woman has the right to choose her husband. Islamic law is very strict regarding the necessity of having the woman's consent for marriage. The groom gives a marriage dowry to the bride for her own personal use. She keeps her own family name, rather than taking her husband's. As a wife, a woman has the right to be supported by her husband even if she is already rich. She also has the right to seek divorce and custody of young children. She does not return the dowry, except in a few unusual situations.

"Despite the fact that in many places and times Muslim communities have not always adhered to all or even many of the foregoing in practice, the ideal has been there for 1,400 years, while virtually all other major civilizations did not begin to address these issues or change their negative attitudes until the 19th and 20th centuries, and there are still many contemporary civilizations which have yet to do so.

"Finally...

"The issue of women in Islam, is topic of great misunderstanding and distortion due partly to a lack of understanding, but also partly due to misbehavior of some Muslims which has been taken to represent the teachings of Islam!"

Charles Kastriot
July 21 at 9:04am
"If you know Islam as well as you claim, you know that hadiths are disputed by various sects and schools of Islam. Some hadiths are labeled sound by some groups but others call the same hadiths false. All of sects and schools consider the Koran is the ultimate source of Islamic doctrine. In the fourth chapter of the Koran appropriately titled 'Women', Mohamad (May he burn in hell forever) clearly states that women are inherently inferior to men and that a man is permitted to beat his multiple wives. Any Mohamadan man who takes multiple wives and beats them is not misunderstanding or distorting Islam. On the contrary, he is emulating Mo (MHBHF) who the Koran states is the paragon and example of ideal human behavior.

"As for oppressive clothing required for women, why must women suffer in suffocating outfits? Men can control their thoughts and actions in regards to women. Even if a women completely hides herself in the outfits identical to a tent, a man can still view her as a sexual object. No amount of hiding herself under layer upon layer of clothing by a woman can make men stop viewing her as a carnal outlet for their sexual gratification. The problem of objectivication of women and girls lies in the minds of sexually compulsive men like Mo (MHBHF).

"On what basis do you claim that a DEITY ordered that women must wear suffocating outfits? It was Mo (MHBHF) that uttered those words recorded in the Koran. He alone claimed to receive those commandments. None of his contemporaries heard any divine voices telling them to how to think or act. There is zero independent corroboration of any divine origin of any of Mo(MHBHF)'s fabrications.

"Can you not see that Mo (MHBHF) was a charlatan who eventually deluded enough people to rise to the level of a dictator? He conveniently received exemptions to rules to which everyone else had to comply. He could have an unlimited number of wives; other men had a four wife limit. Mo (MHBHF) was entitled to twenty percent of the booty from his lackeys robbing other tribes; everyone else settled for smaller shares, even though they actually risked their lives to commit the crimes and Mo (MHBHF) just gave orders. After seeing the wife of his adopted son undresing and he started lusting for her, he just so happened to receive a self-serving alleged "revelation" so he could seize another man's wife for Mo(MHBHF)'s own exploitation.

"(MHBHF) was nothing more than sexually-obsessed, megalomaniacal, evilly manipulative child molester. He exploited the gullibility, greed and superstitious beliefs of ignorant people around him then built up a totalitarian regime with himself wielding the sole position of power. He stands in a long line of similar despots throughout history such as Adolf Hitler, Genghis Khan, Joseph Stalin, Napoleon Bonaparte and other self-appointed so-called "prophets" espousing new ideologies who morphed into absolute tyrants.

Mohammad Irfaan
July 23 at 3:40am

"Hey Charles - seriously I do not know where you get your false sources from.. regards to man beating his wife is totally against Islam - Our Beloved Prophet Muhammad (Peace and Blessing Be Upon him InshAllah) always learned us to love and care for the wives.

"Regarding the cover up of Muslim Women, every Muslim women whom covers does it so by its own personal DESIRE.. its not that if you don't cover you will get killed or beated to death - But Islam order a women to cover up, shez allowed to show her face, hands and ankles - So i don't see where she suffocates!

"A wife (women) can earn as much as she wants and spend it where ever she prefers, according to Islam the women does not need to share money or her finance with her husband, but the Husband has been given the duty to provide full financial support to his wife - Therefore here the women is given huge respect, as the man takes the financial burden!

"Regarding Muhammad Peace and Blessing Be Upon Him InshAllah...

"Almost everyone on the earth today is discussing Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him. People want to know, 'Who was he exactly?' 'What did he teach?' 'Why was he loved so much by some and hated so much by others?' 'Did he live up to his claims?' 'Was he a holy man?' 'Was he a prophet of God?' 'What is the truth about this man - Muhammad?'

"How can we discover the truth and be totally honest in our judgment?

"We will begin with the very simple historical evidences, facts as narrated by thousands of people, many of whom knew him personally. The following is based on books, manuscripts, texts and actual eyewitness accounts, too numerous list herein, yet all have been preserved in original form throughout the centuries by both Muslims and non-Muslims.

"Muhammad ibn (son of) Abdullah ibn (son of) Abdul Mutalib, was born in the year 570 C.E. (Christian Era) in Makkah, Felix Arabia (today: Saudi Arabia) and he died in 633 C.E. in Yathrib (today: Madinah, Saudi Arabia).

"A. His names: When he was born, his grandfather, Abdul Mutalib, gave him the name Muhammad. And it means 'praised one' or 'praising one.' He was later called 'As-Saddiq' (the Truthful) by all of those who knew of his truthful and honest nature. He always said only the truth. He was also called 'Al-Amin' (the Trustworthy) due to his integrity and always upholding any trust given to him. When the tribes were battling against each other, both sides would entrust him with their possessions during the fighting, even if it might be against some of his own tribesmen, because they knew he would always uphold any trust given to him. All of his names indicated the very nature of a man who was praised for his honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. He was also well known for advocating the reconciliation of kinship and relationships. He ordered his followers to always honor the 'ties of the wombs' (siblings and other close relatives).

"Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, taught that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was the immaculate conception and miracle birth of Mary, and that she was the best creation of Almighty God. He insisted even to the Jews of Madinah, that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, was the Messiah, the Christ, the one predicted to come in their Torah (Old Testament). He also taught that Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, did many miracles by the permission of Almighty God, curing the lepers, restoring sight to the blind and even bringing a dead man back to life, and he was not dead, rather Almighty God had raised him up. He also predicted Jesus, peace and blessings be upon him, is going to return again in the Last Days to lead the true believers in a victory over the evil and unrighteous people, and he will destroy the Anti-Christ.

"PLUS...

"Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, forbade any killing, even when his followers were being killed, until the orders for retaliation came from Allah. Even then the limits were clearly spelled out and only those engaged in active combat against the Muslims or Islam were to be fought in combat. And even then, only according to very strict rules from Allah.

Charles Kastriot
August 6 at 11:18pm
"My sources are the Koran and Hadiths. Koran Chapter 4:34 authorizes wife-beating. Mohamadan women are regularly brutalized for refusing to follow Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) commandment (Koran 24:31) to cover themselves completely. Mo (MHBHF) urged murder of his enemies in Koran (2:244, 2:191, 2:216, 4:76, 4:89, 5:33, 9:5, 9:73, 9:111 and 9:123, in addition to numerous others). So where do you obtain your phony Islamic propaganda?

"Mohamadan men hold total authority over their wives according to Koran 4:34. Therefore, a man can prevent his wives from holding jobs thus being totally dependent on his support. This is a common tactic to keep Mohamadan women dependent on their husband despite his infidelity (polygyny) and his Koran-authorized beatings.

"Where are the accounts of eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen or heard Allah's alleged 'revelations' to Mo (MHBHF)? NO ONE ELSE heard Mo's so-called 'revelations'. He claimed to be alone whenever Allah allegedly gave him a message. That is a suspiciously convenient cover for such a huckster like Mo (MHBHF). He fabricated supposedly divine messages whenever he wanted something like larger portions of stolen goods, taking someone else's wife and such criminal behavior."

Mohammad Irfaan
Today at 4:26am

"Hey seems you invented your own false book where you quoting from.
Islam is against beating of the wife, the Holy Book of Al-Mighty Allah the Al-Qur'an is against the beating of the wife.

"A women if she wishes can work and in Islam there is not stopping. Islam has put the financial burden on the Husband, its the Husband's duty to provide food and shelter for the women, if the women earns money too she is not oblighed to support the Husband, if she wishes fair enough else it is not compulsory to give her money to the Husband. Islam AllhamdiAllah has given huge respect to women, we Muslims cover our women and its something that Muslim women prefer, unlike the western society, they love to display their mothers, daughters and wives nude on tv.

"Islam is pure and a solution for Mankind!"

Charles Kastriot
August 10, 2009 at 10:47am
"I did not invent a false book for those quotes. I typed quotes from Mohamad's (May he burn in Hell forever) false book. Since you obviously never read his loathsome fabrication or are simply lying about its contents, I will spell out the entire Koranic verse 4:34.
"'Men stand superior to women in that God hath preferred some of them over others, and in that they expend of their wealth: and the virtuous women, devoted, careful (in their husbands') absence, as God has cared for them. But those whose perverseness ye fear, admonish them and remove them into bed-chambers and beat them; but if they submit to you, then do not seek a way against them; verily, God is high and great.'

"Since I provided Koranic evidence proving Islamic sanctioning of wife-beating, I dare you to provide any Koranic verse giving women the right to work even if her husband objects to that.

"Where have you seen women nude on television? I can tell you that in my country, the United States, NO ONE, female or male, is allowed to appear nude on over-the-air broadcast or basic cable television.

"Yes, you Mohamadans cover your women, just like civilized people cover furniture. That is logical since you savages consider women as objects to be collected like multiple possessions (Koran 4:3) then exploited sexually (Koran 2:223).

"Islam is pure evil and the bane of humanity!"

conversation with a Mohamadan sheep named Fatima Shirazi

2009-08-07T20:40:00.003-04:00

In response to a friend request on Facebook by someone unknown to me calling herself "Fatima Shirazi", the following exchanges took place. I have not altered any of what she or I said in the original messages.

Charles Kastriot
June 29 at 11:51pm
"Have we met previously? I am wondering why you sent me a friend request."

Fatima Shirazi
July 7 at 8:26pm
"lol no...
we havent
just curious to add you"

Charles Kastriot
July 8 at 12:45pm
"What is your opinion of Islam?"

Fatima Shirazi
July 9 at 5:59pm
"but in what aspect do you mean?
it is a broad question
whats your view?"

Charles Kastriot
July 9 at 8:27pm
"I will specify my question. What is your opinion of polygyny, of Sharia and its implementation, of suicidal attacks, of apostasy from Islam and of other religions?"

Fatima Shirazi
July 9 at 9:47pm
"lol wow so basically what do I think of radical islam?
I do not support polygamy it was in the quran back in the day for different reasons, sharia is only practiced in saudi and other gulf nations. I dont suport suicide attacks not does islam, despite wat people say.
apostasy-if a person wants to be a different religion so be it...to each their own.
i have no issue with other religions but if i were to ever convert i could never be a polytheistic one..
ex-hindu, buddhism...etc
but that doesnt mean i have a personal vendetta against them
and you?"

Charles Kastriot
July 11 at 3:12pm
"Polygyny is not radical in terms of Islam. Mohamad (MHBHF) clearly stated in Koran 4:3 that a man can marry up to four women. If someone claimed that polygyny was forbidden in Islam or that a woman could legally have multiple husbands at the same times, those would be radical. Polygyny is a conventional Islamic component

"Koran 3:151, 4:74, 4:76, 4:89-91 and numerous others promote violence versus non-believers and promise eternal rewards for those who die fighting. Once again, there is nothing radical about advocating Islamic violence against non-believers according to the foundation of Islam, the Koran.

"Koran 2:2 clearly states that whatever Mo (MHBHF) said and is recorded in the Koran is absolutely true and not to be doubted."

Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:22pm
"in regards to a man being able to marry four women, those who still practice it despite the history of why it happened during the time of the prophet pbuh, are in my opinion uneducated. it also states in which chapter im not sure, that the reason it was written was so no one disputed him, and later it states that you are only able to marry up to four women if you can support all of them and be equal, since that is not humanly possible it is not to happen. the reason why people still do it is for debts, or they are uneducated and/or they are trying to keep a bloodline in the family. there are many reasons why it happens. i dont understand are we arguing?
i find what you asked me radical.
"i pray, i dont eat pork, i fast during ramadan, but yet i go out, i date non muslims, i am aware of who i am, i added you because you were on the i hate islam group. it is easy to pick apart any religion for its beliefs. there are many beliefs in islam i dont agree with, but the same goes for christianity, buddhism, catholicism, judaism, etc. i find flaws in all religions despite you being able to quote chapters, i am devout but not to the point where i dont have my own mind.
The quran is a guideline, i find religion a guideline and any person who has any kind of faith, agnostic, atheistic or etc...will go to heaven on hell depending on what a person hold inside not what they show to the world as their religion. those who have faith and those who dont...i dont understand the hatred for religions people dont fully understand.
"you have to understand why these things were implemented before you debate them.
as a sidenote, i was int he i hate islam group, because i did not believe it when a friend of mine told me. this friend of mine is christian and a friend of theirs joined the group.
"i am not saying its okay to pick and choose what you believe about a religion, but i am saying that i understand the flaws of islam, and if you were to sit down with me or someone like minded they would be able to explain this to you."

Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:23pm
"its very easy to pick faults with a religion, but why focus on that when we have our own lives to live?"

Fatima Shirazi
July 11 at 4:27pm
"Inside the Koran

A film by Antony Thomas"

Charles Kastriot
July 15 at 9:12pm
"While other religious have their shortcomings, Islam is not merely a religion. It is a totalitarian ideology. Its dedicated adherents pursue Mo(MHBHF)'s exhortations to subjugate the whole world to force all of of humanity to submit to Islamic dominance. That is why I actively oppose Islam and its advocates."

Fatima Shirazi
July 23 at 8:09pm
"Well while I disagree with you fully. I feel this is a no win argument. You have your views and I have mine. But I hope you dont feel like that about Islam forever. Maybe you will meet a great person who is muslim or maybe you will see where your faults lie in your view of islam."

Charles Kastriot
July 25 at 2:46pm
"You truly think by meeting 'a great person who is muslim' that will eliminate all of the evil contained within his/her and your ideology? Would meeting a 'great person who is Jewish' cause you to renounce Islam and accept Judaism? What if that 'great person' were an athiest, a Christian, a Buddhist, a Marxist or a pagan? Falling for Islamic disinformation uttered by a smooth-talking Mohamadan cannot change the inherently totalitarian nature of Islam.

"I hope you will read the Koran and other Islamic texts with an open mind and inquisitive spirit instead of the unquestioned and unchallengeable acceptance that Islamists demand. I simply view Islam as it really exists and what it advocates."

Fatima has not replied to my last message.

conversation with Mohamadan idiot named Ali Siddiqui

2009-08-07T03:26:00.004-04:00

A few months ago, a Mohamadan punk calling himself "Ali Siddiqi" hijacked an anti-Islamic group on Facebook. I had been a member of the group until this savage co-opted it to spew Islamic disinformation. So I quit the group. The following exchanges are his challenges and my responses. All of his rampant misspellings, ignorance of grammatical and capitalization rules and numerous vulgar comments have not been altered by me!

Ali Siddiqui
June 25 at 1:00am
"so you came back huh?
you cant put up a debate so wh should i keep you on the group? "

Charles Kastriot
June 25 at 6:34pm
"I have never been gone. I can debate you into the ground. Your ignorance of anything outside of the ideology created by Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in hell forever) is as glaring as the midday sun. I no interest in belonging to the group you hijacked."

Ali Siddiqui
June 25 at 6:59pm
"lol the one you mean you left? lol what a dumbass. you ran away from the debate we had because the holy spirit knew it couldnt guide you.
my ignorance? buddy you gave me what most anti-islamics give. the same stuff over and over and stupid christians like you haven't realised muslims have refuted all lies you christian sites have thrown at us."

Charles Kastriot
June 25 at 8:01pm
"I had more important activities at the time than spell out all the evils of Islam to an myopic savage like yourself. I can easily debate you and make you look like a fool. You refuse to accept any logic or information that contradicts the Koran and whatever else Mo (MHBHF) fabricated. You are a simpleton whose philosophy is "If Mohamad did or said it, it must be right." I do not need to lie about Mohamadans or Islam. Simply quoting the Koran incriminates Mo (MHBHF) and the ideology he created.

I will repeat what I said to you about the Holy Spirit. I could not care less about defending Christian mysticism. That is not my ideology. I am a Deist."

Ali Siddiqui
June 26 at 4:53pm
"you ran away from the women debate we had. and your saying you can make me look like a fool? i dont see where logic contradicts the quran."

Charles Kastriot
June 26 at 11:26pm
"Try explaining away Koran 76:13 in which Mo (MHBHF) claimed those who would kill & die for his benefit would spend eternity without experiencing the cold of the moon. The temperature on the moon reaches 138 degrees Celsius. Does that sound "cold" to you?

"As for women, Islamic misogyny is summed up in one verse. In 4:34, Mo (MHBHF) not only claimed that men are inherently superior to women but also that men are allowed to beat women. That is naked hatred of women and totally inexcusable."

Ali Siddiqui
June 27 at 1:47pm
"'As for women, Islamic misogyny is summed up in one verse. In 4:34, Mo (MHBHF) not only claimed that men are inherently superior to women but also that men are allowed to beat women. That is naked hatred of women and totally inexcusable.'

"buddy i've taken care of this. remember when you ran away?
do you reall think you can judge the gender equity by this one verse?
and no he ddn say women are inferior to men. men have more responsibilities than women. they have the same rights, diff roles.

"and yeah again theres 3 chances before a wife gets a lgith beating with a miswak. see those women in downtown? yeah islam doesn't alow that. if a wife is going towards prostitution, the husband has to talk to her. if she does it again the husband sleep elsewhere in the house. and if she still does it, then the husband can take that miswak (toothbrush) and tap her. its to cause emotional pain. now i dont know if you got a sex change, but women are emotional. alot more than men."

Charles Kastriot
June 27 at 2:48pm
"Koran 4:34 clearly states that men are SUPERIOR to women. Under Islamic law, women do not have the same rights as men. Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time. Women are not allowed to beat their husbands. Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance. Women are not allowed to exit their homes without hiding their heads and covering their entire bodies in oppressive outfits. These are just a few examples of women's inferiority under Islam.

"The Koran says NOTHING about giving women three chances before being beaten.It does not limit the size of an object that a man can use to hit a woman. Try reading the Koran instead of parroting Islamic disinformation.

"You want more proof of Islamic misogyny? Read Koran 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) stated that women as the same as real estate, an inanimate possession, that be entered whenever the male owners wish. Women are just property in the Mohamadan mindset. That is dehumanizingly evil.

"So you think because women are supposedly a lot more emotional than men that justifies beating and belittling women? Only cowardly savages like you think that way."

Ali Siddiqui
June 27 at 6:59pm
"'Koran 4:34 clearly states that men are SUPERIOR to women. Under Islamic law, women do not have the same rights as men. Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time. Women are not allowed to beat their husbands. Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance. Women are not allowed to exit their homes without hiding their heads and covering their entire bodies in oppressive outfits. These are just a few examples of women's inferiority under Islam.'

"lol. obviously i shouldnt debate with a scholor who's spent years analysing islam like you. i only copy and paste what i fon on the internet to support my claims.
it says they HAVE MORE RESPONSIBILITIES:
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996016420

http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996015878

"'Women cannot have multiple husbands at the same time.'

"so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands? no. islam says men can have more than 1 wife ONLY if he can provide and care for them with the same equality. if you read further you can see how God says he prefers men marry only one.
http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996015724

"watching a video this question came up by a non-muslim women. the woman was pretty angry at this for some reason. she said with a temper 'why cant women in islam have more than one husband? the scholor asked if that woman has a husband, she said 'yes and when he comes home from work he's all grumpy and i get him a beer and cook for him'.
so the scholor asked 'then why do you want 4'?

'Women do not have the right to an equal inheritance'

"again if you weren a dried up pussy you'd remember i took care of this.
women get less inheritance because the law of Naqfa- the man has to support his wife, kids and sisters with the money FIRST before he can spend on what he wants. meanwhile since the wife doesnt have to provde any income, she gets less and she can spend it on whatever. same goes for when she has a job. she could be a millioanre and doesnt have to give a single penny towards the family needs. again thats the man's job. he could make 10 000 a year and the family has to be provided for first. again christianity, judaism and hinduism give ZERO inheritance to females.

"'The Koran says NOTHING about giving women three chances before being beaten.It does not limit the size of an object that a man can use to hit a woman. Try reading the Koran instead of parroting Islamic disinformation.'

"LOL another dried up puss remark. go read the actual verse mr scholor.
i've memorized the quran in 3 languages (arabic of course, english, and my own language urdu plus i can translate into french since i've been taking french immersion since kindergarden).
yes everysingle scholor says it has to be with a miswak or a cloth-http://www.islamonline.net/english/In_Depth/IslamWifeBeating/index.shtml

http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-AAbout_Islam/AskAboutIslamE/AskAboutIslamE&cid=1123996016760

http://whyislam.org/FamilyandGender/IslamandDomesticViolence/tabid/288/Default.aspx

"'You want more proof of Islamic misogyny? Read Koran 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) stated that women as the same as real estate, an inanimate possession, that be entered whenever the male owners wish. Women are just property in the Mohamadan mindset. That is dehumanizingly evil.'

"hmm mr scholor please read the hadiths behind this. before islam anal sex was practiced AGAINST women's will. muhammed pbuh said you can put your penis from any angle AS LONG AS its gets to the vagina. thats what it means by "wish". any way but anal sex is not allowed.

"'So you think because women are supposedly a lot more emotional than men that justifies beating and belittling women? Only cowardly savages like you think that way.'

"only a gay ass drug thinks the way you do. funny how you mix words and interpretations together. re-read what i said on what the wife has to do to get the non-painful beating. no where in the quran does it say men can beat their wives whenever. muslims dont hurt ot insult or beat anyone like how you do to your wife."

Charles Kastriot
June 27 at 10:43pm
"Well, you are cowardly punk. You resort to name-calling because you cannot defend the violent misogyny that Mo (MHBHF) put in the Koran.

"You still have not justified men being allowed to have multiple wives. You betray your own misogyny by your question "so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands?" You obviously only view a wife as sexual outlet and domestic servant, not as an equal member in a partnership.

"You keep referring to a supposed lack of inheritance for women in Judaism, Hinduism and Christianity. As I pointed out to you previously which you refuse to accept, none of those are the legal codes in any country, not even Israel or India. Christianity is not a political ideology as Islam is so your point is a non-sequitor. There is no Christian equivalent to Sharia. Israel, India and Christian countries are representative democracies in which laws are based on the will of the citizens through elected officials. Islamic regimes are based on the whims and example of the dictatorship of Mo (MHBHF).

"Your cited Islamic experts can obfuscate and fabricate whatever they wish about Koran 4:34. That will not change the fact that NO limitation on what a man is permitted to use to beat his wives or how many times he must warn her is listed in the Koran.

"Further proof of your objectification of women is your evasion of addressing the point of 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) equated women with A PIECE OF LAND, a mere possession, not a fellow human being. Under that verse, women have no right to their own bodies. They have no right to decline sex. A man owns her and uses her for his own gratification, regardless of what she wants.

"You still have not explained the illogical promise Mo (MHBHF) made to his followers about being spared the "cold of the moon" in paradise. You claim not to have found any illogic in the Koran. That is just one of many.

"Your statements have revealed yourself as an ignorant anus. You deny the widespread cases of Mohamadan men beating their wives, often fatally, feeling justified by Koran 4:34. Are you that delusional or just a committed liar?"

Ali Siddiqui
June 28 at 12:01pm

"'Well, you are cowardly punk. You resort to name-calling because you cannot defend the violent misogyny that Mo (MHBHF) put in the Koran.

'You still have not justified men being allowed to have multiple wives. You betray your own misogyny by your question "so tell me should women go from house to house, cook and clean for their husbands?" You obviously only view a wife as sexual outlet and domestic servant, not as an equal member in a partnership.'

"your stupidity allows me to call you a fag. you call yourself a scholr yet fail to give any point in your scholory claims.
and mr scholor i took care of polygamy. i gave you links that go directly to scholors, female ones too. islam doesnt allow women to be sexual objects like your cult faith.
i'm saying thats what having more husbands would be like. how can she satisfy all of her husbands? again you've read the entire quran and you still fail to understand.

"'You keep referring to a supposed lack of inheritance for women in Judaism, Hinduism and Christianity. As I pointed out to you previously which you refuse to accept, none of those are the legal codes in any country, not even Israel or India. Christianity is not a political ideology as Islam is so your point is a non-sequitor. There is no Christian equivalent to Sharia. Israel, India and Christian countries are representative democracies in which laws are based on the will of the citizens through elected officials. Islamic regimes are based on the whims and example of the dictatorship of Mo (MHBHF).'

"again mr scholor when you ran away from the debte several months ago, i told you i'm talking about faith not countries. any faith can be put as political. christianity use to in the medevil era. and islam is not the same as christianity. it gives people rightd even non-muslims. dont bother mr scholor taking verses from the quran. most of it talks about war in which we cant start in islam. again the Us has christian values in their government systems.

"'Your cited Islamic experts can obfuscate and fabricate whatever they wish about Koran 4:34. That will not change the fact that NO limitation on what a man is permitted to use to beat his wives or how many times he must warn her is listed in the Koran'

"fabricate? its all in the islamic scriptures. you can whine all you want fag, it wont change a thing. again mr scholor if you didnt ignore my previous posts you'd see how i took care of this. see your wife in downtown? yeah islam doesnt allow that. it doesnt allow women to be whore's like her. when women start to move towards this,the husband has the right to stop her. and again the beating is a tap. it cant hurt. i think your wife needs a fist in her stomach but i cant since islam doesnt allow pain to women.

"'Further proof of your objectification of women is your evasion of addressing the point of 2:223. Mo (MHBHF) equated women with A PIECE OF LAND, a mere possession, not a fellow human being. Under that verse, women have no right to their own bodies. They have no right to decline sex. A man owns her and uses her for his own gratification, regardless of what she wants'

"dont be ignorant like your greedy wife. i took care of this and how that is talking about sex. a woman has no right to her body? what kind of islamic education did you get? did you miss this?:
'O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness, that ye may take away part of the dower [money given by the husband to the wife for the marriage contract] ye have given them, except where they have been guilty of open lewdness; on the contrary live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If ye take a dislike to them it may be that ye dislike a thing, and God brings about through it a great deal of good. (The Noble Quran, 4:19)'

"so over here if i go against my wife's will i'm doing a sin. and look at the ending. if i dont likeomething about her then theres other great things.

"'You still have not explained the illogical promise Mo (MHBHF) made to his followers about being spared the "cold of the moon" in paradise. You claim not to have found any illogic in the Koran. That is just one of many.

"Your statements have revealed yourself as an ignorant anus. You deny the widespread cases of Mohamadan men beating their wives, often fatally, feeling justified by Koran 4:34. Are you that delusional or just a committed liar?'

[76:13] They relax therein on luxurious furnishings. They suffer neither the heat of the sun, nor any cold.

cold moon?

"again islam doesnt allow wife beating. a tap is allowed after 3 tries if she goees towards whoredom. and no if it cant cause pain how can it be fatal? quit going onto jihadwatch buddy. i've an invitation for a debate with rob spenecer which he has yet to reply to.
"i know you let your wife be a slut at midnight but my faith tells women should always be on track. children learn more from their mothers. if they learn to be sluts then theres a problem. kinda like your kids. do you actually think when your daughter tells you she's going over to her friends house to study, she really gonna? no its like mother like daughter."

Charles Kastriot
June 28 at 2:42pm
"You are appallingly arrogant and ignorant. You claim to know about me, my wife and kids. What is my "faith cult", as you referred to it? Since you claim to know so much about them, tell me what are their names? What does she do for a living? How old are they? Where do they attend school? Go ahead and embarrass yourself even more by trying to answer those questions.

"What these supposed rights that non-Mohamadans have under Islam? Non-Mohamadans cannot build or repair their places of worship, openly express their beliefs in public, carry weapons, proselytize to gain converts to their faiths, testify against Mohamadans in trials among other injustices. Mohamadans have those rights in the Free World.

"You have been so thoroughly brainwashed you accept whatever drivel Islamists tell you that the Koran says. You refuse to see what the Koran actually says. You allow Islamists to blatantly add their own self-serving words to verses when those betray the evil or stupidity of Mo's (MHBHF) teachings. You accept their teachings that women exist to serve men as inferiors. Instead you swallow their disinformation like a sheep at a trough.

"Once again, you refuse to read the Koran objectively. 4:19 gives a man an excuse, his wife's supposed lewdness, an excuse to punish her. Under Sharia, lewdness is defined in open-ended ways such as showing any portion of her anatomy other than her eyes or hands. That is why Mohamadan women have to wear oppressive outfits so savages like you will not target them for beatings.

"You conveniently omitted the entire verse of 76:13. The reference the the supposed "cold of the moon" shows that Mo (MHBHF) was an ignorant savage. That shows you are one too for thinking he is the model for human beings.

"So, boy, run along now. Go sodomize your goats or fantasize about your next hijacking. Maybe your brain will congeal enough to function properly so you might actually read the Koran objectively. Hopefully, your suicide bombing vest will explode prematurely before you have the opportunity to kill any civilized people.

Ali Siddiqui
June 29 at 5:35pm

"LOL hey daddy calm down. your machines are done. no woman wants you now. Mrs Kastriot needs love thats why she doesnt want you. go look in your daughters room. see those condoms? those pills? are you fathering properly?

"'What these supposed rights that non-Mohamadans have under Islam? Non-Mohamadans cannot build or repair their places of worship, openly express their beliefs in public, carry weapons, proselytize to gain converts to their faiths, testify against Mohamadans in trials among other injustices. Mohamadans have those rights in the Free World. '

"again how can you call yourself a scholor? do you even know what the sharia is made from? yes non-muslims can have their own places of worship. we cannot carry weapons you imaginary cult. nor can we force non-muslims to accept islam.

"'You have been so thoroughly brainwashed you accept whatever drivel Islamists tell you that the Koran says. You refuse to see what the Koran actually says. You allow Islamists to blatantly add their own self-serving words to verses when those betray the evil or stupidity of Mo's (MHBHF) teachings. You accept their teachings that women exist to serve men as inferiors. Instead you swallow their disinformation like a sheep at a trough'

"is it that i've been brainwashed or you getting your scholorly excuses from the internet? i've memorized the quran in 3 languages (arabic of course, english,urdu plus i can translate into french which i've been taking since elementary).
how do we add our own words when you've been giving scholory excuses which come out of your daughter's vagina? you've without any islamic reference have given me what the quran or hadith say, i've refuted them and you countinue to throw your same laughable rubbish.
again women do not serve men like how you treat Mrs. Kastriot. i accept the quran whole heartedly which is why when fags like you lerk around like a drug addict around children's schools, i can wash away the myths and lies."

"'Once again, you refuse to read the Koran objectively. 4:19 gives a man an excuse, his wife's supposed lewdness, an excuse to punish her. Under Sharia, lewdness is defined in open-ended ways such as showing any portion of her anatomy other than her eyes or hands. That is why Mohamadan women have to wear oppressive outfits so savages like you will not target them for beatings'

"once again you've fucked your wife so bad not only has she left you but you cant concentrate on what i write without you grabbing your dick every few seconds. read the first part of the verse. once again i write:
O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness....

"islam doesnt allow women to dress like your wife at midnight or your daughter in a downtown strip club. it tells to dress modestly which is why muslim women CHOOSE to cover up. the burka and hijab takes the attraction of men away so 1) they keep their modesty 2) they keep their VIRGINITY (unlike your daughter) and 3) they want to be liked for WHO THEY ARE not how they look (again i make reference you your whore wife and daughter). yeah you tell me whats more oppressive.

"'You conveniently omitted the entire verse of 76:13. The reference the the supposed 'cold of the moon' shows that Mo (MHBHF) was an ignorant savage. That shows you are one too for thinking he is the model for human beings.'

"aright charles kasstriot go here:quranbrowser.com or quransearch.com and look up 76:13. again i wonder how you call yourself a scholor.

"'So, boy, run along now. Go sodomize your goats or fantasize about your next hijacking. Maybe your brain will congeal enough to function properly so you might actually read the Koran objectively. Hopefully, your suicide bombing vest will explode prematurely before you have the opportunity to kill any civilized people.'

"my next hijacking will be your bed along with your daughter (she can suck good) and mrs kastriot (she can lick but not as good as your daughter).
hopefully your not around when i have a little fun. when do you get home from work? maybe your wife can tell but i wont hear her since she'll have a mouthful of fun."

Charles Kastriot
Today at 12:11am
"I know perfectly well the source of Sharia. It comes from the rantings originating in the twisted and evil mind of Mo (May he burn in Hell forever). You are too blinded to see that the Koran and Hadiths were nothing more than self-serving drivel spewed by a pedophiliac dictator.

"Yes, there are a few non-Islamic places of worship left inside the Islamic Bloc. Those are the few that jihadis have not burn down or co-opted yet. Once the jihadis vandalize or destroy them, the non-Mohamadans are not allowed to rebuild or repair them, just as Sharia forbids them to do.

"Try reading an accurate translation of the Koran, not a copy filled with cover-ups of Mo's (MHBHF) numerous absurdities. The Islamists at those two websites conveniently deleted the obvious absurdity of "lunar cold" affecting people in Allah's whorehouse. By the way, the savages on those sites cannot even spell KORAN correctly.

"You are perfectly following the example of that sexual deviant you claim was a prophet. So does Allah help you type while you engage in autoerotic activities and fantasizing about real women instead of hideous Mohamadan cows draped in burkas? No wonder you are obsessed with the women and girls in my family! Obviously, you have stretched out your goat's anus beyond the point of any further pleasure so you need another outlet for your perversion.

"You think by hiding a woman under a huge cloth like a piece of furniture makes men respect them?! That's laughable. A man respects a woman or girl when he looks at her as a fellow human being, regardless of her appearance. You savages only look at women and girls as sexual outlets that need to be hidden because you refuse to control your sexual perversions.

"If you think you can rape any woman or girl in my family, I dare you to try. Any one of them will rip you puny testicles off and force-feed them to you before they send you to your eternal and infernal destination."

Charles Kastriot
Today at 12:24am
"By the way, since you think that quranbrowser.com and quransearch.com are so accurate, you should know that the translations on those sites of Koran 76:13 by Sale, Yusuf Ali, Hilali-Khan and Muhammad Al-Hilali/ Muhsin Khan all EXPLICITLY mention the moon as the source of cold. You have proved your ignorance once again. Stick with disciplines you know like hourly masturbation and being on the receiving end of sodomy."

The Case Against Iran

2009-07-03T17:04:00.004-04:00

Why should we care about what is happening in Iran? Are any of you worried that your lives will be impacted negatively by the civil unrest there? Do any you have a burning desire to spend your next vacation there? How many of you are eager to see such cultural attractions as a public hanging of a woman accused of adultery or a flogging of a girl for exposing some of her hair in public? Why should anyone living in the United States spend even a few seconds pondering the events unfolding there and their possible implications?

Despite the fact that we live thousands of miles from Iran, we are not immune to the events occurring there. The days of willful isolationism have ended. The people of the United States can no longer rely on the notion that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans provide sufficient buffers against any harm emanating from that region of the world. The tremendous distance between the United States and one of Iran’s neighbors, Afghanistan, did not prevent the launching of suicide attacks from the other side of the world on the United States on the eleventh of September 2001.
For thirty years, the Iranian regime has been involved in undeclared war against the United States. One of the first acts of the Islamic regime was the seizure of American embassy. On the fourth of November, 1979, militants backing the Islamic regime attacked the American embassy in Tehran and seized the occupants. The Iranian regime imprisoned these fifty Americans for four hundred forty-four days.

On three occasions in 1983, terrorists who received funding and logistical support from Iran attacked Americans. On the eighteenth of April, a suicide bomber from the Shiite terrorist group, Hezbollah, crashed a pickup truck laden with explosives into the American Embassy in Beirut. Seventeen Americans and forty-six others died as a result. On the twenty-third of October, Hezbollah struck in similar fashion; this time the group targeted the U.S. Marines’ barracks in Beirut. The Marines had been sent to Lebanon to serve as members of a multi-national peace-keeping force during the Lebanese civil war. On the twelfth of December of the same year, another Shiite terrorist organization supported by Iran, Al Dawa, sent a suicide truck bomber to attack the American embassy in Kuwait. Five people died and more than eighty suffered injuries.

Attacks on embassies and military installations are blatant acts of war. All embassies are considered sovereign territory of the nation-state maintaining the embassy, regardless of location. However, Americans failed to realize that they had been dragged in this war and refused to reply to repeated attacks.

Iranian regime has been involved in terrorism and other threats to peace and stability in the Middle East. Iranian-backed Hezbollah suicide bombers also struck the French peacekeepers in Beirut the same days as the attacks on the Marines’ barracks. Hezbollah members have repeatedly engaged in kidnappings of Lebanese Christians and foreign journalists, professor, members of the media and others since the mid-eighties. These same militants periodically fire rockets at Israeli civilians from inside Lebanese borders. They smuggle suicide bombers into Israel who then set off explosive vests full of shrapnel on buses or in other public places.
Additionally, the Iranian theocracy has been working to acquire nuclear technology for several years. One must question why a country possessing such an abundance of petroleum would pursue a more costly and less secure form of energy. Iran’s petroleum reserves, one of the largest in the world, serve as the foundation of its economy. Claims for the need to acquire atomic power appear, at best, as a bizarre waste of resources considering Iran’s staggering illiteracy and poverty rates. These problems will only continue to mount considering that nearly a majority of the population is less than thirty years old. Ahmadinejad’s bellicose pronouncements against Israel, the United States and anyone else who may oppose Iranian hegemony in the Middle East betray his regime’s true, malignant designs for the acquisition and implementation of nuclear capability.

Iranians have been suffering under yoke of totalitarian government for thirty years. A pretense of representative democracy has existed in Iran since the revolution. However, these elections should be misconstrued as free and open. All candidates for any office must receive approval by the Guardian Council, twelve men appointed by the true leader of Iran, the unelected and unimpeachable Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Anyone deemed insufficiently adherent to Shiism is disqualified. In the parliamentary elections of 2008, this despotic dozen barred nearly two thousand of the nine thousand candidates who applied to run for seats. Political debates are illegal. No political advertisements ever appear on Iranian television which a governmental monopoly.

Azeri Turks, an ethnic minority comprising a quarter of the Iranian population, are targets of slander in governmental media. News reports have portrayed Azeris as cockroaches and dimwits because Azeris typically speak Farsi, the official language of Iran, with difficulty. The Persian majority of the regime has outlawed the use of Turkish names for geographic locations and children. The mere act of printing anything in Turkish has been deemed a criminal offense.

The Arab minority in Iran face continuous harassment and loss of property. The Arab minority lives in the southwestern portion of Iran. The government regularly seizes their property to give to the burgeoning Persia populace. When the Arabs protest, they are rounded up under the charge of subverting the Shiite regime as agents of the Saudi kingdom.

Oppression of women has been sited as one of the contributing factors to the tumult. An entire generation has grown up under Islamic tyranny yet the governmental propaganda has not fully brainwashed all of those born since the establishment of the Shiite regime. Iranian women and girls catch glimpses of liberated women across the world despite the extensive censorship of foreign media by the Islamic morality police. They realize that women elsewhere do not endure beatings, fines or imprisonment for not covering their hair or wearing anything other than shapeless and oppressively uncomfortable outfits.

Multiple forms of legalized sexual exploitation and abuse haunt Iranian women. Three decades have been blighted with the executions of women and girls for offenses such as adultery, many of whom were in fact raped and did not consent to any extramarital sexual acts. Thousands of teenaged girls from impoverished rural families have been sold off to men in their forties or older. These arranged marriages last only short-term, leaving the girls as destitute as before but also stigmatized as a discarded wife. Additionally, Iranian law permits de facto prostitution under the moniker of “temporary marriages”. These arrangements consist of a man signing a legal contract with a pre-determined termination date of the so-called marriage and a sum paid to the woman. These marriages typically last only a few days or even hours, depending on the whim of the man signing the document.

Persecution of religious minorities has grown rampant under the Islamic theocracy. Applicants to universities must pass a test of knowledge of Shiite Islam, even those Iranian citizens who belong to another sect of Islam or to another religion altogether. Laws forbid the scriptures of any other religion to be translated in Farsi. Only Shiites are allowed to evangelize; members of any other religious group face imprisonment or execution for trying to convert Shiites Iranians to any other faith. All religious minorities must serve in the Iranian military but are barred from becoming officers. If a Shiite kills a non-Shiite, the Shiite cannot be executed under Iranian law. If one member of a non-Shiite family converts to Islam, then that convert automatically inherits all of his/her family’s property regardless of the family’s wishes. If an Iranian was born and raised as a Shiite, he/she faces execution for leaving Islam to accept another religion.

The Jewish population has dwindled to twenty-five percent of its total before the Islamic Revolution. Iranian Jews are forbidden to travel as an entire family outside of the country to prevent their emigration. They are not allowed to operate their own private schools. Officials of the Islamic regime control the school with obvious antagonism such as mandating Saturday as a school day, in violation of the Jewish Sabbath. Any Jewish protests against the hostile policies result in arrests, imprisonment or executions on baseless charges of espionage or subversion under the auspices of Israel.

Since the beginning of Ahmadinejad’s presidency four years ago, persecution of Sufis, a minority sect of Islam, has increased remarkably. Agents of the Shiite regime have destroyed Sufis’ place of worship, shrines and other locations where Sufis gather. Additionally, Sufis are regularly arrested then flogged or forced to sign documents renouncing Sufism.

Christians in Iran have endured oppression since the early days of the Islamic regime. Assyrians and Armenians, ethnic minorities who are Christians, constantly endure governmental surveillance of their religious services. The Ministry of Islamic Guidance has ordered the closing of many churches and other Christian buildings, including all their bookstores in 1990. The Iranian government forbids both groups to accept any new members among other ethnicities in the country.
Zoroastrians, the majority of the people in pre-Islamic Iran, suffer oppression as well. Their faith predates Islam by at least a thousand, seven hundred years yet less than hundred thousand at the present time. They face the same third-class status as other religious minorities.

Bahais, another indigenous religious sect, have not even received the flimsy promises of tolerance accorded to Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians by the Shiite government. This persecution persists despite the fact that the Bahai faith originated in the mid-nineteenth century in Iran when it was called Persia. Almost immediately after Ayatollah Khomeini and his legions seized power in 1978, the mullahs exhorted the followers to pillage Bahai temples and assault the congregants.

The Iranian theocracy has demonstrated similarities to other repressive regimes since its inception thirty years ago. Totalitarian regimes have engaged in banning of any use of minorities languages. The fascist government of Spain suppressed all public use of the Basque and Catalan languages by those two ethnicities. The Communist Chinese government has engaged in a systematic effort to eliminate the Tibetan language and distinctive culture. The Nazi and Soviet regimes fanned the flames of religious hostility toward their Jewish population to rally support for wide-spread imprisonment and seizure of Jewish property. Popular revolts against tyranny met ruthless crackdowns just as those which occurred in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and in Nazi-occupied Warsaw in 1943. The mullahs in charge of Iran have either modeled their oligarchy on preceding authoritarian factions or are engaging in a frightening similar coincidence.

The current resistance movement has been swelling for years. The suspicious outcome of this presidential election only served as the tipping point. Years of misogyny, ethnic chauvinism and religious persecution have all contributed to the boiling cauldron that Iran has become. Finally, the contentious situation has boiled over and spilled into the streets throughout Iran.

The United States stood by passively when the Islamic militants toppled the Shah of Iran. Granted, the Shah headed an autocratic and corrupt regime. However, the most egregious sins of the monarchy pale in comparison to the totalitarians currently in power in Iran. The consequences of the outcome of this tumult far outweigh any importance associated with the death of an androgynous pop singer or that of faded sex symbol from the 1970s.

All of these examples I have cited should motivate every American to support efforts to assist the toppling of the Iranian theocracy. The United States must organize an international boycott of Iran petroleum. Additionally, American naval forces should lead a blockade of Iranian ports used to export its petroleum. Without the profits from the sale of its petroleum, the Iranian regime will soon collapse. Then all of the citizens can unite to establish a true republic with legitimate multi-party elections, equality under the law for women and the end of antagonism toward non-Shiites and non-Persians. Finally, this undeclared war will come to an en

COPYRIGHT JULY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT

Sources for this article:
http://www.cswusa.com/Countries/Iran.htm
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/02/again_religious_persecution_in.html
http://forums.contracostatimes.com/topic/islamic-republic-of-irans-persecution-oppression-of-minorities-islamic-apartheid
http://www.iranfocus.com/en/human-rights/iranian-authorities-destroy-sufi-holy-site-in-isfahan-17207.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022903488_2.html
http://parsikhabar.net/irans-last-zoroastrians-worried-by-youth-exodus/
http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org/stories.asp?id=343
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88148974

Iranian Rebellion: linear or meandering?

2009-06-21T00:10:00.008-04:00

Popular rebellions throughout history have proved extremely difficult to gauge. Pundits and politicians attempt to project their final results. Often sparked by dour economic conditions combined with repressive governmental actions, rebellions open the portals for inundations of demands for economic and social transformations.

The French Revolution started when peasants' crops failed leading to famine. Decades of deficit spending precluded the ability of King Louis the Fourteenth's regime from doing much to alleviate the suffering. The knowledge of the aristocracy's opulence sparked the peasantry's rage. Intermingling with this anger, advocates of the Enlightenment, enthralled with novelties called representative democracy and liberty, joined the anti-monarchical chorus. The fervor eventually led to verbal and physical assaults on Catholic installations and clergy. The urge to overthrow all peripherals of the system even lead to abolition of the Christian calendar and its replacement by a week of ten days and a year that started on the day of the autumnal equinox.

The Russian Revolution grew out of opposition to Czar Nicholas the Second's decision to enter the First World War. Political minorities, factions of Marxism, anarchism and capitalism, became involved in the opposition to the monarchy; they disagreed on what form of government should replace it but all openly pushed for the end of the Czarist autocracy. Eventually, the totalitarianism of the Bolsheviks replaced the autocracy of the Czar. This upheaval led to fundamental changes such as the full-scale oppression of the Orthodox Christian Church and its institutions, even its calendar which the monarchy had used for centuries.

At the present, the world is watching the tumult occurring in Iran. After thirty years under a totalitarian government, the Islam-based oppression is chafing some teens and twenty-somethings. Despite the mullahs' efforts to isolate Iranians, increased ease of communication with the Free World has allowed the penetration of non-Islamic concepts. During the street protests, women have dared to pull back their legally-mandated head-coverings to un-Islamic standards, if not remove them completely. Reports indicate that demonstrators have yelled, "Death to the dictator!" and "Death to Khamenei!" If those have been occurring, the rebellion exceeds a mere burst of outrage by devotees of a candidate who lost an election. The suicide bombing of the mausoleum of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution which installed the Islamic regime, carries profound significance. That act of violence may portend opposition to the entire theocracy, not simply to the loony figurehead who holds the position of President of the Islamic regime.

Some question Mir Mousavi's alleged reformist agenda. Considering that politicians truly antipathic toward Islamic regime are never permitted to seek offices in the government, such skepticism is warranted. Therefore, one can rightfully question Mousavi's commitment to advocate for personal freedom and legitimate democracy in Iran.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never attempted to hide his mental instability. He openly denies the Nazi genocide directed at Jews. He leaves a seat vacant just in case a supposed messianic figure called the "Twelfth Imam" happens to stop by wherever Ahmadinejad is making a public appearance. He actually says with a straight face that Iran wants a nuclear energy program for strictly peaceful purposes. How can any sane person justify the pursuit of nuclear technology for energy production in a country which is one of the largest exporters of petroleum in the world? I suppose Ahmadinejad expects that the "Twelfth Imam" will provide some sort of rational explanation or just bring the nuclear weapons himself, rendering the secretive program obsolete.

No one knows how this tumult will resolve itself. The theocrats in Iran may unleash a torrent of violence to crackdown on the protestors. However, that could possibly fan the blames of opposition causing undecided Iranians to side with the anti-regime forces. Middle Eastern experts might try to predict the outcome yet they have limited access to current developments inside Iran. Intelligence agencies of various countries are undoubtedly extracting all possible information that their agents can obtain. Nevertheless, a multitude of surveillance technology and inside sources cannot provide perfect clairvoyance and clairaudience. In the end, we will only know the fate of Iran after the demonstrations have concluded, either victoriously or in vain.

COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Videos of Islamic Infection of the Free World

2009-06-09T03:48:00.000-04:00

Here is a video from Arkansas of an Islamist spouting anti-Jewish and anti-American lies plus the usual Islamic disinformation. This occurred on the day of the memorial service for Private William Long who was murdered by one of her fellow savages. Her vehicle is a Toyota minivan, license plate is from Louisiana, number PNE 729. If you see her, yell the pro-violence, anti-Jewish and anti-Christian Koranic verses at her:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqopnIAnmAw&feature=related&pos=0

Here is one from the Czech Republic. An undercover crew of journalists infiltrated a mosque. They expose a Czech Mohamadan denying the existence of misogynistic and violent Koranic verses despite having them read to him and justified by a Islamic cleric.
http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2009/05/i-muslim.html

Religious Indoctrination Led to Murder

2009-06-01T23:46:00.004-04:00

A murder occurring this week has not caused a huge nation-wide outrage that it merits. A blatant act of terrorism occurred in the United States, in broad daylight and front of witnesses that demonstrates the gall of the murderer. A violent religious fanatic fatally shot a man simply because that man had training in and engaged in a legal profession. Granted, the victim’s form of employment has raised controversy in some narrow-minded social circles. Although these virulent critics would viciously accuse the victim of engaging in murder, he had not done so under any definition of American jurisprudence. The victim was never arrested for nor charged with any homicides. Despite those circumstances, a blood-thirsty zealot assumed the role of judge, jury and executioner.

American society cannot survive such unapologetic aggression based on a malevolent ideology masquerading as religion. Apparently, this assassin believes that he had divine sanction for his blatant and pre-meditated murder. Undoubtedly, he will defend his action by quoting his faith’s scriptures. This trial will display the oppressive bigotry of the murder’s ilk, bent on imposing their despotic theocracy on the entire United States of America. People who cherish the freedom to live their lives without the shackles of the murderer’s hateful constraints can no longer remain silent. Do the American people want a representative democracy that functions under the rule of law determined by the consent of the governed and not by the dictates of practitioners of an intolerant ideology which originated in the Middle East more than a millennium ago?

The myopic sheep of his congregation will likely distance themselves from this crime, at least, publicly. A few might openly condemn his act. However, away from cameras and prying eyes of non-believers, they will smile, laugh and shout his praises for slaughtering a man that they all loathed. They will strive to assure the country that his actions do not represent their movement’s true intentions and that the killer had strayed from their guidance into extremism. The adherents’ spokesmen have mastered duplicitous statements that fool the bulk of non-believers. Too many gullible Americans so desperately want to avoid conflict that they swallow the double-speak despite glaring inconsistencies. Eventually, that forced consumption of disinformation will lead to either the expectoration of the multitude of lies or irrevocable asphyxiation. Sadly, a significant number of the alleged intellectuals among the media, academia and other spheres of influence have already succumbed to the latter, leading to their obvious brain-dead status.

In conclusion, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad’s murder of Private William Long at an Army-Navy recruiting office in Little Rock, Arkansas should remind all Americans that jihadis do not exist and operate solely in backwaters in which Islam reigns. This latest act of Islamic aggression directed at a defender of freedom should serve notice that those residing in the United States must maintain vigilance against future incidents of savagery. Additionally, this incident underscores the necessity of the total elimination of the malignancy from the entire world, starting within the borders of the United States of America.

COPYRIGHT JUNE 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Timely Reminder

2009-05-24T11:48:00.018-04:00

Among the ongoing debates within the Obama Administration and the rest of the American society about the fate of the war criminals detained at Guantanamo Bay, jihadis reminded those paying attention why the facility exists in the first place. Four career criminals were in the process of waging jihad in New York. In the nearly eight years since the Islamic terrorists destroyed the World Trade Center, the Koran and its exhortations to violence and oppression of non-Mohamadans have not changed. The Islamists' will to impose Islamic dictates on the Free World has not evaporated either.

The continued detainment of jihadis at Guantanamo Bay does inspire other Mohamadans to respond to calls for jihad, as well as it should. If they die in the process of killing non-Mohamadans, they believe an eternity in a free bordello awaits them. If they succeed in murdering so-called "infidels" yet survive the attacks, they will be hailed as heroes throughout the Islamic bloc. If they are captured in the process of jihad, they will be rewarded with three halal meals per day plus a Koran, prayers beads and rug in addition to exercise equipment and furnished living quarters, all paid for by the suicidally naive U.S. government. With these three possible outcomes serving as the only consequences of engaging in jihad versus Americans, one must wonder why all Mohamadan males are not pursuing this path to limitless sex, fame or leisure.

This latest Islamic plot to attack Americans also raises an inexplicable phenomenon. The sheer stupidity of permitting Islamic clerics to enter American prisons stands out as astounding act of national self-immolation. These Islamists prey on criminals who already have little to no regard for the lives and property of law-abiding Americans. The Islamists give them an excuse for their rage against democracy, capitalism and freethinking. Then they encapsulate their lusts for murder, theft and rape by justifying such crimes as permissible by following the example of Mohamad ibn Abdullah (May he burn in hell forever) as recorded in the Koran and the hadiths.

Never in the history of the United States were enemy agents allowed to enter the country so openly and operate so freely as during this current war. The Nazi regime was not allowed to send representatives to scour Depression-era American jails for potential recruits for the SS or Wehrmacht. Without a doubt, Americans with Fascist or Marxist sympathies cruised "Hoovervilles" to stir up anti-republicanism or anti-capitalism. However, they did not do so with explicit approval of federal, state or local governmental sanction. The politically-correct acquiescence to Islamists' demands will continue to produce future enemy agents bent on murder and destruction within the United States. Prison authorities or the politicians controlling the funds supporting those authorities must halt this treacherous permissiveness before more home-grown jihadis strike again.

COPYRIGHT MAY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Catering to Islamists' tastes

2009-05-19T16:00:00.002-04:00

We, the members of the Society for the Defeat of Islam, are promoting a boycott of both Kentucky Fried Chicken and Domino's Pizza. As detailed in these two links below, both companies have kowtowed to demands by Islamists to implement "halal only" locations. We must not allow these incidents of Sharia-creep to continue unchallenged. If these two dhimmified corporations value the business of Mohamadans this much, then they should try to survive financially without the business of freedom-loving people. Credit for the links goes to Cuhraytin Erumy.

KFC: http://tinyurl.com/c7jl5v
Domino's: http://tinyurl.com/r87nq5

Additionally, we ask for everyone to contact both KFC and Domino's to voice our objections to their pandering to Mohamadans. It is vital to inform them of our campaign. If we succeed in reducing their profits yet they do not know about our campaign, they may just assume the losses were due to the economic decline.

Here is the contact information for KFC: http://www.kfc.com/contact

This is for Domino’s: https://info.dominos.com/dominos_pizza/contact.nsf/frmContact?openform

We must inform both that we will continue with the boycott of all their restaurants until they end all halal menus. This means revoking halal menus at corporate-owned locations and terminating franchises for those who maintain halal outlets.

Will you join our effort?

COPYRIGHT MAY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Echos of the 1930s

2009-05-05T15:40:00.014-04:00

In the 1930s, adherents to Fascism and to Communism both claimed to stand on the verge of seizing control of various nation-states, with the goal of inevitable global domination. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics had been carved out of the corpse formerly known as the Russian Empire. Fascists in Italy had bullied their way into power, threatening ideologues who opposed them then bludgeoning or incarcerating those who persisted in resistance. Their German counterparts followed suit several years later. Communists were sowing havoc within the fragile society of China throughout the 1930s, provoking a civil war. With the Great Depression gripping most of the world's economies, it appeared that capitalism and representative democracy were stumbling toward extinction.

Fortunately, Fascists and Communists spent a considerable amount of time and resources attacking each other. These two sects of totalitarianism fought each other in venues such as the Spanish Civil War and in the streets of towns in Germany, the Netherlands and other European lands. In the next decade, they continued their blood feud on the Eastern Front of the Second World War. The Free World survived in part due to the fact they did not focus solely on destroying freedom first before turning on each other.

In our current decade, Islam and neo-Marxism both threaten the Free World.
Neo-Marxists seek to destroy the Judeo-Christian cornerstone of Western societies; Islamists share the same objective. Neo-Marxists have knee-jerk sympathies for "people of color" if those people have disputes with Europeans or descendants of Europeans, regardless of the merits of the claims of either side. Islamists have insidiously convinced their useful idiots that the jihad to destroy Western civilization exists as merely a response to the establishment of Israel and prevalence of American influence in the world. Neo-Marxists instinctively lionize those perceived as "poor", regardless of the poverty resulting from centuries of contempt of scientific research, the creation of works of art or the study of history or philosophy except for those glorify or propagate Islam. Neo-Marxists' immoderate paranoia of receiving accusations of exhibiting any politically incorrect "ism" leads them into moral contortions like justifying or excusing suicide bombings of civilians, oppression of women's rights and freedoms in addition to death threats against and murders of critics of Islam. Socialist governments throw open their borders to Mohamadans for immigration in hopes of gaining future voters. In turn, Islamists readily accept state-supplied housing, food allowances and financial support from the governmental girth created and maintained by Socialist governments. Anyone paying attention can easily discern their symbiotic relationship.

Further credence to this alliance can be found in a widely-reported event from a few years ago. In an audio recording broadcasted on the al-Jazeera Network on the eleventh of February 2003, Osama bin Laden referred to the impending battles in Iraq. He advocated, "Under these circumstances, there will be no harm if the interests of Muslims converge with the interests of the socialists in the fight against the crusaders, despite our belief in the infidelity of socialists." (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2751019.stm) What a ringing endorsement of cooperation from the world's most famous jihadi!

Recent news has demonstrated that the British government has strengthened this totalitarian alliance. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith released the list of personae non gratae. The Labor Party-led government played the role of Socialist appeasers by banning radio talk-show host, Doctor Michael Savage, from entering the United Kingdom. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/16-banned-from-britain-named-and-shamed-1679127.html
Apparently with a straight face and no hint of sarcasm, Secretary Smith stated, "This is someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country."

Despite having never engaging in public demonstrations against any "community" in Britain, Doctor Savage has been offered as a sacrificial lamb to Islamists. Savage's frequent denouncements of Islam and those who advocate it has already led to the fifth column calling itself the Council on American Islamic Relations to file suit against him in American courts in an effort to silence his dissent. Considering that Savage's show is not broadcast in Britain, one must question how Brown's socialist regime decided that Savage deserved the ban and public defamation accompanying it.

The current British government has revealed its hypocritical enforcement of standards. Where was Smith's concern about tension or violence when five thousand Mohamadans marched in London on the third of February in 2006? (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1509664/Muslim-protests-are-incitement-to-murder-say-Tories.html)
Were their signs with messages such as "Slay those who insult Islam", "Europe, take some lessons from 9/11" and "Butcher those who mock Islam" not likely to provoke tension or violence? Have Britons already kowtowed to Islamists and accepted dhimmitude so those slogans no longer qualify as threats? Who is more of a threat to public order, someone who criticizes a totalitarian ideology or someone who advocates the murder of that critic? This spineless administration has chosen to bar one Savage instead of the tens of thousands of savages already within its borders, poised for a demolition of the last vestiges of liberty in Britain.

COPYRIGHT MAY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Three Cheers for the U.S. Navy

2009-04-14T02:03:00.009-04:00

After too many hours of dawdling, providing sustenance to the jihadis, communicating with them and otherwise, wasting time, the U.S. Navy finally instituted a suitable response to the savages who had attacked the Maersk Alabama. Happily, the captain of the ship survived while three of his captors succumbed to simultaneous contractions of cranial lead poisoning. Unfortunately, one of barbarians fell into the custody before being sent off the Great Eternal and Celestial Whorehouse for Islamo-murderers. He will have to settle for the fawning and sympathy of the Atheists', Criminals' and Lunatics' Union and other self-loathing American useful idiots.

The United States has a history of confronting jihadis who were plundering ships flying the American flag. In the first two decades of the nineteenth century, American naval forces and members of the fledgling U.S. Marine Corps confronted North African Islamo-pirates. After continuously paying tribute to the savages of the Barbary States, the American government gradually realized that only brutal reprisals would convince the jihadis to cease the attacks. The first conflicts between Islamists and Americans can provide lessons those living in the twenty-first century.

It is incumbent upon the civilized nations of the world to muster their naval forces to crush these jihadis. Let us not repeat the same errors in judgment as those in power throughout Europe committed during the era of the Barbary States' terrorism. Instead of uniting against their mutual foe, the various Western countries rendered protection money to the savages, just as cowardly dhimmis had done when the Islamic hordes conquered new territory. These bribes happened in hopes that the Mohamadans would target the ships of other nations. Those payments, as well as modern attempts at appeasement, only embolden the thieves to raise the costs of future jizya.

COPYRIGHT APRIL 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Insanity or Treachery?

2009-03-28T19:20:00.003-04:00

It has been said that the first time a type of behavior occurs, that it is merely an incident. After the second occurrence of the same activity, one might dismiss both as coincidences. The third occurrence of identical actions indicates a trend. An Islamist-coddling trend is emanating out of the White House.

Before, the presidential election, anyone who expressed concerns about Barrack Obama's Mohamadan connections or sympathies received ridicule from members of his cult of personality and his numerous lackeys in the media. The mere mention of his middle name, Hussein, evoked screeches of indignant protestation and cries of various politically incorrect "ism"s and "phobia"s. The Obamaniacs brushed aside the fact he attended an Islamic school for years while residing in the predominately Islamic country of Indonesia. His connections to the traitorous Nation of Islam in Chicago while "organizing the community" did not deter the enthusiasm of his adorers. The apologists' obfuscation of Obama's troubling background drowned out voices raising doubts about his loyalty to American representative democracy, his commitment to Christianity and opposition to those who threaten both.

Obama betrayed his true sympathies toward Islam as he was being sworn into the Presidency. He proudly included his Islamic middle name in his oath despite never invoking it during the campaign. This action seems minor by itself. However, it has proven to be a revelation of his friendly inclination toward Islam.

One of his initial decisions resulted in the sending of millions of dollars of aid to Mohamadans in the Gaza Strip. Many of these Gazans celebrated the deaths of Americans on the eleventh of September in 2001. These same alleged victims voted an Islamist regime into power. As Islamists inevitably will do, they provoked a conflict with "infidels", Israelis, in this case. After the Israelis grew tired of the rockets fired into their country by the Gazans, the Israelis counter-attacked, killed some jihadis and destroyed infrastructure in the area. As a result of their choice, the Mohamadans suffered from lack of food, water and other essentials. So, people hostile to the U.S.A. launch attacks on an American ally then the American taxpayers are expected to sustain these savages? Only a fool or enemy agent would propose that lunacy.

More recently, Obama has announced that jihadis detained at Guantanamo Bay will be released. These include the 17 Uighurs captured in Afghanistan who will likely enter the United States since no other country wants to accept them. Instead of returning them to China where they belong, the Obama Administration expressed concern that the Mohamadans might be tortured there. Not only will these enemy agents enter the United States, they will receive federal aid to settle and live in the country. What a preposterous plan! Jihadis will freely enter the U.S.A., allowing them to continue their jihad, all paid for by American taxpayers dollars. The Obama Administration's is concerned about protecting Mohamadans from the possibility of torture at the expense of the safety of the American people. He is facilitating future terrorist activities within the U.S.A. This reeks of misplaced priorities, if not, criminal negligence and abetting the murder of Americans.

Obama's Secretary of Homeland Security announced the administration's attempt to obfuscate reality this month. The dhimmis in the White House decided that already misleading "War on Terror" moniker offended Mohamadan sensibilities. Thus, an even more dishonest label for the Jihad against the Free World is mandated to further obscure the Islamic nature of the enemies of the United States. Of course, the members of the Appeasement Movement, constituting a significant portion of Obama cult, celebrated this act of self-delusion.

The latest incident of Sharia-creep within the Obama Caliphate involves selective hiring of Mohamadans. This list resulted from the efforts of Keith Ellison, the Fifth Columnist in the U.S. House of Representatives. Apparently, Obama wants an affirmative action plan to include in the executive branch more wife-beaters, anti-Christian bigots, Jew-bashers, pedophiles and other types who adhere to Islam. Obama should just hire those Uighurs from Guantanamo Bay. They are going to leech off the federal government anyway. Plus, it gives them more in-roads to sensitive governmental records that can prove useful blowing up infrastructure and murdering Americans. That way, he could demand even more taxes in his budget proposal to clean up the mess the jihadis will have created.

Obama promised change. Unfortunately, this change involves aid and abetting jihadis and pandering to Islamists. The zombies who blindly support this useful idiot of the Islamists will soon have blood of Americans on their hands. The question is: Will that open their eyes to the treachery of their so-called Messiah?

COPYRIGHT MARCH 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

politically correct Islamic references

2009-03-18T12:50:00.025-04:00

This week, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, and the rest of the Obama administration revealed its Orwellian speech code. Denial of the ongoing jihad against the United States and everyone else outside of the Islamic bloc has become a self-delusional case of group-think. Napolitano refused to utter the term "terrorism" in favor of the misleadingly euphemism "man-caused disasters". Interestingly, she wants to conceal the inherent role of Islam in these acts of violence yet does not shy away from linking all of these incidents to men. Of course, political correctness encourages stereotyping of men as inherently evil, as long as they are not Mohamadans.

The American people can expect to hear and read numerous confusing weaselly worded phrases. As a public service, the list seen below includes current terms followed the Obamanical circumlocutions. All of these relate to Islam, its adherents and their practices. As with most politically correct linguistic fabrications, they tend to consist of several words when replacing a single, politically incorrect word. In some cases, more than one Sharia-compliant version exists.

Islam: 1. alternative political ideology
2. religion of peace

Islamic: 1. democratically-challenged
2. freedom-adverse
3. tolerance-impaired

terrorism: fervent opposition to capitalism, human rights and representative democracy

terrorists: 1. Islamic activists
2. peace dissenters
3. homicidal engineers
4. people with anger issues

terrorist attack: 1. elimination of those with different beliefs
2. conflict resolution with explosives or weapons

fatalities due to jihad: former obstructions to the establishment a new caliphate

homicide bombers: 1. committed political activists
2. mortally inclined

suicide bombers: 1. permanently committed political activists
2. nihilisticly inclined
3. explodophiles

enemy combatants: 1. people with different opinions
2. faith-based dissenters

Taliban: indigenous, misunderstood government of Afghanistan

mosque: completely innocent meeting place where no one has ever or will ever proclaim any anti-Jewish, anti-Christian or anti-Western statements

Koran: unassailable source of edicts justifying any measures enacted against enemies of Islam

jihad: actions that perpetuate Islam, whether targets of actions accept them or not

polygyny: 1. matrimonial expansion
2. legally authorized philandering

wife-beating: alternative solution to marital disputes

female genital mutilation: faith-based surgery

box-cutter: 1. traditional Islamic cultural implement
2. good luck charm of persons who happen to be Moslem

hijacking: unofficial change of itinerary

beheading: involuntary cranial removal

kidnapping: involuntary change of address

ransom demands: insistent request for remuneration after an involuntary change of address

burka: outfit demonstrating freedom and equality of women under Islamic rule

death threats against Danish cartoonists mocking Mohamad ibn Abdullah, creator of Islam: lack of consensus regarding artistic merit

honor killings: intrafamilial discipline

marriage of pre-teen girls to middle-aged men: acceptable cultural norm concerning choice of domestic partners

war on terror: oppression of Allah's minions (minions defined in entries for "homicide bombers", "suicide bombers" and "terrorists")

One final example of prevarication has not yet been implemented by the current administration. Nevertheless, it will become apparent to the general public then enter the popular lexicon.

Obama Administration officials: persons who hope to delay their eventual termination at the hands of jihadis by inventing and spouting ridiculous obfuscations

COPYRIGHT MARCH 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Popular Majors for Incoming Gazan Students

2009-03-12T23:42:00.012-04:00

The Obama administration is letting its inner-Hussein peek through the burka of obfuscation. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that American tax dollars will be spent on funding the education of residents of the Gaza Strip, pending the rubber-stamping by the Democratic-controlled Congress. () These funds supplement the nine hundred million dollars headed to support the Islamists in the Gaza Strip, Judea and Samaria. Mrs. Clinton did not indicate how the money would be allocated with such pressing priorities such the purchase of American and Israeli flags for desecration, the procurement of stones for hurling and rockets for launching at Israelis in addition to acquisition of knives for clitorectomies and beheadings of infidels.

Americans may have an interest in how their taxes will be dispensed in this case of halal pork. An informal and unscientific survey of the future recipients would indicate some intriguing choices of courses. We invite you to review the following reasons for Mohamadans' interest in pursuing the following majors:

inorganic chemistry: "study proper steps to create explosives"

organic chemistry: "discover different means to poison infidels"

physics: "learn to increase velocity of shrapnel in suicide-vests"

home-economics education: "discover new ways to create even more oppressive burkas"

English: "improve grammar and spelling for writing on banners displayed in anti-Israel/anti-American rallies plus expand arsenal of epithets to yell at Western media's cameras"

applied mathematics: "obtain new methods of counting up victims of attacks without resorting to their traditional method of removing sandals to count above ten"

riflery: "perfecting the use of fewer bullets to slay infidels"

cellular and molecular biology: "delve into how to mutate more deadly micro-organisms to infect infidels"

film arts: "improve quality of beheading videos such as adding three-dimensional effects and surround-sound"

women's studies: "find out the multitude of ways Allah created women inherently inferior to men"

Jewish Studies: "gain knowledge of all the wicked deeds Jews have committed in the past (assassination of Anwar Sadat and Adolf Hitler, destruction of World Trade Center, et cetera) plus the nefarious schemes that they are currently plotting"

computer science: "master hacking into databases to steal technological secrets and information about infidels obstructing establishment of caliphate"

automotive engineering: "develop and build the perfect car bomb"

aviation and air transportation: "determine means to streamline hijacking procedures"

nuclear engineering: "Do we really have the spell out this one?"

civil engineering: "understand how infidels build structures so we can destroy them"

electrical technology: "diversify the uses of electricity in the torture of hostages"

comparative literature: "understand why every book ever written is automatically inferior to the Koran"

conflict resolution/peace studies: "pick up lingo used by useful idiots in appeasement movement to convince them Islam is 'a religion of peace'"

criminal justice/law enforcement: "determine how to exploit freedom in order to destroy concepts of representative democracy and universal human rights"

German: "acquire ability to converse with escaped Nazis about greatness of 'Final Solution'"

religious studies/theology: "brush up on platitudes explaining why Islam is superior to other religions"

pre-law: "learn how to identify most treacherous, self-loathing American attorneys to defend jihadis after arrests"

foreign languages: "understand how to say 'Give me my taxpayer-funded public housing, food subsidies and welfare check NOW!' in various Western European languages"

history: "read about glorious Golden Age of Islam and how the West has repressed Islam with its running water, disease prevention, underarm deodorant and so forth"

political science/government: "find out about outrageous notions such as women's suffrage, emancipation of slaves and power by consent of the governed in order to undermine them"

geography: "locate suitable locations around the world for next bombings, hijackings and other acts of jihad"

public affairs: "develop ability to utter statements like 'Under Islam, women are respected.', 'Islam is a religion of peace' and 'Islam promotes human rights' without bursting into laughter"

legal assisting: "look for legal loopholes to allow jihadis to escape criminal prosecution"

martial arts: "study techniques to kill infidels when no AK-47 or knife is available"

After reviewing these, one can easily state that many justifications exist for this expenditure of hundreds of millions of dollars. Of course, none of these actually benefit the American people. They do accomplish the goal of placating the appeasement movement with its delusion that subsidizing the Mohamadans will pacify the jihadis. Of course, spending those sums of money on eliminating the jihadis remains the most logical and direct solution, just not the politically correct one.

COPYRIGHT MARCH 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Sharia still slithering through USA

2009-03-10T22:51:00.008-04:00

Here are some recent examples of Sharia-creep.

1. In February of this year, a Mohamadan woman wearing a head-rag entered the Navy Federal Credit Union in San Diego. She did so despite the bank's policy banning the wearing of hats, hoods and sunglasses because these obstruct the view of customers' heads. In typical Mohamadan arrogance, she believed the doctrines of her totalitarian ideology override any security-related policies. She claims the bank denied her service.

2. In February of this year, another female Mohamadan with a rag wrapped around her head went into a Navy Federal Credit Union location. This incident occurred in the town of California in Maryland. An employee asked the customer to exit the line. Despite her violation of the spirit, if not the letter, of the "no disguising of the head" policy, she still completed her transaction at the bank. In March, she refused to conform to the bank's policy or conduct her transactions in a separate area.

If these women are such a devout adherents of Islam, why are they involved with an institution that engages in usury? Mohamad explicitly forbade this practice in the second chapter of the Koran in verses 275, 276 and 278.

Perhaps, both of these incidents coincidentally involve Navy Federal Credit Union locations. However, the fact that they both occurred within the same two month period of this year and involve female Mohamadans wearing head-rags, one might reasonably conclude that these originated in perpetuation of the agenda of the Crybabies Arrogating Islamic Rules. This fifth column consisting of Islamists and their useful idiots, better known as CAIR, is likely just brewing its latest batch of delusions and lies, whatever suits their goal of crushing opposition to and criticism of the Islamification of the USA. They will sue in court and eventually settle for sending their minions to these banks to brainwash the employees and whitewash the truth about Islam, at banks' expense, of course.

3. In Minnesota, Mohamadans pondering the purchase of a house do not have to violate Mohamad ibn Abdullah's (May he burn in hell forever) commandment against usury. Of course, this is due to the New Markets Mortgage Program instituted by the state's housing agency.

The government of a state has capitulated to a group of egoists who refuse to conform to the free market economy of the United States. Interestingly, leftists who have repeatedly cited the non-existent "separation of church and state" clause of the American Constitution remain silent in opposition to this state-funded program with the obfuscating title. Apparently, the Atheists', Criminals' and Lunatics' Union (also known as the ACLU) does not object to intermingling of mosque and state.

COPYRIGHT MARCH 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Poetic Justice... Almost

2009-03-10T02:48:00.006-04:00

Although the existence of karma remains an unsettled issue for humans to resolve, occasional episodes lend credence to its actuality. George Galloway, outspoken apologist for Islam in the British Parliament, has been forced to taste a tiny portion of the bitter hatred and brutal violence that he has supported among the Islamist group, Hamas. His caravan of collaboration received a welcoming consisting of stones thrown at the vehicles and anti-Hamas slogans painted on them. Whether or not someone urinated in the jihadist Kool-Aid he regularly gulps down has not been substantiated.

Unfortunately, it appears that Galloway escaped the attacks alive, unharmed and unrepentant. He has not made any statements yet announcing the error of his words and deeds in support of Islam. Apparently, his exposure to the same tactics employed by the objects of his affection, this time directed at him, have not opened his eyes and mind to reality. One must wonder if one of the hurled stones must strike him in the head in order to enlighten him.

Motivations for Galloway's treachery remain uncertain. If he believes that the Islamic takeover of Great Britain will happen inevitably, he is simply currying favor with his future overlords. Perhaps, he has become seduced by the allure of a totalitarian ideology just as some Britons developed an infatuation with Nazism in the 1930s. The issue might be easily explained by the fact that lives as a closeted Mohamadan.

No one has taken responsibility for the attacks at the time of this article. Therefore, this is an open message to whomever committed these acts: Exemplary effort but so much remains to accomplish. Next time, target this appeasing maggot specifically. Take a careful aim. Pinpoint your hurled stone strikes for the space between his eyes. The Free World will thank you profoundly.

COPYRIGHT MARCH 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Feeding the Crocodile

2009-02-28T21:07:00.008-05:00

President Obama’s decision to aid Arabs in the Gaza Strip has raised a huge cause for concern. Robert Wood, Acting Spokesman of Public Affairs for the United States Department of State, stated on February 10, 2009 that the federal government has already provided nearly sixty million dollars worth of aid to occupants of the territory. (http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/02/117240.htm) This aid will bolster members of Hamas and those who support that jihadist group. A clear thinking person must ask why would Obama help those who are overwhelmingly adherents to an ideology hostile to the U.S.A.

Obama, like other socialists around the world, displays knee jerk reactions when he views the ongoing tension between the Israelis and Arabs. He lapses into the template of sympathizing with “the blameless, impoverished people of color” who are in a continual state of conflict with the “technologically advanced, inherently evil white people”. Of course, the presence of tens of thousands of black Israelis who were airlifted out of Ethiopia in 1984 is never factored into the estimation. Additionally, the fact that Arabs are also Caucasian is conveniently ignored, lest the politically correct lenses shatter under the weight of reality. The hand-wringers in the Obama administration and Obamaniacs everywhere turn a “visually-impaired” eye toward the repeated violent provocations by the Arabs to launch attacks on Israelis. These incitements include missile launchings to strike targets with no military value in Israel. One should not forget about the Arab practice of sneaking brain-washed recruits with fantasies of an afterlife in an eternal whorehouse into Israeli to blow themselves up in order to murder as many Israeli civilians as possible in the process. The useful idiots supporting the Gazans have displayed a Herculean effort in propping up their flimsy and false archetype regarding who act as the true villains in this conflict.

Does Obama hope that aiding the Arabs in Gaza will win over some Islamists into loving the United States or, at least, hating the U.S.A. less? How many of these that he seeks to help were among the throngs of Mohamadans dancing and chanting in the streets upon hearing about the jihadist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the thousands of Americans who had been killed? Does he think that the same people who direct so much vitriol towards the U.S.A. for toppling totalitarian regimes in Iraq and Afghanistan will suddenly experience a 180 degree turn in their disposition toward Americans? If he possesses as much knowledge about Islam as he has claimed, he should realize that true adherents to Islam will never love or even respect Americans until the United States submits to Islam. The most practical goal for the U.S.A. remains making Islamists fear Americans. They must be convinced that any future jihadist attacks would result in a crushing response too harsh for the Islamists to justify the initial strikes.

Is Obama betraying some secret affinity or some sympathy for Mohamadans? The Gazans are overwhelmingly adherents of Islam. This resulted from the forcible removal of Jews from the area when the Israelis vacated the territory. Additionally, a concerted jihad waged on the Christian Arab minority has driven the Christians out of the Gaza Strip. Therefore, only Mohamadans stand to benefit from Obama’s magnanimity. The years of indoctrination in an Islamic school in Indonesia during his youth have undoubtedly colored his view of Islam in a dangerously favorable light.

As Winston Churchill wisely declared, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.” Apparently, Obama is nourishing the ravenous crocodile known as Hamas in the hopes that the beast will not attack him or his country. Meanwhile, his benevolence strengthens this predator. Eventually, this creature will strike Americans. When this reptile does lash out again, he will be capable of assaults since Obama’s misplaced altruism sustained the beast instead of letting him deteriorate then starve to death.

COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Bridges to Truth about Islamic Marriage

2009-02-19T19:38:00.005-05:00

Muzzammil Hassan unwittingly undermined the disinformation spewed forth by Bridges TV, his television station. His actions demonstrated the truth of the repressive and violent basis of Islamic marriages. Hassan's brutal treatment of his wife stands as just another tragic example in a historical legacy of Islam's misogyny, both verbal and physical. Whether the tales involve women resisting Islamic marriages or attempting to escape from them, sadly the fate of a woman is all too often the same: viciously violent death, usually at the hands of their husband or of her blood relatives.

These unions result from fathers arranging marriages for their daughters to the highest bidder or to whomever the father wants influence in future considerations. Marriage exists as a formal declaration of dominion of a man over a woman. It merely announces that a woman has submitted to the control of her husband and what compensation her father gained for relinquishing his authority over her. No thought is given to the "decadent, infidel notions" of "mutual respect", "consent", "romantic love" or "reciprocated affinity".

Why would Mohamadans hold any of those ideals with any esteem? After all, their namesake and role-model certainly did not. His early marriages to wealthy widows resulted from the need to indulge in his gold-digging urges. His later marriage to Aisha, a nine year girl, fed his pedophiliac desires. He collected numerous wives with casual avarice, only concerned with how his possession of them would satisfy his whims. A co-equal and monogamous relationship with a woman would have been viewed as an anathama to Mohamed ibn Abdullah just as representative democracy, use of underarm deodorant and daily bathing are to Islamists.

COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

French Collaboration, 21st Century Style

2009-02-11T22:16:00.008-05:00

A small but significant percentage of the French population actively collaborated with the Nazi authorities following France's capitulation to Germany in 1940. These traitors included police officers who hunted down Jews and others who openly opposed to the fascist regime and sent them to the death camps. Sadly, this shamefully practice of acquiescing to totalitarians has experienced a renaissance in France.

As reported by the television network, France 2, ( http://jt.france2.fr/20h) on its 8 PM news broadcast on February 11, the French government requested that the Catholic University of Paris set up training for "Imams of the Republic". This program includes four hundred hours of classes including law, history and religion. The justification for this certification was stated as the government's need for representatives considered as "legitimate" by the "faithful", meaning Mohamedans in France. These representatives supposedly will become dedicated to French values of liberty, equality, fraternity and secularism. Apparently, non-Mohamedan officers lack the acumen to halt the practice of torching cars and of vandalizing businesses whenever the Mohamedans feel slighted by some cartoons or one of the own is injured or killed while committing criminal acts. Most egregious of all is the traitorous complicity of this Catholic university with the same savages who would eliminate it under a revived caliphate. Obviously, kowtowing to Islamists trumps any commitment to avoid church-state interactions.

The report features a graduate of the program, Mohamed Ali Bouharb, the first leader of "Moslem harmony" within the police department. He claimed that the text of the Koran has different contexts in different societies. He made such a statement either out of utter ignorance or deliberate dishonesty since the Koran clearly states that Islam must reign over the entire world with uniformity and opposes factionalism or dissension. Islamists vehemently object to the translation of the Koran from its seventh century Arabian Peninsular dialect into any other languages; how could anyone honestly believe that Islam can be molded into varying forms to fit into different societies?

The commitment to a Frenchified, secular role for this officer and other government-trained Islamic clerics seems absurd, at best. He claims commitment to secularism while proudly showing off the crescent moon on his uniform hat. Displayed very prominently in his office at his workplace, one can see a prayer rug laid on the floor and a Koran on his desk. Hypocritically, the French government baned the wearing of Islamic head-rags in public schools since they were labelled as "distracting". In contrast, this governmental employee is permitted to openly flaunt his Islamic affiliation and received taxpayer-funded training related to Islam. Granted that the head-rags stand out as an obvious sign of the repressive nature of Islam yet the adolescent girls wearing them were unlikely to carry firearms and certainly lacked the power to arrest anyone. This officer would have both the weapons and the cover of legal authority in his arsenal to threaten someone critical of Islam.

Where is Charles Martel when France desperately needs him again? Hopefully, his spirit of resistance will imbue someone with the courage to resist this and all other forms of Sharia-creep. Otherwise, France will continue to slide into the abyss of Islamification.

COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Lowering of Defenses

2009-02-06T00:10:00.007-05:00

President Obama's catering to Islamists and their useful idiots among the hand-wringing and spineless Hate America crowd has already born bitter fruit. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29042139) In 2000, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri led a covert operation to destroy an American warship, the USS Cole. Despite this clear act of war, he will not face charges in a military tribunal. Unfortunately, this savage, along with the hundreds of other jihadis in American custody will be treated as mere common criminals instead of what they truly are. They operate as members of a hostile army with the exception of no distinguishable uniform. The most consideration these jihads deserve is a trial by military tribunal. They refuse to conform to the protocols of the Geneva Convention. Therefore, they have no right to claim any protections afforded to legitimate POWs. What this savage and the others of his ilk should receive is simple: a bungee-jump with the tether wrapped around their necks.

COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Bigger Fish to Fry?

2009-02-03T23:35:00.006-05:00

In the wake of the Israeli Defense Force's squandered opportunity to obliterate HAMAS, we can only hope that the halt is due to another more dangerous threat. Instead of resolving the situation of regularly launched missiles into Israeli civilian areas from the Gaza Strip, there may exist the likelihood of fewer yet more dangerous missiles from Iran. A homeowner should cease squashing flies infesting his/her home when scorpions are on the verge of invading.
This week, the Iranian regime has launched a satellite, proving it does possess the technology to launch other, more menacing items too. This action has made the security situation clear: the Free World must act now before Iranian missiles start raining down on Israel and other civilized countries. How long before Iranian missiles will be fitted with biological or chemical weapons? Will the world soon find out the true purpose of Iran's allegedly "peaceful" use nuclear technology to attach nuclear warheads to these missiles?(http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iran-satellite4-2009feb04,0,4385361.story )
The nominal leader of Iran, Mahmoud Akhmadinewhackjob, has betrayed his regime's true intentions in past statements. His blatant anti-Israeli rhetoric, including questioning the historical veracity of the Nazis' genocidal activities aimed at Jews, demonstrates his commitment to the ongoing jihad against Jews. He spouts Islamic rhetoric, straight from the most virulent verses of the Koran. As reprehensibly evil as Mohamad ibn Abdullah, the fabricator of Islam, was, he never possessed the power to destroy tens of thousands of people in a matter of minutes. For that reason, the time to act, not negotiate with savages or deny reality, has arrived.

COPYRIGHT FEBRUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Turning rabid dogs into a respectable species

2009-01-22T12:38:00.007-05:00

Newly inaugurated President Barack Hussein Obama has initiated the process of weakening counter-jihad measures at the disposal of the U.S.A. Whether or not his executive orders emanate from treachery, gullibility or pressure from Islamists and their useful idiots remains to be seen. Regardless, he has hamstrung those attempting to defend the U.S.A.

As reported yesterday, (www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28788175) jihadis will be granted the same rights as prisoners of war (POWs). This decision disregards the fact that these jihadis and others on the loose have been conducting military operations without wearing a distinguishable uniform. Under the Geneva Convention regarding POWs, anyone engaged in military actions while not in uniform is considered as a spy. Spies are specifically exempted from the protections of the Geneva Convention. Therefore, the Barack Hussein Obama regime has granted jihadis the gift of selectively favorable application of the conventions of war. Now, they have the best of both worlds: greater ease of conducting bombings, assassinations and other forms of covert operations while now having the security of knowing they will be treated as legitimate armed forces' personnel and the protections which accompany that designation. So what will happen to the jihadis held at Guantanamo Bay? Will those released follow the others who have been released to rejoin the jihad? Dick Morris reported in his latest book, Fleeced, that ten percent of the freed jihadis were recaptured or killed while attacking American or allied forces. What horrible acts will the released jihadis commit upon release?

Instead of trying the jihadis in criminal trials or simply releasing them, the Administration should implement of policy of de-Islamization. POWs from Axis Power regimes held by American forces during World War Two attended classes to refute and undermine years of fascist propaganda to which those detainees had been exposed and forced to parrot. After being forced to examine Islamic beliefs and doctrines in an environment other than a mosque or madrassa, some jihadis may question their willingness to kill and destroy for Allah and Mohamad (may he burn in hell forever).

Granted, some of the jihadis have been so thoroughly brainwashed that it would not be humanly possible to enlighten them. We can only hope and demand that those remain imprisoned permanently, if not executed. Turning loose these savages would be as insanely dangerous as releasing rabid dogs from quarantine.

COPYRIGHT JANUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Pounding HAMAS into Hummus

2009-01-08T18:52:00.006-05:00

Israel has an opportunity to rid itself of the perennial hemorrhoid called HAMAS. Actually, the destruction of this group of murderous jihadis would benefit the rest of the Free World. If Hezbollah continues to launch attacks from Lebanon into Israel, then the same treatment should be meted out to those savages also.

This toughest aspect of this endeavour is resisting the temptation to cave into the demands of the hand-wringing numskulls in the mainstream media and the anti-Jewish elements in positions of political power throughout Europe & North America. Islamists and members of the Appeasement Movement are whining about Mohamadans killed or injured by Israeli counter-attacks. However, they were noticeably silent when HAMAS' provocative attacks killed and injured Israelis, predominately civilians. Do not mistake their concern for the suffering of Mohamadans as concern for all human beings in this conflict. They have obviously aligned themselves with the jihadis in this conflict.

Therefore, this posting stands as a bit of unsolicited advice to all Israelis: DO NOT STOP UNTIL HAMAS IS OBLITERATED! That means every member that can be found must be killed, especially those in positions of power within the organization. Under no circumstances should ANY cease-fire take place. That would only allow the jihadis more time to smuggle in more weapons, other supplies and possibly foreign fighters to continue their attacks. Do not delay operations for any humanitarian reasons to benefit the Mohamadans. They will not hate you any less, no matter how much civility or charity you display toward the savages.

COPYRIGHT JANUARY 2009 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Victory for Islam?

2008-11-10T17:30:00.006-05:00

Does Senator Barrack Hussein Obama's election to the presidency of the U.S.A. equate to a victory for Islamists? Here are some points confirming or opposing that:

FOR
1. As a candidate, he openly stated opposition to the continuation of the U.S. involvement in the Iraqi theater of operations in Islam's war on the Free World. He has said he wants to withdraw U.S. forces in short order, regardless of the level of preparation of the current Iraqi government to assume full authority. The inevitable catastrophe which would result if Islamists topple the popularly-elected officials was not even addressed during the campaign.
2. Obama attended Islamic schools in his pre-teen years. Those years of indoctrination have either made him friendly toward Islam or resentful of the forced immersion in an Islamic cesspool. He has not publicly proclaimed any negativity toward Islam.
3. Obama possessed enough political savvy to deny any affiliation to Islam during the campaign. Now that he has been elected, he does not have to worry about raising anxiety of Americans about the possibility of a Mohamedan in charge of their country.
4. He has been highly critical of the detention of jihadis at Guantanamo Bay. If he follows through on his statements uttered to the appeasement movement, he will give them rights accorded to U.S. citizens in criminal trials, despite their ineligibility for protection for those or even those granted to prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention. He will order the release of some, if not all, detainees without even bringing them to trial to placate the "Hate America First" crowd.
5. Under Islamic law, anyone born to a Mohamadan is automatically considered as a Mohamadan. Therefore, Obama is a Mohamadan since his father was openly Mohamadan. Islamic law does not consider the fact that his mother was not Mohamadan since the mother's faith is not relevant in their opinions and Mohamadan women are not allowed to marry non-Mohamadans. Will Islamists call for Obama's murder in accordance with the Koranic verse
4:89?

AGAINST
1. Obama has publicly stated that he is not Mohamadan. No evidence of his involvement in Islamic organizations or even membership in a mosque has been brought to public attention.
2. Obama has declared his intention to hunt down Osama bin Laden, even sending American forces into Pakistan if necessary to accomplish that.

After weighing both sides, it is still not possible to read Obama's mind. We can only judge his statements and actions. Also, we have to stay vigilant and active to ensure that he does not further the agenda of the Islamists and their useful idiots.

COPYRIGHT NOVEMBER 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Appeasement at Home & Abroad

2008-09-25T01:18:00.009-04:00

The Islamists & their useful idiots have ratcheted up their efforts in the past several days. What is more gauling is the continued idiocy of the appeasement movement.

On the 20th of this month, jihadis bombed a hotel in Islamabad, killing more than fifty. The resignation of former leader Mushariff obviously did not pacify the jihadis. They wanted him out of office since he was not openly anti-American enough to their satisfaction.
The current leader, Zardari, correctly labeled the terrorism of the jihadis as "cancer". However, he continues to try placate the Islamists in Pakistan by allowing jihadis in Afghanistan to use his country as a sanctuary, he will fail. He must decide if he truly wants to eradicate Islamic terrorism or risk the ire of the Islamists with the possibility of more violence provoked by them. The fact that Pakistani troops fired on American forces near the Afghan-Pakistani border betrays whom they consider as their true enemy.

The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations rightfully organized a protest against Iranian leader Ahmadinejad. However, they fell prey to needless partisan political concerns by uninviting Governor Sarah Palin. If Senator Hillary Clinton chose not to attend the event, why not simply invite another female Democratic senator to protest the Iranian threat to the world's stability and the Free World's longevity? If those refuse, look for a female governor or member of the House of Representatives to join the demonstration! Are there no female Democratic politicians in high-profile offices who will stand up to denounce the cruel tyranny of the Islamic regime of Iran, especially considering that women there suffer under Koran-based second class status?

Ahmadinejad has disgraced the U.S.A. with his presence this week. The only positive outcome to that event were if some patriots were to fill his skull with multiple rounds of high-explosive ammunition. Compounding the outrageous appearance of the leader of the public face of Islamic regime of Iran is the fawning attention this Mohamedan madman receives from the members of the appeasement movement. The World Council of Churches along the Quakers and Mennonites who dined with this despot deserve to perish in the next jihadist act of terrorism. Maybe then they will realize that folly of attempting to coddle jihadis. The only dialogue that the civilized people of the world should have with the Iranian regime is the dictation of the unconditional surrender of Iran. This should be followed immediately by the pronouncement of a death sentences for those responsible for aiding or in engaging in terrorism, starting with the storming of the American embassy in Tehran in 1979.

COPYRIGHT SEPTEMBER 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Remember 9/11

2008-09-11T22:24:00.006-04:00

Today, we should rightfully remember those who were slaughtered by nineteen jihadis on this date seven years ago. The proper way to honor their memory is to ensure that every savage responsible for that mass-murder ends up as maggot-fodder, preferably with their corpses covered in dog or pig feces. Those responsible, not only Osama bin Laden and the rest of Al-Kaida but those who financed or otherwise aided their terrorist network, must pay with their lives. Every day that those Mohamadan vermin continue to live stands as a stark example of injustice in this world. As for the nineteen jihadis, we can only hope that they all spend the afterlife on an eternal, infernal rotisserie. If there is any justice in the universe, that is their fate.

The heroic efforts of the passengers of United Flight 93 must serve as an inspiration to all freedom-loving people. Those people found themselves in a situation in which they could have chosen to concede to the authority of jihadis. They could have stayed passive and deluded themselves into thinking that these Mohamadans were not like the others that had already killed thousands of Americans. However, they did not let politically correctness or cowardice stop them from reacting in the proper fashion when threatened by Islamists. These Americans did what everyone confronted by Islamists must do: respond to Islamic threats and violence with an escalated level of force.

Finally, those who try to obfuscate the fact that jihadis committed this murderous act of war deserve the same fate as those responsible for the terrorists' attacks. There should be no distinction between Islamists and their useful idiots in the erroneously named "9/11 Truth" movement. All of them are equally guilty of facilitating Islam's war on the Free World.

COPYRIGHT SEPTEMBER 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

What Are You Doing for Eid al-Fitr?

2008-09-02T01:56:00.004-04:00

Tyson Foods Inc. has released a statement regarding its decision to add the Islamic observance , Eid al-Fitr, as a paid day off work for its employees at one of its processing plants. It can be viewed here:
http://www.tyson.com/Corporate/PressRoom/ViewArticle.aspx?id=3021

The company backtracked after some voiced opposition, especially due to the fact that Labor Day was sacrificed on the altar of appeasement of Islam. Tyson claims that Eid al Fitr will only exist as a paid holiday for this year. However, the inclusion of a prayer room for Mohamedan employees has not been revoked. It is incumbent upon the civilized people of the United States to ensure that Tyson will not continue these practices.

Therefore, we continue to call for a nation-wide boycott of all Tyson Foods' products. Additionally, we request that all freedom-loving individuals to contact Tyson. Tyson must be forced to understand that any catering to Islamists, no matter how multi-cultural or open-minded its representatives may claim their efforts to be, stands as a clear act of cowardly submission to Islam. The residents of the Free World must not tolerate such acts.

We have contacted Tyson Foods Inc. to inform the company of our campaign to roll back their Sharia-creep. We ask that our readers do so as well. The company's contact information is available at its website: www.tyson.com.

COPYRIGHT SEPTEMBER 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Islam at the Olympics

2008-08-14T00:31:00.006-04:00

Since the jihadist bombing in Kashgar in early August, Islamists have not been prominently visible in the lead up to and in the early days of the Olympics. That should have been expected since the Communist Chinese officials, like all totalitarians, have no tolerance for other totalitarians expressing opposition to their power. After this violent act of defiance, a brutal crackdown by the Communists on the Mohamedans was a given. One need only look back at how quickly and thoroughly the fascist regimes in Italy, Germany and Spain in the 1930s rounded up Marxists to be imprisoned and executed. Fascists, Marxists and Islamists share totalitarian tendencies but are fiercely jealous and antagonistic toward each other.

Communist crackdown may not stand as the sole reason why jihadis have not yet disrupted the Olympic Games. Perhaps the jihadis have been bored into catatonia after viewing such insipid events as competitive walking and synchronized men's diving. Maybe the jihadis have been too aroused by images of female athletes' uncovered hair or faces to plot violent responses. It must be difficult to build a car-bomb with a perpetually vertical minerette poking through one's man-dress.

A round of applause is due to NBC for its commentator's remark during the parade of nations. One of them pointed out the glaring absence of ANY women on the Saudi Arabian team. The commentator also mentioned the prohibition on women driving or leaving home without permission from a male family member. The Islamists certainly do not want women to become physically fit or gain self-confidence. They might actually resist being beaten, much to Allah's displeasure.

Speaking of women, will NBC commentators point out the rags wrapped around the heads of the three Iranian women competing in archery, rowing and taekwondo. Olympic rules clearly forbid athletes from making religious statements during competition, including wearing of items that displays religious sentiment. Hopefully, for their sakes, their head-coverings remain tightly secure so that no strand of hair becomes visible. No athlete should experience a flogging as part of the return home after the Games.

COPYRIGHT AUGUST 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Boycott Tyson Foods Inc.

2008-08-09T20:22:00.006-04:00

On August 1st, Debbie Schlussel highlighted the latest case of pandering to Islamists by an American corporation. This outrage was exposed on her website, debbieschlussel.com, and is recounted at http://www.t-g.com/story/1449487.html.

Tyson Foods Inc., replaced an American civic holiday, Labor Day, as one of the paid days off work for its employees. Eid al-Fitr, an Islamic observance, will replace Labor Day. With this decision, Tyson Foods Inc. has demonstrated its preference for a day commemorating the fabrication of the verses which were later compiled and called the Koran. This book is cited by Mohamedans as justification for polygyny, violence toward women, oppression of Jews and Christians, execution of rape victims and numerous other injustices. The day celebrating the industriousness of Americans fell victim to Sharia-creep.

On August 8th, Tyson agreed to restore Labor Day as a paid holiday yet also keep Eid al-Fitr as a paid holiday. Tyson is attempting to save face with the restoration. However, it does not negate the acquiescing to Islamists' demands. More information on the issue can be read at http://www.t-g.com/story/1451367.html. Sharia-creep took two steps forward then one step back. However, the fact remains that Islamists ended up with one more step toward Sharia when the dust settled in this dispute. That one step needs to be forced back as well.

Therefore, we request that all freedom-loving individuals boycott Tyson's products. Also, we ask that you contact the corporation to express your opposition to this decision. Please explain to these panderers that you will not purchase their products as long as they continue to kowtow to Islamists.

Tyson Foods Inc. can be contacted in a few different ways.

the postal address

Consumer Relations CP631
2210 West Oaklawn drive
Springdale, AR 72764-6999

the corporation website at http://www.tyson.com/Recipes/CustomerService.aspx.

customer relations telephone number, 1-800-233-6332

Please spread the word far and wide. Tyson must understand that there are most Americans that still value hard work, not totalitarianism. That sentiment extends to which days we choose to celebrate.

written by Charles Kastriot
edited by Islam S. Bane

Mohamadan Businesses in Massachusetts

2008-06-23T23:00:00.008-04:00

These are Mohamadan-owned businesses located in Massachusetts. Included in the list are two businesses, Taj Mahal and Cedar Market, which may be owned by non-Mohamadans but are catering to Mohamadan demands. If they are in fact dhimmi-owned businesses, we consider them worth boycotting too. One restaurant is a location of a national chain, Kentucky Fried Chicken.

Adam Pizza

120 Blackstone Street
Boston, MA 02109-1506

Al-Amine Halal Meat Deli & Rotisserie

637 Mount Auburn Street
Watertown, MA 02472-2017

Al-Hassan

714 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215-2423

Al-Hoda Market

304 Prospect
Cambridge, MA 02139-1315

Ali Baba Tandoor

2088 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02140-2012

Ali's Roti

1035 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02120-2161

Allah Bachio

2500 Gravvy Street
Boston, MA

Almaeedah International Market & Halal Meat

690 Hancock Street
Quincy, MA 02170-2814

Arrow Street Crepes (I)

1154 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138-5205

Atlas Market

223 Highland Avenue
Malden, MA 02148-6430

Baraka Café

80 1/2 Pearl Street
Cambridge, MA 02139-4046

Bay State Bakery
95 Water Street
Worcester, MA 01604-5016

Bengal Café

2263 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02140-1212

Bismillah Halal Meat

105 Broadway
Malden, MA 02148-6001

Blackstone Halal Market

96 Blackstone Street
Boston, MA 02109-1506

Bombay Mahal

458 Moody Street
Waltham, MA 02453-0415

Border India

781 Main Street
Cambridge, MA 02139-3509

Boston House of Pizza

169 Chestnut Hill Ave
Brighton, MA 02135-4647

Boston Kebab House

7 Liberty Square
Boston, MA 02109

Boston Shawarma

315 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115-4444

Brookline Family Restaurant

305 Washington Street
Brookline, MA 02445-6817

Bytes

64 Sidney Street
Cambridge, MA 02139-4170

Cedar Market

13 Cottage Street
Norwood, MA 02062

Cheema's Supermarket

572 Cambridge Street
Allston, MA 02134-2432

Crown Fried Chicken
1208 Main Street
Springfield, MA 01103-1906

Dakshin

672 Waverly Street
Framingham, MA 01702-8517

Dayib Café

722 Shawmut Avenue
Roxbury, MA 02119-2030

Diallo's Halal Meat & Grocery

11 Erie Street
Dorchester, MA 02121-3707

The Falafel Place

512 Park Drive
Boston, MA 02215-2901

Foodland

2234 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02140-1837

Fresh Farm
560 Lincoln Street
Worcester, MA 01605

Giovanni's Pizzeria
88 Westfield Street
West Springfield, MA 01089-2548

Gold Star

341 Cochituate Road, Suite 6
Framingham, MA 01701

Grain & Salt

431 Cambridge Street
Allston, MA 02134-1788

Halal Meat Shop & Groceries

120 Cambridge Street
Burlington, MA 01803

Haymarket Bargain Basement

96A Blackstone Street
Boston, MA 02109-1506

Hot Breads

430 Main Street
Woburn, MA 01801-4235

Hot Breads

495 Worcester Road
Framingham, MA 01701-5363

India Castle

928 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139-3106

Islamic Book Store
724 Shawmut Avenue
Roxbury, MA 02119-2030

JMP Fine Indian Cuisine

1095 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215-1022

Jasmine

580 Mt. Auburn Street
Watertown, MA 02472-4124

Joe's Greek Place
367 Russell Street
Hadley, MA 01035-9431

359 Moody Street
Waltham, MA 02453-5208

Kabob & Tandoori

33 Lexington Street
Waltham, MA 02452-4415

Kebab Indian Cuisine

1270 Westford Street
Lowell, MA 01851-2732

Kennedy Fried Chicken
333 High Street
Holyoke, MA 01040-6514

Kolbeh of Kabob

1500 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02139-1004

Madina Market

72-74 Brighton Avenue
Allston, MA 02134-2101

Maryam's Famous Cuisine

310 Bowdoin Street
Dorchester, MA 02122-1832

Medina Market

72 Brighton Avenue
Allston, MA 02134-2101

Mediterranean Grocery

136 Lowell Street
Methuen, MA 01844-3665

Moby Dick

269 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115-4506

Moody's Falafel Palace

25 Western Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139-3304

New Apna Bazar

395 Moody Street
Waltham, MA 02453-0401

New Halal Market & Grocery

14 Blackstone Street (Haymarket)
Boston, MA 02109-1507

Northboro Desi Store

243 West Main Street
Northboro, MA 01532-1898

The Olive Branch

117 Broadway
Arlington, MA 02474-5403

The Olive Tree

245 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139-4257

One Stop International Market

35 Bridge Street
Lowell, MA 01852-1220

Pasta Pisa

285 Boston Avenue
Medford, MA 02155-5200

Picante Grill

80 Walnut Street
Peabody, MA 01960-5630

Pizza, Etc.

200 Main Street
Haverhill, MA 01830-5050

Quality Meat Market

13 Corinth Street
Roslindale, MA 02131-3022

Reef Café

170 Brighton Avenue
Allston, MA 02134-2011

Rizelli Café

284 Washington Street
Brookline, MA 02445

Royal Pizza
320 Pleasant Street
Worcester, MA 01609-2025

Sabb's Market

1001 Boston Providence Highway
Norwood, MA 02062

Sabur

212 Holland Street
Somerville, MA 02144-2432

Safy Halal Market

691 Broadway
Revere, MA 02151-2347

Saray Restaurant

1098 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215

Shawarma King

1383 Beacon Street
Brookline, MA 02446-4808

Stefani's Pizzeria

783 Main Street
Cambridge, MA 02139

Sundar Variety

281 Cross Street
Malden, MA 02148-7827

Taj Mahal
1 West Church Street
Mansfield, MA 02048-2122

Tabrizi Bakery

56 Mount Auburn Street
Watertown, MA 02472-3929

Tassili Café & Grill

561 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02141-1106

Taste of India

277 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115-4506

Taste of India
17B Montague Road
Amherst, MA 01002-1027

Town Shawarma

580 Mount Auburn Street
Watertown, MA 02472-4124

Turkuaz Market

16 Brighton Avenue
Brighton, MA 02134-2310

Waltham India Grocery

337 Moody Street
Waltham, MA 02453-5207

Wellfoods

380 Somerville Avenue
Somerville, MA 02143-2920

Zain's

1504 Hancock Street
Quincy, MA 02169-5205

Zamzam Foods

1275 Boston Providence Turnpike
Norwood, MA 02062-5031

COPYRIGHT JUNE 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

PBS' cruel joke

2008-06-12T04:29:00.005-04:00

This month, PBS has started airing "On a Wing and a Prayer: An American Muslim Learns to Fly". After viewing this, I can assuredly state that it is a blatant attempt to whitewash the past and potential future efforts of jihadis to learn to fly airplanes. Unity Productions Foundation, a purveyor of Mohamedan disinformation, is responsible for this blatant piece of Islamic propaganda. The useful idiots at PBS kowtowed like willing dhimmis to these Islamists. Even more offensive is the use of U.S. taxpayers' money to broadcast a puff-piece extolling the virtues of a Mohamedan in the U.S. learning to fly interspersed with attempts to portray the subject of the film, and Mohamedans in general, as blameless victims of horrible discrimination by Americans.
This quaint little Islamo-drama is set in Bellingham, Washington, a town less than 50 miles from the U.S.-Canadian border. Monem Salam, a man of Pakistani origin, works for Saturna Capital as a manager of their Islamic investing operations. His wife, Iman, claims to be Arab by origin but clearly speaks with an American accent. She showed a photograph of herself in her high school yearbook with her name listed as "Iman Ibrahim", in an Islamic head-cover, of course.
The story proceeds like this: Monem, a open adherent of the alleged "Religion of Peace", has a yearning to learn to fly airplanes. He applied to one of the two flight schools in Bellingham to take courses. The school with the newer planes and facilities received his application but never contacted him months after he applied. So he applied to the other flight school in town which accepted him. After he applied to the second school, Bellingham Aero Flight School, F.B. I. agents unjustifiably arrived at the school to ask questions about Monem and the flight school. Poor little Monem is angry and confused about the F.B.I. snooping around when he wants to learn how to fly. After all, there's never been ANY problems resulting from Mohamedans learning how to airplanes in the U.S., right?
Anyway, between shots of Monem learning to fly, there are other poignant images of his professional life. He is criss-crossing the country on "business", meeting with various other Mohamedans. One of these is Osama DeLorenzo, an obvious Hispanic man who converted to Islam. Osama complains about some American clients not wanting to deal with someone named Osama. (Anyone wonder why? No one (in)famous with the same first name was ever mentioned in the documentary.) Just for a basis of comparison, I was hoping the film's creators would compare Osama's struggles to stay in business with the proudly overt Nazi named Adolf, the owner of a kosher deli, who also inexplicably has experienced a lack of customers. Alas, no such segment was included in the film.
His wife, Iman, does make frequent appearances in the documentary. (Any other wives that Monem may or may not have are neither seen nor heard.) She peeks out from her head-scarf to utter her demand that, "Every Muslim should be able to fly in the U.S." Whether or not that means the ban female drivers in birthplace of Islam should not apply to female Mohamedans wanting pilot planes in the U.S. is not clarified. Also she told a bold-faced falsehood by declaring that, "Women are not forced to wear hijab under Islam". No one in the film refers to the Koran, Chapter 24, Verse 31 which clearly states, "And say to the believing women that they cast down their looks and guard their private parts and do not display their ornaments except what appears thereof, and let them wear their head-coverings". Hey, who has time for such insignificant corrections of misstatements? The film-makers needed as much time as possible for her diatribe about the slurs and strange looks she has endured for hiding most of her head in public while images of her husband conducting his first solo flight appear on screen.
Who needs Al-Jazeera when the Islamists have PBS doing their dirty work them?

COPYRIGHT JUNE 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Mohamadan Enterprises in the Occupied Territory

2008-06-03T22:11:00.003-04:00

These are businesses owned by Mohamadans in and around the Occupied Territories of Dearborn (a.k.a. Dearbornistan) and New Fallujah (a.k.a Detroit) with a few possible exceptions. The rest are owned by Dhim-wits who have sold their allegiance to Islamists by submitting to Mohamadan demands for Islamic practices in their enterprises. Some examples of these include Bog Boy, Blimpie, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Subway, Wal-Mart & McDonald's locations.

All freedom-loving people must avoid these establishments lest their profits are funneled to jihadis as is the Islamic mandate. For those who cannot avoid these Mohamadan businesses, purchases from these locations should be limited to ham sandwiches and beer paid for by low-interest loans.

Access Travel International

24100 Southfield Road
Southfield, MI 48075-2819

Advanced Sleep Neurodiagnostics

23900 Orchard Lake Road, Suite 150
Farmington Hills, MI 48336-2500

Al-Afrah Pizza

12741 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1530

Al-Ajami

14633 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1345

Al Amin Poultry & Fish Market

8526 Conant Avenue
Hamtramck, MI 48211

Al-Berdouni

5821 Chase Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-2103

Al Ghadeer Meat Market

6550 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-1813

Al Masri Sweets

6235 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-2210

Al Nour Halal

500 Tobin Drive
Inkster, MI 48141

Al Saad Meat Market

10047 Vernor Highway
Dearborn, MI 48120-1513

Al-Saha Café

6321 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-2210

Al-Sultan (restaurant)

415 Inkster Road
Garden City, MI 48135

Al Ummah Pizza

G4084 Corunna Road
Flint, Michigan 48532

Al-Zahraa

13710 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1423

Aladdin

29410 Orchard Lake Road
Farmington Hills, MI 48334-2969

Aladdin Sweets Hamtramck

11945 Conant Avenue
Hamtramck, MI 48212

All American Ice Cream & Donut

25633 West Warren Street
Dearborn Heights, MI 48127-2045

Amanah Poultry & Grocery

10026 Conant Avenue
Hamtramck, MI 48212

Arabian Village Market

10040 Dix Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48120-1502

Arabica Bistro

14600 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1346

Ashoka

3642 Rochester Road
Troy, MI 48083-5213

Asian Jewellers

28534 Ford Road
Garden City, MI 48135-2842

Badawest

4018 Corunna Road
Flint, MI 48532-5011

Beirut Gardens Restaurant

19045 Eureka Road
Southgate, MI 48195-2928

Beirut Palace

2095 15 Mile Road
Sterling Heights, MI 48310-4805

Bengal Masala Café

9335 Conant
Hamtramck, MI 48212-3505

Berry & Son's Meats

10163 Dix Road
Dearborn, MI 48120-1501

Big Boy

13001 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-3553

Blimpie

108 West Hancock Street
Detroit, MI 48201-1304

Caffe Italia

41985 Ford Road
Canton, MI 48187-3648

Cedar Gardens

26348 Ford Road
Dearborn Heights, MI 48127-2854

Cedarland

13007 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1536

Cedarland

1615 South Opdyke Road
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-1043

Charara Window

4266 Bingham
Dearborn, MI 48126-3611

China Town Buffet

18900 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-3929

Country Chicken

5131 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-3229

Express Poultry & Fish

15038 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1352

Famous Hamburger

5808 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-2255

Fayrouz Boutique

7020 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-1817

Friday's Pizza & Subs

16135 West Warren Avenue
Detroit, MI 48228-3762

Golden Bakery

14526 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1344

Greenfield Seafood Grill

6761 Greenfield Road
Detroit, MI 48228-3720

Grill of India

2105 South Linden Road
Flint, MI 48532

Haggerty Fruit Market

1735 South Haggerty Road
Canton, MI 48188-3161

Halal Pizza

6521 Greenfield Avenue
Detroit, MI 48228-4765

Halal Select Snacks

3319 Greenfield Road, #104
Dearborn, MI 48120-1212

Hassan Brothers Halal Meat Shop

2904 East Long Lake Road
Troy, MI 48085-3780

Iraq Bakery

17015 West Warren
Detroit, MI 48228-3506

Iraqi Kabob

13650 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1421

Jordan's Pizza

5635 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-4714

JT's Pizzeria

5539 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-3253

Jouni Halal Meat

37234 Dequindre Road
Sterling Heights, MI 48310-3596

Jouni Meats

28958 Orchard Lake Road
Farmington Hills, MI 48334

Joy Road Auto Repair

20700 Joy Road
Detroit, MI 48228-1614

K & J Auto Service

29541 West 8 Mile Road
Livonia, MI 48152-1808

Kababish Restaurant

45490 Ford Road
Canton, MI 48187-4723

Kathmandu Chullo

411 South Washigton Avenue
Royal Oak, MI

Kassey's Baked Subs

5565 Woodward Avenue
Detroit, MI 48202-3803

Kentucky Fried Chicken

12721 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-3734

Kentucky Fried Chicken

10120 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1654

Kentucky Fried Chicken

606 South Rochester Road
Rochester Hills, MI 48307-2737

Khalid Meat

Dequender & Maple
Sterling Heights, MI

King Fish & Chicken

17022 West Warren
Detroit, MI 48228-3566

King Food Mart

20836 Telegraph Road
Browns Town, MI 48174-9319

La Marsa

35558 Grand River
Farmington Hills, MI 48335-3123

Law Offices of Akhtar & Associates

89 West South Blvd., Suite 600
Troy, MI

Lion Pizza

15029 West Warren
Dearborn, MI 48126-1351

Makkah Islamic Superstore

13300 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-3541

Malek Al Kabob

22371 Goddard Road
Taylor, MI 48180-4235

Mayur Indian Cuisine

5113 Rochester Road
Troy, MI 48085-3426

McDonalds

14864 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-3445

Mediterranean Express

4000 Baldwin Road
Auburn Hills, MI 48326-1221

Middle East Café

35000 West Warren Avenue
Westland, MI 48185-2011

Mowtown Chicken and Fish Xpress

18110 Plymouth
Detroit, MI 48228-1104

New Sahara Restaurant

29222 Orchard Lake Road
Farmington Hills, MI 48334-2965

New Yasmeen Bakery

13900 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1455

Noor Bakery

15301 Tireman Avenue
Dearborn, MI

Noor Tax Service

3044 Caniff Avenue
Hamtramck, MI 48212-3019

Oasis Grill & Café

12930 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1535

Original Al-Hallab

5125 Schaefer Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-3229

Peecher's Pizza Shoppe

15264 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-2933

Pine Land (restaurant)

13823 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-3521

Pita Prince

28811 Northwestern Highway
Southfield, MI 48034-1827

Prince Shish Kabobs

13057 Pardee Road
Taylor, MI 48180

Ram's Horn

6356 Greenfield Road
Dearborn, MI 48126-2060

Rio Wraps

Ford Road at Schaefer Highway
Dearborn, MI 48126

Roma Bakery

10618 West Warren
Dearborn, MI 48126-1541

Romarios Coney Island

24059 Orchard Lake Road
Farmington, MI 48336-2556

Royal Indian Cuisine

3877 Rochester Road
Troy, MI 48083-5245

Royal Palace

27346 Ford Road
Dearborn Heights, MI 48127-2892

Saad Wholesale Meats

2814 Orleans
Detroit, MI 48207-4531

Savers Discount Store

16427 West Warren Avenue
Detroit, MI 48228-3704

Shalimar Gardens

25125 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48124-1746

Shatila (restaurant)

14300 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1459

Sheeba Khan, Esq.

23023 Orchard Lake Road
Farmington, MI 48336-3209

Sizz'l-N-Spice

136 Monroe Street
Detroit, MI 48226

South Asian Grocery & Halal Meat

29406 Orchard Lake Road
Farmington Hills, MI 48334-2969

Station Sandwiches

13701 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1422

Subway

6781 Greenfield Road
Detroit, MI 48228-3720

Super Greenland Market

12715 West Warren Avenue
Dearborn, MI 48126-1530

Taboon at the Valley

3393 South Linden Road
Flint, MI 48507

Tawaa

28542 Ford Road
Garden City, MI 48135-2842

Taza Fresh Grill

16185 Dix-Toledo Road
Southgate, MI 48195-2948

Tikka Café

20838 Telegraph Road
Brownstown, MI 48174-9319

VG's Food Center

40832 Ryan Road
Sterling Heights, MI 48310-1716

Wal-Mart

5851 Mercury Drive
Dearborn, MI 48126-4161

Boycott of Mohamadan enterprises in Michigan

2008-05-30T19:00:00.003-04:00

In order to counter the Islamification of Michigan, freedom-loving people of that state must help themselves by undercutting the financial resources of the Islamists. This includes boycotting Mohamadan businesses. One of the pillars of Islam, called zakat, is alms giving. These funds often come from profits of businesses. Mohamadans typically donate proceeds to third parties such as mosques and Islamic charities who, in turn, send financial support to Hamas, Al-Kaida, Hezbollah and other jihadist groups. These jihadis have been killing civilized people and destroying institutions of democracy and liberty for far too long.

This practice of funding jihadis through alms giving is not new. The Holy Land Foundation in Dallas has been supporting Hamas. Numerous Islamic "civil rights" groups with connections to terrorists groups are listed in Steven Emerson's American Jihad:The Terrorists Living Among Us. Additionally, Mohamadans use the long-held practice of takkiya (Koran 16:106 & 3:28) to obscure the true nature of their actions with false words. Mohamadans will deny giving any of their incomes to terrorists. Therefore, we must assume that all Mohamadans are following the dictate of Mohamad ibn Addullah, the creator of Islam.

We wish to drive these and all Mohamadan enterprises out of business. Then these locations can be converted into establishments that actually benefit humanity such as shelters for abandoned dogs or public restrooms.

We have compiled a list of Mohamadan -owned enterprises in the Allah Arbor (a.k.a Ann Arbor) and Islamiya (a.k.a. Ypsilanti) region. Lists of other locations will follow.

A. M. Tax Consultants

3181 Packard
Ann Arbor, MI 48108

Abbas Phone Card & Grocery

2279 Ellsworth Road
Ypsilanti, MI 48197-4805

Access Travel International

3060 Packard Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48108-1944

Ahmo's Gyros
341 East Huron
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1908

Al Noor (restaurant)
233 Washtenaw Road
Ypsilanti, MI 48197-2525

Al Qamar (restaurant)
505 South Huron Street
Ypsilanti, MI 48197-5435

Aladdin's Market

3188 Packard Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48108-1947

Ali & Company, CPA, PC

2260 Woodhaven Court
Ann Arbor, MI 48105-9296

Ali Baba (restaurant)

601 Packard Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-3313

Ayse's Courtyard Cafe
1703 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48105-1800

Canton Center Auto Repair

345 Canton Center Road
Canton, MI 48188-1019

Chennai Vilas (restaurant)
207 North Main Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Eastern Flame (restaurant)

304 South Ashley
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-5800

Faz Hello Pizza

2259 West Liberty
Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4405

Golam Produce Market

3033 Packard
Ann Arbor, MI 48108

Jerusalem International Market

1713 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48105-1800

Lashish (restaurant)
2370 Carpenter Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48108-1102

Madras Masala (restaurant)
328 Maynard Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Mediterranean Market

4019 Stone School Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48108

Pita Kabob Grill
619 East William Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2419

Pita Pita Mediterranean Grill
2649 Washtenaw Road
Ypsilanti, MI 48197-1549

Raja Rani (restaurant)
400 S. Division
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Shan-e-Punjab (restaurant)
1143 Broadway
Ann Arbor, MI 48105-1807

Sottini's Subs
205 South Fourth Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2101

Sunshine International

3240 Packard Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48108-1952

Temptations (restaurant)
2876 Washtenaw Avenue
Ypsilanti, MI 48197-1507

University Bank

959 Maiden Lane
Ann Arbor, MI 48105-1901

Support Rep. Sue Myrick

2008-05-28T23:14:00.003-04:00

Americans determined to protect their lives and liberties against the encroachment of Islam must support the "Wake Up America" Agenda. This is a list a legal measures proposed by Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC). These can be viewed at this website: http://www.house.gov/list/press/nc09_myrick/wakeupamerica41808.html

These are her proposals:

“Wake Up America” Agenda

1. Will call for a government investigation of all US military chaplains who were approved by Abdurahman Alamoudi.

2. Will call for a government investigation of all US prison chaplains who were approved by Abdurahman Alamoudi.

3. Will call for the Government Accounting Office (GAO) to investigate the selection process of Arabic translators in the FBI and DoD.

4. Will call for the Internal Revenue Service to investigate the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) 501(c)(3) non-profit status which restricts “lobbying on behalf of a foreign government”.

5. Introduce a bill to make the preaching, publication, or distribution of materials that call for the death of American citizens, attacks on the United States Government or Armed Forces, or the financing of the means and/or operations to accomplish these acts, acts of sedition and/or solicitation of treason.

6. Will call on the Government Accountability Office to conduct an audit to verify the total sovereign wealth fund investment in the United States.

7. Will attempt to cancel scholarship student visa program with Saudi Arabia until they reform their textbooks.

8. Will introduce a bill to restrict R-1/R-2 religious visas for imams who come from countries that do not allow reciprocal visits by non-Muslim clergy.

9. Will introduce a bill to cancel contracts to train Saudi police and other security forces in US Counterterrorism tactics until the Saudi’s certify the prosecution of Al Qaeda financiers, like Yasin al-Kadi, and the detention of repatriated Guantanamo terrorists that keep being released into the general population after being “rehabilitated”.

10. Will introduce or sponsor a bill to block the sale of sensitive military munitions, especially Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs), to Saudi Arabia.

For those unfamiliar with Abdurahman Alamoudi, details of his criminal activities can be read at the Department of Justice's website:
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2004/October/04_crm_698.htm

Enemies under Our Noses

2008-05-15T15:56:00.004-04:00

To all those Islamists and their useful idiots in the appeasement movement who constantly whine about the detainees held at Guantanamo facilities, here is all the evidence needed to justify the continued imprisonment of captured jihadis:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/08/2238587.htm?section=world

It is outrageous that this savage was allowed to continue to live, with his Islamic-approved meals, housing, Koran, prayer rug and recreation paid for by the citizens of the U.S.A. By engaging in acts of war against the U.S.A., he proved he had been a sworn enemy of Americans. Additionally, since he was not in uniform while conducting military activity for a hostile force, he should have been considered a spy. Under the Geneva Convention Article 68, the occupying power may impose the death penalty. There is precedent for such executions considering that the U.S. Army executed by firing squad Germans soldiers committing acts of sabotage while not wearing their uniforms during the Battle of the Bulge in December 1944 and January 1945.

Unfortunately, jihadis not only conduct destructive operations in civilian clothing like Abdallah Salih al-Ajmi did. A U.S. Navy signalman, Hassan Abu-Jihad, passed sensitive naval information to jihadis. Even more egregeous, Asan Akbar, a sergeant in the U.S. Army, murdered Capt. Christopher Scott Seifert with a fragmentation grenade. Why are Americans so naive to even allow Mohamadans into their armed forces? Obviously, their ignorance of Koranic commandments to fight non-Mohamadans played a huge role in this stupifying tolerance. How many more Mohamadans have to sabotage operations or kill Americans until they agents of the enemy are barred from the armed forces of the U.S.A.?

Here are the links: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1981068/posts
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/03/24/101.attack.ap/

First Step of the Counter-Offensive

2008-05-09T14:39:00.003-04:00

Every inhabitant of the free world who cherishes his/her liberty has an obligation to aid efforts to halt the spread of Islam. A person need not enlist in the armed forces nor work law enforcement in order to accomplish this. Every man, women and child can assist the resistance to Islam by how and where one spends money. Through support of military and law enforcement personnel, the civilized people of the world also combat Mohamadan tyranny. Finally, free citizens must monitor and communicate with governmental employees and elected officials so that those in power realize the danger Islam poses and will make every effort to defeat the Islamists.

This effort includes disrupting the means of Islamists to finance their jihad. We will provide the names of businesses who are funneling their profits to jihadis. We expect that free people will boycott these enterprises plus encouraging others to do so. Islamic businesses function as leeches that thrive on the economies of the free world only to finance those who wish to destroy Western civilization.
Freedom-loving people are compelled to counter the implementation of Sharia. The true totalitarian nature of Islam reveals itself in the laws of Sharia. The second-class status of women and even lower status of non-Mohamadans is glaringly obvious under Sharia. The abolition of true freedom of religion, speech and others stands as a cornerstone of Islamic law.
The civilized world must use its liberties to fend off and overcome Islam. Otherwise, Islamists will exploit our rights to undermine and, ultimately, obliterate them. Free speech is worthless if someone is cowed into only speaking false platitudes about Islam or its creator, Mohamad ibn Abdullah. Islam must be challenged and exposed as the violent, misogynous, anti-Jewish, Christophobic and totalitarian ideology that it has always been.

COPYRIGHT MAY 2008 BY CHARLES KASTRIOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Wake Up-Call to the Free World

2008-05-06T20:28:00.003-04:00

The time has come for the free world to unite and confront its common enemy: Islam. It is not Islamic "fundamentalism", "extremism", "radicalism" or any other politically-correct euphemism that threatens the world. Islam, in its true and unadulterated form, menaces any and all who refuse to convert or submit to its adherents' tyranny.

It has become abundantly clear that very few in the free world realize the true evil nature of Mohamad ibn Abdullah and his ideology he dubbed "Islam". Governments of states in Europe and in the Americas foolishly allow Mohamadans to immigrate in huge numbers into their countries despite the clearly stated hostility of Mohamadans to non-Islamic societies. Mohamadans infiltrate free societies, exploiting freedom found there to propagate Islam. Their efforts have led to legal prohibitions against criticizing any aspect of Islam or its adherents such as the "hate-speech codes" in Australia, Canada & throughout Europe. Additionally, Mohamadans take advantage of the liberated economies to raise funds for jihadists to kill and destroy non-Mohamadans around the world.

Therefore, individuals in the free world must take the initiative to defeat Islam. This includes boycotting Mohamadan-owned enterprises and refusing to conduct any business with Mohamadans. We must appeal to governmental agencies and political leaders to resist Sharia-creep. Whether it is installing foot-washes in public restrooms, permitting Mohamadan women to obscure their faces in public or any other manifestation of Islamic corruption of free societies, no ground can be allowed to Islamists. Islam is the cancer that will kill the free world if it is not halted and eliminated.